Tag Archives: RC

Report: Lexus to replace GX SUV with new TX crossover

By Jeffrey N. Ross

2012 Lexus GX

Filed under:

There’s been a lot of news regarding future Lexus products recently, including spy shots of new RC coupe and NX compact crossover, and reports that a 2+2 coupe based on the LF-LC concept is heading for production. Now, Automotive News says that Japan’s #1 luxury automaker is planning to replace the fullsize, body-on-frame Lexus GX SUV with a three-row crossover called the TX.

The article says that the GX, which is based on the foreign-market Toyota Land Cruiser Prado, will get a styling update for 2014 before being phased out in 2016. In a similar move as Infiniti made with its new three-row JX/QX60, the new TX will be car-based, but details are still unknown as to whether it will be front-wheel-drive riding on the Toyota Avalon platform or rear-wheel-drive using the Lexus GS platform. Either way, this new luxury crossover could join the Lexus lineup as soon as late 2016.

Lexus to replace GX SUV with new TX crossover originally appeared on Autoblog on Wed, 31 Jul 2013 11:31:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Autoblog

Saints Row IV: Capitalising on Classification Confusion

On Monday afternoon it was announced that Saints Row IV had been slapped with a fresh Refused Classification rating by the Australian Classification Review Board. The Classification Review Board is a separate panel which reevaluates classification decisions made by the Australian Classification Board. Its decisions then take the place of the original ones.

It’s easy to be cynical about what looks like just another layer of classification bureaucracy but publishers have successfully had RC ratings overturned in the past. In December 2009 the Classification Review Board quashed a Refused Classification decision for Aliens vs. Predator, opting for an MA15+ rating instead. The Classification Review Board agreed with SEGA’s Australian branch that the violence in the game, while extreme, was acceptable within the context of the Alien franchise.

Continue reading…

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at IGN Video Games

Spy Shots: Are you the Lexus GS F?

By Steven J. Ewing

Lexus GS F spy shot - rear three-quarter in garage

Filed under:

It’s been a while since we’ve heard rumors of the fabled high-performance Lexus GS F, but thanks to our eager spy photographers, this looks to be our first real proof of the machine’s existence. We don’t have the usual brace of photos from all angles to work with this time around, our spies saying that every time Lexus‘ garage door opened, engineers jumped in front of the cameras to prevent the car from being photographed.

Even so, we have a pretty clear glimpse at some significant changes to this GS sedan, including the same staggered, quad-pipe exhaust found on the Lexus IS F. There’s also an air diffuser panel nestled between the exhaust outlets, as well as a larger lip spoiler and unique wheels (matching those of the RC coupe) wrapped in high-performance tires.

Last time we heard rumors of the GS F’s existence, sources predicted that the M5-fighting sedan would use a tuned version of Lexus’ 5.0-liter V8, producing something like 465 horsepower. We have also heard that the automaker plans to reduce weight wherever possible, and that the final curb weight will be something like 3,700 pounds.

Of course, those earlier reports said we’d see the car as early as 2012, and that obviously didn’t happen. These days, our spies’ best guess is that the GS F will arrive in time for the 2015 model year.

Are you the Lexus GS F? originally appeared on Autoblog on Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Autoblog

How to exit a script with error ?

By Salil Gupta

Hi,

I have a script ABC which calls another script XYZ. Function of XYZ is to ftp a file from one server to another.

code for ABC:

Code:

#!/bin/ksh
PATH=/usr/bin

home/user/xyz "$@"

exit $?
~


code for xyz:

Code:

#!/bin/ksh
HOSTNAME=$1
SRCNAME=$2
DSTNAME=$3

### This file holds the outget of the FTP commands for success checking
FTPCHK=/tmp/ftpchk.$$
#touch $FTPCHK
echo "" > $FTPCHK

SRCFILE=$SRCNAME

DSTFILE=$DSTNAME

echo Source Host: $HOSTNAME
echo Source File Name: $SRCFILE
echo Destination File: $DSTFILE

echo `date` Beginning FTP download...
ftp -v ${HOSTNAME} <>$FTPCHK 2>&1
ascii
nlist ${SRCFILE}
get ${SRCFILE} ${DSTFILE}
quit
EOF

### Check for FTP errors
CHK1=`grep -c "226 Transfer complete." $FTPCHK`
CHK2=`grep -c "226 ASCII Transfer complete." $FTPCHK`
CHK3=`grep -ic "226 transfer complete" $FTPCHK`
CHK4=`grep -ic "226 File send OK." $FTPCHK`

### In NT, There should transmissions complete:
### One for the data transfer,
### One for the nlist

if [ $CHK1 -eq 2 ] || [ $CHK2 -eq 2 ] || [ $CHK1 -eq 1 -a $CHK2 -eq 1 ] || [ $CHK3 -eq 2 ] || [ $CHK4 -eq 1 ]; then
RC=0
echo "OK: FTP Transmission Worked"
echo '--------------------------------------------------------------'
cat $FTPCHK
echo '--------------------------------------------------------------'

else
RC=1
echo "ERROR: FTP Transmission Failed"
banner "ERROR"
echo '--------------------------------------------------------------'
cat $FTPCHK
echo '--------------------------------------------------------------'
fi

date
ls -al ${DSTFILE}

rm $FTPCHK

echo '---------------------------------------------------------------------'

exit $RC


In script XYZ, I am trying to ftp a file. So during ftp , whenever it shows that space is less than size of file, it should ftp the partial according to the available space and prompt a message about it and also prompt a message to outer script that inner script could not complete successfully. Hence resulting in the failure of outer script, due to partial ftp of file.

Also please post the comments about the each step of script to explain what is happening in that step. Thanks a lot in advance.

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at The UNIX and Linux Forums

Lexus Reportedly will Debut RC350 at Tokyo Auto Show, RC F in Detroit

By Andrew Wendler

When we caught a few spy shots of the pending Lexus RC hiding under that swirly black and white camouflage earlier this month, we already had a pretty good bead on the car’s architecture and potential powertrain options, but could only speculate regarding its timeline for rollout. Now, Automotive News is reporting that the RC350 will debut at November’s Tokyo auto show, followed by debut of the RC F performance variant in January at the Detroit auto show.

Being conscientious types, we got on the horn to Lexus pronto, hoping for an official comment. True to form, the brand had none, other than mentioning that any official teasers or pre-previews probably would take take place “three months or so” before any legitimate unveiling. Based on such a timeline, expect to see Lexus’s first teasers for the new RC in August.



Automotive News goes on to say that the RC350 will begin trickling into showrooms in late 2014. Predictably, the RC350 will be powered by Lexus’s ubiquitous 3.5-liter V-6, while AN reports that Lexus sources say the RC F will be powered by a 460-hp V-8. Video of the RC F being tested would suggest that’s the case, but our sources hinted that a 3.5-liter V-6 with forced induction was a real possibility. Regardless of engine choices, it’ll be interesting to see how much of the LF-CC concept’s styling makes the transition to these production vehicles.

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Car & Driver

Followup: Lexus coupe caught in spy shots actually RC, headed for Tokyo reveal?

By Brandon Turkus

Filed under:

Lexus may have pulled a fast one on us. The car our spy shooters spotted yesterday may not, in fact, be an IS F Coupe as we indicated. Rather, the car shown above may be a new model, dubbed RC, that will arrive at this year’s Tokyo Motor Show.

Following a report from Automotive News, the RC is believed to be a pure coupe, rather than a hardtop convertible. This gels with information provided on the IS sedan’s launch, when Lexus spokespeople said the IS Convertible would remain on the current platform. With styling based on the LF-CC from the 2012 Paris show, the new car will share a rear-drive platform with the IS and GS sedans.

Power is expected to come from a 3.5-liter V6 that turns out 306 horsepower. That car will likely wear the RC 350 badge. A hybrid model is expected to follow, but in a twist, it won’t be coming to the US. The big news, though, is that the RC will spawn an RC F.

Sources told AN that a 460-hp V8 will replace the 416-hp mill found in the current IS F, allowing the RC F to really duke it out with Stuttgart, Munich, and Ingolstadt.

Where does that leave the IS F? We can’t be sure, but with Mercedes-Benz and BMW both offering (now or in the future) fast, compact sedans, we wouldn’t bet on Lexus sitting out. We can expect to see a production RC F at the 2014 Detroit Auto Show, with examples arriving in dealers later that year.

Lexus coupe caught in spy shots actually RC, headed for Tokyo reveal? originally appeared on Autoblog on Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:29:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Autoblog

2015 Lexus RC F Spy Photos: The Two-Door IS Gets a New Name and an F Variant

By John Lamm

2015 Lexus RC F (spy photo)

What It Is: A coupe companion to the recently launched IS that may be badged as the RC. Lexus holds trademarks on both “RC350” and “RC F,” and such a change to the two-door IS’s moniker would make sense considering the trend in this direction—the coupe version of Audi’s A4 being called A5, and BMW recently opting to launch the latest 3-series coupe as the 4-series. This particular example is a step up from the 306-hp IS350 F Sport not just in performance, but in attitude. That’s evident in the flared fenders hiding under that cute curlicue camo, the functional hood scoop, an abundance of oversized intakes and vents, and the lip spoiler. READ MORE ››

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Car & Driver

Help with thermostat wire mapping

By Tinman_99

I’m looking to switch from what I think is a Peco T158, to something better/newer. However, this doesn’t have any wires mapped to what I see in other thermo installs, it’s simply 1 through 17, with 3, 4, 5, 6, 10 and 12 connected and 114 connected together. I have found some T158 manuals online, but they still don’t reference the terms I see in other thermostats, like RH, RC, G, Y/Y1/C, W/H, O/B/R, etc.

Peco install guide:
http://www.pecomanufacturing.com/ass…tion_Guide.pdf

tia for any help mapping to a Nest or newer thermostat with the alphanumeric labels.

See attached photo for the stock thermo i’m looking to replace, thanks!

Attached Images

…read more

Source: DoItYourself.com

Wiring AC to Furnace Terminals

By aharmona

Hello folks,

I have an American Standard Silver Series furnace installed and I’m trying to figure out which terminals the red and white wires from the air conditioner should connect to. I’ve tried Red with R and White with W obviously but nothing happens. My father-in-law installed the furnace and didn’t bother with the AC saying he’d get to it later but he doesn’t know anything about the wiring anyway.

The Silver Series terminals are as follows C, G, R, W,Y, TWIN. with Green, Red, Yellow and White wires connected according to their first letters.
The Hunter thermostat (model 44110) terminals are G, RC (with a jumper to) RH, Y, W with Green, Red, Yellow and White wires connected according to the letters with the Red wire connected to the RH terminal.
There is a blue wire which isn’t connected to any terminal in the thermostat or the furnace.

I had written down where the wires for the AC were connected prior but the previous furnace had a T terminal. Also I believe the Red wire was connected to the Y terminal and the White wire to the T Terminal.

If anyone can makes heads or tails of this and can tell me where the AC Red and White wires should go to, I’d be most grateful.

Thank you!

Source: DoItYourself.com

Raphaël Hertzog: My Free Software Activities in March 2013

This is my monthly summary of my free software related activities. If you’re among the people who made a donation to support my work (114.19 €, thanks everybody!), then you can learn how I spent your money. Otherwise it’s just an interesting status update on my various projects.

Simple-CDD and debian-cd

I tried to use wheezy’s version of debian-cd and simple-cdd to generate an automatic installer. In this process, I filed a couple of bugs on simple-cdd (#701963: type-handling package is gone and should not be listed in default.downloads, and #701998: the --keyboard parameter is not working with wheezy’s debian-installer) and I commited fixes for a few issues in debian-cd:

  • r2518: adjust Makefile for new xorriso requirement
  • r2520: add missing depends on dosfstools
  • r2521: use --no-check-gpg when querying debootstrap
  • r2522: make debian-cd work with a mirror without sources)

Debian France

I completed the new website for Debian France and I put it online. Later I merged some supplementary enhancements prepared by Tanguy Ortolo (and I gave him commits rights at the same time).

I tried to update our Galette installation to the latest upstream version but I reverted to the former version after having encountered two problems (filed here and here). In the process, I created a Debian package for galette (you can grab it on git.debian.org).

I also suggested an idea of improvement for Galette’s paypal plugin and it has been quickly implemented. Thus I updated the plugin installed on france.debian.net.

Kali related work

It’s been a few months that I have been helping the Kali team to prepare this new Debian derivative. Now that the derivative has gone public, I can attribute some of my Debian work to my collaboration with the Kali team.

This month I contributed a few features and fixes to debian-installer and live-build:

After the launch, we registered Kali in the derivative census. Paul Wise quickly reported some misfiled bugs from early Kali users and I discovered that reportbug was not behaving properly even though we correctly updated base-files (see #703678 on reportbug and #703677 on lsb-release).

Misc packaging work

  • I sponsored a new upstream version of dnsjava because it’s required by Jitsi.
  • I prepared rebuild 0.4.1.1 and uploaded it to testing-proposed-updates for a RC bug fix.
  • I uploaded Publican 3.1.5 to experimental and filed #703514 to request a new upstream version of docbook-xsl that is needed by Publican.
  • I filed #703995 to fix apt-setup’s handling of the apt-setup/multiarch preseed option.

DPL election

I also spent quite some time to read and participate to the discussions on debian-vote since it was campaigning time for the DPL candidates

Thanks

This was a rather active month if you take into account the fact that I got a second son — Lucas — on March 6th.

See you next month for a new summary of my activities.

No comment | Liked this article? …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Planet Ubuntu

The Investment Profile of the Modern Baseball Card, Part 2

By Jeff Hwang, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

In Part 1 of this series, we noted seven good reasons how the investment profile of modern baseball cards has improved dramatically over the past 20 years or so:

  1. Graded cards and multiple expansion.
  2. Smaller print runs yielding upside leverage.
  3. Short-printed rookie cards, limited-print serialized parallels, and autographed prospect and rookie cards.
  4. An enhanced baseball prospecting game.
  5. Enhanced liquidity because of the presence of eBay and graded cards, as well as the presence of new online trading sites such as COMC.com.
  6. A half-generation of current untapped potential demand.
  7. Fantasy sports, sports betting, and untapped redemand.

We discussed the first three points in Part 1. Let’s go on to point  No. 4.

An enhanced baseball prospecting game
In 1992, Topps changed the rookie-card game forever by including cards of prospects who had yet to play a game in the big leagues — and were often pictured in street clothes — in its landmark 1992 Bowman set. As this practice continued, the prospect cards included in Bowman sets were considered to be a player’s rookie card until 2006, when only players who had been placed on a team’s 25-man roster could have an “official” rookie card featuring the official MLBPA Rookie Card logo.

However, Topps was grandfathered into the practice of including minor-league prospects in its major-league sets, and it continues to include prospect cards as “inserts” in its Bowman, Bowman Chrome, Bowman Draft, Bowman Platinum, and Bowman Sterling sets. (The term “insert” is used loosely here, as draft picks make up 165 of the 220 base cards found in packs of 2012 Bowman Draft, for example, while “official” rookie cards make up the other 55.) And official designations aside, collectors still recognize a player’s first Bowman card — labeled “1st Bowman Card” and “1st Bowman Chrome Card” for the chrome versions — as a player’s true effective rookie card, whether it’s included in the Bowman, Bowman Chrome, or Bowman Draft packs.

Whether this is good for the hobby is a source of debate. On one hand, there’s no question that the “official” RC vs. 1st Bowman Card problem — along with the fact that Topps includes the 1st Bowman cards in three different sets each year — can be quite confusing to new collectors, or anybody who hasn’t bought a baseball card in the past decade or two. Moreover, most of the 1st Bowman Cards are of players who are several years away from playing in the majors, if at all, and with an extremely high wash-out rate. Contrast this with a sport like hockey, where at least a player must actually play in the NHL before having a rookie card, or football, where every player who plays in the NFL and has a rookie card has generally played three or four years of college before turning pro.

As a consequence, baseball cards are generally far more speculative upon initial release than are their football, hockey, and basketball counterparts.

On the other hand, we know where to find the key cards every …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

RSH issue…trigged from mainframe on UNIX

By Yuvaraj737

I’m invoking RSH from mainframe to trigger a shell script on unix. The Unix shell script return code is not realized back by RSH in mainframe. Even if the script finishes ‘exit -1’, still RSH gets RC 00 in mainframe.

I want ‘exit -1’ to be read as RSH failure RC and ‘exit 0’ as RSH RC 00 respectively. I want the subsequent mainframe steps to be flushed out if RSH returns failure RC.

How to achieve this? Any advice unix kings??

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at The UNIX and Linux Forums

Report: Lexus LF-LC approved for production

By Jonathon Ramsey

Lexus LF-LC concept - front three-quarter view, maroon

Filed under:

On the sidelines of a press drive for the 2014 Lexus IS, the company’s vice president of marketing in the US told Ward’s Auto that the honchos in Japan have approved the Lexus LF-LC concept for production. He wouldn’t offer any other details on how the luxury coupe might be transformed into a vehicle for the buying masses, and that has led to a bag full of speculation.

The show car was hybrid-powered and rear-wheel drive, a beautifully executed stab by Toyota designers in Newport Beach at redefining Lexus, but even with the concept, the point was to keep it “within reach for premium buyers.” The report says the odds are on limited production and higher pricing than Lexus’ “mainstream products,” and other sites have speculated on what kind of powertrain it might end up in showrooms with.

GT Channel posits that the LF-LC will be the inspiration for a coupe in the Lexus LS price bracket with a choice of either the 4.2-liter V8 or the hybrid powertrain from the LS 600h, further speculating it will be called LC 550 and cost more than $100,000. It then says that there would be another coupe created beneath that one to replace the SC 430. Lexus Enthusiast, however, calls those “warmed-over rumors” and says that the marque probably won’t deviate from its engine-capacity-naming scheme – labeling a car with a 4.2-liter V8 an LC 550. Nor does it think Lexus will use the letters LC after the company has trademarked “RC” in the US and Australia.

Time will sort the rumors from the truth, but we can probably start to admit that we’re look forward to it.

Lexus LF-LC approved for production originally appeared on Autoblog on Thu, 28 Mar 2013 14:01:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Autoblog

KScreen 0.1-RC1 released

After a few more weeks of hard work in KScreen we are glad to announce the release of our first release candidate. We decided to jump directly from alpha1 to RC because of all the great feedback we have received and thesurprisinglysmall list of reported bugs

We’ll probably do another RC release to test some of the code that is not yet in this version,like supporting the restoration of manually added resolutions (something only needed for broken monitors).

Tarballs:
http://download.kde.org/unstable/libkscreen/0.0.81/src/libkscreen-0.0.81.tar.bz2.mirrorlist
http://download.kde.org/unstable/kscreen/0.0.81/src/kscreen-0.0.81.tar.bz2.mirrorlist

Cheers !

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Planet KDE

How to check whether files are transferred or not using ftp?

By Little

Hi,

i want to execute a shell script which transfers files from one server to another using ftp in unix. How can i check whether the ftp is successful or not.(i.e files are transferred to destination server). because if i am checking the return code of ftp, it always shows 0 (denoting ftp is success). but when i check the remote server , the files are not transferred. can any1 help me out.. my sample code for ftp is

Code:

ECHO="/bin/echo -e"

ftp -n $REMOTE_MC <<_FTP1
quote USER $REMOTE_UID
quote PASS $REMOTE_PWD
lcd $LOCAL_FOLDER
cd $REMOTE_FOLDER
prompt noprompt
binary
mput $LOCAL_FNAME
quit
_FTP1

RC=$?
$ECHO "RC = $RC"
if [ $RC -eq 0 ]; then
$ECHO "FTP successfull....."
else
$ECHO "FTP failed"
fi
fi


Thanks

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at The UNIX and Linux Forums

Decide What You Want in The Saints Row IV Collector's Edition

Deep Silver is requesting fan input with regards to the contents of a Saints Row IV Collector’s Edition.

The publisher has set up a survey in which you can express how interested you are in various items appearing in a special edition bundle on a scale of 1 (HELL NO!) to 5 (AWWWW YEAH!).

Items mentioned include t-shirts, pins, hats, flags, figurines, posters, RC helicopters, books, maps and even a display case. There’s also reference to a “functional (not deadly!) in-game weapon replica”. Given Deep Silver‘s previous collector’s edition woes, we reckon that bit in brackets is probably for the best.

Continue reading…

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at IGN Video Games

Bryan Quigley: Rolling Release – w/ Upstream Stable Cadence, Upstream Beta Cadence, and Limited Delta Buffer

Upstream Stable Cadence

We track upstreams, what they consider stable, we consider stable, we ship in rolling release under *conditions.

Upstream Beta Cadence

We track upstreams beta/rc repo, what they consider “almost stable”, we consider worth getting extremely easy user testing.  We try to ship in Rolling Release archive, but with different package names.  This will not work for everything.   Some upstreams don’t really have RC/beta releases, others might be too complicated to keep in repo.

For example, meta-packages for:  firefox-beta, linux-rcs, etc.
Goal would be to evaluate doing this with packages in main only.  Others, like all of Gnome, might need a different plan.

Data.  Lots of data.

We need data that we can get an idea of how stable a product is. Some combination of reported bugs, automatic bugs, weighted in different ways.
The data should be generated from both the beta  and stable releases.

We also need to better connect users of the beta releases to upstream, faster, when they have a problem.

“Limited Delta Buffer” (*conditions)

First – Big changes to stable release separated by 3 weeks initially.  New Kernel and new Xorg both want to get in?  Only 1 get’s in every 3 weeks.  In this case I would suggest letting the kernel go first, then three weeks later Xorg get’s in.   This limits the volatility of the rolling release by limiting updates from all coming at the same time.
Second – Data driven modifications to buffering time, who get’s in first, and what blocks what.    For a new kernel the data would come from that exact kernel in the beta package,   If we find that the kernel never breaks anything and is super stable, move it to just a one week buffer.
Third – refine if we consider upstream to be “wrong”.  Maybe Linux kernel rc3 and above is all we ship in beta package, etc.

Rationale: We need a new concept of a stable system for a Rolling Release.  It should take advantage of and contribute to upstreams own stabilization procedures (their “beta cadence”) while limiting the rate of change (delta) users of the rolling release need to deal with.   As for using ‘Months’, they are way to arbitrary.  Some months there will be nothing interesting, others we could have a new kernel, Xorg, Unity, and Gnome.

Obviously, this isn’t perfect and needs a bunch more refinement, I just wanted to get this out there before March 18th (the deadline for proposals).  Thanks for reading and please let me know what you think.

 

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Planet Ubuntu

KDE SC 4.11 Release Schedule

You can find it at http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.11_Release_Schedule

There are two main changes agreed by Release Team against the previous releases:
* No specified time between Beta and RC tag and release. We will try to release them ASAP after the tag to make them as useful as possible
* No release with broken tests. We won’t release if there are tests that do not pass in build.kde.org. So please start caring about tests that do not pass …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Planet KDE

Northrop Wins $93 Million in Pentagon Contracts

By Rich Smith, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Over the past two in-sequester days, the Pentagon has awarded a total of 42 separate contracts to various contractors, worth well over $4 billion in aggregate.

Among many beneficiaries, Northrop Grumman won a total of four contracts in two days:

  • The largest of the four awards, for $49.3 million, came in the form of a contract for “guardrail modernization system spare parts.”Contrary to what the name might suggest, this contract has nothing to do with roadside safety, rather referring to the U.S. Army’s upgrade of its RC-12X “Guardrail” signals intelligence (SIGINT) aircraft, which is built upon a Beechcraft King Air turboprop chassis. The contract has a March 5, 2018 completion date.
  • Northrop Grumman won a $22.2 million contract modification award on its contract to upgrade the cryptography on remote key/code changes in the nation’s ICBM fleet. This contract runs through Aug. 3, 2013.
  • The company’s Electronic Systems Sector, Land and Self Protection Systems Division, won an $11.7 million modification to a previously awarded contract “for software and the integration of that software into the hardware design of the AN/APR-39D(V)2processor and appropriate antennas and receiver resources in support of various naval aviation platforms.” This award refers to upgrades on radar “threat” receivers, which alert a pilot to the fact that he is being tracked by enemy weapons-targeting radar. Work on this one should be completed by March 2014.
  • Finally, Northrop’s Information Systems division won a $9.8 million contract exercising an option on a previous contract for systems sustainment in support of a biometrics database. Completion date: Feb. 28, 2014.

link

The article Northrop Wins $93 Million in Pentagon Contracts originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Rich Smith has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Northrop Grumman. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Dolphin 2.2 is there!

I told you about the changes in Dolphin 2.2 some time ago already. Here is a summary of the last bugs that were fixed during the beta/RC phase:

  • Bug 311582: Fix another “View fails to update after changes in the directory” issue. See git commit 74b0d33a.
  • Bug 310770: Use the correct default settings for Nepomuk. See git commits 530c743a, fe4bb558, review request 107464.
  • Bug 304299: Use only one application instance when opening multiple files if possible. See git commit e45a847d, review request 107305.
  • Bug 311782: Do not show “Directory loading has been cancelled” message if an error occurs. See git commit 07ee7c06, review request 107787.
  • Use the new Nepomuk2::MetaDataWidget for the Information Panel, which provides many improvements compared to KFileMetaDataWidget. See git commits 487d6dd5, da5b7dcd, 32d5e287.
  • Fix crash when browsing contents of Bluetooth device. See git commit 90c7fd40.
  • Bugs 262464, 312812,313992: Show file names in plain text, even if the file name contains HTML tags. See git commits 4e6d2d84, e27c4b3a, f05e18db, 8a97ca66, review requests 108291, 108336, 108307, 108584. Nice example that shows how tricky it can be to get something right that looks extremely trivial.
  • Bug 312679: Fix crash when sorting by “Date” and the modification time of some files is close to a shift to/from daylight saving time. See git commit 715f00a9, review request 108309. This was actually caused by the new parallel sorting algorithm – it turned out that comparing dates is not reentrant.
  • Bug 311794: Show correct duration for audio files. See git commit d23631d0, review request 108281.
  • Bug 314338: Do not delay the popup menu when clicking the “Create New” toolbar button. See git commit 4d9af664, review request 108397.
  • Bug 290736: Select the correct item as the new current item after deleting files. See git commit 14e5ba5b, review request 108356.
  • Bug 302264: Fix crash when showing version-controlled directories. See git commit a9d7ebbc, review request 107656.
  • Use the correct icon size in the “Edit places entry” dialog. See git commit 99f200d2, review request 108443.
  • Bug 313151: Allow “timeline” URLs as homepage. See git commit 87a4eb9e, review request 108428.
  • Bug 313466: Make the “A folder cannot be dropped into itself” message less intrusive. See git commit c1051731, review request 108483.
  • Do not update Nepomuk data more often than necessary. See git commit af280715, review request 108543.

Those who have not upgraded to Dolphin 2.2 yet can enjoy at least the bug fixes that are also in the last bug fix update for Dolphin 2.1: