Tag Archives: President Ronald Reagan

The Border Fence: Horrible Deal At Cost Up To $40,000 Per Illegal Immigrant Apprehended

By Richard Finger, Contributor There are few topics today that arouse more passionate debate than the current immigration reform bill which though recently passed by overwhelming majority (68-32) in the senate most probably will, according to the political cognoscenti, languish in our fractious House of Representatives. Not only is this not a new issue, it has been tackled through various iterations over the past three quarters of a century. The Bracero Program from 1942-1964 was designed to alleviate wartime labor shortages in the agricultural sector. Workers were often taken advantage of through very poor wages and abysmal living conditions while unions offered strenuous objections over American workers being displaced. The H-2 visa program guarantees guest workers a minimum wage and other protections and at the end of the contract period that person returns to his or her country of origin. In the “Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986” sitting President Ronald Reagan famously offered immediate blanket amnesty to an estimated 2.8 million illegal immigrants and a simple five year path to citizenship. (I will come back to this). In 2004, President George W. Bush’s proposal to mend our nation’s immigration cleavage through “Fair and Secure Immigration Reform” foundered. …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

Thatcher's Death Renews Debate Over 1980s Economic Policies

By The Associated Press

Filed under: , ,

Howard L. Sachs/AP/DPA U.K. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher speaks after visiting U.S. President Ronald Reagan at the White House in July 1987. Thatcher’s death Monday has renewed debate about the economic policies pursued by both leaders.

By ADAM GELLER

Believers hailed its reduced tax rates and deregulation as springboards for economic miracles under the leadership of President Ronald Reagan and British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. Critics dismissed the very same ideas as so much trickle-down hocus-pocus and voodoo.

It’s been most of three decades since debate over “supply-side” economic policies was at the center of U.S. politics. But for the moment, talk of conservative economic ideas that were as central to the story of the 1980s as Michael Jackson‘s moonwalk and the first MacIntosh personal computer is back. Why? A pair of its leading proponents have returned to the headlines.

Memories of economic days gone by were rekindled last week when David Stockman, Reagan’s budget director, unleashed a scathing attack on years of decision-making by U.S. leaders, including his former boss. It continued this week, when Thatcher’s death on Monday prompted recollections — some fond, others not so much — of how the Iron Lady imposed her will on a long-stagnant British economy.

‘Time Machine’

The confluence of events got economists waxing about what the past means for today, although there’s disagreement on how much supply-side’s ideas have been abandoned in the U.S. or are just awaiting their moment of return. In the meantime, there was Arthur Laffer, the U.S. economist often called the father of supply-side, back on television three times Monday, recalling a warm friendship with Thatcher that highlighted a time when prevailing wisdom on taxes, deficits, and the roles of government and individuals was very different.

“We’re back in the time machine,” said Yoram Bauman, a Seattle economist who makes a living doing stand-up comedy about the dismal science — and who has long opened with a joke or two about supply-side to test the depth and endurance of his audience’s knowledge.

Supply-side economists argued that reducing taxes through lower rates would encourage work, saving and investment. Early supply-side theory promised that the reduced tax rates could pay for themselves by raising tax revenues. Under Reagan, the government lowered tax rates and reduced government regulation as the Federal Reserve worked to rein in inflation. The administration’s focus on lowering tax rates for the wealthy, labeled “trickle-down economics,” reflected the belief that these gains would encourage the rich to spend and invest more to create jobs for others.

Now that theory — and Bauman’s comic material, for that matter — may have found its moment, but it’s not clear how long it will last.

‘Destruction of Fiscal Rectitude’

It began last week when Stockman wrote a lengthy opinion piece in The New York Times, followed by interviews, to …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Thatcher's ceremonial funeral to include full military honors

The British government says former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s funeral will be held April 17.

Undertakers on Tuesday removed the ex-leader’s body from London’s Ritz Hotel, where she died Monday, amid preparations for a ceremonial funeral with full military honors.

A van carrying Thatcher’s casket left the hotel for an undisclosed location.

Officials say Thatcher’s funeral will be held with full military honors at St. Paul’s Cathedral. It is not technically a state funeral, which requires a vote in Parliament, but is the same level of honor given Princess Diana and the Queen Mother Elizabeth.

Thatcher’s coffin will lie overnight at the Houses of Parliament before the funeral, and then travel on a horse-drawn gun carriage to the cathedral along a route lined by military personnel.

“The Iron Lady” died at 87 after suffering a stroke.

“It is with great sadness that Mark and Carol Thatcher announced that their mother Baroness Thatcher died peacefully following a stroke this morning,” Thatcher spokesperson Lord Bell said Monday in a statement.

Thatcher led Britain’s Conservatives to three election victories from 1979 to 1990, the longest continuous period in office by a British prime minister since the early 19th century. Alongside former U.S. President Ronald Reagan, Thatcher battled against communism and saw the Berlin Wall get torn down in 1989.

“We have lost a great leader, a great prime minister and a great Briton,” British Prime Minister David Cameron said in a statement.

Tony Blair, a former British prime minister, said Thatcher had a vast impact on the world.

“Very few leaders get to change not only the political landscape of their country but of the world,” he said. “Margaret was such a leader.”

President Barack Obama said with Thatcher’s death, America has lost a “true friend,” while former President George W. Bush echoed Blair’s sentiment, calling Thatcher an “inspirational leader.”

Prime Minister Thatcher is a great example of strength and character, and a great ally who strengthened the special relationship between the United Kingdom and the United States,” Bush said in a statement.

Buckingham Palace said Queen Elizabeth II was sad to hear the news of Thatcher’s passing, adding that she would be sending a private message of sympathy to the family.

It said the funeral will be attended by a “wide and diverse range of people,” and the service will be followed by a private cremation.

During 11 bruising years as prime minister, Thatcher transformed her country by a ruthless dedication to free markets and infuriated European allies. She transferred large chunks of the economy from the state hands to private ownership.

“The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money,” she once said, according to Reuters.

To her fervent admirers, battling Maggie was an icon, a national savior who ended Britain’s post-World War II cycle of confrontation and decline — eclipsed as a 20th-century British leader only by Winston Churchill.

Her vehement critics, however, saw her as a bellicose figure at home and abroad, a destroyer of industries and, with it, a way of life.

She was a sharply divisive figure even within her Conservative …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox World News

Thatcher detonated change in UK business

It went beyond the Big Bang.

Margaret Thatcher transformed the British economy over little more than a decade in office. She introduced free-market policies that helped the country throw off its postwar malaise and shook up the cozy world of banks and brokers with a flurry of deregulation — which came to be known as the “Big Bang” — that made London one of the world’s pre-eminent financial centers.

But while Thatcher ushered in an era of unprecedented economic growth, her legacy on economic issues remains divisive. Some argue her policies also sowed the seeds for the 2008 financial crisis. Meanwhile, the economy is on the verge of another recession and she is still reviled by unions who say she ignored the needs of workers and the poor.

“To supporters, she changed Britain from a nation in long term industrial decline to an energetic, dynamic economy. To opponents, she entrenched inequalities between the regions and classes, and placed the free market above all other concerns,” Richard Carr, a political historian at Anglia Ruskin University said in statement. “Our politics, and many of our politicians, have been forged in her legacy.”

When Thatcher arrived at 10 Downing Street in May 1979, Britain’s first female prime minister set about smashing the existing economic order. Along with her conservative soulmate, President Ronald Reagan, she rejected the way economic policy had been conducted since the end of World War II in favor of a focus on free market ideology that is accepted by most of the world today.

The woman who said she learned to be careful with money by watching her green-grocer father sought to reduce the government‘s footprint in the economy, diminished labor unions’ powers and overhauled London‘s financial center.

In 1986, just a year before the movie “Wall Street” coined the phrase “greed is good,” Thatcher pushed through a flurry of reforms, the so-called Big Bang, which broke up the “boys’ club” culture that dominated the City of London. The changes allowed international banks like Goldman Sachs to step in and attracted a river of foreign business.

It changed the financial services sector and the country.

“The Big Bang paved the way for the spectacular growth of the financial services industry in the U.K.,” said Iain Begg, a professor from the London School of Economcis. “It went from a relatively cozy banking center doing …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox World News

Margaret Thatcher, Iron Lady, dead at 87

Ex-spokesman Tim Bell says that former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher has died. She was 87.

Bell said the woman known to friends and foes as “the Iron Lady” passed away Monday morning.

During 11 bruising years as prime minister, Thatcher found a fellow believer in former U.S. President Ronald Reagan, transformed her country by a ruthless dedication to free markets and infuriated European allies.

Thatcher retired from public engagements in 2002 following a series of small strokes, and was only occasionally seen in public since then.

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox World News

Ronald Reagan's boyhood home reportedly demolished

Demolition reportedly began Tuesday on the Chicago apartment building President Ronald Reagan lived briefly as a child.

Chicago’s DNAInfo.com website said crews from Heneghan Wrecking Co. began tearing down the Hyde Park building at 832 E. 57th St., where the 40th U.S. president lived from ages 2 to 3 with his parents in 1914 and 1915.

The University of Chicago purchased the building in 2004 as part of an effort to buy all residential property immediately north of the hospital. It plans to install a plaque at the site to commemorate Washington’s connection.

Preservationists had tried to save the building, the website reports, but those efforts were unsuccessful. The university said it had no immediate plans to build on the property.

“In the short term, the site will be part of a construction staging area, to be used for the new Center for Care and Discovery Hospital and for construction of a new parking garage for the medical center,” university officials said in a statement.

Despite persistent rumors, university officials have repeatedly said the site will not be used for a Barack Obama presidential library.

Click for more from DNAInfo.com.

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox US News

Revealed: There Might Not Be a Huge Bubble Set to Explode (Our April Fool's Joke Explained)

By John Reeves and Ilan Moscovitz, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

It’s time to come clean: We don’t actually have a secret source in Davos, Switzerland, and we aren’t producing batches and batches of Market Goggles.

Yesterday, April 1, was The Motley Fool‘s de facto annual holiday, and our special report, “The Hugest Bubble in History Set to Explode,” was our April Fool’s Day joke. We hope you enjoyed it. (Special thanks to the annoyed readers who, without realizing the day, wrote to chastise us over the word “Hugest” in the headline.)

Bubble, bubble, toil and trouble
With the S&P 500 wrapping up the first quarter at a record high, there are quite a few pundits, of course, who do believe we are experiencing a market bubble right now.

At the website Minyanville, an anonymous source talks of an impending credit crisis, and warns, “When the music stops, there will be no chairs.” The economic forecaster Harry Dent is far more precise, and declares that we’ll have another crash by this summer. And just last Sunday, David Stockman, President Ronald Reagan‘s former budget director, wrote, “When the latest bubble pops, there will be nothing to stop the collapse. If this sounds like advice to get out of the markets and hide out in cash, it is.”

On the other hand, professor Aswath Damodaran, a valuation expert from New York University, recently attempted to value the entire stock market, and he came away thinking “there are good reasons why US stock prices are elevated.” He notes that cash flows are high right now, and growth prospects are encouraging. After completing his valuation exercise, Damodaran intends to “stop worrying about the overall market and go back to finding undervalued companies.”

So, are we in a bubble or not?

We have no idea. It’s likely, however, that the pundits who are predicting a crash in the near future have no idea either.

How much does a chimp charge?
Philip Tetlock, a professor of psychology at the University of Pennsylvania, has studied the performance of pundits, and the results aren’t encouraging. He found that forecasters performed no better than the “proverbial dart-throwing chimp,” and he also discovered that “the more famous the expert, the less accurate his or her predictions tended to be.”

Tetlock did learn that some pundits performed better than others. The better forecasters tended to be “self-critical, eclectic thinkers who were willing to update their beliefs when faced with contrary evidence.” The less successful ones were more like our secret source: overconfident, persuasive, and committed to some big, overarching vision.

Insist on accountability
Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner has been talking a lot lately about how we must insist on everyday accountability — whether it’s on a stock pick or a market call — from our financial media. Investors need to be able to know which financial predictions to value, and which ones to discard. That’s why …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

'Never Thought It Would Happen to Me'

Obama's North Korean And Iranian Missile Defense Trajectories: Course Corrections; Russian Re-Set Dud

By Larry Bell, Contributor

Thirty years ago on March 23, 1983, President Ronald Reagan announced his commitment to develop and deploy an advanced defense capability, the Strategic Defense Initiative, to protect America from a Soviet missile attack. The Soviet Union recognized that they couldn’t compete, and SDI has been credited with hastening their decline. Yet despite great scientific and technological superiority in past decades, U.S. strategic missile and nuclear deterrence protections under the current administration continue to erode. …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

Ronald Reagan’s Daughter, Patti Davis, Releases Lesbian Novel

By The Huffington Post News Editors

She may have received a lukewarm reception from publishers, but Patti Davis has been undeterred about getting her new novel — centered on a lesbian love story — out into the world.

Davis, the 60-year-old daughter of former President Ronald Reagan, has self-published her new work, entitled Till Human Voices Wake Us, as an e-book. It is currently available online for $2.99.

On Amazon, the book description:

Read More…

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Huffington Post

Private papers show Thatcher's Falklands isolation

Margaret Thatcher felt betrayed by close ally President Ronald Reagan over the Falkland Islands, according to newly released papers that reveal how isolated Britain’s prime minister was in her determination to repel the Argentine invasion by force.

When Argentina seized the British territory off the South American coast in April 1982, Thatcher’s government presented a united front in public.

But private papers released Friday by the Thatcher archive at Cambridge University show that the British leader’s closest advisers urged her to negotiate over the islands’ future rather than go to war. And the Reagan administration backed a peace plan that called for Britain to drop its insistence on self-determination for the islanders — a stance that led Thatcher to say Anglo-American friendship had brought her “into conflict with fundamental democratic principles.”

The war was one of the pivotal moments of Thatcher’s career. But many doubted she would triumph in retaking the South Atlantic islands, 8,000 miles (13,000 kilometers) from London and home at the time to fewer than 2,000 people.

On April 6, four days after the invasion, Chief Whip Michael Jopling sent Thatcher a note outlining the views of Conservative lawmakers.

The blunt assessments ranged from “my constituents want blood … invade as quickly as possible” to “we are making a big mistake.” One lawmaker was described as “hopelessly defeatist, depressed and disloyal,” another as “desperately depressed.”

Historian Chris Collins of the Margaret Thatcher Foundation said the documents reveal confusion, uncertainty and dismay inside 10 Downing St.

“I think the range of opinion and the degree of confusion is startling,” Collins said. “Particularly in the first few weeks, people don’t know how to react.”

Thatcher’s opponents weren’t just the liberal “wets” she often derided, but loyal lieutenants who shared her uncompromising economic policies.

Thatcher’s economic adviser, Alan Walters, wrote in his diary — also made public Friday — that he had proposed that “we should get Argentina to pay compensation to the Falklanders.”

John Hoskyns, head of Thatcher’s policy unit, wrote in his diary of his fear “that we are about to make almighty fools of ourselves.”

He said it would …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox World News

Welcome Back, Visible Risk

By Robert Stein, None Risk – and more accurately “visible risk” – has re-entered the market, and that’s a very good thing. Visible risk is what you can measure, evaluate, mitigate, manage, and hedge (at least to some degree). Compare that to the alternative we’ve been saddled with for the past few years in the aftermath of the financial crisis – “complete uncertainty” – which amounts to flying blind into uncharted territory, with your only solace being a promise from the government that says it’s here to help. (As late President Ronald Reagan observed, those are the scariest words in the English language.) Thankfully, things are changing and we are in a new investment paradigm. Markets are a good mechanism for pricing risk— uncertainty not so much. When faced with uncertainty, markets become volatile and follow irrational patterns. With visible risk, on the other hand, it is far easier to calculate the potential downside and invest accordingly. …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

Hinckley asks for more time at mother's home

The man who shot and wounded President Ronald Reagan has been spending too much time at a psychiatric hospital and should instead spend more time at his mother’s Virginia home, his lawyer said Monday.

Barry Levine made the remarks on the first day of a hearing to determine whether Hinckley will be allowed to spend additional time away from the hospital where he has lived since being found insane at the time he shot Reagan in 1981. Hinckley has been gradually given more freedom from Washington’s St. Elizabeths Hospital, and at the end of 2005 he was given permission to start making overnight visits to his mother’s home in Williamsburg, Va. The visits now last 10 days. They are carefully planned, and Hinckley is sometimes trailed by the Secret Service.

Levine argued that Hinckley, who attended the proceeding, “has done nothing dangerous at all for more than two decades” and has earned more time in Virginia.

“Mr. Hinckley has been spending too much time in the hospital,” Levine said, later adding that keeping him at the hospital is “disguised prison.”

Lawyers spent two weeks in late 2011 and early 2012 discussing plans that would expand the length of Hinckley’s visits to Virginia, first to 17 days and then to 24 days. After those visits, which could take a year to complete, Hinckley could be allowed to live permanently outside the hospital while making monthly visits to St. Elizabeths. But the plan hit a snag after hearings.

St. Elizabeths had planned for Hinckley to attend group programs at a treatment facility called People’s Place while visiting his mother’s home, but the facility withdrew its participation. St. Elizabeths and the facility apparently couldn’t agree on the people managing Hinckley’s case. St. Elizabeths now proposes that Hinckley join a therapy group run by a psychotherapist he sees in Virginia. He also would participate in music therapy with another specialist.

Colleen Kennedy, a government attorney, criticized the solution and called it a “patchwork quilt.” She also raised questions about Hinckley’s ability to drive now that he has a driver’s license.

“He could drive anywhere, including to D.C. and see President Obama,” Kennedy said.

The government has previously said in documents filed with the court that Hinckley is “a man capable of great violence” and “not sufficiently well to alleviate the concern that this violence may be repeated.”

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox US News

Rex Scouten, former White House chief usher, dies

Rex Scouten, who served 10 first families as a Secret Service agent, White House chief usher and chief curator, has died.

The Richard Nixon Foundation says Scouten, who lived in Fairfax, Va., died Wednesday at a local hospital. He was 88.

Scouten’s career began during Harry S. Truman’s administration and continued through Bill Clinton‘s presidency. Scouten guarded Truman for four years, then became part of the first Secret Service detail assigned to a vice president with Richard Nixon.

In 1969, Scouten became chief usher, a position he held until 1986. He briefly retired, only to return as White House curator at President Ronald Reagan‘s request. He left that job in 1997.

The Reagans’ dog was named Rex in honor of Scouten.

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox US News

Women In Combat: Felony Stupid

By Matt Barber

Tank Army Military SC Women in Combat: Felony Stupid

The term “moronic” is defined as “notably stupid or lacking in good judgment.” It is frequently used as an insult.

The Obama administration is moronic.

This is not an insult.

President Obama’s latest “notably stupid” stoke of America’s calculated slow burn is the decision to lift the ban on women in direct combat. Along with the move a few years back to turn the Officers’ Club into the Blue Oyster Bar, this most recent social experiment with national security represents one small step for the “progressive” agenda and one giant prance toward the pansification of the greatest military in world history.

It’s a jaw-dropping “lack in good judgment.”

In 1991, the late Gen. Robert H. Barrow, former commandant of the Marine Corps, gave compelling testimony on the subject before the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee. He stated: “If you want to make a combat unit ineffective, assign some women to it. … In three wars – World War II, Korea and Vietnam – I found no place for women to be down in the ground combat element,” he concluded.

In a recent column headlined “Women in Ground Combat,” Bing West, former Marine officer and assistant secretary of defense under President Ronald Reagan, notes that during his testimony, Gen. Barrow “cited the 1950 fighting retreat from the Chosin Reservoir in temperatures of minus 20 degrees, with one Marine division pitted against eight Chinese divisions. Had women comprised 15 percent of his division, Barrow concluded, the Marines would have lost the battle. ‘The very nature of women disqualifies them from doing it (killing so brutally),’ Barrow said. ‘Women give life, sustain life, nurture life; they don’t take it.’”

Evidently, Gen. Barrow never met one of today’s abortion-worshiping feminist “Flukes” of nature. Still, they only kill innocent children who can’t fight back.

In short, Gen. Barrow observed that opening the front lines to, um, “infantrywomen” would not only cost precious American lives; it would ultimately “destroy the Marine Corps.”

Now, I know, who the heck do Barrow and West think they are, right? Did they ever bravely serve God and country as a glorified teacher’s assistant at Harvard Law?

I think not.

Did they ever do “a little blow,” march with the Black Panthers, “organize their communities” into welfare-dependent hellholes, or drink lattes with “Marxist professors and the structural feminists”?

No.

Sheesh.

Even so, despite an obvious lack of credibility on combat readiness and a meager century or so in combined service, I think we should at least humor them a bit.

“To Barrow, a warrior admired by three generations of grunts,” wrote West, “ground combat meant killing under the harshest of circumstances. Barrow opposed the incorporation of women into infantry units characterized by primal instincts: sleeping, defecating, eating, and smelling like wolf packs while hunting down and slaughtering male soldiers.”

That’s the problem with political correctness – with liberalism in general. It raises a pseudo-utopian barrier to reality. Oftentimes, that barrier is deadly.

This is what happens when a gaggle of left-wing civilian politicians who don’t know which end of the gun goes “bang!” are placed in charge …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

How the Union’s state got so ‘strong’

By hnn

…Strong, stronger, strongest — one of those words has been used to describe the union in each of the last 17 State of the Union addresses.

But it was not always so. Presidents once used other words to describe the state of our union. President Jimmy Carter liked to call it “sound.” President Harry S. Truman liked to call it “good.” President Lyndon B. Johnson, in a lyrical moment, described the state of the union in 1965 as “free and restless, growing and full of hope.”

And when things were not going well, they said so.

“I must say to you that the state of the union is not good,” President Gerald R. Ford said in 1975, citing high unemployment, slow growth and soaring deficits. He added, “I’ve got bad news, and I don’t expect much, if any, applause.”…

What changed? The simple answer is President Ronald Reagan….

Source:
NYT

Source URL:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/12/us/politics/state-of-union-address-language-changed-over-time.html?emc=eta1

Date:
2-12-13

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at History News Network – George Mason University

States Push Back Against Obama's Knee Jerk Tax-Increase Addiction

By Rex Sinquefield

In the wake of the U.S. economy realizing its most significant decline since 2009 (an annualized decline of 0.1 percent during the 4th quarter of 2012), this week President Obama laid out his plan to kick the “sequester can” even further down the road. His renewed call for tax increases, along with limited spending cuts, is a prime example of what President Ronald Reagan was referring to when he claimed, “Some people have labored so long at making government bigger that they’ve developed a knee-jerk addiction to tax increases. Every time their knee jerks, we get kicked.” …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Opinions

Ronald Reagan's Heart: Two Emotional Landmarks

By Mary Claire Kendall, Contributor When former President Ronald Reagan visited his birthplace in Tampico, Illinois on May 10, 1992, this tender-hearted, consummate gentleman, fast-fading with enveloping Alzheimers, wept, said curator Joan Johnson, as he laid eyes on the bed, where his mother Nelle had labored for many difficult hours, before giving birth to him on February 6, 1911.
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

Colin Powell Goes After Birthers

By Breaking News

Colin Powell SC Colin Powell Goes After Birthers

In an interview with ABC’s Diane Sawyer and George Stephanopoulos during ABC’s special inauguration day coverage this morning, former Secretary of State Colin Powell lashed out at people in the Republican Party who spent the last four years spreading “birther nonsense” and other “things that demonize the president,” calling on GOP leaders to denounce such talk — publicly.

“Republicans have to stop buying into things that demonize the president. I mean, why aren’t Republican leaders shouting out about all this birther nonsense and all these other things? They should speak out. This is the kind of intolerance that I’ve been talking about where these idiot presentations continue to be made and you don’t see the senior leadership of the party say, ‘No, that’s wrong.’ In fact, sometimes by not speaking out, they’re encouraging it. And the base keeps buying the stuff.

“And it’s killing the base of the party. I mean, 26 percent favorability rating for the party right now. It ought to be telling them something. So, instead of attacking me or whoever speaks like I do, look in the mirror and realize, ‘How are we going to win the next election?”

But Powell, who served as National Security Adviser under President Ronald Reagan, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under George H.W. Bush and as the nation’s top diplomat under President George W. Bush, didn’t stop there.

“The Republican Party ought to be out there not restricting voting by voter ID, but saying we want everybody to vote,” he told Sawyer and Stephanopoulos. “It’s a party that has to stop saying, ‘We are going to appeal to you with new messages.’ You need policies — the country is becoming more minority.”

Powell, who endorsed President Obama’s reelection bid in October, said that his critiques of the GOP have left some wondering, “Why are you still a Republican?”

Read More at ABC News . By Michael Falcone.

Photo Credit: jdlaisca (Creative Commons)

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Can An Oath Of Office Be Treason?

By Gerald Todd

Obama Official Portrait SC Can an Oath of Office be Treason?

In an era where lying has become an art form, is it possible to hold those who take a solemn oath to protect and defend the Constitution to that pledge of honor and responsibility?

The oath to be taken by the president on first entering office is specified in Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.

The Constitution (Article VI, clause 3) requires that Senators and Representatives take an oath of office to support the Constitution. It reads:

I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

The military officer’s oath is similar. Solemn oaths are very serious business; an elected or hired official or military officer takes within his or her hands power over the lives and welfare of one person, or 350 million.

The Presidential oath being taken on January 21, 2013 must discern where the officeholder’s heart is and what level of power he lusts for. The same holds true for all who dare make that solemn promise while looking into 350 million pairs of eyes…

The Founders were common in their belief in the core teachings of the Bible as is over 80% of the American population. The inscription on George Washington’s tomb – designed by him, reads: “I am the resurrection and the life, saith the Lord, he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live; and whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die.” (John 1: 25-26)

(Did he want himself remembered as a “deist”?)

It is from this belief that the core principle of the Constitution found in the Declaration finds meaning: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights; that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Would it be an understatement to say that few other than our beleaguered military take their oaths of office seriously? Renewed or newfound Love of Country is the easiest way to reverse the mortal danger he and the nation he uses are facing. The opposite of love is not hate, but use! One who truly loves cannot use the beloved, willing to lay down his life for her/him. That is what oaths are all about! The Founders saw that swearing an oath upon the Bible was natural and binding.

Today, we have three problems:

1. Swearing on the Bible as above with no intention of upholding that solemn promise. The current President actually believes the Constitution is “dead for all practical purposes” (as stated to Vladimir Putin in 2009.) Too many public servants take the oath as a rite of passage with no binding responsibilities. That must change. Now!

2. Swearing to uphold the Constitution on the Qur’an (Koran) is oxymoronic in that the holy book of the Muslims is also a theocratic code of laws strictly observed with severe penalties. It is called Sharia (Law). Buddhists, Hindus, Shintos, Sikhs, Jews, and almost the entire world’s ways of connecting with our Creator have found a place within the framework of freedom the Constitution affords. Some will always struggle because of local prejudices, but they all have the foundation of freedom to stand and build on. Not so under Sharia.

3. After years of political correctness, misguided social justice, and divisive diversity, the American people have been conditioned to be influenced by a drive to totalitarian rule. One of Alinsky’s protégés, the young lawyer Barack Hussein Obama, became its most powerful and persuasive adherent. He should take the oath on “Rules for Radicals.” (Alinsky dedicated “Rules” to Lucifer.)

Listed below are the basic tenets of the “Rules for Radicals” bible. Some call it good politics. I call it spiritual warfare. (Note: righteous citizens, elected, hired, and military are the “enemy” referred to here. My comments are in parentheses)

1. “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” (And boy have we let them bamboozle us with political correctness and the ACLU!)

2. “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” (Done consistently, in every aspect of life – health, education, welfare, environment, energy, religion, and labor, then lied about)

3. “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” (Not likely, but “progressives” will even lie about the obvious.)

4. “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” (We should “put on the whole armor of God” – it might feel good for a change!)

5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon”. (Ask Congress, Sarah Palin, Mitt Romney, etc.)

6. “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” (He who laughs last…)

7. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” (Exceeds their own expertise and is ultimately exposed for the lies the tactic is built from. Progressives get bored because they exceed their own knowledge or capability to understand technology or stewardship.)

8. “Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.” (A daily does of new crises, talking points with the complicit 5th Column in the mainstream media)

9. “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” (Health care, fiscal cliff, debt ceiling, ad nauseum)

10. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.” (They are masters at it; but when their house of cards crumbles, they’ll cry like babies.)

11. “If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside…” (Love conquers all, but tough love is what is needed here.)

12. “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” (With cadres “eating out the peoples’ substance,” they are ready every day with thousands of new rules and highly-paid operatives to seek to enforce them.)

13. “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” (Republicans have been suckered into this deep freeze for decades, with the only reprieve being under President Ronald Reagan. They will never love you, and the 5th Column media will never be on your side.)

Anyone who has faced a bully, spent time pondering Scripture, or reading history sees we are engaged in all-out spiritual warfare. While political strategies are critical, the war must be fought on the spiritual plane.

On April 14, 2005, I was privileged to be asked to read Washington’s prayer over his very tomb at Mt. Vernon. This circular was directed to the Governors and States of the new nation; his reference to them has been replaced by the words “the United States.” Otherwise, the words and spelling are those of General Washington:

I now make it my earnest prayer, that God would have the United States in his holy protection, that he would incline the hearts of the Citizens to cultivate a spirit of subordination and obedience to Government. To entertain a brotherly affection and love for one another, for their fellow Citizens of the United States at large, and particularly for their brethren who have served in the Fields, and finally, that he would most graciously be pleased to dispose us all, to do Justice, to love mercy, and to demean ourselves with that Charity, humility and pacific temper of mind, which were the Characteristicks of the Divine Author of our blessed Religion (a paraphrase of Micah 6:8), and without an humble imitation of whose example in these things, we can never hope to be a happy Nation. Amen.

Now we too must pray and act!

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism