Tag Archives: Piers Morgan

How Obama Truly Was Like Trayvon Martin

By Cliff Kincaid

Trayvon Martin SC How Obama Truly Was Like Trayvon Martin

The Huffington Post has perfected the smear technique of expressing shock and anger at things that conservatives say which make complete sense and are factually based. “Hannity’s Awful Reaction To Obama’s Trayvon Martin Comments” was the headline over Fox News host Sean Hannity’s reaction to President Obama comparing himself to Trayvon Martin. Hannity said he wasn’t sure how to interpret Obama’s remarks because “he was part of the Choom Gang and he smoked pot and he did a little blow” and “we know that Trayvon had been smoking pot that night.”

Obama, of course, was not deliberately comparing himself to Martin because of their common interest in smoking dope. But the comparison by Hannity was not unreasonable, since Obama was in fact a heavy dope smoker, a member of what his biographer David Maraniss called the Choom Gang; and Martin was smoking dope before he was killed by George Zimmerman following a violent confrontation. Obama had also admitted doing cocaine, or “blow.”

It was an opportunity for Obama to say something important, such as that young blacks should avoid the drugs that got Martin into trouble, and that black parents should strive to keep their children out of trouble. Instead, Obama harped on racism.

The alleged “awful reaction” of Hannity would only be awful if Hannity had said something about Obama and Martin that was not true. But it is true and worthy of comment because of the effect that marijuana may have had on Martin the night he was killed. The subject came up during the Zimmerman trial.

The influence of marijuana in the Martin-Zimmerman confrontation has taken on more significance in the wake of the exchange that CNN’s Piers Morgan had with Martin’s friend, Rachel Jeantel:

Morgan: What about drugs?

Jeantel: Drugs. OK, weed, marijuana. In my area, we say weed. My area, we—for Trayvon, I can explain one thing, weed don’t do make him go crazy, it just make him go hungry.

Morgan: But he did—

(Laughter)

Jeantel: Like it’s the best thing I can say. It made him hungry.

Morgan: Did he take a lot of weed?

Jeantel: No.

Morgan: How much would you say?

Jeantel: Like twice a week.

Morgan: Twice a week?

Jeantel: Yes.

Morgan: Is that normal for teenagers in your community?

Jeantel: Yes. Real normal.

Writing in The New York Times on July 11 under the headline “Reefer Madness, an Unfortunate Redux,” a professor named Carl L. Hart ridiculed the idea that Trayvon Martin was aggressive and paranoid from smoking marijuana, and that his marijuana use led him to attack George Zimmerman. Hart, an associate professor of psychology at Columbia University, claimed there wasn’t enough dope in Martin’s system to affect his behavior.

But marijuana can have lasting effects on the brain, depending on how much he had been smoking and for how long. During the trial, Shiping Bao, the medical examiner who autopsied Trayvon Martin, testified that marijuana “could have” altered Martin’s mind and body the night he died.

A pro-marijuana website, “The Weedblog,” also ridiculed “the pot made him do it” line of attack on Martin. …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Matthew Perry On ‘Piers Morgan Live’: Lisa Kudrow Guests For ‘Friends’ Reunion

By The Huffington Post News Editors

It’s a “Friends” reunion on “Piers Morgan Live” when Matthew Perry guest hosts.

On Monday, July 22, Perry will host his friends co-star Lisa Kudrow. Perry’s other guest? His ex-girlfriend-turned friend Lauren Graham.

Video: Radio Host Has Video Of Piers Morgan Shooting Guns

By NewsEditor

Alex Jones admits such in an interview with James O’Keefe!

From: http://www.westernjournalism.com/radio-host-has-video-of-piers-morgan-shooting-guns/

Churches: Time To Fight!

By Michael Reagan

Evangelical Church SC Churches: Time to Fight!

You can’t win the fight if you don’t put on the gloves.

A punch-drunk, old heavyweight boxer knows that’s a truism, but not the churches of America.

The Supreme Court heard arguments this week on the constitutionality of California’s Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage in the state by a 52 to 47 margin in 2008 but has since been declared unconstitutional by federal courts.

Fox TV, Rush Limbaugh, and other talk-show pundits have weighed in, arguing the conservative — and moral — position that sanctifying gay marriage with the grace of the U.S. Constitution is not only wrong but a serious threat to the culture of this country.

But those media outlets often speak to those who are already in the choir. That leaves a lot of other Americans who aren’t hearing anyone preaching the conservative argument on gay marriage.

I don’t expect the GOP to provide any leadership. Republicans are too busy cat-fighting with each other and making sure their presidential choice will be whooped by Hillary Clinton in 2016.

And where in the heck are the churches on the issue of legalizing gay marriage?

Where are the Protestants, Jews, and Catholics? Have they lost their tongues? Their hearts and wills? Their institutional you-know-whats?

Where’s the moral outrage? Why aren’t thousands of our pastors, priests, and rabbis shouting from their pulpits? Why aren’t they leading their congregations through the streets in mass protest?

Why aren’t their bishops appearing on the tube with David Gregory and Piers Morgan to defend the institution of marriage as a union of one man and one woman?

Like the bank executives who are too chicken to stand up to the federal bullies in Washington, and like the energy company bosses in California who won’t stand up to the Green Socialists in Sacramento, the churches cower in fear.

Are they afraid to lose their 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status by engaging in political activity? Are they afraid to be derided as religious nuts and cultural Cro-Magnons by the liberal media?

Or are our churches and their comfortable leaders simply no longer willing to fight for what is right?

This fight over Proposition 8 isn’t just about saying it should be legal in the eyes of government for two people of the same sex to get married in California.

It’s ultimately about changing the culture of the entire country; it inevitably will lead to teaching our public school kids that gay marriage is a perfectly fine alternative and no different than traditional marriage. There is also a very slippery slope leading to other alternative relationships and the unconstitutionality of any law based on morality. Think about polygamy, bestiality, and perhaps even murder.

Churches should be in the vanguard of the fight to defend the culture against legalized gay marriage, not hiding in their pews.

Sure, the mainstream liberal media will be against them and will ignore them as much as they can. But if the churches show up en masse — and make sure millions of their members’ voices are heard — the media will be forced to cover them, and even the …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Piers Morgan’s Former Deputy Among Phone Hacking Arrests At Mirror Group

By The Huffington Post News Editors

LONDON — British police made four arrests for suspected phone hacking Thursday, the first time that top editors and journalists at the Mirror group have been implicated in the scandal that has rocked U.K. media.

One of those arrested was a former deputy to Piers Morgan, the current CNN interviewer, a person briefed on the arrests said.

Read More…
More on Phone Hacking

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Huffington Post

Christopher Dorner: Liberal Extremist?

By capblack

Christopher Dorner SC Christopher Dorner: Liberal Extremist?

Imagine that a nominally liberal Black former cop and Naval Reservist (named Christopher Dorner) goes on a rampage against his previous employer, the Los Angeles Police Department, promising a one-man insurgency?

Sounds like a Blacksploitation movie plot, doesn’t it?

It’s real, and so are questions his manifesto raises.

His civil rights complaints and support of liberal mouthpieces like the infamous Piers Morgan prompts a disturbing question:

Should police departments monitor progressive police officers for fear they may become violently radical?

Christian constitutionalists have been on police and intelligence radars for years. With a liberal president in office, a blind spot may have developed regarding leftist extremists, especially American Black ones.

Black officers, as a group, come from very liberal communities. Anti-police and anti-White conditioning runs deep in these zip codes.

Our civil rights organizations, colleges, and political organizations all download anti-Establishment zealotry into young urban minds.

Are Black police immune to this programming?

The 1969 Black nationalist revenge novel “The Spook Who Sat By the Door” (also a 1973 movie) comes to mind.

A Black CIA officer uses his paramilitary skills to organize gangs to overthrow America because of racism.

I close with these final questions:

Is Christopher Dorner a real spook who sat by the door?

And, in the wake of rampant liberal programming of American Blacks since the sixties, is he the only one?

Cap Black The Hood Conservative
504 214-3082

Donate Dollar Super Power
To American History Month-
Cap Black’s alternative to Black ( Liberal ) History Month:

http://www.gofundme.com/197xk8

” Be your OWN Superhero!”

Photo credit: www.YoVenice.com (Creative Commons)

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Video: Ted Nugent Slams Piers Morgan For His ‘Obsession’ With Guns

By Daniel Noe

When Ted Nugent sat down with Piers Morgan in Texas last night, he delivered the CNN host his most explosive interview since last month’s showdown with Alex Jones.

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Video: Rush Limbaugh Shreds Piers Morgan

By Daniel Noe

Rush Limbaugh says it’s comical to listen to the abject ignorance of people like Piers Morgan.

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

The Tea Party Is Splintering, A Good Thing!

By Kirsten Smith

Alex Jones SC The Tea Party is Splintering, a Good Thing!

Editor’s note: The opinions below are solely those of the author.)

Ignoring the bully fringe only empowers them; when will we learn?

The Tea Party is splintering off into two parts. Not surprisingly, the mainstream media is not promoting this; they are especially fond of parading the most fringe to represent the Tea Party to the marginally informed general public. This is evidenced by Piers Morgan’s interview with Alex Jones, the conspiracy king. The vast majority of Tea Party participants will tell you they do not follow nor believe Alex Jones or his propaganda. His InfoWars site promotes UFOs, Chem trails, 911 “Truthers”, and other discredited conspiracies.

Alex Jones’s supporters are attempting to take over the Tea Party by infiltrating their social networks and groups. They are unwelcome guests who need to leave NOW! Even though a few of Alex’s far-fetched ideas are in fact true, this is no reason to buy into all of his extremism and paranoia.

The MSM has done a great job of portraying all Christians, in particular Baptists, as being represented by the Westboro Baptist Church. They will do the same to the TP if we do not draw attention to this matter and police our own. Ignoring bullies only empowers them!

News Flash: Al Gore = Alex Jones

Much the same as the radical left has taken over the Democrat Party, the plan by Alex and pals seems to be moving in and taking over the Tea Party. If anyone goes head to head with these conspiracy bullies, we are met with “GOP elitist” and “Neocon” labels. I guess Andrew Briebart would fit in both these categories according to those who know the facts before they are disseminated. Thank God for Ben Shapiro to come out and say it loud and clear!

Glenn Beck and Ben Shapiro have both distanced themselves from Alex Jones and his InfoWars site; I suggest the Tea Party make a concerted effort to do the same, before the Jones supporters take us down. Andrew Briebart was as close to a Tea Party leader as we have had; Ben Shapiro is now filling his shoes. This should be the path for the Tea Party to follow.

Fighting two fronts is tough, but the option is to be destroyed from within.

Thus the Tea Party has a two-pronged problem. 1) How to differentiate itself from the fringe, as Ben Shapiro did in his interview with Piers Morgan on CNN when he stated “ Do not lump me in with Alex Jones”. Glenn Beck took it a step further and called out Alex for what I believe he is, a “Madman.” 2) Getting the public, despite the left and the Mainstream Media’s attempt to lump us together, to see Alex Jones and his followers as not representative of the Tea Party, but rather a small, very vocal extremist group preying on the minds of the uninformed, gullible, or unstable.

The liberals are using this as their hammer against the Tea Party. As one Tea Party advocate put it, “Alex Jones is a well-disguised enemy of the Tea Party.”

This trend from the leaders of the Tea Party needs to continue: openly differentiate us from the madmen or prepare to be embarrassed, taken down by the left, and disappear. The radical left is counting on this; don’t play into their hands.

Photo credit: The Alex Jones Show (Creative Commons)

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Obama Ignores The Rational Answer

By Michael Reagan

Barack Obama 6 SC Obama Ignores the Rational Answer

What do Al Hunt of Bloomberg News, David Gregory of “Meet the Press”, and President Obama have in common — besides their liberal politics?

They all send their kids to Sidwell Friends School.

With campuses in Washington, D.C. and Bethesda, Md., the highly selective private school is where the Clintons and the Gores sent their kids, along with Joe Biden’s grandchildren.

It’s also where the local 1 Percenters and the government-media elites who can afford to shell out about $32 grand a year to send their children to be indoctrinated — excuse me, educated — and to be safe.

Unlike parents across America who are worrying about how to protect their school kids in the wake of the tragic shootings in Newtown, Conn., Sidwell parents spend their days worry-free.

Their children are better protected than the printing presses at the Bureau of Engraving and Printing. And it’s not because of the heavily armed Secret Service detail posted on campus to protect first-kids Sasha and Malia Obama.

It’s because Sidwell Friends — a Quaker school, by the way — is defended by guards with loaded guns. In addition to the Secret Service with its Uzis and large ammo clips, Sidwell has its own security staff of 11.

I didn’t hear President Obama mention Sidwell Friends’ solution to school safety on Wednesday when he announced his sweeping plans to reduce gun violence by banning assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines, instituting tougher gun-registration laws, and taking steps to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill.

None of Obama’s measures would have prevented the slaughter of innocents in Connecticut, but that’s not the point. The point is pure politics, and the president and his crew want to take full advantage of the Newtown shootings to advance their anti-gun agenda.

At his White House media extravaganza, the president used lawmakers, law enforcement officials, and children as his props. The kids, drawn from across the U.S., had written letters to the president saying they were worried about gun violence and school safety. You can bet there were no Sidwell kids on stage with him.

While Washington’s grand-standers and anti-gun nuts prepare to fire their latest round of ineffective, politically correct, feel-good federal laws at law-abiding gun owners, at least six states are preparing new legislation that will allow teachers to carry guns into schools or require several teachers in the building to be armed.

Putting guards with guns in places that need to be protected from bad guys or crazies is not a radical idea. It’s perfectly sensible.

Politicians and celebrities use armed bodyguards all the time. We have armed guards in banks, jewelry stores, and malls. After 9/11 we armed airline pilots and armed federal marshals posing as passengers.

Only politicians and hysterical celebrity dummies like Piers Morgan can’t understand why making schools gun-free zones attracts mass-murders and reduces the chances that anyone with a gun will stop them to zero.

The president never thought of using Sidwell Friends as an example of how armed guards at schools can make them safer.

He was too busy trying to score points by attacking the NRA, dreaming up laws to further oppress law-abiding gun owners, and making fun of the people who know the Second Amendment isn’t about protecting duck hunters’ rights (it’s about the right of the people to protect themselves from their government.)

Meanwhile, here in Los Angeles, the Catholic grade school where my daughter teaches didn’t wait around for the president or Joe Biden to come up with complicated new laws to allegedly ensure the safety of their children.

The officials at my daughter’s school decided for themselves the best way to make their campus safer. Taking a cue from the smart folks who run the Sidwell Friends School, they did a simple, effective, and rational thing. They hired an armed guard.

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

The Significance Of The United States Constitution: Then And Now

By AK Fielding

constitution 2 SC The Significance of the United States Constitution:  Then and Now

Degrading the United States Constitution seems to be the latest fad in our country.  Most recently, in a debate with author Ben Shapiro, British journalist Piers Morgan attacked the Constitution and called it a “little book.”  Morgan lives and works in the United States but is clearly unaware that the United States Constitution is not a “little book” but the supreme law of the land.  Morgan is not alone in his berating of the Constitution; the current administration continuously tries to bend the law to its will at every opportunity.  The latest attack against the Second Amendment is hardly a response to a new situation but an outcome of years of planning to eradicate the Constitutional rights of law-abiding Americans.  Ironically, those attacking the Second Amendment unhesitatingly hide behind the First Amendment to cover their disparaging remarks about the same Constitution they despise.  For people such as Morgan, clearly unfamiliar with United States history, a short lesson on the Constitution is in order.

On May 14, 1787, the Federal Convention met at the Independence Hall in Philadelphia.  The plan was to correct errors in the loosely tied Articles of the Confederation.  By June, it was evident that the Articles of Confederation was incapable of supporting the form of government required by the new Republic.  Hence, the delegates worked methodically to create an entirely new type of document that represented the co-operation of all.

Lest someone feel the process involved in writing the Constitution and ratification was an easy one, a few points are worth noting.  To begin with, the delegates to the Convention arrived in Philadelphia under the steady onslaught of daily rain.  Unfortunately, far from cooling the city, the rain simply added in making it more humid and unbearable.  It may seem a minor problem to us today because of the advent of air-conditioning but for delegates of the Constitutional Convention, the heat, humidity, and flies alone created a nettlesome atmosphere often leading to escalated tensions in the meetings.

Despite the heat, 55 of the appointed 74 delegates arrived in Philadelphia.  Many of them remained in the city, the others traveled back and forth from their respective states to attend the sessions.  Yes, it required more than one session because they did not automatically agree on all terms of the Constitution.  Indeed, it took four long months to convince enough of the delegates to sign the Constitution.  The opposition was heavy from the beginning.  Alexander Hamilton, for example, arrived from the dissenting state of New York straddled with two other delegates, both anti-federalists.  Many of them favored one possibility over another and it would take several gruesome hours daily to convince all to agree upon one resolution.  For instance, James Madison and George Washington favored the Virginia Plan that called for a bicameral legislative branch, an executive branch led by a single person, and a judicial branch headed by a supreme court.  Others such as Benjamin Franklin, John Lansing and William Paterson backed the New Jersey Plan that suggested a unicameral legislative branch, and an executive council.  After giving an uninterrupted six-hour long speech on an alternative plan, Hamilton retired to New York, leaving the delegates behind with a milder opinion of the Virginia Plan.

Even after Hamilton’s grandiose speech, far from reaching common ground immediately, the delegates fought over the specifics and only came to an agreement on September 17, 1787 to sign the new Constitution.  The signatures secured a new Constitution at the convention but it still needed ratification to become law.  Anti-federalists such as Patrick Henry and George Clinton worked diligently to undermine the ratification process.  In response, Hamilton, Madison, and John Jay fired away in support of ratification of the Constitution in a series of essays and articles noted for the magnitude of their literary and political beauty.  The Federalist Papers have long become a masterpiece in political discourse and should be on the bookshelf of every American citizen.  The final ratified Constitution included a Bill of Rights that carefully laid out the rights of individuals without which we may never have had the final product we see today.

The Constitution stands as the lifeblood of our great nation.  To undermine its authority is to undermine the intelligence, wisdom, hard work, dedication, and sacrifices of the Founders who worked against all odds to create a law to safeguard the natural rights of people.  Therefore, We the People must respect the Constitution for through its provisions our rights remain protected against those who tread upon us.  It is our duty as Americans and patriots to honor the supreme law of our land and to correct those who ridicule it or try to minimize its relevance.  It is true that we no longer live in the eighteenth century, but our Founding Fathers had the foresight to devise the Constitution to last beyond their time; and for over 200 years, it has done so remarkably well.

Follow on Twitter:  @AKFielding

BLOG:  http://akfielding.blogspot.com/

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Video: MASTERFUL: Breitbart’s Ben Shapiro TORCHES Piers Morgan

By Daniel Noe

Breitbart’s Ben Shapiro: 2nd Amendment is for protection against usurpatious government.

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Video: TV Anchor Delivers Blistering Fact-Check Of Piers Morgan’s Anti-Gun Claims

By Daniel Noe

After Morgan’s very public, on-air spat with radio host Alex Jones, Ben Swann, a local Fox anchor for WXIX-TV in Cincinnati, offered up a fascinating fact-check of some of the stats that the British CNN host has been using. Morgan will surely find the results unpalatable.

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Piers Morgan Can Stay, Says the White House

By Alex Kantrowitz, Contributor Not that there was much drama involved, but the White House responded to a petition asking it to deport CNN host Piers Morgan over his views on gun control and said Morgan can stay. In a statement explaining the decision, White House spokesman Jay Carney told the petition’s 109,000 plus […]
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

Video: Piers Morgan And Guests Openly Call For Alex Jones’ Murder

By Daniel Noe

Daily Beast sports columnist Buzz Bissinger appeared on Piers Morgan’s program in response Alex Jones’ appearance.

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Twidiots: Alex Jones Won the Debate

On Monday Alex Jones appeared on CNN to debate Piers Morgan about gun control. In his appearance Alex Jones yells, interrupts, affects a mocking English accent, accuses Piers Morgan of being a “redcoat” and generally steam rolls through the entire segment. To many viewers Alex Jones came off as an unhinged lunatic who did more damage than help to his cause.

But “many people” does not include these people:

Source: FULL ARTICLE at College Humor – Articles

Piers Morgan: My Guest Was 'Best Argument' for Gun Laws

By John Johnson CNN’s Piers Morgan thinks gun-rights proponent Alex Jones‘s memorable appearance on his show last night made a fine case—for his opponents. “He was the best advertisement for gun control you could wish for,” Morgan tells Politico , referring to the conservative radio host. “That kind of vitriol, hatred, and zealotry…
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Newser – Home