Tag Archives: Ben Shapiro

Obama Takes Heat For Criticizing Fox News, Limbaugh

By B. Christopher Agee

Fox News channel SC Obama takes heat for criticizing Fox News, Limbaugh

Further showcasing his inability to tolerate dissension, Barack Obama recently made a statement calling out media outlets often unsupportive of his leftist agenda.

He claimed that Republican lawmakers would generally be open to compromising with their Democrat counterparts but are afraid they will be “punished on Fox News or by Rush Limbaugh.”

Obama made the comments in an interview that never explored the obvious liberal bias held by the overwhelming majority of news outlets.

In fact, he openly embraced what he called “more left-leaning media outlets” for their recognition “that compromise is not a dirty word.” He also suggested that he and his leftist cohorts in the Democrat party are more open to “buck[ing] the more absolutist-wing elements in our party to try to get stuff done.”

Plenty of media watchdog groups and conservative organizations lashed out at the president for his ill-advised verbal attack on an industry he despises.

Of course, this is far from the first time Obama has targeted a group or individual he deems unfriendly to his worldview. In fact, as author Ben Shapiro pointed out, he has taken aim at the same entities in previous remarks.

“He’s done this before,” Shapiro said, calling Obama “a bully.”

He continued, saying the president is “saying the media is not liberal enough. I think he wants people who don’t like him to be quiet.”

A respected Fox News personality, Greta van Susteren also chastised Obama’s generalization of her network.

Writing on her blog, van Susteren implied Obama is upset because he “wants his usual media pass and Fox challenges his policies,” which she said “happens to be the media’s job.”

She also lambasted the president’s implication that Fox News featured just one viewpoint.

“Some Democrats have told me that they want to come on Fox to discuss issues,” she said, “but they get heat from their leadership for appearing on Fox.”

Finally, she pointed out the absurdity of Obama suggesting that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is open to compromise.

“He has not allowed a budget to get to the Senate floor for years to even begin a discussion,” she said. “The budget process is where all compromise begins and ends and ended it before it even got started.”

The Obama White House, and the president specifically, have called out Fox News on other occasions. While Obama implied the network’s viewers were “a little stubborn” in 2012, his then-spokesperson Anita Dunn described it three years earlier as “opinion journalism masquerading as news.”

Rich Noyes of the Media Research Center summed up Obama’s overarching complaint.

“The media has always helped shape the political environment,” he said, “but Democrats object to the conservative media now being able to.”

Noyes surmised the prevailing thought among leftists, saying “It was so much easier for them when the big three networks and The New York Times left out the inconvenient facts.”

Click here to get B. Christopher Agee’s latest book for less than $5! Like his Facebook page for engaging, relevant conservative content daily.

Photo Credit: ario_ Creative Commons

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Video: Ben Shapiro On Obama’s ‘Orwellian’ Inaugural Speech

By Daniel Noe

Ben Shapiro, editor-at-large of Breitbart News, appears on Lou Dobbs’ show to discuss Obama’s inaugural speech.

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

The Tea Party Is Splintering, A Good Thing!

By Kirsten Smith

Alex Jones SC The Tea Party is Splintering, a Good Thing!

Editor’s note: The opinions below are solely those of the author.)

Ignoring the bully fringe only empowers them; when will we learn?

The Tea Party is splintering off into two parts. Not surprisingly, the mainstream media is not promoting this; they are especially fond of parading the most fringe to represent the Tea Party to the marginally informed general public. This is evidenced by Piers Morgan’s interview with Alex Jones, the conspiracy king. The vast majority of Tea Party participants will tell you they do not follow nor believe Alex Jones or his propaganda. His InfoWars site promotes UFOs, Chem trails, 911 “Truthers”, and other discredited conspiracies.

Alex Jones’s supporters are attempting to take over the Tea Party by infiltrating their social networks and groups. They are unwelcome guests who need to leave NOW! Even though a few of Alex’s far-fetched ideas are in fact true, this is no reason to buy into all of his extremism and paranoia.

The MSM has done a great job of portraying all Christians, in particular Baptists, as being represented by the Westboro Baptist Church. They will do the same to the TP if we do not draw attention to this matter and police our own. Ignoring bullies only empowers them!

News Flash: Al Gore = Alex Jones

Much the same as the radical left has taken over the Democrat Party, the plan by Alex and pals seems to be moving in and taking over the Tea Party. If anyone goes head to head with these conspiracy bullies, we are met with “GOP elitist” and “Neocon” labels. I guess Andrew Briebart would fit in both these categories according to those who know the facts before they are disseminated. Thank God for Ben Shapiro to come out and say it loud and clear!

Glenn Beck and Ben Shapiro have both distanced themselves from Alex Jones and his InfoWars site; I suggest the Tea Party make a concerted effort to do the same, before the Jones supporters take us down. Andrew Briebart was as close to a Tea Party leader as we have had; Ben Shapiro is now filling his shoes. This should be the path for the Tea Party to follow.

Fighting two fronts is tough, but the option is to be destroyed from within.

Thus the Tea Party has a two-pronged problem. 1) How to differentiate itself from the fringe, as Ben Shapiro did in his interview with Piers Morgan on CNN when he stated “ Do not lump me in with Alex Jones”. Glenn Beck took it a step further and called out Alex for what I believe he is, a “Madman.” 2) Getting the public, despite the left and the Mainstream Media’s attempt to lump us together, to see Alex Jones and his followers as not representative of the Tea Party, but rather a small, very vocal extremist group preying on the minds of the uninformed, gullible, or unstable.

The liberals are using this as their hammer against the Tea Party. As one Tea Party advocate put it, “Alex Jones is a well-disguised enemy of the Tea Party.”

This trend from the leaders of the Tea Party needs to continue: openly differentiate us from the madmen or prepare to be embarrassed, taken down by the left, and disappear. The radical left is counting on this; don’t play into their hands.

Photo credit: The Alex Jones Show (Creative Commons)

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

The Significance Of The United States Constitution: Then And Now

By AK Fielding

constitution 2 SC The Significance of the United States Constitution:  Then and Now

Degrading the United States Constitution seems to be the latest fad in our country.  Most recently, in a debate with author Ben Shapiro, British journalist Piers Morgan attacked the Constitution and called it a “little book.”  Morgan lives and works in the United States but is clearly unaware that the United States Constitution is not a “little book” but the supreme law of the land.  Morgan is not alone in his berating of the Constitution; the current administration continuously tries to bend the law to its will at every opportunity.  The latest attack against the Second Amendment is hardly a response to a new situation but an outcome of years of planning to eradicate the Constitutional rights of law-abiding Americans.  Ironically, those attacking the Second Amendment unhesitatingly hide behind the First Amendment to cover their disparaging remarks about the same Constitution they despise.  For people such as Morgan, clearly unfamiliar with United States history, a short lesson on the Constitution is in order.

On May 14, 1787, the Federal Convention met at the Independence Hall in Philadelphia.  The plan was to correct errors in the loosely tied Articles of the Confederation.  By June, it was evident that the Articles of Confederation was incapable of supporting the form of government required by the new Republic.  Hence, the delegates worked methodically to create an entirely new type of document that represented the co-operation of all.

Lest someone feel the process involved in writing the Constitution and ratification was an easy one, a few points are worth noting.  To begin with, the delegates to the Convention arrived in Philadelphia under the steady onslaught of daily rain.  Unfortunately, far from cooling the city, the rain simply added in making it more humid and unbearable.  It may seem a minor problem to us today because of the advent of air-conditioning but for delegates of the Constitutional Convention, the heat, humidity, and flies alone created a nettlesome atmosphere often leading to escalated tensions in the meetings.

Despite the heat, 55 of the appointed 74 delegates arrived in Philadelphia.  Many of them remained in the city, the others traveled back and forth from their respective states to attend the sessions.  Yes, it required more than one session because they did not automatically agree on all terms of the Constitution.  Indeed, it took four long months to convince enough of the delegates to sign the Constitution.  The opposition was heavy from the beginning.  Alexander Hamilton, for example, arrived from the dissenting state of New York straddled with two other delegates, both anti-federalists.  Many of them favored one possibility over another and it would take several gruesome hours daily to convince all to agree upon one resolution.  For instance, James Madison and George Washington favored the Virginia Plan that called for a bicameral legislative branch, an executive branch led by a single person, and a judicial branch headed by a supreme court.  Others such as Benjamin Franklin, John Lansing and William Paterson backed the New Jersey Plan that suggested a unicameral legislative branch, and an executive council.  After giving an uninterrupted six-hour long speech on an alternative plan, Hamilton retired to New York, leaving the delegates behind with a milder opinion of the Virginia Plan.

Even after Hamilton’s grandiose speech, far from reaching common ground immediately, the delegates fought over the specifics and only came to an agreement on September 17, 1787 to sign the new Constitution.  The signatures secured a new Constitution at the convention but it still needed ratification to become law.  Anti-federalists such as Patrick Henry and George Clinton worked diligently to undermine the ratification process.  In response, Hamilton, Madison, and John Jay fired away in support of ratification of the Constitution in a series of essays and articles noted for the magnitude of their literary and political beauty.  The Federalist Papers have long become a masterpiece in political discourse and should be on the bookshelf of every American citizen.  The final ratified Constitution included a Bill of Rights that carefully laid out the rights of individuals without which we may never have had the final product we see today.

The Constitution stands as the lifeblood of our great nation.  To undermine its authority is to undermine the intelligence, wisdom, hard work, dedication, and sacrifices of the Founders who worked against all odds to create a law to safeguard the natural rights of people.  Therefore, We the People must respect the Constitution for through its provisions our rights remain protected against those who tread upon us.  It is our duty as Americans and patriots to honor the supreme law of our land and to correct those who ridicule it or try to minimize its relevance.  It is true that we no longer live in the eighteenth century, but our Founding Fathers had the foresight to devise the Constitution to last beyond their time; and for over 200 years, it has done so remarkably well.

Follow on Twitter:  @AKFielding

BLOG:  http://akfielding.blogspot.com/

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism