Tag Archives: PDF

How to Instantly Change Blocks of 'CAPITALIZED TEXT' in Microsoft Word to 'lowercase letters'

You know that moment when you finally figure out something, but you figured it out years after you really needed it? Don’t you freaking hate that?! Thanks to Reddit user josawalk, whom I hate, yet love, I now know how to change chunks of text from all capital letters to lowercase.

There were so many times in school when I needed to copy text from some PDF or a source like JSTOR and all of the letters were in uppercase!

SOMETIMES I SIMPLY FORGOT THAT CAPS LOCK WAS ON AND WOULD HAVE TO RETYPE THAT WHOLE SENTENCE.

If only I knew about this easy MS Word keyboard shortcut, I would’ve saved so… more

Source: Wonder How To

Deficit Down 15% for Fiscal 2013

By Justin Loiseau, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

The deficit is down again for March, according to a Treasury Statement released (link opens in PDF) today. After a rare January surplus and a $203.5 billion February deficit, March’s numbers drop Uncle Sam‘s deficit to $106.5 billion.

The improvement reflects both increased revenues (taxes) and decreased spending and showed significant upside over analysts’ $172 billion deficit expectation.

Source: fms.treas.gov. 

So far for FY 2013, the national deficit stands at $600.5 billion, down 15.2% from FY 2012’s $779 billion.

Overall revenues have risen 12.4%, with corporate and individual tax receipts up 18% and 14.7%, respectively.

Spending cuts haven’t performed quite as well, but Uncle Sam has still managed to knock 2.5% off his outlays. Defense spending took a major squeeze, down 6.2% to $315 billion.  

The article Deficit Down 15% for Fiscal 2013 originally appeared on Fool.com.

Y
ou can follow Justin Loiseau on Twitter @TMFJLo and on Motley Fool CAPS @TMFJLo.
Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = document.createElement('script');
ga.type = 'text/javascript';
ga.async = true;
ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';

var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

U.S. Crude Oil Inventories Steady as Pump Prices Drop

By Justin Loiseau, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

U.S. crude oil inventories bumped up 0.3 million barrels for the week ending April 5, according to an Energy Information Administration (EIA) report (link opens in PDF) released today. At 388.9 million barrels total, the newest number represents a 0.08% increase compared to the previous week.

For the same period, crude oil refinery inputs increased by 106,000 barrels per day (bpd), while imports fell by 211,000 bpd. These newest numbers carry forward the previous week’s trend, when inputs rose 130,000 bpd and imports fell 227,000 bpd. Overall inventories remain “well above the upper limit of the average range for this time of year,” according to the EIA.

Source: eia.gov.

Gasoline inventories rose 1.7 million barrels but remain within their average range. Prices at the pump fell for the sixth straight week to a national average of $3.608, $0.037 per gallon less than the previous week and $0.331 cheaper than a year ago.

Source: eia.gov.

Distillate fuel inventories fell slightly by 0.2 million barrels, keeping inventories low but within their five-year range. After a boost in wholesale demand dropped inventories by 2.3 million barrels the previous week, supply and demand seem to be averaging out for the summer season.

Source: eia.gov.

The article U.S. Crude Oil Inventories Steady as Pump Prices Drop originally appeared on Fool.com.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = document.createElement('script');
ga.type = 'text/javascript';
ga.async = true;
ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';

var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();

Read | Permalink | Email this

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Pump Prices Predicted to Drop for 2nd Summer in a Row

By Justin Loiseau, The Motley Fool

2013 Ford Focus ST

Filed under:

Prices at the pump are expected to drop for the second consecutive summer, according to a U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) report (link opens in PDF) released today.

After a 34% spike from 2010 to 2011, summer retail gasoline prices bumped down in the summer of 2012 and are expected to drop again this summer. According to EIA‘s report, drivers can expect an additional $0.06 shaved off this summer’s per-gallon cost, putting the average at $3.63, compared to last summer’s $3.69 average.

Source: eia.gov. 

The EIA assessment notes lower Brent crude oil prices, non-OPEC supply growth, and increased fuel economy as the main drivers behind the projected drop.

On a regional basis, West Coast pump prices should drop the most, from $4.02 last summer to $3.89 per gallon  this summer. The Midwest and Rocky Mountain regions are expected to receive a $0.09 cut from 2012’s pump prices, followed by a $0.04 drop on the East Coast and a $0.02 decrease for the Gulf Coast.

link

The article Pump Prices Predicted to Drop for 2nd Summer in a Row originally appeared on Fool.com.

Y
ou can follow Justin Loiseau on Twitter, @TMFJLo, and on Motley Fool CAPS, @TMFJLo.
Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = document.createElement('script');
ga.type = 'text/javascript';
ga.async = true;
ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';

var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();

Read | <a target=_blank href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/09/pump-prices-predicted-to-drop-for-2nd-summer-in-a/" …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Wholesale Sales Rise, Inventories Drop for February

By Justin Loiseau, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Wholesale sales were up and inventories down for February, according to a Commerce Department report (link opens in PDF) released today. After January’s sales slump and rise in inventories, this newest report indicates wholesalers are back on a more sustainable business path.

Sales for February increased 1.7% (from January) to a seasonally adjusted $422.5 billion, boosted significantly by a 10.6% spike in petroleum and petroleum products sales. Compared to February 2012, lumber sales have improved the most (+17.6%), while metals sales take the underperformance cake (-4.4%). Year-over-year U.S. total sales increased 3.7% in February 

February’s inventories shrank 0.3% to $501.4 billion. Even after January’s revised 0.8% rise, market analysts were expecting an additional 0.5% bump. A 0.9% drop in nondurable goods pushed inventories lower, led by a 5.7% drop in farm products. Despite the overall drop in inventories, computer equipment notched a 2.2% increase for February.

To understand the rate at which goods are being made and sold, economists compute an inventories/sales ratio. Since sales rose and inventories fell from January to February, the inventories/sales ratio dropped from 1.21 to 1.19, just 0.01 above February 2012’s ratio.

Source: census.gov. 

link

The article Wholesale Sales Rise, Inventories Drop for February originally appeared on Fool.com.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = document.createElement('script');
ga.type = 'text/javascript';
ga.async = true;
ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';

var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

What's LINN Energy Worth?

By Matt DiLallo, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Over the past month or so LINN Energy has been under a bit of an attack from short sellers. The company has been quick to respond to these comments and its most recent response (link opens a PDF) had a very detailed analysis of its net asset value. It’s always a good idea to have at least some basis for what an investment is worth, so let’s drill down into LINN’s net asset value.

LINN’s recent presentation provided investors with two different analyses of its net asset value. One is the company’s internal analysis and the other came from a third-party advisor. Both showed that LINN is currently undervalued, and possibly has an upside of up to 70% even before taking the company’s recently announced Berry Petroleum  merger into account. Let’s take a look at what this all means to current and potential LINN Energy investors.

LINN’s own internal analysis implies an equity value of $44.74-$64.74 per unit. The foundation of its analysis is its proved reserves, which when you add it all up, gives a base value of $8.8 billion. These reserves include both proved developed and unproved developed which are believed to hold approximately 5 trillion cubic feet of equivalent, or Tcfe, of reserves.

One thing I will point out is that in LINN’s valuation it is using a PV-7.5 instead of a more traditional PV-10 value. What it’s doing is taking the present value of these reserves and not discounting it as deeply. Given LINN’s low cost of capital, and the fact that these are known reserves, it’s not using an overly aggressive rate but it is something an investor needs to know.

In addition to the reserves that LINN has in place, it owns a gas processing plant that it acquired from BP in the Hugoton deal last year. At the time the plant was just 41% utilized giving it significant excess capacity and future upside. LINN has value in its hedge book as well as additional assets and facilities that hold value. Together, these assets add another $1.3 billion in value to the company.

From here the value gets a little more complicated and is more open for debate. LINN has a significant inventory of future drilling sites which could possibly yield upwards of 14 Tcfe of reserves. A large portion of this future potential is located in its Granite Wash acreage which could deliver 5.2 Tcfe of future production, however, in order for that production to be realized, gas needs to move above $4.70 per MMBtu after 2018 and oil needs to remain above $90 per barrel.

When you incorporate this future potential it adds significantly to LINN’s net asset value. Using both PV-15 and PV-10 rates these reserves could add between $6.5 billion and $11.2 billion to the company’s value respectively. Taking that top number, and netting out its debt, it implies a value upwards of $65 per unit.

LINN’s third-party …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

"The World's Leading Airline" Is Actually the Worst in the U.S.

By Adam Levine-Weinberg, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

United Continental CEO Jeff Smisek has been marketing United as “the world’s leading airline” for the past year. At an industry conference last month, Smisek stated that he wasn’t worried about American Airlines taking the title of the world’s largest airline following the latter’s merger with US Airways . Instead he was focused on the goal of being the world’s leading airline. This entails having the best route network to get people where they need to go, and providing strong customer service along the way.

Unfortunately for United and its customers, reality doesn’t quite live up to Smisek’s vision. The 2013 Airline Quality Rating survey (an annual study of various quality of service metrics for the U.S. airline industry) put United at the bottom of the list (No. 14). Furthermore, the No. 12 and No. 13 airlines — SkyWest subsidiaries SkyWest Airlines and ExpressJet Airlines — are regional carriers doing most of their flying for United. United’s poor service quality will make it difficult for the airline to sustain its historical revenue premium. As a result, I believe the market is overestimating United’s ability to bounce back quickly from its disappointing 2012 earnings performance.

Survey says!
The Airline Quality Rating survey (link opens a PDF) takes into account four criteria: on-time performance, denied boarding frequency (aka “getting bumped”), mishandled baggage, and customer complaints. For 2012, United and its regional partners were near the bottom of the pile in terms of on-time performance and mishandled baggage, and were by far the worst offenders in terms of denied boardings and customer complaints. United’s overall score of -2.18 was far worse than the scores for its major competitors:

Airline

Rating (smaller negative number is better)

American Airlines

-1.11

Delta Air Lines

-0.58

Southwest Airlines

-0.81

United Airlines

-2.18

US Airways

-0.87

Data from 2013 Airline Quality Rating survey

United Continental‘s performance significantly deteriorated compared to 2011, when United scored -1.45 and Continental scored -1.41. Much of this drop can be attributed to the difficult merger integration process, particularly a number of IT system problems that disrupted flight schedules and hurt customer service. Nevertheless, even if the company had maintained its 2011 rating, that still would have placed it significantly behind all of its major competitors.

Why it matters
Despite its poor service compared to peers and unit revenue growth near the bottom of the industry for 2012, United still maintains a modest revenue premium over competitors. This is partially the result of having hubs in many of the biggest and wealthiest cities in the country. However, it its also partially a legacy of Continental Airlines‘ reputation for superior service. As recently as 2009, Continental was the top-ranked network carrier in the AQR survey. However, United Continental has lost that customer service advantage to Delta, and it should not be surprising that Delta …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

5 Ways Obamacare Will Fail

By Sean Williams, The Motley Fool

2013 Lexus GS450h

Filed under:

Whether you’re ready for it or not, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, known collectively as Obamacare, is going to be fully implemented in less than nine months. The blatant rising costs of health care in this country, compounded by the successful implementation of socialized health care from our neighbors to the north, pre-empted President Obama and lawmakers to vote for change in 2010. Yesterday, in fact, I examined five ways that this bill will improve the scope of health care in this country.

However, not everyone is on board with the proposed changes set forth in this bill. In fact, the opposition has tried everything under the sun in order to get Obamacare repealed without any success.

Source: White House on Flickr

Today, I propose to turn the tables and examine five areas where Obamacare appears destined to fail.

1. Health insurers will keep most of their leverage.
If you recall, one of the key points I touched on yesterday where Obamacare is a boon for paying members is that it requires the insurance industry to spend at least 80% of its premium revenue on actual health services. This will cap the profit potential of insurers and is expected to cancel out unwarranted premium hikes under the PPACA.

Conversely, there’s little in the way of fines and regulations that will ultimately stop health insurers from raising their premiums or from shocking current members with huge premium hikes in advance of the full implementation of the PPACA in 2014. Obamacare was expected to take the power of premium pricing away from health insurers and put it into the hands of consumers in a competitive marketplace, but it appears it will be more of the same even after the bill is put into action.

A perfect case in point is the complete 180 that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, pulled on Medicare Advantage providers last week. In February, insurers like Humana and Universal American that provide Medicare Advantage — a broader-care coverage plan for seniors that involves fewer out-of-pocket costs — were informed that their Medicare reimbursement rates would drop 2.3%. Following weeks of rigorous lobbying to lawmakers, the CMS reversed its decision from a 2.3% reduction in reimbursements to a 3.3% increase, claiming that it changed the scope by which it expected doctor pay to fall as its reasoning. In essence, by complaining and lobbying, the insurance industry orchestrated itself a nice raise and completely debunked the premise of Obamacare, which is to reduce the reliance of private insurers on the governments’ wallet.

2. Premiums will continue to rise.
The entire premise of creating the PPACA was to avert what seemed like an exponential growth in health-care costs due to high hospitalization and prescription drug costs. However, it appears that the usually conservative Society of Actuaries believes otherwise.

The SOA released a report (link opens PDF) two …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

WikiLeaks launches library with Kissinger-era intelligence cables

History buffs and conspiracy theorists, rejoice. Thanks to WikiLeaks, millions of U.S. intelligence documents are now available online.

WikiLeaks combined the 250,000 State Department documents it had previously released in 2010 (now called “Cablegate”) with 1.7 million documents from the department’s Henry Kissinger era to launch the Public Library of U.S. Diplomacy (PlusD).

The Kissinger Cables date from Jan. 1, 1973 to Dec. 31, 1976, and include assessments of Vietnam and transcripts from conversations that include classic Kissinger-isms like, “The illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer (see screenshot below).”

The government had previously declassified or made publicly available most of the documents included in the Kissinger Cables release, but the diplomatic records were largely in PDF format at the National Archives and Records Administration.

To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at PCWorld

One Word You'll Rarely Hear on Wall Street

By Buck Hartzell, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

I recently had a fascinating discussion with Lawrence Cunningham, author of The Essays of Warren Buffett: Lessons for Corporate America. The 3rd edition of this business classic has just been released.

Cunningham, professor of law at George Washington University, is one of the sharpest students of Warren Buffett in the world, and his insights are potentially quite valuable for investors and business leaders alike. Below is perhaps the most important lesson from my discussion with professor Cunningham.

A common Buffett word is unpopular on Wall Street
Cunningham actually put all of Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway shareholder letters into a word cloud, and discovered that the word “mistake” was one of the most common ones used.

Curious, I searched several annual reports from some other leading financial firms for the word “mistake” and guess what I found?

  • AIG‘s 2008 annual Report: 0 mentions.
  • Bank of America‘s 2009 annual report: 1 mention in boilerplate text over 600+ pages in.
  • Citigroup‘s 2008 annual report: 0 mentions.
  • JP Morgan Chase‘s 2012 annual report: 1 mention on page 315 of the PDF in relation to legal disclosures.
  • Fannie Mae‘s 2008 annual report: 2 mentions in a section on pension plan administration saying that no committee member is personally liable for even mistakes of judgment and the corporation will indemnify and hold harmless any employee, officer, or director. This feels like the opposite of admitting a mistake. Instead, the company is saying that it is going to protect its employees regardless of how poor their decisions are.

I think it’s fair to say that these companies could have used the word “mistake” just a bit more regularly, when writing about their recent history. Then again, it shouldn’t surprise us all that much that they didn’t use that word.

A word cloud created from JP Morgan’s 2011 shareholder letter.

The best organizations can admit to and learn from their mistakes, while poorly led firms will avoid mentioning them no matter what. If a company is unwilling or unable to acknowledge a mistake, how could it possibly learn from it?

Click here to read the entire transcript of my fascinating interview with professor Cunningham.

link

The article One Word You’ll Rarely Hear on Wall Street originally appeared on Fool.com.


Buck Hartzell owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Berkshire Hathaway, and American International Group. The Motley Fool recommends American International Group and Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool owns shares of American International Group, Bank of America, Berkshire Hathaway, Citigroup Inc , and JPMorgan Chase & Co. and has the following options: Long Jan 2014 $25 Calls on American International Group. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

2 More Law Firms File Suit Against Atlantic Power

By Justin Loiseau, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Two more law firms announced last week that they’re suing Atlantic Power on charges of misleading or failing to disclose key business factors to its shareholders. The Law Offices of Todd M. Garber (announced by Reuters; link opens in PDF) and Levi & Korsinky say they find concern with management’s statements on the sustainability of Atlantic’s dividend, and on the future prospects of soon-to-expire contracts.

Although both firms allege longer-term mismanagement, the foundation of both companies’ complaints stems from Atlantic’s Feb. 26 earnings report, when the utility announced that it would reduce its dividend by 66%.

Both firms are filing suits on behalf of investors who purchased Atlantic stock between July 23, 2010, and March 4 of this year. These latest lawsuits follow a similar filing by Robins Geller Rudman & Dowd on March 14.

The article 2 More Law Firms File Suit Against Atlantic Power originally appeared on Fool.com.



Fool contributor Justin Loiseau has no position in any stocks mentionedbut he does use electricity. You can follow him on Twitter, @TMFJLo, and on Motley Fool CAPS, @TMFJLo.

















…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Employment Oozes and Labor Force Shrinks in March

By Justin Loiseau, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

The Department of Labor released its March employment situation report (link opens in PDF) today, and the news is lackluster at best. Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 88,000, but market analysts were expecting a 193,000 hike after February’s revised 286,000 jump.

The unemployment rate dropped 0.1 percentage points, to 7.6%, continuing its recovery decline. But for March, at least, the decrease was due to a 496,000 drop in labor force numbers, rather than an increase in those employed.

Source: Labor Department

In the private sector, health care led gains, with a steady 23,000 bump, while retail trade knocked 24,000 off its payroll after averaging 32,000 new jobs per month for the last six months. The U.S. Postal Service put the squeeze on government employment, falling 12,000 in March.

For those remaining employed, March’s hourly earnings numbers leave little reason to celebrate. Analysts had expected a slight 0.2% bump, to $24.29 from $23.82, but earnings increased by #0.01 from February.

The article Employment Oozes and Labor Force Shrinks in March originally appeared on Fool.com.

Y
ou can follow Justin Loiseau on Twitter, @TMFJLo, and on Motley Fool CAPS, @TMFJLo.
Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = document.createElement('script');
ga.type = 'text/javascript';
ga.async = true;
ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';

var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();

Read | Permalink | <a target=_blank href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/forward/20532579/" …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Trade Deficit Improves For February

By Justin Loiseau, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

The U.S. international trade deficit improved slightly in February, according to a Commerce Department report (link opens a PDF) released today. The total deficit dropped $1.5 billion, to $43.0 billion, due primarily to a boost in goods exports. Market analysts were pleasantly surprised by the news, having expected a slight worsening to $44.8 billion.

Source: Commerce Department 

The goods deficit improved by $1.5 billion overall, led by $1.8 billion worth of increased industrial supplies and materials exports. At the same time, imports for industrial supplies and materials dropped $2.6 billion, more than reversing January’s trend.

Services exports and imports both bumped up $0.2 billion for February, but exports ($53.8 billion) continue to heavily outweigh imports ($36.5 billion).

In the past year, the overall trade deficit has managed a $1.6 billion decrease, reflected by a 3.2% increase in exports outweighing a 1.9% bump in imports.

The article Trade Deficit Improves For February originally appeared on Fool.com.

Y
ou can follow Justin Loiseau on Twitter, @TMFJLo, and on Motley Fool CAPS, @TMFJLo.
Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = document.createElement('script');
ga.type = 'text/javascript';
ga.async = true;
ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';

var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

3 Obamacare Stories You Missed This Week

By Brandy Betz, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Changes related to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare, roared on as March led in to April Fools’ Day. The slow rollout of the health care program gives us a steady stream of adjustments and finalizations.

This week saw Vermont become the first state to release a premium rate proposal. The Department of Health and Human Services clarified that not all states will receive a waiver for Medicaid expansion alternatives. And some top insurers have a trick up their sleeve to avoid Obamacare requirements until late next year.

Vermont’s premium proposal
Vermont became the first state to release proposed premium rates (link opens PDF) for its health insurance exchange, Vermont Health Connect. The story was notable because the rates were flat with the average rates available in the state prior to Obamacare. But as The Washington Post’s Ezra Klein pointed out, the lack of change was due to Vermont having strict insurance requirements even before the ACA passed.

Average price for individual coverage ranges from $374.18 to $609.47,

but many beneficiaries will receive federal subsidies to help cover some of the cost. The proposal came from the two participating insurers: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Vermont and MVP Healthcare. State officials will now review the rates and either suggest changes or finalize. Health insurance exchanges will open in October, offering coverage plans that will begin at the start of 2014.

Medicaid expansion stays complicated
The HHS released a document (link opens PDF) further clarifying the potential waivers, or premium assistance that states may receive for Medicaid expansion alternatives.Here’s the key bit:

HHS will consider approving a limited number of premium assistance demonstrations since their results would inform policy for the State Innovation Waivers that start in 2017. As with all such demonstrations, HHS will evaluate each proposal that is submitted and consider it on a case by case basis relative to this standard.

The HHS clarification might calm the frenzy states stirred when Arkansas received a waiver to allow federal money to purchase private insurance for the newly eligible. Tennessee recently found out the hard way that HHS will express caution in approving submitted plans.

Insurers avoid Obamacare requirements?
The Los Angeles Times reports that top insurers including WellPoint and UnitedHealth may delay their full exposure to the stricter coverage requirements of Obamacare. A loophole allows the insurers to renew existing policies that expire before the end of 2013. Renewal would make the plans, which don’t meet Obamacare standards, stretch well into 2014.

WellPoint told the paper that its renewal plans would vary by state. UnitedHealth admitted that some of its renewals would stretch until the end of March.

What’s the big deal about some insurance plans lasting a bit longer than anticipated? The health insurance exchanges depend on as many healthy people enrolling as possible. Presumably those who would want to renew before January are people in good …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

DSCA Seeks Authorization to Sell Singapore $246 Million Worth of Missiles

By Rich Smith, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

In twin announcements (link opens in PDF), Defense Security Cooperation Agency says (link opens in PDF) it has notified Congress of plans to make “Foreign Military Sales” to Singapore of two batches of air-to-air missiles.

The first delivery DSCA wishes to proceed with involves 100 AIM-120C7 Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM) manufactured by Raytheon (NYS: RTN) , Honeywell (NYS: HON) , Exelis (NYS: XLS) , and Alliant TechSystems (NYS: ATK) . Factoring associated equipment, parts, training, and logistical support into the cost of the order, the AMRAAM delivery would be worth an estimated $210 million to the companies involved.

Additionally, DSCA informed Congress of a planned sale of 20 AIM 9X-2 SIDEWINDER Block II All Up Round Missiles manufactured by Raytheon — also with included equipment, parts, training, and logistical support — valued at $36 million in total.

DSCA clarified that the AMRAAM missiles would be used to arm F-15SG fighter jets for the Singaporean Air Force. The intended use of the Sidewinders was not spelled out, but they seem likely to be destined for the same purpose.

According to DSCA, “The Republic of Singapore requires these missiles to meet current and future threats of enemy aircraft.”

Justifying the sale, DSCA advised Congress that both sales “will contribute to the foreign policy and national security of the United States by increasing the ability of the Republic of Singapore to contribute to regional security … [bolstering Singapore‘s] counter-piracy and counterterrorism efforts … to stabilize a critical chokepoint where much of the world’s goods and services transit en route to and from the Asia Pacific region.”

The article DSCA Seeks Authorization to Sell Singapore $246 Million Worth of Missiles originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Rich Smith has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Raytheon Company. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Review: 64-bit Adobe Preview Handler shows PDF thumbnails in Windows/File Explorer

When I upgraded to Windows 8 64-bit a few months back, a strange thing happened. The thumbnails for all of my PDF files disappeared. Normally, when I view an Explorer folder, I have the PDF files on “view large icons” (as it then gives me a preview of what the first page of the file looks like).  But Windows 8 wiped all of that. I couldn’t even get the standard Adobe PDF logo. So I did my usual and went Googling for answers and ended up with a free program called 64-bit Adobe Preview Handler.

The app itself is just a simple box which can be closed, once you click the “apply fix” button.

This small app (which weighs in at a measly 1MB) makes a small Windows registry fix that brings your PDF thumbnails back. The issue of disappearing thumbnails doesn’t seem to be confined to just Windows 8 though. Anyone with either Vista or Windows 7 64-bit may also experience this problem, and 64-bit Adobe Preview Handler is here to save the day.

Simply do the usual download and install and when you start it up, you will see a small window. There is pretty much nothing to configure–no options or anything. Click “apply fix” and then restart Windows Explorer.  If it still doesn’t work, you may also have to clear your thumbnail cache, but don’t worry, this is very easy to do. Simply run Disk Cleanup, select the C drive, put a tick in the Thumbnails checkbox, and then click OK. The system will do the rest.

Check back again on Windows Explorer, and you should see your PDF thumbnails appear again.

To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at PCWorld

PCWorld Digital Magazine Enhanced iPad Edition now available to subscribers for free

At PCWorld we’ve been producing digital versions of our print magazine issues for the past 10 years. But during most of those years, the digital versions were available only in PDF format—first through Zinio, later through Amazon Kindle and Barnes and Noble Nook, and most recently through Google Play—as exact copies of the print PCWorld magazine issues. In the past year, however, thanks to evolving technologies and capabilities, we’ve moved beyond the limitations of print (and PDF replication) to offer our readers a better digital magazine experience. Last May we launched the PCWorld Digital Magazine Enhanced iPad Edition, and now we’re now offering current print subscribers free access to it.

We’ve designed the Enhanced iPad Edition to deliver the best possible experience of PCWorld magazine on the iPad, optimizing the pages to work with all iPads (running iOS 5.0 or later) and including support for high-res Retina displays. The enhanced format enables us to provide rich multimedia content not available in print, including videos, interactive slideshows and features, and other multimedia elements. And because we’ve remastered the magazine content into an iPad-friendly layout, you can use the intuitive gestures and touchscreen capabilities native to the iPad to navigate through each issue. Your options include using the interactive table of contents, swiping from page to page, or gliding through article content from the tip of your finger. Embedded links take you directly to related information within the issue as well as to websites for additional content; and the app allows you to bookmark and share articles via email and Twitter.

To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at PCWorld

Congressional OK Sought for F-15 Sale to South Korea

By Rich Smith, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

The Defense Security Cooperation Agency announced on Wednesday (link opens in PDF) that it has notified Congress of plans to make a “Foreign Military Sale” to South Korea of 60 Boeing F-15SE “Silent Eagle” fighter jets. The sale, which would be structured as a direct commercial sale from Boeing to the Republic of Korea, is estimated to be worth $2.4 billion once the cost of associated equipment, parts, training, and logistical support are factored in.

Justifying the sale, DSCA advised Congress that “this proposed sale will contribute to the foreign policy goals and national security objectives of the United States by meeting the legitimate security and defense needs of an ally and partner nation … [augmenting] Korea‘s operational aircraft inventory and enhance[ing] its air-to-air and air-to-ground self-defense capability, provid[ing] it with a credible defense capability to deter aggression in the region.” 

DSCA further advised that as the F-15SEs are delivered, the ROK Air Force plans to decommission the ancient F-4 Phantom fighter jets currently in its arsenal to make way for the new planes. Hence, “Korea will have no difficulty absorbing this additional equipment and support into its inventory.”

As in a similar notification that DSCA gave Congress regarding a proposed F-35 fighter jet sale to South Korea by Lockheed Martin , DSCA made clear that South Korea will not necessarily buy the F-15SEs, even if Congress approves the sale. Rather, South Korea is holding a competition to choose its next generation of fighter jets. Congressional preapproval of a sale would pave the way for Boeing’s participation in this competition.

The article Congressional OK Sought for F-15 Sale to South Korea originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Rich Smith has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Lockheed Martin. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Pixelworks® and ACCESS Collaborate on Officeviewer to Enable Content Viewing and Presentations witho

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Pixelworks ® and ACCESS Collaborate on Officeviewer to Enable Content Viewing and Presentations without a PC

Officeviewer enables projection capability without a PC using USB host

SAN JOSE, Calif. & SUNNYVALE, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Pixelworks, Inc. (NAS: PXLW) , a pioneer in innovative video and display processing technology, and ACCESS CO., LTD, a global provider of advanced software technologies to the mobile and beyond-PC markets, today announced the companies are collaborating on Officeviewer to bring projection capability without a PC to a full range of projectors — from traditional mainstream projectors to small LED or laser-based portable and pocket projectors. Officeviewer offers users the convenience of using a portable USB thumb drive to view content and make presentations when a PC isn’t available or convenient.

As part of this collaboration, ACCESS ported its NetFront™ Document Viewer to Pixelworks’ existing platform of digital projector solutions. Officeviewer leverages USB host functionality in Pixelworks’ connected display processors, such as the Topaz platform family, to effectively eliminate the need for a PC to make presentations. The Officeviewer software solution is now available for integration by customers of new and existing Pixelworks SoC projector platforms, including the Company’s latest generation Topaz family of display processors.

ACCESS and Pixelworks, respective leaders in software and projectors, have successfully collaborated to bring this innovative solution to market and improve the user experience for our customers,” said Graham Loveridge, Sr. Vice President of Marketing at Pixelworks. “This projection capability will be available for a range of platforms, including the Topaz SoC family, and will ultimately be designed into nearly every leading projector brand. As such, we expect giving a presentation or viewing content without a PC to eventually become mainstream.”

“Similar to the growing trend of projection capability without a PC, viewing or sharing documents and content across connected devices has become a standard expectation for consumers in a connected world,” said Kiyoyasu Oishi, Senior Executive Officer, Global Business Unit, ACCESS CO., LTD. “By combining these projection and document viewing technologies, consumers will no longer need to use a PC to present and share documents, making it simpler and more efficient to work and collaborate.”

Features of Officeviewer include:

Haldex Annual Report for 2012 Released

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Haldex Annual Report for 2012 Released

STOCKHOLM–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Regulatory News:

Haldex (STO:HLDX) Annual Report for 2012 has been published and is available in PDF format at www.haldex.com.

Link: http://www.haldex.com/en/GLOBAL/Investors/Report-archive/Report-archive/

Haldex (www.haldex.com), headquartered in Landskrona, Sweden, is a provider of proprietary and innovative solutions to the global commercial vehicle industry, with focus on products in vehicles that enhance safety, environment and vehicle dynamics. Haldex is listed on the Nasdaq OMX Stockholm Stock Exchange and had net sales of approx 3.9 billion SEK in 2012. The number of employees amounts to about 2,200.

Haldex (www.haldex.com), headquartered in Landskrona, Sweden, is a provider of proprietary and Haldex AB (publ) is required to publish the above information under the Swedish Financial Instruments Trading Act. The information was submitted for publication on April 4, 2013.

This information was brought to you by Cision http://news.cision.com

Haldex
Kristina Brink
Corporate Communications Manager
+46 418 47 61 88 or +46 705 90 91 40

KEYWORDS:   Europe  Sweden

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS:

The article Haldex Annual Report for 2012 Released originally appeared on Fool.com.

Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance