Tag Archives: Fitch Ratings

Fitch Downgrades UK, Citing 90% Debt Threshold Used In Discredited Austerity Research

By The Huffington Post News Editors

Here’s an example of why credit-rating agencies might have a bit of a credibility problem.

On one of the most dramatic news days in recent history, Fitch Ratings took the opportunity on Friday to cut its credit rating for the United Kingdom’s sovereign debt to AA+ from AAA. This had zero real-world impact and little news value, but there was one interesting thing about it: The agency based the downgrade on the U.K.’s inability to get its debt down to 90 percent of gross domestic product.

If that number sounds familiar, that’s the threshold made famous by an economic research paper often used to justify government austerity, research that just this week was revealed to be full of errors.

Read More…
More on Mark Gongloff on Money

From: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/19/fitch-downgrades-uk_n_3116984.html

The Biggest Threat To China's Economy

By Gordon G. Chang, Contributor On Tuesday, Fitch Ratings downgraded China’s long-term local currency debt one notch, from AA– to A+.  The primary reason for the move was the country’s too-rapid expansion of credit, one of the “underlying structural weaknesses” the agency cited in its announcement.  Many analysts in fact think the debt resulting from then Premier Wen Jiabao’s borrowing binge, which began to accumulate in earnest in late 2008, is now China’s number one economic risk. There are, of course, other risk factors now undermining the country’s economic growth.  Among them are an eroding environment, unfavorable demographic trends, and persistent internal discontent.  Yet the events since early last month in North Asia—the tearing up of the Korean War armistice, Pyongyang’s promises of pre-emptive nuclear strikes on the U.S., and the deployment of North Korea’s mobile missiles, to name just a few of them—suggest the biggest threat to the Chinese economy may be the least discussed one: turmoil in the region.  As Fitch carefully noted in its explanation of Tuesday’s downgrade, “The ratings assume there is no significant deterioration of geopolitical risk, for example a conflict between China and Japan or an outbreak of war on the Korean peninsula.” North Asia looks like the world’s most volatile region at the moment.  An assertive China is working to push America aside, grab territory from an arc of nations from India in the south to South Korea in the north, and close off the South China Sea so that it becomes an internal Chinese lake.  Last month, while Chinese leaders talked about enhancing cooperation in the region, two Chinese vessels attacked a Vietnamese fishing boat, setting it on fire. There are many reasons for Beijing new assertiveness, but one stands out: slowing GDP growth, evident since the early summer of 2011.  The economic problems in particular have created a dangerous dynamic, trapping China in a self-reinforcing—and self-defeating—loop.  In this loop, the slumping economy is leading to a crisis of legitimacy, the legitimacy crisis is causing Beijing to fall back on nationalism and increase friction with its neighbors, and the increased friction is aggravating the country’s economic difficulties.  Caught in a trap of their own making, Beijing leaders will continue to blame foreigners for the problems evident in Chinese society and then lash out, as they did in September against Japan, over the uninhabited Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea.  And as they lash out, they are making their problems worse.  The anti-Japan protests in China last fall, for instance, are resulting in Japanese industry reducing its commitment to China by shifting investments into Southeast Asia, as Nissan announced at the end of October.  That, in turn, could push the Chinese economy past the tipping point.  Moreover, the North Korean crisis, which Beijing has been aggravating behind the scenes, is not helping the Chinese economy either.  Commerce between China and the North seems largely unaffected, as various reports from the border crossings indicate.  But the Kim regime in Pyongyang seems to be targeting the South Korean economy

From: http://www.forbes.com/sites/gordonchang/2013/04/14/the-biggest-threat-to-chinas-economy/

Michigan Credit Rating Gets An Upgrade

By The Huffington Post News Editors

(LANSING, Mich.) — Gov. Rick Snyder announced Tuesday that Fitch Ratings has upgraded Michigan’s general obligation credit rating to AA, the first time Fitch has rated Michigan above AA– since January 2007.

Standard and Poor’s also upgraded Michigan’s credit outlook to “positive,” while affirming its AA– rating. Moody’s announced a similar upgrade last week.

Read More…
More on Detroit Development

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Huffington Post

What's Holding These Automakers' Stock Prices Down?

By Daniel Miller, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

January and February were two great months for vehicle sales in the U.S. market, delivering great sales figures, profits, and renewed optimism at Detroit automakers Ford and General Motors . In those same two months, however, the stock prices of Ford and GM haven’t responded – both companies lag the broader market. With a rebounding U.S. market, and gaining share in China, it’s clear Europe is the biggest cause of pressure on domestic auto stocks. I bet you’re shocked, huh? There’s no need to panic or avoid these stocks, for the European market will bottom out and rebound eventually. What’s important is understanding if the rebound will resemble the U.S. market or the Japanese market. If you don’t know the difference, then read on; it will make a huge difference in the stock prices through 2020.

Japan or U.S.
Ford expects to lose more money in Europe in 2013 than it did in 2012. Not good news from a company that lost $1.8 billion there last year. Analysts expect sales to start recovering in 2014, but they see a slow and gradual rebound. Vehicle sales aren’t expected to reach pre-crisis levels until the end of the decade, at least. That’s terrible news considering that the European auto market once was the largest in the world.

Some analysts now believe Europe could resemble Japan‘s auto recovery rather than that of the United States. “Auto sales in the U.S. recovered to 14.4 million in 2012, up 13.4 percent from 2011 and 39 percent from 2009. This was in contrast to previous market assumptions and forecasts pointing to long-lasting depressed conditions,” Emmanuel Bulle, Paris-based autos analyst with Fitch Ratings said.

He goes on to mention that Japan‘s vehicle sales have fluctuated between 25% and 45% below its 1990 peak, never fully recovering. If that’s the case, and the European consumer doesn’t fully return, it makes maintaining market share in the U.S. and growth in China the most important factors going forward. There is hope though; let’s look at a few factors that will help Ford and GM get out of this rut.

Been there, done that
Obviously, industry sales are expected to decline again this year, but consider some other factors. There are advertisements that are offering discounts equivalent to over $9,000 per vehicle. Some nations are also considering scrap programs, similar to our cash-for-clunkers program, which would make it even more difficult for automakers to estimate needed inventories. Any of that sound familiar? It’s 2008 all over again, with a European twist.

Alan Mulally, Ford’s CEO, still expects to lose $3 billion over the next two years in Europe. That said, the company has seen much worse and come out better than ever. Consider that between 2006 and 2008 Ford lost $30 billion due to the U.S. recession — or 10 times more than it expects to lose in Europe over the next two years. Ford plans to use the same cost-cutting tactics …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Jackson® Reports 2012 Record IFRS Net Income of $992.0 Million

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Jackson ® Reports 2012 Record IFRS Net Income of $992.0 Million

  • Record 2012 IFRS1 net income of $992.0 million, up 73.0%
  • Record total sales and deposits2 of $25.5 billion, up 11.3%
  • Year-end 2012 IFRS assets total $165.4 billion, up from $119.0 billion at year-end 2011
  • Year-end 2012 regulatory adjusted capital of $4.7 billion, up from $3.9 billion at year-end 2011

LANSING, Mich.–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Jackson National Life Insurance Company® (Jackson) reported record IFRS net income of $992.0 million for full-year 2012, up from $572.8 million in full-year 2011, driven primarily by higher fee income from variable annuities.

Jackson, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the United Kingdom’s Prudential plc (NYS: PUK) , increased total IFRS assets to $165.4 billion3 at the end of 2012, up from $119.0 billion at the end of 2011. As of December 31, 2012, the company had $4.7 billion of regulatory adjusted capital, more than eight times the minimum regulatory requirement.4

On September 4, 2012, Jackson completed the acquisition of SRLC America Holding Corp. (SRLC) from Swiss Re Life Capital Ltd (Swiss Re) for an initial consideration of $587.3 million.5 SRLC was the U.S. holding company of Reassure America Life Insurance Company (REALIC), which was merged into Jackson on December 31, 2012. The acquisition helps diversify Jackson’s sources of earnings by increasing the amount of income generated from stable life insurance profits.

“In 2012, Jackson had a successful year and we are pleased with the progress that has been made on several fronts. During the year, we delivered record IFRS profits and record sales despite the challenges that the industry faces from the current low-interest rate environment. We completed the acquisition of SRLC which has broadened our policyholder base and enhanced the resilience of our earnings. We launched a new variable annuity product, Elite Access®, which provides tax-efficient access to alternative investments. And, most importantly, we maintained a strong capital position throughout the entire year. There is good momentum within our businesses and we are well positioned as we move into 2013,” said Mike Wells, Jackson’s president and chief executive officer.

Financial Strength

During 2012, all four primary rating agencies—A.M. Best, Standard & Poor’s, Fitch Ratings and Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.—affirmed …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Why Boeing and Financials Are Leading Stocks Higher

By John Maxfield, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Stocks are positioned to extend their winning streak today despite disappointing news out of both Europe and China. The Dow Jones Industrial Average has now closed higher on every day in March, up a cumulative 2.7%. If the blue-chip index finishes up once again, it will have done so for seven consecutive days, setting records throughout the run.

Today’s rally is fighting against growing economic headwinds. At the end of last week, ratings agency Fitch Ratings downgraded Italy‘s credit rating to three steps above junk status. And today, data showed that the country’s gross domestic product contracted by 0.9% in the final three months of last year. On a year-over-year basis, the figure was 2.8% down from the final quarter of 2011.

“I think the Italian downgrade is acting as a bit of a wake-up call,” a London-based economist told Reuters.

In China, data revealed that inflation is rising while growth in industrial production and retail sales came in below expectations. As my colleague Dan Dzombak discussed in more detail, inflation in February increased to 3.2%. Meanwhile, the growth rates of industrial production and retail sales fell to 9.9% and 12.3%, respectively. With respect to the latter figure, economists had forecast growth of 13.8%.

On the heels of this news, the Dow is up by 38 points, or 0.26%, with about an hour left in the trading session.

In terms of the index’s best-performing individual components, Boeing is leading the way. Shares in the company are 1.9% higher after the aerospace giant announced that it has finally identified the problem with its flagship 787 Dreamliner. Two months ago global aviation authorities grounded all 50 of the aircraft then in use after lithium-ion batteries on two separate planes caught on fire.

Speaking at a conference of aviation financiers today, Boeing’s marketing vice president Randy Tinseth said, “It is a solution that we believe provides three levels of protection for the airplane and it’s a solution that we’re confident will ensure safe and reliable service for the 787 in the future.”

Shares of both JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America are also rallying today after the banks discovered last week that they had passed the Federal Reserve‘s annual stress test mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act. At the end of this week, in turn, investors should know whether the banks have also gotten approval to increase dividend payouts and/or initiate share buyback programs.

Last week, fellow too-big-to-fail bank Citigroup announced that it will ask the Fed for permission to buy back $1.2 billion in shares. The bank is still smarting from having a similar request denied last year — many even believe the denial was a major contributing factor in former CEO Vikram Pandit’s forced resignation. As a result, the planned repurchase this time around is designed only to “offset estimated dilution created by annual incentive compensation grants.”

In addition, the Financial Times reported that JPMorgan has “requested a share buyback of …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Fitch Upgrades Ecopetrol's Rating Outlook

By Rich Duprey, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Columbia’s largest company, Ecopetrol , said this morning that Fitch Ratings maintained its international ratings for  the company’s local and foreign currency at BBB and BBB-, respectively, and has revised the rating outlook from “stable” to “positive.” The action occurred on Friday.

The rating action affects approximately $1.5 billion of notes outstanding.

The government of Colombia owns 88.5% of Ecopetrol’s business. Fitch recently upgraded Colombia‘s ratings, so this helped lead to its upgrade to “positive” on the company, which Fitch said also has a strong financial profile and improving production levels.

Fitch expects Colombia to become a net sovereign external creditor in 2013 because of its continued international reserve accumulation. Moreover, the government‘s debt burden continues to decline as “fiscal consolidation and economic growth” work in tandem to allow debt to fall to an estimated 36.3% of GDP in 2012, said Fitch, in line with its estimates.

As a result, Fitch affirmed Ecopetrol’s foreign currency and local currency issuer default ratings that affect approximately $1.5 billion of notes outstanding. Fitch has also affirmed Ecopetrol’s national short- and long-term issuer default ratings at F1+ and AAA, respectively.

Fitch says further upgrades could result from an upgrade of Colombia‘s ratings coupled with continued strong operating and financial performance, though a downgrade is possible if Colombia‘s sovereign ratings are downgraded or conditions otherwise deteriorate.

Ecopetrol is one of the 50 largest oil companies in the world.

link

The article Fitch Upgrades Ecopetrol’s Rating Outlook originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Rich Duprey has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

3 Reasons Not to Buy AMD

By Caroline Bennett, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Semiconductor manufacturer Advanced Micro Devices has been trading on the cheap lately. It has the trappings of an appealing value play, but there’s a lot more to AMD than meets the eye. Here are three reasons why it’s probably best to stay away from this stock.

1. The PC’s no longer the thing
As proven most recently when Dell went private, personal computers have taken a backseat to the mobile phone and tablet. Even heavyweights like Microsoft and HP are taking a hit in computer sales, and for a company like AMD, which has put extra emphasis on building semiconductors for personal computers, this change in the wind could cause setbacks for some time to come.

AMD isn’t the only company struggling with this. Its greatest rival, the much larger Intel , has suffered its share of weaker-than-expected earnings calls lately. As fellow Fool Anders Bylund put it, the fact that both companies are struggling (as opposed to one triumphing over the other) is a sign that something has gone deeply awry in the world of IT.

2. A dismal past year
Besides a turn in the tech tide, Advanced Micro Devices has had to answer for some dreary recent financial statements. The company saw a 17% drop in revenue during 2012, along with operating and net income losses of more than $1 billion each.

AMD isn’t just dwindling in sales. Its profit margins show that last year, the company was producing its goods inefficiently. During its most recent two quarters, AMD has additionally burned $239 million worth of cash. It’s difficult enough for a company to adapt to changing trends if its business structure is stable. AMD’s weak financial skeleton could make any change in the tech climate seem like a fatal blow.

3. Downgraded rating
Because of the business’ recent financials, AMD was recently given a downgrade by the Fitch Ratings agency. Fitch based its assessment on a belief that the company’s lack of cash flow would drive AMD to its “minimum operating level.”

A low rating is probably the least of AMD’s worries at the moment, but it can immediately affect its stock price, as it signifies the market is growing wise to its struggles. In this case, AMD’s price dropped 2.6% to $2.67 after its downgrade. It’s a small drop, but a drop nonetheless, and currently AMD isn’t doing much to prove it can shake it off.

Save your money — at least for now
If AMD can’t adapt to its surroundings, it’s going to get swallowed up. Now that the PC market is on its way down, AMD needs to spend less on producing its goods, or else its financials could get even worse, and the company could sink even faster. There are clearly holes in this boat, and investors may want to think twice before they step into it.

AMD’s rival Intel may have dominated the PC microprocessor arena, but now that market is maturing, …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

States Race To Legalize Online Gambling

By The Huffington Post News Editors

By Deena Beasley and Nichola Groom
(Reuters) – New Jersey Governor Chris Christie this week finally approved online gaming in the Garden State. Now comes the hard part: banding together with other states to attract more gamblers, drive up jackpots and lure players away from offshore websites.
New Jersey is now the third state to approve online gambling, after Nevada and Delaware. The catch, however, is that the new laws apply only to people physically present in the individual states.
Several other states, including Massachusetts, California, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa and Mississippi, are weighing some kind of online gambling legislation. If they want to offer the big jackpots that attract scores of players, they are likely to look outside their borders to combine gaming offerings and set regulations, much as they have with multi-state lottery drawings like Powerball and Mega Millions.
“I would be shocked if within a few years there aren’t multiple states cooperating,” said Tom Goldstein, an attorney who has represented online gaming companies. Once that happens, Goldstein expects a “steamroller effect where a state legislature says ‘Why are we passing up on tens of millions of tax revenue every year?”
According to American Gaming Association, about 85 countries have legalized online gambling, and an estimated $35 billion is bet online worldwide each year, including millions of people in the United States through offshore websites. Every state except Hawaii and Utah collects some kind of revenue from lotteries, casinos or other types of wagering. States received an estimated $7.5 billion in direct gaming revenue in 2011 on a fiscal year basis through licensing fees, taxes and other allocations, according to Fitch Ratings.
The U.S. government has long considered online wagering illegal, but the Department of Justice in late 2011 clarified its stance, paving the way for states to unilaterally legalize some forms of online gambling.
A state’s population is a key factor for the new gaming programs. With just 2.7 million residents, Nevada could have trouble attracting enough in-state players to its online poker games to offer a range of limits, or the minimum and maximum amounts a player can wager on one bet. Without a wide range of active games, states could lose business to the unregulated offshore sites that dominate the market currently.
“There’s going to be …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Huffington Post

An Angie's List for Debt Ratings?

By 24/7 Wall St.

131772836

Filed under:

The difference between professional services reviews posted to Angie’s List Inc. (NASDAQ: ANGI) and book reviews posted at Amazon.com Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN) or the number of video views counted at Google Inc.’s (NASDAQ: GOOG) YouTube is that Angie’s List takes pains to verify that its reviews are not being padded by self-promoters. It’s an Internet version of a model long practiced by Consumer Reports — independent reviews by the person who pays the bill.

Now, consider how that might apply to the ratings agencies like Moody’s Corp. (NYSE: MCO) or The McGraw-Hill Companies’ (NYSE: MHP) Standard & Poor’s or Fitch Ratings. Under their current modus operandi the agencies are paid by the bond issuers for ratings. We all know how that worked out, and S&P now faces a federal investigation related to its ratings of mortgage-backed securities prior to the real estate meltdown of 2007.

The logical thing would be for the ratings users to pay for those bond ratings, but the trick would be how to control the way the data gets disseminated. After all, if a brokerage pays for something, it would want to own it. And the bond brokers wouldn’t want to be saddled with bad ratings either because they couldn’t sell dicey bonds to savvy investors. Corporate bond issuers would hate this too.

How about having the federal government pay? Certainly the cost wouldn’t be nearly as high as the cost of propping up and bailing out the financial system. But, realistically, the philosophical and political issues with having the government pay for bond ratings has virtually no chance of gaining any traction.

The ratings system we’ve got — including the threat of federal prosecution — might be the best we can get. But do you really think Moody’s or S&P or Fitch is as trustworthy as Angie’s List? Really?

Filed under: 24/7 Wall St. Wire, Bonds, business and finance, Internet Tagged: AMZN, ANGI, GOOG, MCO, MHP

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Dell: Fitch, Gimme Credit Cut Debt Ratings On LBO Funding

By Eric Savitz, Forbes Staff

The credit research firms Fitch Ratings and Gimme Credit have both reduced their debt ratings on Dell to reflect the substantial amount of debt the company will add to complete the pending leveraged buyout of the company to be led by founder Michael Dell and the private equity firm Silver Lake. Fitch Ratings reduced its long-term issuer default rating on Dell to BB+ from A, noting that a further reduction is possible. “Key details of the financing package for the proposed LBO have yet to be disclosed, but Fitch continues to expect pro forma leverage in the 3.5x – 4.5x range …. This would likely result in a long-term IDR in the mid to high single ‘B’ range,” Fitch said. “A ‘BB-‘ rating is a possibility based solely on leverage at the very low end of the range. However, various other factors need to be considered, including the highly competitive environment in which Dell operates, the uncertain macro economy, public sector weakness, reduced financial flexibility to pursue future acquisitions, a nascent track record of its recently acquired enterprise portfolio, and the potential to burn cash in down cycles due to its negative working capital position.” Gimme Credit analyst David Novosel today cut his credit score on Dell to deteriorating from stable. “The recently announced LBO will add a huge chunk of debt to the balance sheet, likely sending leverage to more than 4 times,” he writes. “Dell’s free cash flow has been declining and future cash flows may be directed to acquisitions as the company repositions its portfolio. Therefore leverage will probably remain elevated in the near term. … Although Dell is moving away from the business of selling PCs to consumers, that still comprises a large potion of total revenue. And the PC market has been weak lately, reflecting difficult economic conditions across the globe, delayed spending in emerging markets, and a shift toward smartphones and tablets. The soft top line is pressuring margins. Free cash flow has declined modestly, yet remains strong. However, extensive spending on acquisitions had led to higher debt. Combined with lower EBITDA, leverage has risen to more than 2x.” Dell shares are up 3 cents to $13.45, which is 20 cents below the $13.65 a share bid price. …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

Is S&P About To Fall Prey To American Bloodlust?

By James Poulos, Contributor Is it the first move in a new crackdown, or another act of symbolic politics? The Wall Street Journal reports: The Justice Department and state prosecutors intend to file civil charges alleging wrongdoing by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services in its rating of mortgage bonds before the financial crisis erupted in 2008, according to people familiar with the matter. Here’s the key piece: Many details of the looming enforcement action couldn’t be immediately determined, such as why prosecutors are zeroing in on S&P rather than rivals Moody’s Corp. and Fitch Ratings, a unit of Fimalac SA and Hearst Corp. As Reuters points out, all the ratings agencies have long been the focus of pent-up financial frustration. In addition to being the first federal action against such an agency, the DOJ‘s impending suit comes complete with collaboration by a number of states’ Attorneys General, who are expected to join the legal effort.
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

Feds Finger Standard & Poor's In DOJ Lawsuit

By James Poulos, Contributor Is it the first move in a new crackdown, or another act of symbolic politics? The Wall Street Journal reports: The Justice Department and state prosecutors intend to file civil charges alleging wrongdoing by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services in its rating of mortgage bonds before the financial crisis erupted in 2008, according to people familiar with the matter. Here’s the key piece: Many details of the looming enforcement action couldn’t be immediately determined, such as why prosecutors are zeroing in on S&P rather than rivals Moody’s Corp. and Fitch Ratings, a unit of Fimalac SA and Hearst Corp. As Reuters points out, all the ratings agencies have long been the focus of pent-up financial frustration. In addition to being the first federal action against such an agency, the DOJ‘s impending suit comes complete with collaboration by a number of states’ Attorneys General, who are expected to join the legal effort.
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

S&P expects US lawsuit over its mortgage ratings

The U.S. government is expected to file civil charges against Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, alleging that it fraudulently gave high ratings to mortgage debt that later plunged in value and helped fuel the 2008 financial crisis.

The charges would mark the first enforcement action the government has taken against a major rating agency involving the financial crisis.

S&P said Monday that the Justice Department had informed it that it intends to file a civil lawsuit focusing on S&P’s ratings of mortgage debt in 2007. The action does not involve any criminal allegations.

S&P denies any wrongdoing and says any lawsuit would be without merit.

A lawsuit would “disregard” the fact that S&P reviewed the same data on risky mortgages as the rest of the market and U.S. government officials, who publicly said in 2007 that the problems in the subprime mortgage market appeared to be limited, the company said in a statement.

In the statement, S&P said it “deeply regrets” that its ratings on some securities “failed to fully anticipate the rapidly deteriorating conditions in the U.S. mortgage market during that tumultuous time.”

Justice Department spokeswoman Nanda Chitre declined to comment on the matter.

S&P is a unit of New York-based McGraw-Hill Cos. McGraw-Hill’s stock plunged nearly 14 percent Monday after reports surfaced about the government‘s expected lawsuit.

Moody’s Corp., the parent of Moody’s Investors Service, another rating agency, closed down nearly 11 percent. The two rating companies’ stocks suffered the biggest percentage drops in the S&P 500 index, which closed down slightly more than 1 percent.

S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch Ratings, the third major rating agency, have been blamed for helping fuel the crisis by assigning AAA ratings to trillions of dollars in risky securities backed by subprime mortgages. The securities later collapsed in value once the housing market bubble burst and home-loan delinquencies soared. Major U.S. banks absorbed tens of billions of dollars in losses.

The rating agencies are crucial arbiters of the creditworthiness of securities traded around the world. The grades they assign can affect a company’s ability to raise or borrow money and how much investors will pay for securities it issues.

The securities in the anticipated federal lawsuit are collateralized debt offerings. CDOs are investment vehicles that contain many underlying mortgage loans.

A CDO generally gains in value if borrowers repay. But a wave of defaults can cause them to tumble in value. Soured CDOs contributed to, and intensified, the financial crisis.

Critics have long argued that rating agencies have an inherent conflict of interest: They’re paid by the same companies whose products and credit they rate. The agencies have been accused of issuing unduly high ratings before the crisis because of pressure from banks they desired as clients.

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox US News

S&P expects gov't lawsuit over mortgage ratings

Standard & Poor’s says the government plans to file a civil lawsuit alleging wrongdoing by the agency when it gave high ratings to mortgage debt securities that later plunged in value and fueled the 2008 financial crisis.

S&P said Monday that it has been told by the Justice Department that it intends to file a civil lawsuit focusing on S&P’s ratings on some mortgage debt securities in 2007. A suit would mark the first enforcement action by the federal government against a major rating agency over the issue.

The big rating agency denies any wrongdoing and says any lawsuit would be without factual or legal merit.

A suit would “disregard” the fact that S&P reviewed the same data on risky mortgages as the rest of the market and U.S. government officials, who publicly said in 2007 that the problems in the subprime mortgage market appeared to be limited, the company said.

In a statement, S&P said it “deeply regrets” that its ratings on the securities “failed to fully anticipate the rapidly deteriorating conditions in the U.S. mortgage market during that tumultuous time.” However, the company said, it took “extensive” rating actions in 2007, before other rating agencies, on the mortgage-backed securities that were included in a mix of mortgage securities.

Justice Department spokeswoman Nanda Chitre declined to comment on the matter.

S&P is a unit of New York-based McGraw-Hill Cos. The company’s stock was down 13 percent in heavy trading Monday amid a broader market decline.

S&P and the other two major agencies, Moody’s Investors Service and Fitch Ratings, have been blamed for helping fuel the crisis by giving AAA ratings to trillions of dollars in risky securities backed by subprime mortgages. The securities later sank in value when the housing market bubble burst and home-loan delinquencies soared, causing tens of billions of dollars in losses for major U.S. banks.

The rating agencies are crucial financial gatekeepers. The grades they assign can affect a company’s ability to raise or borrow money and how much investors will pay for securities it issues.

The securities in the anticipated federal lawsuit are collateralized debt offerings, or CDOs. CDOs are securities that contain many underlying mortgage loans.

A CDO generally gains in value if borrowers repay, but lose value if they default. Soured CDOs have been blamed for intensifying the financial crisis.

Critics say rating agencies have an inherent conflict of interest: They’re paid by the companies whose products and credit they rate. The agencies have been accused of issuing unduly high ratings before the crisis because of pressure from banks they wanted as clients.

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox US News

Puerto Rico teeters on fiscal edge over pensions

Office clerk Lillian Marti hopes to retire one day with a decent pension. Now, like many other employees of Puerto Rico‘s government, she’s beginning to fear she might not get that chance.

“Of course, I’m worried,” said the 61-year-old, who has worked for the government for 20 years.

Some experts are calling for cutting benefits to help Puerto Rico confront what economists and financial analysts say is a ticking fiscal time bomb: A public pension system with a $37.3 billion unfunded liability that must be addressed soon, at a time when the U.S. island territory’s government has little money to spare.

The unfunded liability, which is spread across three public pension systems, is almost four times the annual government budget for the island of nearly 4 million people. Only a few much larger U.S. states, such as California and Illinois, face bigger unfunded liabilities.

Puerto Rico‘s problem stems from decades of neglect as politicians facing budget deficits were unwilling to set aside money for the growing ranks of retired police, firefighters, teachers and office workers. Now many analysts and even some government officials concede it is the most critical issue facing the administration of newly elected Gov. Alejandro Garcia Padilla.

“This is the most important financial issue right now,” said Gustavo Velez, a prominent Puerto Rican economist. “They have to find a solution. They have to create a plan in the next three months.”

Velez and others suggest that Puerto Rico should immediately reduce benefits, raise the retirement age and demand increased contributions from current employees, ideas that don’t sit well with people like Marti.

“Imagine, I’m going to be left without a big chunk of money that I contributed,” she said.

Garcia, who defeated the incumbent with support of the public employee unions, has formed a committee to come up with suggestions. He has not yet said how he will address the situation. Simply taking the money from the island’s general fund is out of the question: Puerto Rico has a projected deficit this year of $1.2 billion.

“It’s a very complex situation,” Garcia said at recent news conference. “We will respect the pensions of those who contributed and built this country.”

The island only recently emerged from a six-year recession and the unemployment rate is 14 percent, higher than any state. Manufacturing, the largest segment of the economy, has been in decline for years. Former Gov. Luis Fortuno laid off more than 20,000 government workers. His predecessor, Anibal Acevedo Vila, was forced to partially shut down the government for two weeks in May 2006 in a standoff over budget talks with the legislature.

In the meantime, the pension system’s deficit kept growing.

“It’s not that we’re bad off. We’re broke,” said Miguel Morales, a consultant to a permanent committee charged with regulating the pension system. “The concern is that there will come a day when the government cannot respond and everyone will be left out on the street.”

Nearly all of the problem centers on two pension systems — one for teachers and one for other government workers — that stopped accepting new beneficiaries in January 2000. They serve more than 273,000 active and retired government workers.

Those initially allowed workers to retire at age 55 with 25 years of service or at age 58 with 10 years of service. In 1990, legislators made significant changes, reducing benefits and increasing the retirement age from 55 to 65 years for newly hired workers.

As liabilities mounted, legislators scrapped that system 13 years ago, creating a new system that is more like a 401(k)-type plan in which workers must make their own contributions.

The newer defined-contribution plan is considered financially stable. But the older plan will have used up its assets “within several years,” Karen Krop, a senior director of public finance at Fitch Ratings.

If the system does collapse, the island’s general fund is supposed to honor those collections. “But the general fund doesn’t have that money,” Velez said.

Nearly three years ago, former Gov. Fortuno established a committee charged with solving the pension fund’s problems, noting that the overall system was paying $679 million more a year than what it received in contributions.

“Absent any corrective measures, the systems could be left without funds in or before 10 years,” he stated in a March 2010 executive order.

That study led lawmakers to increase employee contributions to the system and they transferred $162 million into the retirement system so that officials could buy a capital bond expected to generate $1.5 billion in 40 years. But it wasn’t enough to solve the problem.

Puerto Rico‘s public pension problems also have damaged the island’s bond ratings, which remain significantly lower than any U.S. state, raising the island’s cost of borrowing.

In December, Moody’s lowered Puerto Rico‘s credit rating, stating in part that it doesn’t have a clear idea as to how and when the government will solve the retirement systems’ problems. It warned of an additional credit rating downgrade if no reforms are undertaken.

Complicating the territory’s financial situation is its $69 billion public debt.

Puerto Rico debt levels are well, well in excess of what we see in other states,” Krop of Fitch Ratings said.

Most states have an average 3 percent of tax-supported debt as a percentage of personal income. Nine percent is considered high. Puerto Rico is at 80 percent, Krop said. The per capita debt is more than $12,000 per person, excluding pension, she added.

Given those numbers, Marti said she doesn’t believe she’ll have enough money to retire. She went back to work in part to collect more Social Security, but even then, she said the federal fiscal situation doesn’t give her much hope.

“Things are not easy,” she said. “You don’t know what’s going to happen with Social Security either.”

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox World News

Public Finance Sector OK…For Now; Fitch Cautions About Medicaid Cuts

By Tedra DeSue, Contributor Although the vibe on Capital Hill indicates that the nation’s leaders are facing insurmountable differences when it comes to dealing with the nation’s finances, a major market player says the outlook for the public finance sector remains positive. Fitch Ratings today released a report noting that majority of its rating actions […]
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest