Tag Archives: Coca Cola

Ad Groups Scramble After Publicis-Omnicom Merger

By The Huffington Post News Editors

* Shares in WPP, Interpublic, Havas leap on deal news
* Competing agencies will seek to poach big advertisers
* Conflicts possible in tech, telecom, autos
* Publicis, Omnicom say can manage conflict risks (Recasts)
By Kate Holton and Leila Abboud
LONDON/PARIS, July 29 (Reuters) – A plan to merge Publicis and Omnicom into the world’s biggest advertising group has begun a scramble by rivals to poach their blue-chip clients worried the new agency might face conflicts of interest.
Without any defections, the Franco-U.S. giant would bring the accounts of major competitors in a number of industries such as Apple and Samsung, or Coca Cola and PepsiCo, under one roof.
Publicis boss Maurice Levy and Omnicom’s John Wren spoke to some of their biggest clients before the $35.1 billion deal was announced on Sunday, and made further calls on Monday to reassure them they will be better served by the new group.
But rival chief executives from London to Paris and New York, including WPP boss Martin Sorrell, were already scouting on Monday for accounts to poach from the soon to be formed group, industries sources said.
Under the planned deal, the French and U.S. groups will form a giant that will have the necessary scale and investment firepower to cope with rapid changes brought by technology on the advertising business.
Rival ad groups have a rare opportunity to swoop as contracts between major advertisers and agencies often include clauses that say they can be renegotiated in the case of agencies being bought or sold.
“It’s good for us and other independents,” said David Kershaw, CEO of ad group M&C Saatchi. “It shakes out more people that want great creative and global capability but they don’t want to be involved with one of these behemoths, and also who feel uncomfortable having their competitors within the same group,” …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Huffington Post

Sharing Food at Restaurants and What I Ate at City House in Nashville

By Lauren Salkeld Over the years, I’ve developed a preference for sharing food when I go out to eat. This doesn’t always work. Some dishes simply don’t lend themselves to sharing. Soup is tricky, and divvying up a burger isn’t much fun either. Then there is the people problem. With many friends, I have an unspoken agreement that when we go out to eat, we will share food. We don’t ask, “What are you ordering?” Instead, we say, “What should we get?” Everyone wants to try a bunch of items and can’t commit to just one, so we order a pile of appetizers, mains, sides, and if there’s room, a dessert or two. But some folks just don’t like communal eating and there’s very little point in trying to convince someone to share when all they really want is to enjoy what they ordered on their own. I get it: Sharing isn’t for everyone. My bias means that I tend to like restaurant with menus that cater to or are designed with sharing in mind. Nashville’s City House is just such a place. Tucked behind trees in the city’s Germantown neighborhood, City House has a clean but rustic aesthetic, an open kitchen, friendly and casual service, and a buzzy atmosphere. While a couple would undoubtedly enjoy their City House experience, I think it’s perfect for small groups, and yes, diners who like to share. Chef Tandy Wilson’s menu is divided into antipasti, pizza, pasta, and fish + meat. Obviously, the food has Italian roots, but look closely and you’ll see Southern touches like buttermilk, cornmeal-crusted catfish, and summer peaches. My group, four curious eaters and all dedicated sharers, ordered from all over the menu. The meaty and just a little bit crispy octopus served with fennel, carrot gremolata, and fregola was a standout, even for a known fennel-hater like me. City House is known for its pizza, baked in a giant wood oven. We ordered one topped with peaches, buttermilk cheddar, scallions, and strutto (a rendered pork fat), which was both creamy and tangy, as well as sweet and savory. We loved it. House meats are another specialty. We tried a garlic sausage that was perfect for sharing, and just a little bit of meat for everyone. It also paired well with the creamy, just slightly cheesy grits we picked as our side. The frico was like a tender potato sleeping inside a gooey and decadent sleeping bag of cheese, which reminds me of another benefit of sharing. Splitting the not-at-all good for you dishes means you only eat a bite or two, without feeling guilty that you either ate too much of something unhealthy, or wasted food that was far too filling for you to finish on your own. Sharing was particularly smart for dessert as we were able to polish off the peanut butter Coca Cola cake with rum and coke caramel and vanilla malt gelato, as well as the almond ricotta pound cake with lemon syrup and lemon ricotta gelato….<div …read more

Source: Epicurious

Cardiology Goes Better With Coke

By Larry Husten, Contributor

At the bottom of this post I’ve reprinted an email cardiologists are receiving from the American College of Cardiology. See the bottom of the message for the disclosure that Coca Cola is paying for this educational program. I don’t have much to say about this though I wonder what the faculty of this program will say about the role of sugared soda and obesity. I also wonder what position the ACC will take on public health efforts to curb sugar consumption. …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

Tyra Banks And Ashton Kutcher Help Launch Social Shopping Platform

By Karsten Strauss, Forbes Staff

Adding yet another layer to the enterprise that is Tyra Banks, the former model turned television personality is taking to the startup game with an investment in a new social shopping platform. Ashton Kutcher, who has made a name for himself as a tech-centric venture investor through his own firm, A-Grade Investments, has also laid down cash. Called The Hunt, Banks and Kutcher’s latest venture helps people track down things they want to buy using Pinterest, Instagram, Tumblr or any website with a photo of a product. While surfing the web, when you find something that appeals to you – a gadget, a piece of furniture, a pair of shoes you saw a celebrity wear –  you can upload the URL or just post a picture of it, which lets everyone else browsing the site know that you’re trying to find out where to get that product. As you browse what items other users are seeking, you can “follow” their searches so that when they find out where to get their coveted handbag, dress or pair of shoes, you will be notified as well. If you see a product that you recognize and know where it can be purchased, you can let the seeker (or ‘hunter’) know all about it. The San Francisco-based company was founded by Tim Weingarten, who’d previously headed Visage Mobile. Other investors in the company include A-Grade Investments’ Guy Oseary, Coca-Cola executive Rohan Oza, DesiHits! CEO Anjula Acharia-Bath, and Luminari Capital director Michael Banks. I tried it myself, setting up a profile and posting a “hunt” for a hooded blazer I’d briefly mentioned in a previous article about Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s penchant for hoodies. As I browsed it became clear that its early days for the new venture, as the categories for which people search are limited to mostly women’s fashion. We can probably expect more categories for men’s products in the future, as well as electronic gadgets and maybe even apps or games that people have seen pictures of but haven’t been able to identify. That said, it may well be that women are the focus users for The Hunt, as a Pinterest-style of platform has been known to really connect with female users. The Hunt is the first investment Ms. Banks has made through the newest arm of her Tyra Banks Company enterprise, Fierce Capital LLC. The fund will focus on early-stage companies, including women-led startups, according to the company. Ms. Banks first came to public attention as a model, sauntering down the runway wearing hip and sexy outfits from top international fashion designers. A career in television followed, with Banks at the helm of “The Tyra Banks Show” and “America’s Next Top Model.” She’s even written a children’s book called Modelland. Kutcher, a former male model turned TV and film actor, is currently starring alongside Jon Cryer in the hit CBS show Two and a Half Men. His venture investments have included Spotify, Uber, Foursquare, Getaround and YPlan, among others. He also …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

Activision’s CEO Made $65 Million Last Year

Activision CEO Robert Kotick is among the highest-paid Chief Executive Officers in the United States. According to Reuters, Kotick made a total of $64.9 million in 2012, including $56 million in stock awards. Kotick’s salary for 2012 was $2 million, twice what he made in 2011.

Compared to other CEOs in 2012, Kotick made more than three times the $21 million earned by Goldman Sach Group Inc’s Lloyd Blankfein, and 50% more than Walt Disney CEO Robert Iger, who earned $40.2 million.

Kotick is also a board member of Coca-Cola and appeared in the 2011 film Moneyball. He became CEO of Activision in 1991, and later became CEO of Activision Blizzard after Activision joined with Vivendi in 2008.

Continue reading…

Source: FULL ARTICLE at IGN Tech

Coca-Cola Gulps Up Growth In Emerging Markets

By Trefis Team, Contributor

Quick Take reports strong 4% consolidated volume growth and 5% growth in adjusted currency neutral operating income. International volumes grew by 5% y-o-y driven by growth from Emerging markets. Sparkling volumes increased 3% globally led by the company’s flagship brand, Coca-Cola. Impact of slowdown in China’s economy seen in the company’s volume growth in the country. The Coca-Cola Company announced strong first quarter earnings featuring 4% consolidated volume growth, led by its flagship brand Coca-Cola which sold 3% more in number globally as compared to the same period last year. Emerging markets fueled growth of its International business for which volumes were up 5% y-o-y. Still beverage category continues to outperform as volume growth from the category stood at 6% as compared to 3% y-o-y growth in sparkling beverages. First quarter reported net revenues and operating income declined 1% and 4% respectively primarily due to foreign currency fluctuations. However, comparable currency neutral net revenues and operating income grew 2% and 5% respectively despite two fewer selling days.

From: http://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2013/04/18/coca-cola-gulps-up-growth-in-emerging-markets/

Why the Start button is Microsoft's 'New Coke' moment

Companies make bad decisions all the time. Some of those decisions do irreparable harm, but others—like forcing users to boot to the new Modern interface in Windows 8, and taking away the Start button—can be reversed. Microsoft needs to ask whether it makes sense to backpedal.

There is new speculation that Windows 8.1, known as Windows “Blue,” will allow users to bypass the Modern interface and boot straight to desktop mode, complete with the Start button.

Retronaut

Once upon a time in 1985, a carbonated beverage called Coca-Cola was by far the dominant leader of its market. However, Coca-Cola’s corporate geniuses decided to scrap the guarded, secret recipe to launch something called New Coke.

It was one of the most spectacular debacles in the history of product marketing. (New Coke makes Microsoft Bob, 10 years later, seem brilliant.) After a customer backlash, Coca-Cola brought back the original recipe under the new name of Coke Classic, but stubbornly hung on to New Coke for awhile, even rebranding it as Coke II. Many credit the return to Coke Classic for saving the brand from complete meltdown.

To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here

From: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2035384/why-the-start-button-is-microsofts-new-coke-moment.html#tk.rss_all

Coca-Cola Per-Share Earnings Fall 13% in the First Quarter

By The Associated Press

Filed under: , , , ,

Justin Sullivan/AP

Coca-Cola Co.’s first-quarter results came in above expectations as the world’s biggest beverage maker saw global sales volume grow.

The Atlanta-based company said it earned $1.75 billion, or 39 cents a share, for the period ended March 29. That’s down from $2.1 billion, or 45 cents a share, a year earlier.

Not including one-time items such as restructuring charges, however, Coca-Cola said it earned 46 cents a share, better than the 45 cents a share analysts expected.

Net revenue declined to $11.04 billion, from $11.14 billion a year ago, hurt by foreign currency exchange rates and two fewer selling days in the period. Analysts expected $10.97 billion.

Coca-Cola Co. (KO) also announced it was starting to refranchise its U.S. business by giving bottlers expanded territories.

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

From: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/16/coca-cola-first-quarter-earnings/

Next Week's Earnings: Handicapping the Bull

By Alex Dumortier, CFA, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

The S&P 500 and the narrower, price-weighted Dow Jones Industrial Average just recorded their best weekly performances of the year. The S&P 500 is now up 11.4% on the year.

Not surprisingly, then, the VIX , Wall Street‘s fear gauge, plumbed its lowest level since March 15 on Friday, even dipping below 12 on an intraday basis. (The VIX is calculated from S&P 500 option prices and reflects investor expectations for stock market volatility over the coming 30 days.)

The earnings drum is beating
As I’ve argued several times in this column, the rally that began off last year’s June low is being driven by valuation, rather than earnings, with the market willing to pay a higher multiple for a dollar of earnings, as investor risk aversion continues to dissipate. There are good reasons for this — to a certain extent — as fears of global macro dislocations have receded. However, I think it’s worth sounding a few words of caution.

At a price-to-earnings ratio of 14.3, the S&P 500 may not look expensive on the basis of 2013 operating earnings per share; however, that figure masks the range of valuations across the different sectors. In a yield-starved environment, investors have been snapping up shares that pay rich dividends, and that enthusiasm is reflected in the P/E multiples of the consumer staples, telecoms, and utilities sectors, at 17.4, 19.7, and 16.4, respectively.

Furthermore, I continue to believe that the S&P 500’s current forward multiple understates how expensive it really is. Consider that the 14.3 P/E assumes that operating earnings per share will rise nearly 15% year-on-year in 2013. That figure strains credulity; 2012 growth was 0.4%. On this point, first-quarter earnings will provide us with some clues either way, and we have a heavy week ahead of us in terms of earnings announcements, with nearly 15% of the companies in the S&P 500 reporting quarterly results, including more than a third of the Dow components — 11, to be exact:

  • Tuesday: Coca-Cola, Johnson & Johnson, Intel
  • Wednesday: Bank of America, American Express
  • Thursday: IBM, Microsoft, UnitedHealth Group, Verizon
  • Friday: General Electric, McDonald’s

If you’re ready to invest based on competitive advantage, long-term value creation, and valuation, The Motley Fool’s chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for this year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report: “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2013.” Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

The article Next Week’s Earnings: Handicapping the Bull originally appeared on Fool.com.


Fool contributor Alex Dumortier, CFA has no position in any stocks mentioned; you can follow him on LinkedIn.

The Motley Fool recommends American Express, Coca-Cola, Intel, Johnson & Johnson, McDonald’s, and UnitedHealth Group and owns shares of Bank of America, General Electric, Intel, IBM, Johnson

From: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/14/next-weeks-earnings-handicapping-the-bull/

What to Watch for From the Dow's Earnings This Week

By Dan Carroll, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Earnings season is in full swing, and a full third of the companies on the Dow Jones Industrial Average are set to report last quarter’s data this week. From consumer-goods giants such as Coca-Cola to health-care staples such as Johnson & Johnson, seemingly every sector of the blue-chip index is on pace to capture investors’ attention in the next few days. Let’s look at what you should be watching out for as America’s most prominent stocks face their biggest test of 2013.

What should you look out for?
The Dow’s week of earnings starts off with Tuesday’s slate, as Intel , Coke, and J&J report on their most recent quarters. Intel’s had a tough time recently with the PC market‘s decline, and analyst expectations for both the company’s revenue and earnings are down from a year ago. The company’s done its best to diversify, reaching out to the fast-growing mobile market while advancing into new fields such as Internet TV, but don’t expect to see the fruits of Intel’s diversification efforts show up this early. For now, this is still a company stuck with its ties to the falling PC industry.

Analysts expect better EPS results from J&J and Coke, however: Projections for the two companies’ earnings average year-over-year growth of 2.2% and 2.3%, respectively. Coca-Cola’s steadily advanced overseas despite fighting against regulatory hurdles and legislation at home, promoting its iconic brand around the globe in an effort that should help this stalwart company’s future. Although analysts project slightly lower revenue from the company, Coca-Cola looks to be on good footing for the long term.

Financials take center stage on Wednesday, as both Bank of America and American Express report earnings. Analysts expect earnings per share from these companies of $0.22 and $1.22, respectively; B of A’s projected earnings represent significant year-over-year growth over last year’s $0.03 mark. Financial firms have done well recently — B of A has been one of the Dow’s top risers over the past year — but consumer spending has been shaken by the payroll-tax holiday expiration earlier this year, along with sequestration. On Wednesday, we’ll be able to see just how much these events have affected consumer-oriented companies such as American Express. While the company’s earnings are expected to grow around 5% over last year, tightening consumer wallets could put a dent in AmEx’s results.

Thursday brings three more companies up to bat, with UnitedHealth Group , IBM, and Verizon to the forefront. UnitedHealth provides a particularly interesting report to watch as the company shifts toward the full arrival of Obamacare next year. Analysts expect a drop in the company’s earnings to $1.14 per share this quarter, down from $1.31 a year ago. Still, UnitedHealth has done a good job growing its subscription base and advancing internationally, two trends that should bolster its numbers. IBM and Verizon, on the other hand, are both expected to post year-over-year EPS gains for

From: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/14/what-to-watch-for-from-the-dows-earnings-this-week/

Apple's Overlooked Secret Weapon: Its Brand

By Andrew Tonner, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Many analysts look at Apple‘s products, market share, and earnings to determine whether to invest. In this video, Andrew Tonner discusses one aspect of Apple that many people miss and that doesn’t show up in conventional metrics: the strength of its brand.

Apple is still considered to be a cool, cutting-edge company, Andrew says. Interbrand considers Apple to be the second most valuable brand in the world, behind Coca-Cola, and that brand strength results in customer loyalty and recurring sales. For example, between 80% and 90% of iPhone users keep buying iPhones.

Check out the video for more details.

There’s no doubt that Apple is at the center of technology’s largest revolution ever and that longtime shareholders have been handsomely rewarded, with more than 1,000% gains. However, there is a debate raging as to whether Apple remains a buy. The Motley Fool’s senior technology analyst and managing bureau chief, Eric Bleeker, is prepared to fill you in on both reasons to buy and reasons to sell Apple and what opportunities are left for the company (and your portfolio) going forward. To get instant access to his latest thinking on Apple, simply click here now.

var FoolAnalyticsData = FoolAnalyticsData || []; FoolAnalyticsData.push({ eventType: “TickerReportPitch”, contentByline: “Andrew Tonner“, contentId: “cms.31030”, contentTickers: “NASDAQ:AAPL”, contentTitle: “Apple’s Overlooked Secret Weapon: Its Brand”, hasVideo: “True”, pitchId: “1”,

From: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/13/apples-overlooked-secret-weapon-its-brand/

Coke Stock: One of Warren Buffett's Biggest Investments Might Be His Worst

By Adam Levine-Weinberg, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Global beverage titan Coca-Cola has for a long time been one of Warren Buffett‘s largest holdings at Berkshire Hathaway . Buffett began purchasing Coke stock in 1988, and the stock saw tremendous gains for the next decade, leading some observers to call Coca-Cola one of his greatest investments. Yet the stock‘s performance since 1998 has been decidedly mediocre.

Coke stock has joined in the recent market rally, more than doubling off its Great Recession low. That said, I’m skeptical that the company will be able to grow its bottom line enough to justify its generous P/E ratio of 20.7. Coca-Cola may therefore continue its long run as one of the biggest dogs of Buffett’s portfolio.

A love affair with Coke
Coca-Cola has been the largest holding in Berkshire Hathaway‘s equity portfolio for much of the past two decades. In the earliest 13F filing available online from the SEC — for the first quarter of 1999 — Berkshire Hathaway reported holding 200 million shares of Coke stock, valued at $61.375 a share, or more than $12 billion in total.

Buffett is often associated with the “buy and hold forever” investing strategy, and this is exactly what he has done with Coca-Cola. Berkshire Hathaway still owns every one of those shares — although a recent stock split means that Berkshire now owns 400 million Coke shares, valued today at more than $16 billion. That makes it the second largest holding in Buffett’s portfolio, only recently eclipsed by Wells Fargo.

Yet Coca-Cola has basically been a dud in Buffett’s portfolio for the past 15 years. While the stock has recovered very nicely from the global recession in the past four years, it still sits below the all-time high it touched all the way back in mid-1998:

Coca-Cola 15-Year Price Chart (split-adjusted); data by YCharts.

Of course, the stock market as a whole hasn’t performed too well for the past 15 years, either. There was a crash at the end of the bubble period in 2000, followed by a second crash associated with the 2008-2009 recession. Still, the S&P 500 has outperformed Coke stock by nearly 40% over the whole 15-year period:

Coca-Cola vs. the S&P 500; data by YCharts.

Poor total return
From a total return perspective — which includes the benefit of dividends — Coca-Cola has still been a poor investment since 1998. Since June 1998, Coke stock has generated a total return of 33%. Obviously, that’s a lot better than losing money; however, it represents a less than 2% annualized return. Buffett could have done better in government bonds!

Coca-Cola Total Return (June 1998-present); data by YCharts.

In short, this means that Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway investors have had a lot of money tied up in an underperforming stock for a very long time. Coca-Cola was a great investment in the 1990s, but in retrospect, Buffett clearly should

From: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/13/coke-stock-one-of-warren-buffetts-biggest-investme/

5 Big Reports for the "World's Greatest Retirement Portfolio"

By Brian Stoffel, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

A full 23 months ago, I started identifying 10 companies that I would be putting $40,000 of my own retirement money behind. Since then, that sum of money has grown to $51,880 — a 29.7% increase and $1,560 better than if I had just invested the money in the S&P 500.

The portfolio has benefited from one company already reporting positive results, and I’ll be looking for four more to report next week.

PriceSmart
A huge part of the reason that the portfolio has done well this week is because of the continued excellent execution at Latin American wholesaler PriceSmart. The company, which was spun off its American counterpart — Costco — continues to follow in its parent-company’s footsteps of providing value for customers and shareholders alike.

For the last quarter, PriceSmart increased revenue by 10.8% while earnings were up an even more impressive 22.3%. Probably most important, however, was the fact that sales at comparable stores were up 10.1%. That, combined with the company’s slow and steady growth plans, gives investors lots of reasons to cheer.

Four more set to report
After next week ends, half of the company’s in this retirement portfolio will have reported earnings. Here’s what the week has in store.

Company

Earnings Date

Expected Revenue 

Expected EPS

Coca-Cola

April 16

$11.0 billion

$0.45

Johnson & Johnson

April 16

$17.5 billion

$1.40

Google

April 18

$14.2 billion

$10.69

Intuitive Surgical

April 18

$583 million

$3.99

Source: E*Trade. 

Coca-Cola and Johnson & Johnson are both in the portfolio to act primarily as anchors, offering stability in a portfolio that otherwise has stocks that can be quite volatile.

I’ll be looking to see how two different aspects of these reports play out. Recent evidence has pointed to the popularity of energy drinks over soda lately, and I’m curious to see if analysts have any questions for the company on expanding its line of energy drinks or even acquiring others — like Monster Beverage. And though Johnson & Johnson has had a tough time in the consumer health products division, its pharmaceutical business has been carrying more than its fair share of the revenue load.

When it comes to Intuitive Surgical, I think I’ll actually be just as interested in the conference call as the numbers released. The last couple of weeks have seen several sources  call into question the necessity of the daVinci Surgical system in helping perform hysterectomies.

Though any effect from these announcements probably won’t show up in results for the quarter, I’m very interested to see what management has to say about these developments.

Finally, with Google, I’m simply expecting more of the same. Earnings might miss, as I don’t think CEO Larry Page is done spending money to invest in the future, but I think revenues should continue to increase likely. And while many analysts will be

From: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/12/5-big-reports-for-the-worlds-greatest-retirement-p/

Disney vs. Coca-Cola: Which Dow Stock's Dividend Dominates?

By Alex Planes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Dividend stocks outperform non-dividend-paying stocks over the long run. It happens in good markets and bad, and the benefit of dividends can be quite striking: Dividend payments have made up about 40% of the market‘s average annual return from 1936 to today. But few of us can invest in every single dividend-paying stock on the market, and even if we could, we might find better gains by being selective. That’s why we’ll be pitting two of the Dow Jones Industrial Average‘s dividend payers against each other today to find out which Dow stock is the true dividend champion. Let’s take a closer look at our two contenders now.

Tale of the tape
Disney is a 21-year veteran of the Dow, and it will be celebrating its 22nd Dow-niversary next month. Hailing from sunny Burbank, Calif., Disney is the largest diversified media company in the United States, with a history of success that spans film, broadcast, theme parks, publishing, and pretty much any other major media segment you can think of.

Coca-Cola is a 26-year veteran of the Dow based in Atlanta, Ga. It’s the world’s largest beverage company, with 400 brands consumed an estimated 1.6 billion times every day. It’s been one of the best dividend-paying stocks on the market for nearly a century, so Disney will have some fierce competition to contend with today.

Statistic

Disney

Coca-Cola

Market cap

$108.5 billion

$183 billion

P/E

19.1

20.7

Trailing 12-month profit margin

13.1%

18.8%

TTM free-cash-flow margin*

8.6%

16.4%

Five-year total return

113.4%

58.4%

Source: Morningstar; YCharts. *Free-cash-flow margin is free cash flow divided by revenue for the trailing 12 months.

It looks like the larger Coca-Cola has the advantage in margins today. Will it come out ahead in the battle? Let’s go down to ringside and get this contest started.

Round one: endurance
According to Dividata, Disney began paying dividends in 1982 and has been paying ever since. An annual payout (last paid in December) gives Disney a 30-year streak. That’s a respectable length of time, but it can’t hold a candle to Coke, which began paying quarterly dividends in 1920. A 93-year payout streak lets Coke take the endurance crown without breaking a sweat.

Round two: stability
Paying dividends is well and good, but how long have our two companies been increasing their dividends? The same dividend payout year after year can quickly fall behind a rising market, and there’s no better sign of a company’s financial stability than a rising payout in a weak market (so long as it’s sustainable, of course). Disney’s annual payouts held firm through the financial crisis, so the House of Mouse has only been increasing its dividend since 2010. Coke, on the other hand, has been paying more each year for the past half-century. This one was over before it even began.

<p

From: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/11/disney-vs-coca-cola-which-dow-stocks-dividend-domi/

Goodyear Sued by French in Ohio

By Rich Duprey, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Since this country’s discovery, France always had a large presence in the Ohio River Valley, until its defeat by American colonials and the British during the French and Indian Wars.

Today it’s back again, declaring war on U.S. tire maker Goodyear , by suing it in Ohio courts over the announced closing of its French tire factory earlier this year because it was no longer profitable. Despite losing money there for five straight years, the plant’s workers are suing in U.S. courts because they say that’s where the decisions emanated from.

Taking a siesta
Time magazine labeled the French factory in Amiens as Goodyear’s “nightmare.” Despite trying to work with the unions over the years to change work hours or eliminate redundancies and prevent just such an outcome, the unions thwarted every entreaty. The government has a heavy-handed way of dealing with closures and layoffs, for example castigating ArcelorMittal for also having the temerity to want to close down an unprofitable facility. So just because Goodyear says it wants to end the bloodletting doesn’t mean it will happen anytime soon.  

It probably didn’t help any when the French government approached the CEO of tire maker Titan International , Maurice “The Grizz” Taylor, to see if he would be interested in buying the plant and was greeted with a giant guffaw instead.

“How stupid do you think we are?” he wrote to the French industry minister. “The French workforce gets paid high wages but works only three hours. They get one hour for breaks and lunch, talk for three, and work for three.” He concluded by saying, “You can keep the so-called workers.”  

Getting while the getting’s good
France is a worker’s paradise and, as Time aptly put it, a business owner’s nightmare. Look no further than a bill making its way through the French parliament that would grant union members amnesty for pillaging corporate offices and threatening executives with bodily harm. With violent protests breaking out at Goodyear offices and protesting union workers battling with French police, it’s quickly become clear that France is not a place where you want to do business.

In addition to factory closings by Goodyear and Arcelor, Ford, Coca-Cola, Renault, Samsonite, Sanofi, Sony, and Merck Serono are among some 1,500 firms looking to get out of Dodge. Or France, anyway.

Locking the gate
Because French courts have actually upheld the business‘ right to close, the French are seeing a mass exodus at a time when their unemployment rate is approaching 11%. That also probably informed the unions’ decision to try their luck in American courts. In addition to stopping the closure, the union is seeking $4 million in damages.

It took nearly a decade for the French and Indian War to come to a conclusion, and analysts expect Goodyear will have to go nearly as long before it’s able to finally close the French factory. The bloody battle will hardly serve as an enticement for other companies to locate to France

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

It's Time to Buy General Mills Stock. Here's Why.

By Rich Smith, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

It might not be obvious to the casual observer, but right now, today, General Mills stock offers one of the best values available in the packaged-cereals industry. Why?

Three reasons.

General Mills is cheap
When you stack up General Mills stock against two of its bigger rivals — Kellogg and ConAgra Foods , which bought cereal maker Ralcorp late last year — it’s clear that General Mills is the cheapest of the three. Its 17.9 price-to-earnings ratio is a full 25% cheaper than what a share of Kellogg will set you back. It’s a whopping 34% discount to the P/E ratio at ConAgra.

General Mills has the best record around
General Mills stock looks great in the rearview mirror, and nearly as good when viewed through the windshield. Over the past five years, it’s grown its annual sales 25% faster than the closest rival, notching 6% annualized sales growth to ConAgra’s 4.8%. General Mills has outperformed Kellogg’s 3.8% rate of sales growth by an even wider margin — and its profits growth has similarly outperformed all comers.

General Mills pays you best
Perhaps most important to investors, though, is the simple fact that out of the three big cereal concerns discussed above, General Mills is the firm generating the most cash from its business — and gives you the biggest free cash flow bang for the buck.

Measured by dividing a company’s market capitalization (the price you pay for General Mills stock) into its free cash flow (the money your investment generates for you), General Mills offers investors quite simply the best “free cash flow yield” of the three named. Put even more simply, for every dollar you invest in a share of General Mills stock today, you can expect the company to generate nearly 6.9 cents’ worth of real, cash profits on your investment.

GIS Free Cash Flow Yield data by YCharts.

General Mills may ultimately use this cash to pay you bigger dividends (it already pays a 3.1% dividend — more than either Kellogg or ConAgra), to buy back shares (increasing the size of your stake in the company for every share it takes off the table), or to reinvest in its business and maintain its lead over rivals for years to come. Any way you look at it, though, General Mills‘ ability to generate cash offers investors a great reason to invest.

And that, Fools, is the reason I think now’s a great time to buy General Mills stock.

General Mills is a great brand to invest in, but America is a company populated with many such great brands. For example: Coca-Cola‘s wide moat has helped provide its shareholders with superior gains in the past, but the company faces some new threats to its continued market dominance. The Motley Fool recently compiled a premium research report containing everything you need to know about Coca-Cola. If you own or

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Coca-Cola: A Great Stock for Kids and Adults

By Asit Sharma, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Some investing trends are so entrenched and powerful that it’s easy to see only the past, while discounting future potential. Because of Coca-Cola‘s longevity, and due to its widespread market presence in over 200 countries, you might assume that the company has tapped out its total potential market share. But Coke will not stop growing anytime soon, as it will continue to prosper from one of the most visible trends on the planet: world population growth.

One of the ways Coke measures itself is by its share of daily worldwide beverage consumption. According to the company, in the year 2000, the human population consumed a total of approximately 48 billion beverages each day. Coke’s share of this daily consumption (counted as beverages bearing trademarks owned by or licensed to the company) was roughly 1 billion beverages, or 2.1%. By the end of 2012, Coke estimated that global daily beverage consumption had grown to approximately 57 billion beverages each day, and its share of that consumption was pegged at 1.8 billion beverages daily, or 3.2% of the total.  

Potential investors should be impressed by the recent rate of Coke’s daily beverage share growth. In 13 years, world daily consumption of beverages grew by almost 19%. Coke grew its servings, however, by 80%, and grew its share of the daily market by 50%. You can tie Coke’s revenue growth to these two drivers just as Coke does: the population of the world, and Coke’s growing share of each beverage consumed daily worldwide.

This market is only getting bigger. Below is a chart of world population growth. The future growth lines in red, orange, and green are taken from United Nations 2010 projections:

Source: Wikimedia Commons.

Under the “medium” scenario, the world’s population is expected to grow from 7 billion people today to 9 billion people by just after 2040. Consider a teenager who is 13 this year. By the time she is 40, if Coke can grow daily share at its current rate of 1 percentage point every 12 years, 3.4 billion beverages per day will bear trademarks owned by or licensed to the company. This will equal 1.2 trillion servings per year. Assuming the price of Coke’s average beverage at least doubles during those 27 years, the company’s annual revenue when our teen turns 40 will be close to $180 billion, and if Coke can preserve its present profit margin, the revenue will generate in the neighborhood of $32 billion of net income each year. This slow, almost inexorable growth will pay off handsomely for anyone who can buy shares today and reinvest dividends for the next three-plus decades.

Before you laugh away the ludicrousness of trying to project results 27 years into the future, bear in mind that 27 years ago, the world population was just under 5 billion people, and Coke stock was selling, on a split-adjusted basis, at just under a dollar on Jan. 2,

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

No, These Food Companies Are Not Owned by Monsanto

By Alyce Lomax, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

A meme that’s recently enjoying some frequent sharing through social media like Facebook lists well-known consumer brands and companies, stating they are “owned” by genetically modified seeds giant Monsanto  and therefore, anyone who doesn’t want to consume GMO foods should avoid them. Actually, though, it’s not really accurate.

In many cases, some of the listed companies’ brands do indirectly rely on Monsanto (and other companies that make genetically modified agricultural products) for ingredients. Are these brands or companies owned by Monsanto? No: That part’s hogwash.

Here’s the skinny on Monsanto and the grocery list.

Digging deeper into that anti-grocery list
The way Monsanto indirectly sneaks into Americans’ grocery carts is simply that it genetically modifies seeds for common crops. So do other companies like DuPont, but they receive far less public scrutiny than Monsanto.

There are different variations of the anti-Monsanto social meme floating around, claiming that companies and brands like Procter & Gamble , PepsiCo , Coca-Cola, and other household names are owned by Monsanto.

This is completely untrue. Those of us who are investors know that consumer giants like these are in fact public companies, owned by shareholders and certainly not Monsanto.

One list making the rounds has some pretty overt mistakes even beyond the ownership claim.

For example, list member “Kraft/Philip Morris” no longer exists. Those two were once a giant conglomerate, and they parted ways about six years ago. More recently, Kraft split up, with Mondelez keeping the high-growth snack sector (including brands like Cadbury and Nabisco) while spinning off Kraft grocery brands, such as the iconic Kraft Macaroni & Cheese.

Some outrageous typos also tipped off a list lacking much thought or fact-checking. “Minute Made,” “Cool-aid,” and “Sweppes” aren’t exactly on shopping lists in the first place, because technically, those aren’t the products’ names.

The spirit of the list can’t be denied, though, and it’s the reason the meme gets circulated: Many consumers simply aren’t armed with the information they desire, and labels and marketing claims can be confusing. For example, brands like Kashi, Bear Naked, and Gardenburger are all owned by Kellogg ; products like these that say they are “natural” aren’t necessarily organic. So if you’re avoiding GMOs, beware.

The straight dope on GMOs in your food
The majority of American processed food likely contains GM ingredients from crops grown with engineered seeds. That’s because just about all conventional U.S. corn and soybeans now have foreign genes. These genes allow soybeans to resist a common herbicide, and engineer corn to produce its own insecticide.

A massive number of American products utilize corn or soy as crucial ingredients. Anyone who pays attention to high-fructose corn syrup has probably noticed how frequently that ingredient substitutes for cane sugar, for example. Consumers’ best way to avoid such foods is to buy organic, which by definition excludes genetically modified organisms, or GMOs.

Whole Foods Market is a safe place for GMO skeptics to shop, since so many of its products are in fact organic, and many of its

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

4 Surprising Stocks That Missed the Dow's Record High

By Dan Caplinger, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

It took a while, but the Dow Jones Industrials finally warmed up to the start of earnings season by rising 60 points and setting a new all-time record high. Yet even though anxiety about the huge bull-market run that stocks have enjoyed since 2009 has some investors considering whether they ought to take profits and run, today’s market action shows a surprising dynamic that is a big shift from more normal investor behavior.

Ordinarily, with markets at new highs, worried investors would bid up shares of consumer giants. Yet many of the Dow’s top consumer companies finished lower today. Procter & Gamble fell two-thirds of a percent, while Coca-Cola backed off a 52-week high to finish lower by 0.4%. Both companies generally have defensive characteristics that worried investors typically like, as their businesses aren’t very sensitive to changing economic conditions, and they sell products that have relatively inelastic demand. Yet both stocks trade at above-market valuations, and recent concerns about Coke’s sales-volume challenges and P&G’s product miscues have conservative investors feeling less secure about their ability to withstand a market reversal.

Meanwhile, it was tech stocks — far from the usual favorite among defensive investors — that finished with huge gains. Although the Dow’s tech components can point to news to justify part of their gains, investors are also gravitating to their cheap valuations as providing a margin of safety in the event of a future downturn.

McDonald’s , also a defensive favorite, had its own problems today, falling from new highs to end down 0.4%. For the fast-food giant, an outbreak of bird flu in China could lead to reduced numbers of customers in the emerging nation, which has been an important part of the McDonald’s growth story in recent years. Reported price cuts could help, but they might also merely exacerbate sales declines by trimming margins and leading to further weakness.

Finally, American Express fell more than half a percent after the European Commission said it’s looking at a couple of card networks that target the continent to see if there are anticompetitive practices involved in the fees they charge and the agreements they have with merchants. AmEx wasn’t specifically mentioned, but given its growth ambitions, it faces many of the same issues as its rivals and could potentially face the same issues that the EC mentioned.

McDonald’s turned in a dismal year in 2012, underperforming the broader market by 25 percentage points. Looking ahead, can the fast-food giant reclaim its throne atop the restaurant industry, or will this unsettling trend continue? Our top analyst weighs in on McDonald’s future in a recent premium report on the company. Click here now find out whether a buying opportunity has emerged for this global juggernaut.

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance