Tag Archives: Procter Gamble

Damaged Hair Epidemic: Head & Shoulders® Answers the S.O.S. Call

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Damaged Hair Epidemic: Head & Shoulders® Answers the S.O.S. Call

Survey Ranks Top 10 Cities with Most Damaged Hair

CINCINNATI–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Women everywhere are no strangers to damaging their hair; yet according to a recent survey conducted by Wakefield Research, on behalf of Head & Shoulders, 91% of U.S. women continue to damage their hair almost every day. In fact, damaged hair is not concentrated to one region. The survey identified 10 U.S. cities and assessed which was in most need of a hair S.O.S., including:

1. Chicago

2. Los Angeles

3. New York City

4. Philadelphia

5. Houston

6. Dallas

7. Atlanta

8. San Francisco

9. Washington, D.C.

10. Boston

Bad hair habits add up over time – too-tightly wound ponytails, curling or straightening hair, and even running a brush through wet hair each morning. The damage of repetitive bad hair behavior is cumulative and it’s being noticed. The Head & Shoulders survey found that over half (57%) of women in the U.S. consider their hair to be damaged, with their leading causes for hair damage including:

  • Brushing hair when it is wet (46%)
  • Putting hair into a ponytail (45%)
  • Itching or scratching scalps (35%)

Head & Shoulders is answering the S.O.S. call from women who consistently put their hair and scalp though ultimate torture tests. New Damage Rescue shampoo helps prevent and rescue hair from damage every day, leaving hair up to 10X stronger* after just four washes and makes hair more resilient against future damage, all while keeping the scalp visibly flake free with regular use. Damage Rescue conditioner nourishes damaged hair with a light peach scent.

“With a good percentage of the global population suffering from dandruff, consumers shouldn’t have to make a choice between beautiful hair and anti-dandruff efficacy,” said Michael Sabbia, Brand Manager for Head & Shoulders, North America, Procter & Gamble. “We are excited to be able to offer consumers a way to treat their scalp issues and have damage-rescued, great-looking hair with no tradeoffs.”

Head & Shoulders …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

The 4 Longest Dividend Streaks in the Dow

By Dan Caplinger and Mike Klesta, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

In the following video, Fool markets analyst Mike Klesta talks with contributor Dan Caplinger about the importance of dividends. While dividends are great, it’s important for investors to look beyond the simple yield.

Instead, Mike and Dan will focus on four Dow Jones Industrial Average companies that are the best of the best, the cream of the crop. These dividend raisers are members of an elite group of companies that have raised their dividend each year for at least 25 years.

If you’re looking for more long-term investing ideas, check out the Fool’s special report: “The 3 Dow Stocks Dividend Investors Need.” It’s absolutely free, so just click here and get your copy today.

The article The 4 Longest Dividend Streaks in the Dow originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Dan Caplinger and Mike Klesta have no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends 3M, Coca-Cola, Johnson & Johnson, and Procter & Gamble and owns shares of Johnson & Johnson. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = document.createElement('script');
ga.type = 'text/javascript';
ga.async = true;
ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';

var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Is Procter &amp; Gamble Destined for Greatness?

By Alex Planes, The Motley Fool

PG Total Return Price Chart

Filed under:

Every investor can appreciate a stock that consistently beats the Street without getting ahead of its fundamentals and risking a meltdown. The best stocks offer sustainable market-beating gains, with improving financial metrics that support strong price growth. Let’s take a look at what Procter & Gamble‘s recent results tell us about its potential for future gains.

What the numbers tell you
The graphs you’re about to see tell P&G’s story, and we’ll be grading the quality of that story in several ways.

Growth is important on both top and bottom lines, and an improving profit margin is a great sign that a company’s become more efficient over time. Since profits may not always reported at a steady rate, we’ll also look at how much P&G’s free cash flow has grown in comparison to its net income.

A company that generates more earnings per share over time, regardless of the number of shares outstanding, is heading in the right direction. If P&G’s share price has kept pace with its earnings growth, that’s another good sign that its stock can move higher.

Is P&G managing its resources well? A company’s return on equity should be improving, and its debt-to-equity ratio declining, if it’s to earn our approval.

Healthy dividends are always welcome, so we’ll also make sure that P&G’s dividend payouts are increasing, but at a level that can be sustained by its free cash flow.

By the numbers
Now, let’s take a look at P&G’s key statistics:

PG Total Return Price data by YCharts.

Passing Criteria

3-Year* Change 

Grade

Revenue growth > 30%

8.5%

Fail

Improving profit margin

(17.4%)

Fail

Free cash flow growth > Net income growth

(19.4%) vs. (3%)

Fail

Improving EPS

5%

Pass

Stock growth (+ 15%) < EPS growth

39.5% vs. 5%

Fail

Source: YCharts.
*Period begins at end of Q4 2009.

PG Return on Equity data by YCharts.

Passing Criteria

3-Year* Change

Grade

Improving return on equity

(4.6%)

Fail

Declining debt to equity

13.8%

Fail

Dividend growth > 25%

27.7%

Pass

Free cash flow payout ratio < 50% 

45.8%

Pass

Source: YCharts.
*Period begins at end of Q4 2009.

How we got here and where we’re going
P&G doesn’t put forth a particularly compelling argument for its stock today. Nearly all of its price growth has been the result of higher valuations, which makes future returns far from certain and which contributes to several of its failing grades. Can P&G turn its drifting ship around and reclaim some positive momentum this year — and possibly earn more than just three out of nine passing grades the next time we examine it?

As a component on the Dow Jones Industrial Average , P&G isn’t really expected to be a growth stock. It’s more than a century old, after all. However, this year it’s returned roughly double the index’s gain, helping the Dow to a fresh all-time high in the …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

3 Bank Investing Mistakes to Avoid in 2013

By John Grgurich, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Though we’ve passed over the cusp of March, I thought it still might not be too late to offer bank investors some sage advice for 2013. The year is still young, and investing adventure awaits. Without further ado, then, here are three bank-investing mistakes to avoid for the rest of the year, and beyond.

1. Not investing in banks, period
This one is here just in case you’ve never invested in banks, but are interested in trying and perhaps a bit hesitant. And maybe I’m addressing how I felt about investing in banks not so very long ago.

For beginning investors, I think banks can be a bit daunting, especially if you come from the Peter Lynch school of investing: Essentially, invest in what you know and what you can get your head around. Hence, I think it’s easier for most people to start off their lifetime investing adventures with classic consumer-goods companies, like Starbucks, Procter & Gamble, and Apple. Companies that you “get” right away. It’s what I did.

But with a little homework, you can learn enough about how banks operate — along with some basic do’s and don’ts — that should leave you feeling quite comfortable with the idea of plunking your money down in the banking sector. And it’s worth the effort, because there’s money to be made, here.

People who had Bank of America stock at the beginning of last year saw share prices double by the end of the year. I bought my first shares of Goldman Sachs at the end of last November, which have so far returned me better than 25%. Banks as investments are simply too potentially profitable to be ignored.

2. Not investing in too-big-to-fail banks
Once you’ve decided to invest in banks, you might be put off by the too-big-to-fail banks, so-called because so many weren’t allowed to fail on their own — as they almost surely would have — at the height of the financial crisis, without government intervention. This elite-for-the-wrong-reason group includes Bank of America, Citigroup , JPMorgan Chase , and Wells Fargo.

But again, there’s money to be made, here, as spelled out above in the case of B of A. Also, in the past year, Citi has returned 27% to its shareholders, JPMorgan has returned 21%, and Wells Fargo more than 15%.

And stop me if I’m being too cynical, but as long as these banks remain too big to fail — that is, until they’re broken up or otherwise configured to be unable to single-handedly take down the economy if they go under — you the shareholder have an all-but-explicit guarantee from the federal government that your investment will never go out of business.

3. Not paying enough attention to balance sheet quality
This is what separates the JPMorgans from the Bank of Americas, and the Wells Fargos from the Citigroups: what’s on the balance sheet.

It’s no secret that B of A and Citigroup …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Why FutureFuel Is Poised to Keep Popping

By Brian Pacampara, Pacampara, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Based on the aggregated intelligence of 180,000-plus investors participating in Motley Fool CAPS, the Fool’s free investing community, chemicals and biofuels manufacturer FutureFuel has earned a respected four-star ranking.

With that in mind, let’s take a closer look at FutureFuel and see what CAPS investors are saying about the stock right now.

FutureFuel facts

Headquarters (Founded)

Clayton, Mo. (2005)

Market Cap

$546.3 million

Industry

Specialty chemicals

Trailing-12-Month Revenue

$366.8 million

Management

Chairman/CEO Paul Novelly
Principal Finance Officer Rose Sparks

Return on Equity (Average, Past 3 Years)

11.2%

Cash/Debt

$196.4 million / $0

Dividend Yield

3.3%

Competitors

Archer-Daniels Midland
DuPont

Renewable Energy Group

Sources: S&P Capital IQ and Motley Fool CAPS.

On CAPS, 97% of the 58 members who have rated FutureFuel believe the stock will outperform the S&P 500 going forward.

Just yesterday, one of those Fools, neocolonialist, succinctly summed up the FutureFuel bull case for our community:

“P/E is reasonable at < 15, they have no debt, they are amazingly diversified with a whole chemical side of the house (weed killer, detergent packet chemicals, etc), strong customers like Procter & Gamble , they have a great dividend, and lots of cash for their size. What’s not to like?”

If you want market-beating returns, you need to put together the best portfolio you can. Of course, despite a strong four-star rating, FutureFuel may not be your top choice.

We’ve found another stock we are incredibly excited about — excited enough to dub it “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2013.” We have compiled a special free report for investors to uncover this stock today. The report is 100% free, but it won’t be here forever, so click here to access it now.

Want to see how well (or not so well) the stocks in this series are performing? Follow the TrackPoisedTo CAPS account.

The article Why FutureFuel Is Poised to Keep Popping originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Brian Pacampara has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Procter & Gamble. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

This Is One Incredible CEO

By Sean Williams, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

The Motley Fool’s readers have spoken, and I have heeded your cries. After months of pointing out CEO gaffes and faux pas, I’ve decided to make it a weekly tradition to also point out corporate leaders who are putting the interests of shareholders and the public first and are generally deserving of praise from investors. For reference, here is last week’s selection.

This week, we’ll turn our attention to the first female CEO to ever take the helm of food giant Campbell Soup , Denise Morrison.

Kudos to you, Ms. Morrison
It’s both an exciting and scary time to be a food producer. The exciting part stems from the sheer number of deals we’ve seen over the past year that are consolidating a generally slow-growth sector. Ketchup maker Heinz agreed to a $23.2 billion buyout last month led by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway and Brazilian private equity firm 3G Capital. Considering the tight range Heinz had been trading in, and the slow but steady growth experienced by shareholders, the immediate 20% premium was gladly welcomed.

Another great example is Kellogg which picked up the Pringles brand from Procter & Gamble after its sale with Diamond Foods fell through. After lowering its outlook twice in 2012, Kellogg’s latest quarterly report demonstrated that Pringles sales kicked in 5% domestic growth and 1% overseas, helping to boost results past Wall Street‘s expectations.

On the other hand, inflation costs continue to rear their head in nearly every facet of food production. In fruits and vegetables, Dole Food disappointed investors in early January when it offered a full-year EPS forecast that was below the Street’s projections. Dole blamed the shortfall on ongoing contract negotiations as well as rising banana costs. Meat producers have shared similar woes, with Tyson Foods commenting at the Goldman Sachs annual agribusiness conference that its second quarter has been “challenging.” Margin compression from its pork and beef business caused by rising livestock feed prices, compounded with an expected USDA meat inspector furlough, which will slow production as a direct result of federal budget cuts, isn’t giving shareholders much to sink their teeth into.

Luckily for Campbell’s shareholders, Morrison’s company has walked this fine line with success — relying on its steady cash cow that is the soup business while also conservatively introducing new products to target younger age groups.

Campbell’s success lies in the fact that it controls approximately 60% of all soup market share. While a steady business, consumers also don’t tend to consume that much more soup each year, leaving cost-cutting, price increases, and overseas expansion as its primary growth driver in the soup arena. In its recently concluded second quarter, Campbell’s noted that it was able to grow its U.S. soup business despite lower ad spending thanks to its brand-building efforts over the years. Simply put, Morrison understands that with higher taxes come smaller discretionary budgets, which take big price increases off the table unless you want to completely scare away …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Time for Investors to Break Out the Champagne? Not So Fast.

By Nicole Seghetti, The Motley Fool

PG Total Return Price Chart

Filed under:

It’s official. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is trading at an all-time high. Investors are feeling richer as they excitedly double-check their 401(k) balances these days. But despite the giddiness, many Americans are downcast and discouraged. So why this is the case and what implication does it have for stocks?

Buzzkill
There are several reasons that investors are rethinking the resilience of the American consumer. Ever since the last Dow record-shattering took place in October 2007, median U.S. household incomes have dropped. And they continue to do so. Last Friday, the government reported a 3.6% drop in personal income during January. 

When the payroll tax holiday party ended on Jan. 1, everyone took a roughly 2% cut in take-home pay. Compile that with higher gas prices and the delay in tax refunds and a broader picture comes into focus.

Not surprisingly, consumers are feeling pessimistic and, as a result, revising their spending plans. In January, an indicator of consumer sentiment unexpectedly deteriorated. That bad news was followed by a National Retail Federation survey that reported 70% of Americans were adjusting their spending plans as a result of the increased payroll tax.

Dealing with the pain
Despite the Dow’s recent achievement of reaching an all-time high, improvements in the job market, and the housing rebound, this despair may substantially slow growth for companies that rely heavily on our spending. When that spending slows, consumer goods companies feel the pain.

Last month, Wal-Mart’s leaked internal emails that referenced “disastrous sales” turned this negative sentiment into reality. While the retailing giant posted solid results for 2012 and raised its dividend by 18%, the company cautioned investors that it expects lackluster results for the current quarter.

Meanwhile, on last week’s fourth-quarter conference call, Target CEO Gregg Steinhafel told investors, “While there are some encouraging signs in the housing market, volatility in consumer confidence, the payroll tax increase, and the rise in the price of gas all present incremental headwinds.” 

But while consumers can typically put off buying larger-ticket items like cars, they can’t do the same for toothpaste, soap, and diapers. Consumer staples companies reap the rewards of our dependency on these everyday items. In fact, several of these companies, like Target and Procter & Gamble , have performed well recently.

PG Total Return Price data by YCharts.

Despite deteriorating consumer sentiment, the stocks of these companies have returned roughly twice what the Dow has so far this year. Target has returned nearly 14% year to date, while Procter & Gamble is up more than 11% year to date.

Target reported a slight increase in same-store sales during the fourth quarter. To help fend off U.S. economic headwinds, the company may look for future growth from international stores. Target is expanding into Canada, a country whose economy is growing at a steady pace.

Meanwhile, in late January, household goods giant Procter & Gamble reported much better than expected quarterly results that were led by new products …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

3 Companies With a Simple Strategy for Success

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

In the video below, editor and analyst Brendan Byrnes is joined by Playing to Win co-author Roger Martin to discuss companies that are doing well. Steelcase , the big furniture manufacturer, is a good example; it sells high-end office furniture to big corporations. VF is also doing well. The company owns The North Face, Timberland, Vans, and Nautica brands. These companies both have figured out where exactly they are going to play and win. Compared to other companies, they have a greater level of precision.

The Motley Fool’s chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report: “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2013.” Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

To watch the full interview with Roger Martin, click here.

The article 3 Companies With a Simple Strategy for Success originally appeared on Fool.com.


Brendan Byrnes has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Procter & Gamble. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = document.createElement('script');
ga.type = 'text/javascript';
ga.async = true;
ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';

var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();

Read | Permalink …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Procter &amp; Gamble: Where to Play, How to Win

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Brendan Byrnes interviews Roger Martin, a consultant who helped turn around Procter & Gamble and author of “Playing to Win.”  The key change Roger helped to install was for every division in Procter & Gamble to have a clear idea of what they wanted to achieve, where they were going to play, and how they were going to win. As a result, Procter & Gamble is now a much more strategically careful company.

The Motley Fool’s chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report: “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2013.” Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

To watch the full interview with Roger Martin, click here.

The article Procter & Gamble: Where to Play, How to Win originally appeared on Fool.com.


Brendan Byrnes has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Procter & Gamble. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = document.createElement('script');
ga.type = 'text/javascript';
ga.async = true;
ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';

var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();

Read | Permalink | Email this …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Procter &amp; Gamble: Why Strategy vs. Execution Doesn't Matter

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

When asked if it’s more important to have good strategy or good execution, business consultant Roger Martin doesn’t directly answer the question. In this video, he explains why instead it’s important to have corporate decision-makers executing intelligent decisions based on defined strategy.

To watch the full interview with Roger Martin, click here.

The article Procter & Gamble: Why Strategy vs. Execution Doesn’t Matter originally appeared on Fool.com.


Brendan Byrnes has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Procter & Gamble. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = document.createElement('script');
ga.type = 'text/javascript';
ga.async = true;
ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';

var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Software firms lobby Congress to defend patent protection

Software firms are coaxing U.S. lawmakers to protect patent law because they encourage tech innovation and protect research, and not be put off by the current court battles over intellectual property.

The U.S. patent system isn’t perfect, but lawmakers and judges shouldn’t solve current controversies by eliminating software patents altogether, executives with Microsoft, Oracle, IBM, Covia Labs, and Procter & Gamble said during a briefing last week before congressional staffers in Washington, D.C.

“As my grandmother used to say, you don’t throw the baby out with the bath water,” said Dorian Daley, senior vice president and general counsel at Oracle.

Lawmakers should look at ways to improve patent quality, make it tougher for patent licensing firms to file infringement lawsuits, and require companies to be transparent about the patents they hold, Daley said during the briefing, sponsored by software trade group BSA and the National Association of Manufacturers.

To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at PCWorld

Hirsute in a huff over Gillette ads in Brazil

Hate that hair? In Brazil, beware.

A self-regulatory council for Brazil‘s advertising industry is looking into complaints against razor maker Gillette for running body-shaving commercials.

Council spokesman Eduardo Correa says 20 consumers have filed complaints that the campaign “encourages prejudice against hairy men.”

The online commercials show beautiful women telling men they should shave their chests to please their girlfriends.

The council’s ethical committee is expected to rule on the case in 30 days.

Elaine Moreira is a spokeswoman for Gillette parent company Procter & Gamble. She says the campaign was “an irreverent way to say that women prefer hairless men and that the company never meant to offend consumers.”

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox World News

A Billionaire's Startup Secrets: Culture And Hiring WIth Clay Mathile

By J.J. Colao, Forbes Staff Each year we relish the opportunity to give a handful of founders from our list of America’s Most Promising Companies the chance to speak with Clay Mathile, the longtime owner of pet-food maker Iams. Mathile sold the company to Procter & Gamble for $2.3 billion in 1999. (We currently peg his net worth at $1.9 billion.) Since then, he’s spent $130 million building the Aileron Institute in Dayton, Ohio, an airy 70,000-square-foot facility that offers a full roster of courses for small business owners. Classes at the campus cover everything from culture and strategy to people development and corporate structure, each one taught by real operators rather than stuffy academics. …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

A. G. Lafley: Develop a Strategy to Win at Business

By Dan Schawbel, Contributor I recently had the honor of speaking to A.G. Lafley, who is the former Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Procter & Gamble. Under Lafley’s leadership, P&G’s sales doubled, its profits quadrupled, its market value increased by more than $100 billion, and its portfolio of billion-dollar brands—like Tide, Pampers, Olay, and Gillette—grew from 10 to 24 as a result of his focus on winning strategic choices, consumer-driven innovation, and reliable, sustainable growth. Today, Lafley consults on business and innovation strategy, advises on CEO succession and executive leadership development, and coaches experienced, new, and potential CEOs.
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

Behind The Brand: Amway's Global Growth Strategy

By Jennifer Rooney, Forbes Staff Candace Matthews has been CMO at Amway far longer than typical CMO tenure; she joined in 2007. She’s a veteran of Procter & Gamble, General Mills and L’Oreal, and she’s putting brand at the center of marketing efforts for the global nutrition, cleaning and cosmetics products company. In our recent interview, […]
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest