Tag Archives: Roger Martin

How to Fix the Biggest Problem With CEO Pay

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

In the video below, The Motley Fool speaks with Roger Martin, strategy expert and dean of the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto. We discuss how to fix the biggest problem with executive compensation, which Martin believes is that it incentivizes CEOs to make decisions based on the short term, not based on the long-term benefits of the business. Martin argues that we would be better off if executives were compensated in stock that began to vest after the CEO retired, therefore incentivizing the CEO to focus on the long-term health of the company. 

A transcript follows the video.

The full interview with Roger Martin can be seen here, in which we discuss a number of topics including Bill Ackman, innovation, corporate responsibility, executive compensation, and how to pick great companies. Martin is the coauthor of Playing to Win, a new book focusing on strategy written with former Procter & Gamble CEO A.G. Lafley.

If you’re on the hunt for a great stock idea, The Motley Fool’s chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the new free report: “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2013.” Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Brendan Byrnes: Should CEOs not get any stock-based compensation?

Roger Martin: I think the world would work a lot better if they didn’t. We have this now romantic attachment to stock-based compensation. If people feel that they have to use stock-based compensation, I think they have to do two things.

One is, in the case when I hired you, I’d say, “Brendan, this is your only grant of stock-based compensation you are ever going to get as CEO. It’s a really big one, but we’re not going to give you one annually.”

And, “These are restricted. They’re restricted until three years after you retire.”

If that was the case, then you wouldn’t try to drive things down to drive them back up because you’re not going to get some more stock at a low value, and you won’t try and time it right to the end and do all sorts of extravagant, crazy things at the end — gigantic acquisitions, massive cost-cutting of all R&D and everything — to get the stock as high as possible when you retire, because it’s going to have to perform well for several years until you leave. That’s what I would do.

Brendan: And maybe you would focus more on grooming a successor.

Martin: Oh, you sure would. You sure would.

Brendan: Waiting three years afterwards.

Martin: Yeah, because that person, you really depend on them. Again, back to P&G  and A.G. Lafley, he went to the board and said, “You know all my stock-based compensation? I think you should make it vest in 10% increments in each year after I retire.” He did that, not the board.

He said, “This would …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

The Big Problem With CEO Compensation

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

In the video below, The Motley Fool speaks with Roger Martin, strategy expert and dean of the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto. We discuss executive compensation, specifically what he thinks of the current way executives are compensated. Martin believes that stock-based compensation for executives leads many of them to focus too much on the short term and can lead to management making decisions based on compensation schedules rather than the good of the business

A transcript follows the video.

The full interview with Roger Martin can be seen here, in which we discuss a number of topics including Bill Ackman, innovation, corporate responsibility, executive compensation, and how to pick out great companies. Martin is the coauthor of “Playing to Win,” a new book on strategy written with former Procter & Gamble CEO A.G. Lafley.

If you’re on the hunt for a great stock idea, The Motley Fool’s chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report: “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2013.” Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Brendan Byrnes: Executive compensation. You’ve said in the past that right now the executive compensation system is deeply flawed. What is wrong with it right now, and how has it evolved over time?

Roger Martin: What’s wrong with it now is it’s so much based on stock-based compensation, and that has evolved since about 1980. Prior to 1980, there was actually almost no consequential amount of stock-based compensation in the American economy.

In 1976, less than 1% of CEO compensation was stock-based. By 2000, it had become 50%.

The deep flaw, I think, is if you really think about what a stock price is, a stock price is simply everybody in the market‘s view of how well the company is going to do in the future. It’s not a real thing. It’s just about expectations of the future.

Brendan: Another Warren Buffett. In the short term, it’s a popularity contest.

Martin: That’s absolutely right. So, in essence, when you give somebody stock-based compensation … If you’re the CEO of a company, I’m on the board and I give you a stock option at the current market price, and say, “This is your incentive compensation, Brendan. You should make the most of this.” What they’re actually saying to you is not, “Make the company perform better.” They’re saying, “Raise expectations about future performance by those people out there called investors.”

I would argue there are a lot easier ways to do that, especially in the short term, than actually work really hard to build better products and be more efficient and effective and a better company.

Brendan: Let’s talk about those ways. How do you do it better? Do you look at a model like maybe Jeff Bezos at Amazon and say, “He’s focused on the long term, …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

How J.C. Penney Is Killing Itself

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

In the following video, we speak with Roger Martin, strategy expert and dean of the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto. We discuss what Martin believes is J.C. Penney‘s fundamental strategic flaw, the fact that it’s competing against itself with the new “store within a store” concept, and why he believes the company is doomed to fail.

A transcript follows the video.

The full interview with Roger Martin can be seen here, in which we discuss a number of topics, including Bill Ackman, innovation, corporate responsibility, executive compensation, and how to pick out great companies. Martin is the co-author of Playing to Win, a new book focusing on strategy, written with former Procter & Gamble CEO A.G. Lafley.

If you’re on the hunt for a great stock idea, The Motley Fool’s chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report: “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2013.” Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Brendan Byrnes: You know a thing or two about strategy, having helped turn around Procter & Gamble. I wanted to ask you about Bill Ackman and J.C. Penney. You wrote in a blog post recently that “Bill Ackman shows almost no evidence of understanding enough about strategy to turn around a company.” What’s he doing wrong?

Roger Martin: Well, I think he understands a whole lot about capital markets and a whole lot about how to make investors happy, but I’m not sure he knows how to make consumers — customers — happy in a way that brings about competitive advantage.

What I see with J.C. Penney is sort of a fallacy that I see often in the strategy of companies, which is that it’s good enough to try to improve things. It’s not. Improving is good, but only in the context of having a goal to have an advantage against competitors with some set of customers so that customers say, “I need this company.”

If you just improve a company, you say, “I’m going to get their inventory turns up, or their sales per square foot up.” That ends up often disappointing. I think that’s, in some sense, what’s happening at J.C. Penney.

They just announced a huge fourth-quarter loss. Same-story sales were down almost 30% in 2012, but the focus has been on, “Oh, we’ve got the new J.C. Penney” — 10% of the stores are this new store within a store, and it’s double the sales per square foot of the rest of J.C. Penney — “so as soon as we get the stores converted over to 100% of this our sales per square foot,” which were 130 apparently, and are 260 within the little store-within-a-store new J.C. Penney, “everything will be fine.”

But that begs the question, “Who are you competing against?” I would argue that …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

The Problem With Simply Investing in Great Companies

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

In the video below, The Motley Fool speaks with Roger Martin, strategy expert and dean of the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto. Martin says that investors looking for great businesses should focus on whether the company has a clear “Where to play” area that they’re focusing on and that they have a “How to win” with a solid customer base.

As Martin points out, however, that’s only half of the equation. Evaluating the expectations the market has built into the stock is a whole different skill set and one that can derail even investments in such great companies as Apple  and Microsoft .

A transcript follows the video.

The full interview with Roger Martin can be seen here, in which we discuss a number of topics including Bill Ackman, innovation, corporate responsibility, executive compensation, and how to pick great companies. Martin is the coauthor of “Playing to Win,” a new book that focuses on strategy and which he cowrote with former Procter & Gamble CEO A.G. Lafley.

If you’re on the hunt for a great stock idea, The Motley Fool’s chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report: “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2013.” Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Brendan Byrnes: As an investor, from your perspective, you have an inside view of quite a few companies. What do you think investors should look for, from the outside, at companies that are maybe doing things the right way from a strategic point of view?

Roger Martin: Boy, it’s a really hard question. Lots of people say, “You’re a strategy guy, Roger, so what’s your investment advice?”

I say you have to be careful. There are two things that are completely different. One is the real operations of a company and then there’s the expectations surrounding those. I have no experience, no insight, no nothing, on evaluating the expectations.

I could say to the person, “Here’s what I would do. If I wanted to understand whether that company was going to perform well over time, I’d ask myself the question, “Do they have a very clear “Where to Play”? Can you tell from the outside that they want to play here and not there, and they’re sticking to this?

Then they have a “How to win.” Here’s an offer that they have to their customer base there. If you can see that, and you can see that clearly, that company has got a better likelihood of performing well over the long term.

Now, it may just be that everybody else looking at that says, “They’re unbelievable. They’re even better than you think they are, or better than reality,” in which case buying that stock would be a bad idea.

I often point to Microsoft. Microsoft, I sometimes feel sorry for them. I probably …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Why CEOs Must Always Be Innovators

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

In the video below, The Motley Fool speaks with Roger Martin, strategy expert and dean of the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto. We discuss how leaders must look at innovation within their organization. Martin believes that CEOs must lead like their company’s life depends on innovation in order to stay one step ahead of the competition. He believes that investors should watch out if CEOs of companies in their portfolio aren’t leading in this way. 

A transcript follows the video.

The full interview with Roger Martin can be seen here, in which we discuss a number of topics including Bill Ackman, innovation, corporate responsibility, executive compensation, and how to pick out great companies. Martin is the coauthor of Playing to Win, a new book focusing on strategy written with former Procter & Gamble CEO A.G. Lafley.

If you’re on the hunt for a great stock idea, The Motley Fool’s chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report: “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2013.” Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Brendan Byrnes : How important do you think it is to have a CEO or top management that are constantly innovating, to take Apple as an example? Are you of the opinion that they’re in trouble now that Steve Jobs is gone and Tim Cook is in there — more of an operator and less of an innovator? Is that how you see it, or do you think both can be successful?

Roger Martin: I’ve never met Tim Cook, so I’m loath to make assessments of people I’ve never met, but to your fundamental question I do think, especially in the modern era of business, if you don’t have a CEO that really believes that his or her company’s life depends on innovation, I think it’s bad for you.

I just think, with more global competition, especially with really legitimate players in so many sectors in the low-cost geographies — whether it be Indian outsourcers in that business, or Chinese manufacturers in a whole bunch of businesses — if you’re not innovating, they’re going to be able to replicate what you’re doing now with a much lower cost structure and your advantage will be eroded that much faster.

You always have to be one step ahead, and I think you need a CEO who’s comfortable with that, not uncomfortable, not wistfully thinking, “If we could only just keep things the way they are,” or “If I could only go to the government and prevent those Chinese or Indian companies from entering our market.”

If that’s your CEO today, I just don’t see good things for you.

link

The article Why CEOs Must Always Be Innovators originally appeared on Fool.com.


Brendan Byrnes owns …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Why Investors Should Care About Corporate Responsibility

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

In the video below, The Motley Fool speaks with Roger Martin, strategy expert and Dean of the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto. We discuss why shareholders of a company should care about corporate responsibility. Martin argues that investors should look for the companies that are using their products to express their corporate responsibility, including companies like Starbucks . 

A transcript follows the video.

The full interview with Roger Martin can be seen here, in which we discuss a number of topics including Bill Ackman, innovation, corporate responsibility, executive compensation, and how to pick out great companies. Martin is the coauthor of Playing to Win, a new book focusing on strategy written with former Procter & Gamble CEO A.G. Lafley.

If you’re on the hunt for a great stock idea, The Motley Fool’s chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report, “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2013.” Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Brendan Byrnes: You’ve also done a lot of work on corporate responsibility. How important is that to shareholders of a company, and how do you think potential investors should look at the corporate responsibility of a company when they’re considering an investment?

Roger Martin: I think this is a really, really interesting issue which is still being very much sorted out.

I think there is now a rising tide of desire for corporate responsibility among consumers. Until such time as that happened, I just don’t think that corporations were going to respond, but I think now consumers care more than they ever have before, so I think getting out ahead of sustainability issues and how you treat your employees is important.

Brendan: We talked about conscious capitalism last time. Companies like Whole Foods , Panera , Starbucks starting to do more of this and, actually, if you look back at it over time, seeing better returns. Is that something that you think other companies will take notice and will start to take off and snowball like that?

Roger: I think they will, and I think what is cool about those examples that you’ve given are that the expression of their corporate responsibility is through what they actually do for consumers.

Starbucks saying, “You will get a cup of fair trade coffee.” Coffee is their business, so I like that better than — even though I like corporate philanthropy — than, say, giving money to something that doesn’t relate at all to your business. Whole Foods would be a similar story. I think that’s going to be the trend.

If I was an investor looking at that I’d say, “Boy, I’d rather invest in a company that’s figured out through their business, in a way that supports and enhances their business — those people drinking a cup of coffee from Starbucks …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Why Apple Hires the Best Users of Its Products

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

In the video below, The Motley Fool speaks with Roger Martin, strategy expert and dean of the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto. We discuss Apple and how it conducts consumer research. Martin points out that while Steve Jobs famously said the company doesn’t do consumer research, it often hires the best users of its products and gives prototypes to these internal people for evaluation, giving it a built-in advantage in understanding the consumer. 

A transcript follows the video.

The full interview with Roger Martin can be seen here, in which we discuss a number of topics including Bill Ackman, innovation, corporate responsibility, executive compensation, and how to pick out great companies. Martin is the coauthor of Playing to Win, a new book focusing on strategy written with former Procter & Gamble CEO A.G. Lafley.

There’s no doubt that Apple is at the center of technology’s largest revolution ever, and that longtime shareholders have been handsomely rewarded with over 1,000% gains. However, there is a debate raging as to whether Apple remains a buy. The Motley Fool’s senior technology analyst and managing bureau chief, Eric Bleeker, is prepared to fill you in on both reasons to buy and reasons to sell Apple, and what opportunities are left for the company (and your portfolio) going forward. To get instant access to his latest thinking on Apple, simply click here now.

var FoolAnalyticsData = FoolAnalyticsData || []; FoolAnalyticsData.push({ eventType: “TickerReportPitch”, contentByline: “Brendan Byrnes”, contentId: “cms.28170”, contentTickers: “NASDAQ:AAPL, NYSE:PG”, contentTitle: “Why Apple Hires the Best Users of Its Products”, …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Why CEOs Should Stop Complaining About Uncertainty

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

In the video below, we speak with Roger Martin, strategy expert and dean of the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto. We discuss why CEOs should stop using uncertainty as an excuse, and the best way for companies and investors to conquer uncertainty. 

A transcript follows the video.

The full interview with Roger Martin can be seen here, in which we discuss a number of topics including Bill Ackman, innovation, corporate responsibility, executive compensation, and how to pick out great companies. Martin is the coauthor of “Playing to Win“, a new book focusing on strategy written with former Procter & Gamble CEO A.G. Lafley.

Thanks to the savvy of investing legend Warren Buffett, Berkshire Hathaway‘s book value per share has grown a mind-blowing 586,817% over the past 48 years. But with Buffett aging and Berkshire rapidly evolving, is this insurance conglomerate still a buy today? In The Motley Fool’s premium report on the company, Berkshire expert Joe Magyer provides investors with key reasons to buy as well as important risks to watch out for. Click here now for instant access to Joe’s take on Berkshire!

var FoolAnalyticsData = FoolAnalyticsData || []; FoolAnalyticsData.push({ eventType: “TickerReportPitch”, contentByline: “Brendan Byrnes”, contentId: “cms.28138”, contentTickers: “NYSE:BRK-A, NYSE:BRK-B”, contentTitle: “Why CEOs Should Stop Complaining About Uncertainty”, hasVideo: “True”, pitchId: “50”, …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Are Activist Investors Ever Good for Shareholders?

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

In the video below, The Motley Fool speaks with Roger Martin, strategy expert and dean of the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto. We discuss activist shareholders, which have been increasingly in the news lately with companies like Herbalife, Dell, and J.C. Penney. The question many individual investors are asking is: Are these activist investors good for the stocks that I own? Martin explains that they will likely create short-term value, but long-term investors should be wary of activist investors.

A transcript follows the video.

The full interview with Roger Martin can be seen here, in which we discuss a number of topics including Bill Ackman, innovation, corporate responsibility, executive compensation, and how to pick out great companies. Martin is the coauthor of Playing to Win, a new book focusing on strategy written with former Procter & Gamble CEO A.G. Lafley.

If you’re on the hunt for a great stock idea, The Motley Fool’s chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report: “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2013.” Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Brendan Byrnes: Let’s talk about activist investors. You saw Icahn recently purchasing a 6% stake in Dell. He’s got 10% of Netflix. Bill Ackman we talked about earlier, obviously J.C. Penney. He lost his proxy fight with Target.

If I’m a shareholder and I own one of these companies, should you welcome an activist investor coming in? What effect does that have on strategy?

Roger Martin: I think it really depends. What I’ve seen of the activist investors … I actually haven’t seen any activist investor out there be able to improve the long run operations of the core company they’ve gotten involved with.

There’s undoubtedly examples where it’s happened, but I don’t see any consistency of that.

What I see is them triggering something that makes the capital markets very happy in the short term, so when Ackman went in and said, “Fortune Brands, you have to split into three companies,” everybody said, “Oh, wow, this is great. We’ve released all this value,” so there’s a bump.

The question is, can you make the performance of each of the companies that much better? I think a short-term shareholder, if an activist comes in and forces them to divest something — sell off their real estate assets or monetize some portfolio of assets — they can have a bump in the stock.

But I think if you’re actually a long-term shareholder — let’s say you’re a pension fund or something that wants to hold a given stock for 30 years and an activist comes in — I don’t think it’s particularly good for you because what they tend to do is make their money on a one-time bump.

As soon as we create the spinoff and we get a bump …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

An Interview With Roger Martin

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

In the interview below, we chat with Roger Martin, strategy expert and dean of the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto.

We touch on a number of subjects in this interesting interview, including Bill Ackman, innovation, corporate responsibility, executive compensation, and how to pick out great companies. Martin is the coauthor of Playing to Win, a new book focusing on strategy written with former Procter & Gamble CEO A.G. Lafley. 

A full transcript follows the video.

If you’re on the hunt for a great stock idea, The Motley Fool’s chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the new free report: “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2013.” Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Brendan Byrnes: Hi, I’m Brendan Byrnes and I’m joined today by Roger Martin. Roger is the coauthor of Playing to Win, and also the dean of the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management. Thanks again, it’s good to see you.

Roger Martin: It’s good to be back.

Brendan: You know a thing or two about strategy, having helped turn around Procter & Gamble. I wanted to ask you about Bill Ackman and J.C. Penney. You wrote in a blog post recently that “Bill Ackman shows almost no evidence of understanding enough about strategy to turn around a company.” What’s he doing wrong?

Martin: Well, I think he understands a whole lot about capital markets and a whole lot about how to make investors happy, but I’m not sure he knows how to make consumers — customers — happy in a way that brings about competitive advantage.

What I see with J.C. Penney is sort of a fallacy that I see often in the strategy of companies, which is that it’s good enough to try to improve things. It’s not. Improving is good, but only in the context of having a goal to have an advantage against competitors with some set of customers so that customers say, “I need this company.”

If you just improve a company, you say, “I’m going to get their inventory turns up, or their sales per square foot up,” that ends up often disappointing. I think that’s, in some sense, what’s happening at J.C. Penney.

They just announced a huge fourth-quarter loss. Same-store sales were down almost 30% in 2012, but the focus has been on, “Oh, we’ve got the new J.C. Penney” — 10% percent of the stores are this new store within a store and it’s double the sales per square foot of the rest of J.C. Penney — “so as soon as we get the stores converted over to 100% of this our sales per square foot,” which were 130 apparently, and are 260 within the little store within a store, new J.C. Penney, “everything will be fine.”

But that begs the question, “Who are you competing against?” …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Why We Love Founder-Led Companies

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

In the video below, Playing to Win co-author Roger Martin talks with Fool analyst Brendan Byrnes about the benefits of investing in companies that are headed by their founders.

Roger says he loves founder-led companies. But there’s also a bias about which founder-led companies we learn about, he says. Investors don’t really hear about the lousy founder-led companies that fail, just the good ones that succeed.

That aside, founders of those successful companies have usually developed “where-to-play” and “how-to-win” strategies, Roger says. And while those strategies are sometimes carried on by successors, those new, professional managers can also come in with a belief that success will go on forever.

Strategies must be re-evaluated constantly, and professional managers sometimes don’t see that as a core part of their job, he says.

To watch the full interview with Roger Martin, click here.

The article Why We Love Founder-Led Companies originally appeared on Fool.com.

Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = document.createElement('script');
ga.type = 'text/javascript';
ga.async = true;
ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';

var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

3 Companies With a Simple Strategy for Success

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

In the video below, editor and analyst Brendan Byrnes is joined by Playing to Win co-author Roger Martin to discuss companies that are doing well. Steelcase , the big furniture manufacturer, is a good example; it sells high-end office furniture to big corporations. VF is also doing well. The company owns The North Face, Timberland, Vans, and Nautica brands. These companies both have figured out where exactly they are going to play and win. Compared to other companies, they have a greater level of precision.

The Motley Fool’s chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report: “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2013.” Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

To watch the full interview with Roger Martin, click here.

The article 3 Companies With a Simple Strategy for Success originally appeared on Fool.com.


Brendan Byrnes has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Procter & Gamble. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = document.createElement('script');
ga.type = 'text/javascript';
ga.async = true;
ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';

var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();

Read | Permalink …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

How Maximizing Shareholder Value Can Bury Your Business

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Roger Martin, co-author of Playing to Win, holds the unexpected view that “setting as your goal the maximization of shareholder value is a bad idea.” Why would this be the case, especially when many companies expressly state that one of their major goals is to benefit the stockholders? Because, as Martin explains, “Setting it as your goal makes it less likely that you will maximize shareholder value.” This certainly sounds counterintuitive. However, the reasoning behind Martin’s statements is that companies need to focus on customer satisfaction first, and they also need to maintain and nurture employee morale. Both of these goals are complicated when customers and/or employees hear how they aren’t as important as the shareholders. Furthermore, he says by making the customer “deliriously happy,” sales will naturally increase — and also, inevitably, will share prices.

See more in the following video.

The Motley Fool’s chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report: “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2013.” Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

To watch the full interview with Roger Martin, click here.

The article How Maximizing Shareholder Value Can Bury Your Business originally appeared on Fool.com.


Brendan Byrnes has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Google, Starbucks, and Whole Foods Market. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Transforming Management: We Need To Think Bigger (Videos)

By Steve Denning, Contributor

Steve Denning is on fire today. Claudio Perrone In fact, lots of us were on fire on January 25, 2013 for the global event, Stoos Connect, aka World Stoos Day. With a sold-out gathering in Amsterdam, twenty-two satellite sites around the world, and around twenty speakers, including Dan Pink, Roger Martin, Lisa Earle McLeod, Franz Röösli and Joe Justice, the event was rather amazing. …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

1 Investor Strategy for Finding Companies That Win

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

The Motley Fool’s chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report: “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2013.” Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Brendan Byrnes: Do you think investors can look at companies that are using these strategies, and say, “These may be a better investment, down the road?” Can this be a tool for investors as well, when looking at the stock market?

Roger Martin: Absolutely. I really think that it’s a way of analyzing companies and just asking yourself the question, from the outside — you’ll never have as much information as the insiders but you can still analyze it — and say, “Well, where are they playing? Do they have a proposition that actually is winning with the customers?”

I give Jeff Immelt a bunch of credit. I think he inherited a company that maybe had had a Where to Play that expanded a little bit too much, and maybe wasn’t as precise about its How to Win. I think he’s trimming back on areas that are less advantaged, for him.

Good businesses — NBC Universal, a great business — but it fits better with Comcast . When the deal closes, it’ll be fully at Comcast. GE Capital , which became a more sprawling empire of things that really worked well and didn’t work so well has been shrunk back …

Brendan: Got in a little bit of trouble back in …

Roger: [laughs] In 2008? Absolutely.

I think investors, hopefully, are looking at that and saying, “Wow, that’s getting to be a more precise strategy, where we can understand why they’re playing where they are, and how they’re intending to win in each of those places,” and would like that.

*********************

To watch the full interview with Roger Martin, click here.

The article 1 Investor Strategy for Finding Companies That Win originally appeared on Fool.com.


Brendan Byrnes has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of General Electric Company. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Procter &amp; Gamble: Where to Play, How to Win

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Brendan Byrnes interviews Roger Martin, a consultant who helped turn around Procter & Gamble and author of “Playing to Win.”  The key change Roger helped to install was for every division in Procter & Gamble to have a clear idea of what they wanted to achieve, where they were going to play, and how they were going to win. As a result, Procter & Gamble is now a much more strategically careful company.

The Motley Fool’s chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report: “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2013.” Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

To watch the full interview with Roger Martin, click here.

The article Procter & Gamble: Where to Play, How to Win originally appeared on Fool.com.


Brendan Byrnes has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Procter & Gamble. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = document.createElement('script');
ga.type = 'text/javascript';
ga.async = true;
ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';

var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();

Read | Permalink | Email this …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Procter &amp; Gamble: Why Strategy vs. Execution Doesn't Matter

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

When asked if it’s more important to have good strategy or good execution, business consultant Roger Martin doesn’t directly answer the question. In this video, he explains why instead it’s important to have corporate decision-makers executing intelligent decisions based on defined strategy.

To watch the full interview with Roger Martin, click here.

The article Procter & Gamble: Why Strategy vs. Execution Doesn’t Matter originally appeared on Fool.com.


Brendan Byrnes has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Procter & Gamble. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = document.createElement('script');
ga.type = 'text/javascript';
ga.async = true;
ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';

var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

5 Choices Every Business Owner Must Make

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

The Motley Fool’s chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report: “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2013.” Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Brendan Byrnes: When you’re writing a book like this, is it a challenge to make it relevant and applicable to everyone from the top of the corporations to maybe a small business owner? How do you go about doing that?

Roger Martin: That’s what we tried to do, Brendan, in the book, and I hope we’ve succeeded, which is to say, “Regardless of what kind of business you’re in, this is a set of choices — five of them — that comprise the strategy. Here’s what they look like.”

I think they’re as applicable in a small business as a big business. I think they’re applicable in a non-profit. I think they’re also applicable at the personal level. I think anybody who’s given a job has some important aspiration questions, “What am I trying to accomplish?” and some Where to Play, How to Win choices.

“Where, within the confines of this job, should I focus my energies and how do I create lots and lots of value for my employer?” I think they’re a set of questions that are broadly applicable.

*****************

To watch the full interview with Roger Martin, click here.

The article 5 Choices Every Business Owner Must Make originally appeared on Fool.com.

Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Procter &amp; Gamble: The Common Mistakes of a Leader

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

The Motley Fool’s chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report: “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2013.” Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Brendan Byrnes: Wow. That’s one example of things that leaders do right. How about taking a look at the other end of the spectrum? What’s a common mistake that you think leaders make when looking at strategy?

Roger Martin: I think a lot of leaders think of it as a plan. It’s just a description of a bunch of things that you’re going to do, and often that’s just a compilation of what all your direct reports say they want to do, rather than saying, “We have to do some things that position us to win, and we don’t do other things.”

Another thing is just thinking strategy is an aspiration statement, a vision statement. “We’re going to be the best in our industry. We’re going to be fantastic.”

That’s nice, but unless you have a Where to Play, How to Win that makes that possible, makes that a reality … it doesn’t matter that you have high aspirations if you’re not doing anything to make that come true. I’d say those are errors.

Another one is the Where question; the second question, the Where to Play. I find that often companies and executives almost treat it as it’s ordained by the heavens that “We’re playing here now, so that’s where you play and everybody else in our industry plays there.”

If we would have done that with Olay, we would have stayed with the 50+ segment. Instead, we chose this brand new Where that ended up being incredibly, incredibly fruitful for us.

I often describe it as, if you assume your Where to Play is a given, you’re trying to make strategy with one hand tied behind your back. You should operate both hands in order to develop a winning strategy.

**************

To watch the full interview with Roger Martin, click here.

The article Procter & Gamble: The Common Mistakes of a Leader originally appeared on Fool.com.

Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Procter &amp; Gamble: How to Stop the Competition from Eating Your Lunch

By Brendan Byrnes, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

The Motley Fool’s chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report: “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2013.” Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Brendan Byrnes: Can you talk about why you called the book Playing to Win, and how does one play to win?

Roger Martin: Sure. We called it Playing to Win because what A.G. and I believe strongly is that if a company doesn’t attempt to win — by which we mean have a better value proposition for the customer than anybody they’re competing with — then one of those other companies will choose to do that and they will eventually eat your lunch.

Serving the customer better, having a better value proposition, is the aspiration that you need to have. If you do that, if you set that as your aspiration, then it will help you make choices that are consistent with that.

If you’ve got this general, fuzzy, “We want to sell stuff” kind of aspiration, then it won’t help you make the choices that say, “What do we have to do to actually make that happen?”

*************

To watch the full interview with Roger Martin, click here.

The article Procter & Gamble: How to Stop the Competition from Eating Your Lunch originally appeared on Fool.com.

Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance