By Jane Levere, Contributor The National Archives in Washington, D.C., is hosting interviews in its theater this week with actress Valerie Harper and talk show host Dick Cavett that will be Webcast live and then archived. Both are being offered in conjunction with the National Archives’ current photographic exhibition, “Searching for the Seventies: The DOCUMERICA Photography Project.”
Tag Archives: National Archives
WikiLeaks launches library with Kissinger-era intelligence cables
History buffs and conspiracy theorists, rejoice. Thanks to WikiLeaks, millions of U.S. intelligence documents are now available online.
WikiLeaks combined the 250,000 State Department documents it had previously released in 2010 (now called “Cablegate”) with 1.7 million documents from the department’s Henry Kissinger era to launch the Public Library of U.S. Diplomacy (PlusD).
The Kissinger Cables date from Jan. 1, 1973 to Dec. 31, 1976, and include assessments of Vietnam and transcripts from conversations that include classic Kissinger-isms like, “The illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer (see screenshot below).”
The government had previously declassified or made publicly available most of the documents included in the Kissinger Cables release, but the diplomatic records were largely in PDF format at the National Archives and Records Administration.
To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here
Source: FULL ARTICLE at PCWorld
Know Your History
By Bradlee Dean
“Study The Past”– Inscription on the National Archives in Washington, D.C.
Love him or hate him, President Woodrow Wilson rightly stated that “A nation that does not remember what it was yesterday, does not know what it is today, nor what it is trying to do. We are trying to do a futile thing if we do not know where we have come from, or what we have been about… America was born a Christian nation. America was born to exemplify that devotion to the tenets of righteousness which are derived from the revelations of Holy Scripture.”
Recently, while doing a radio interview, I was asked what my opinion was concerning immoral issues that are taking place in our country. I said that “My ‘opinion’ doesn’t matter any more than your ‘opinion’ does.” I said, “It is OK for us to have different opinions as long as we are rooted in the same principles.”
And herein lies America’s problems.
When we are no longer rooted in the same principles, corruption seeps in and begins to divide and conquer through outlets such as the media, public schools, and colleges.
For example, most young people think America is a democracy. Yet, when saying the Pledge of Allegiance, you recite: “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the UNITED States of America, and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, indivisible (cannot be divided, separated, or broken), with liberty and justice for all.”
President Andrew Jackson said that “The Bible is the rock upon which our republic rests.” And these are the principles that keep us united.
I can just now hear the media, the teacher, the “well-educated” college professor, or the philosopher (using big words with common-sense meanings) decry: “We are not a Christian nation.” They then complain about the government that will not be ruled by Law (God gave government through Moses – Exodus 18:21).
In their confusion, they blurt out the truth: They would rather listen to man’s 10,000 commandments than to God’s Ten Commandments, which only produce liberty when you love God with your whole heart, mind, soul, and strength.
In essence, the unprincipled in America are at war with God and His Law, which commanded we should not kill, commit adultery, steal, lie, or covet. They seem to forget that “Wherever law ends, tyranny begins”… and tyranny is what you are dealing with today because most people do not know their history.
America, how is it that the left (as it is called) knows how to lie better than the right knows how to tell the truth?
The remedy: know your history
The University of Houston political science professors searched to find where the Founding Fathers chose their ideas:
- They assembled 15,000 writings from the era of the founders.
- They researched for 10 years, isolated 3,154 direct quotes, and identified the source of the quotes:
- 8.3 percent were quotes from Baron Charles de Montesquieu;
- 7.9 percent were quotes from Sir William Blackstone;
- 2.9 percent were from John Locke;
- 34 percent of their quotes came directly from the Bible – and when researching …read more
From the Archives: Play Ball, Mr. President!
By Presidential Libraries of the National Archives and Records Administration
Our national pastime and our Nation’s leaders have shared a unique relationship for some 150 years. Presidents throwing out first pitches or hosting World Series winners at the White House are familiar images from each baseball season.
The connection between Presidents and baseball stretches back as far as Abraham Lincoln. According to research conducted for the 1939 Major League Baseball Centennial Celebration, Lincoln was playing baseball in Springfield, Illinois, when he was informed that the Chicago Republican Convention had nominated him as the Presidential candidate. Lincoln is reported to have responded, “They will have to wait a few minutes until I get my next turn at bat.” A year later when he arrived at the White House in 1861, baseball’s popularity had caught on in Washington, D.C. As President, Lincoln is said to have played baseball on the White House lawn.
A Letter To Tyrants
By Bradlee Dean
The Bible is no mere book, but a Living Creature, with a power that conquers all that oppose it. – Napoleon Bonaparte
On a daily basis, America’s biblical and constitutional foundation is under hostile attack by atheist and homosexual groups that are being used as a political battering ram in an attempt to usher in communism.
For example, an atheist group filed a brief on Feb. 15 fighting the federal government’s motion in support of a permanent shrine to Jesus in the Flathead National Forest. Outrageous!
I find that these groups operate on the defense rather than the offense, falling into the very holes they themselves have dug (Psalm 7:15).
Another example: Outgoing Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta has defied the Defense of Marriage Act and unilaterally issued a directive stating that the U.S. military will now extend certain benefits to unmarried domestic partners that were formerly reserved for married couples—but will only do so if the domestic partners certify in writing to the Department of Defense that they are of the same sex. Absurd!
The question is, who has been responsible for encouraging the onslaught of attacks against America’s Christian heritage and constitutional republic? You need not look any further than Obama and his vile minions for the answer.
Scripture comes to my aid: “The wicked walk on every side, when the vilest men are exalted” (Psalm 12:8).
Barack Hussein Obama has been labeled the “Architect of a New America” by Time magazine, and Newsweek featured him as the “First Gay President.” Obama is also known as America’s most biblically hostile president. He has placed himself above We the People time and time again, as if to say we derive our rights from Obama instead of God.
Obama has personally attacked biblical values, the bedrock of our republic, over 50 times since he took office.
Day by day, Obama’s tyrannical measures are beginning to take shape. And what should America expect from one who is at war with God?
It is clear to see the narcissism of this president, but just as obvious is the hypocrisy and lack of duty from the professed church and the modern government (leaven of the Pharisees and of Herod, Mark 8:15). After all, leaders will only do what the people let them get away with.
Theologian John Calvin said “And ye, O peoples, to whom God gave the liberty to choose your own magistrates, see to it that ye do not forfeit this favor by electing to the positions of highest honor, rascals and enemies of God.”
Study the Past
At the entrance of the National Archives in Washington, D.C., you will see a monument stating: “Study the Past.”
Why study the past? Our forefathers suggested this so we might learn from history, so it does not repeat itself.
History has shown time and time again that when a nation departs from God, there will be a tyrant in the midst attempting to move into His position. Then follows devastation and massive loss of life. This is what God warned would happen to nations that refuse to keep …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism
National Archives cancels tours due to budget cuts
The National Archives is canceling reservations for late afternoon and evening tours due to automatic federal budget cuts taking effect.
AVG Technologies Chief Policy Officer Siobhan MacDermott to Speak as "Visiting Future-ist" for the F
By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool
Filed under: Investing
AVG Technologies Chief Policy Officer Siobhan MacDermott to Speak as “Visiting Future-ist” for the Future of Information Alliance at the University of Maryland
–(BUSINESS WIRE)– AVG Technologies (NYS: AVG) :
WHAT: The University of Maryland’s Future of Information Alliance will host invitation-only discussions in a series entitled, “The Big Picture of Big Data.” Visiting Future-ists will give 10-minute presentations on the topic as it pertains to their respective industry or discipline.
The Future of Information Alliance was launched at the University of Maryland in 2011. It was created to serve as a catalyst for dialogue across disciplines and to promote research on issues related to the evolving role of information in our lives. By identifying shared challenges and encouraging innovative solutions, the Future of Information Alliance seeks to facilitate a future in which information in all its forms can be an effective resource for all. The founding partners include the Library of Congress, the National Archives, the Smithsonian Institution, the National Geographic Society, the Newseum, Sesame Workshop, the U.S. National Park Service, the Barrie School, the Online Academy, WAMU 88.5 and Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley. The Future of Information Alliance is co-directed by Ira Chinoy, a University of Maryland Philip Merrill College of Journalism associate professor and associate dean, and Allison Druin, a professor at the University of Maryland College of Information Studies (iSchool).
WHO: Siobhan MacDermott is a respected thought leader on the future of Information Technology, consumer dynamics, cybersecurity, privacy, and business leadership. She is currently Chief Policy Officer of AVG Technologies (NYS: AVG) , having worked in senior leadership positions at many reputable U.S. and global technology companies. MacDermott is both a US and EU national, and has worked on four continents and speaks five languages. She received her MBA from Thunderbird School of Global Management, is working on her second Masters degree at the Fletcher School, and serves on and advises several boards including the Internet Security Alliance and the Fund for Peace.
AVG‘s mission is to simplify, optimize and secure the Internet experience, providing peace of mind to a connected world. AVG‘s powerful yet easy-to-use software and online services put users in control of their Internet experience. By choosing AVG‘s software and services, users become part of a trusted global community that benefits from inherent network effects, mutual protection and support. AVG has grown …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance
National Archives reduces hours due to budget cuts
The National Archives is reducing its public operating hours due to automatic federal budget cuts taking effect.
Letter From American History
By ckreiser
Stolen Treasures
A hallmark of American democracy we tend to take for granted is that records kept by the government belong to the people. At the National Archives in Washington, D.C., and its satellite locations, the general public has access …
Nixon's Space Legacy Unveiled at National Archives
President Richard Nixon made the first Earth-to-moon phone call during the historic Apollo 11 mission.
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Space.com
How Reagan Risked Creating the "Worst Possible Impression on London"
By ruddin
According to documents released under the 30-year rule, U.S. President Ronald Reagan delayed accepting formal invitations to visit the UK.
The two-month delay in responding to invites from both Margaret Thatcher and the Queen risked creating, said Britain’s Ambassador to Washington Sir Nicholas Henderson, the “worst possible impression on London.” The White House was determined to make a good impression, though, and asked what the Commander-in-Chief should wear to go horse riding at Windsor Castle. The aforementioned fashion inquiry is but one gem within a 485-page treasure-trove of hitherto confidential documents surrounding Reagan’s 48-hour, 1982 visit made public by the National Archives.
Source:
Special to HNN
Date:
12-29-12
After a century, US Arabs look for pieces of past
Tossing and shivering below deck, Hussien Karoub felt ill. In the cold, crowded conditions, sleep came seldom. When it did, it didn’t last long: The cries of children and the moans of those even sicker than he was made certain of that.
It was approaching midnight somewhere in the North Atlantic, aboard a vessel carrying the 18-year-old Syrian and many fellow immigrants toward, they hoped, a better life. If nothing else, he knew it had to beat this arduous monthlong odyssey in steerage, enduring conditions that were, in every sense, below those in first and second class.
It would be days before details trickled down about the doomed ship a couple hundred miles away. Above, in his vessel’s radio room, came the first distress call from the foundering RMS Titanic: “Require immediate assistance. Come at once. We struck an iceberg. Sinking.”
A couple weeks later, Hussien Karoub arrived in the United States even more anonymously than he otherwise might have. Public attention was elsewhere, focused on the Titanic and its tragic end.
That is the story of my grandfather’s voyage to America. Or, more likely, it isn’t. And that’s part of the point.
___
I am a third-generation Arab-American, and I am on a journey to learn more about the journey of my “jiddo,” the Arabic word for grandfather. I am sorting through family stories, passed down, that have a way of changing in the retelling. Folk tales are compelling, but I am trying to anchor my story to facts before the channels to history close entirely, in hopes they might offer insight about how I got here.
My quest mirrors those of so many Arab-Americans. They’re looking back and trying to unearth their stories, separating myth from truth and — just as important — hoping to show their neighbors that, in the story of America, they are not a “them” but an “us.”
Maybe the Titanic tale is true. It’s remotely possible, since Hussien Karoub came to the United States in the same year, 1912. My family hasn’t confirmed that through records, but by anecdotes like a radio interview from the early 1960s, when he said he came to Detroit in 1915 to make cars after spending three years making hats in Danbury, Conn.
For many Arabs, a version of the story is true. U.S.-bound Middle Easterners were on the Titanic and other ships traversing the Atlantic. In lower Manhattan, an already thriving Syrian community awaited and would be instrumental in identifying and memorializing the dead and helping survivors meet the new world.
“I always tell people who ask that Jiddo’s ship crossed paths with the Titanic on the way over from Syria,” my cousin Carl, the family’s historian, tells me. “The wake from the Titanic nearly capsized his tiny ferry and he cursed the Titanic.”
He has no proof, of course. In only a century, the truth blurs in a genealogical game of telephone. Yet why not hitch our tale to that of a great American epic? It’s not that big of a stretch. Americans — most Americans, even — have done that since the very beginning.
But I want more than stories.
___
“Who’s ‘Aszim’?” the voice over the phone asks me. It’s Diane Hassan, a researcher from the Danbury Museum & Historical Society. Hassan finds a record saying Aszim was born in Danbury in 1913, which brings us closer to confirming the timeframe of my grandfather’s arrival in Danbury. This was my father’s first cousin, known to my family by his American name, Jimmy. He was the son of Mohammed, my grandfather’s brother.
I’ve sought Hassan’s help because I’ve hit a brick wall. Ellis Island, the entry point for millions of immigrants, contains records of my grandfather coming in 1920 aboard the Kroonland with his wife, Miriam, and their young son Allie. That was Hussien Karoub‘s second U.S. arrival, but there is no record in Ellis Island‘s archive of his inaugural voyage as a single man some eight years earlier.
A short boat ride away, they’re asking the same kinds of questions on a much larger scale. A group of New Yorkers have worked with curators from the Arab American National Museum in the Detroit suburb of Dearborn on a new traveling exhibit that documents what had been one of the earliest settlements of Arabs in America.
It’s not lost on them that the Little Syria neighborhood in lower Manhattan would become the site of the World Trade Center — the towers whose destruction a decade ago put many of Middle Eastern descent under intense scrutiny and suspicion.
For so many decades, the self-appointed “us” of America had names for the not-quite-white, not-quite-black, not-quite-sure group of “them” arriving from the Middle East: “Orientals,” ”Ali Baba,” and later, “towelheads.”
The increasingly malignant stereotype of Arab and Muslims as terrorists appeared in the 1960s with the Arab-Israeli war but hit warp speed after 9/11. It came in actions — anti-Islamic hate crime cases reported to the FBI spiked after the terrorist attacks — but it came more commonly, casually and sometimes just as cruelly in words:
“Go home.”
Go home. It’s as perplexing as it is offensive, especially to those whose American story stretches back a century. Where exactly is home for someone who was born in the U.S.? Or came here seeking a better life — and succeeded? Or fled tyranny for opportunity? In times of crisis, the public forgets how long Arab and Muslims have been in the U.S. or what they’ve contributed.
So, in the face of foes and a forgetful public, it is left to Arabs themselves to remember and remind others of where they’ve been. That presents difficulties — not only with facts that were never committed to paper but also with facts that bump into something equally potent: family consensus.
I’ve known since I was little that my grandfather made up his birthdate. Why? Because the village where he was born didn’t keep records. His gravestone lists his birth year as 1893; his petition to become a U.S. citizen, filed in 1919, says he was born on Dec. 20, 1892.
That led me to another surprise: learning he registered for the World War I draft in 1917, a full decade before being declared a citizen. The document shows his birthplace as the “Syrian Arab Republic” and his occupation as “grinding for Ford Motor Co.” The registration also details back problems, which likely kept him from being drafted. His address is on the same street in the Detroit enclave where, just four years later, he would lead what was likely the first mosque in the United States.
In Danbury, a whole section of town is referred to as “Little Lebanon,” where immigrants like my grandfather came to work in fur and hat factories. One Arab immigrant whose time there wasn’t lost to history was William Buzaid, who opened a fur-cutting factory in 1910.
Hassan is working with the city’s Lebanese American Club to learn more about the paths of its forebears. She welcomes my call for help in finding facts to fill my story, knowing it could in turn help Danbury and Detroit, Chicago, Los Angeles, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and many other places where Arab-Americans traveled through or put down roots during the Great Migration of 1880-1924. The peak for those coming from what then was known as “Greater Syria” was from 1910 to 1914.
Even after trying several variations of Karoub — Kharoub, Karoob, Karub, Karroubi — I came up empty. Maybe, Hassan suggests, he was among those who came through Baltimore or Boston. Maybe even Canada. Maybe he didn’t enter at Ellis Island at all.
Maybe. A word I can’t seem to escape.
___
Devon Akmon also wants to fill in some ancestral blanks. He lacks even more basic facts than I do. He knows this much: He’s half-Lebanese, like me, and his family came from northern Lebanon. But who came to the U.S., and when?
“This is the hard part. This is what we don’t know,” said Akmon, now deputy director of the Arab American National Museum. “They first came to Kentucky. That’s the story I want to figure out. … It’s family history. Knowing your family’s story only back a generation — it seems so mysterious.”
To know more, he said, enhances his “sense of self-worth.”
How can details like these disappear so soon? A relative’s reluctance to reminisce is a common obstacle for the family historian, and Akmon said his grandfather didn’t talk a lot about his past.
It’s a challenge in his day job as well. “Trying to do research on Arab-Americans in the early … 20th century is very difficult,” he says. “It’s so underdocumented.”
That’s an underlying theme of the 1985 book, “Becoming American: The Early Arab Immigrant Experience,” by Alixa Naff. It draws on dozens of interviews with pioneer immigrants and their descendants from more than 25 communities, including my uncle — a son of Hussien Karoub who followed him into ministry.
You come away with one overarching feeling: The ancestry quest of Arab-Americans is common to all immigrants, be they Irish, Italians, Germans, Jews or others. It is the story of most everyone in America.
Yet Syrians are one of the least studied of America’s ethnic groups — partly because they were smaller in number and the formal Arabic language was not widely understood by Western students and scholars before World War II. But Naff says the blame also falls upon Arab immigrants, who “neglected to study themselves.”
“The history of their American experience was, by comparison, too insignificant and too fleeting to warrant recording,” she wrote.
So, what filled the cultural void? American myth and history. “Lacking ancestral legends and heroes that had an organic relevance to their lives, they adopted American legends as their own — presidents, cowboys, athletes and men like Charles Lindbergh,” Naff wrote.
Maybe the Titanic — itself no slouch as an American history tale — looms so large in my grandfather’s legend because the sea at that time of its fateful passage was filled with Middle Easterners seeking a new life, including on the “unsinkable” ship itself. There, 154 of the Titanic’s passengers were Arabic; 29 survived.
Those who did included 24-year-old Catherine Joseph, who was sailing steerage with her children, 6-year-old Michael and 2-year-old Anna. The passenger record indicates her husband, Peter, sent them back to Lebanon a few months earlier to save money, but called them back to Detroit.
We know these facts about the Joseph family because of “Titanic: The Artifact Exhibition,” which spent several recent months at the Henry Ford Museum in Dearborn, the capital of Arab-America. Visitors learned about passengers and their fates on special tickets handed out at the exhibition’s entrance.
It didn’t take years for the tales of those on the Titanic to be told. Arabic-language newspapers from New York’s Little Syria played a particularly aggressive role in helping to identify victims and provide support to families and survivors — something it was uniquely equipped to do.
“The entire Syrian community of New York identified with the difficulties of those who had left their homeland seeking a better future in a new land,” Leila Salloum Elias wrote in 2005 in an essay that laid the groundwork for a new book, “The Dream and the Nightmare: The Syrians Who Boarded the Titanic.”
“They were reminded of their own journey across ocean and sea,” she wrote. “The Syrian community considered the ship’s Syrian passengers as part of it.”
What kind of impression did that leave on my Jiddo? I wonder if he was there to see newspapers report, connect and advocate on behalf of those on the ship, and if those efforts helped him decide to launch his own newspaper a few years later in Detroit.
No doubt he was lured like many other immigrants by the promise of Ford’s “five bucks a day” to make Model Ts. But he saw another, less material motive: Muslims making Michigan their home would need a spiritual leader. He could put his Islamic studies to work to help build an American community.
More help in my quest comes from the National Archives, the main repository for pieces of the American story. Naturalization records contain details about where and when an immigrant came to the United States — and my grandfather’s record is among them, at the Archives’ Chicago branch. It teases me even more.
He listed himself as a sewing machine operator. He had a scar on his left palm. His signature — in a sturdy, stylish penmanship for a man who wasn’t raised reading or writing English — attests that he is neither polygamist nor anarchist.
I press on. Genealogy specialist Constance Potter runs a general search on several conceivable spellings for Hussien Karoub. As far as the archive is concerned, no record exists of my grandfather’s 1912 arrival.
That’s unsurprising. Many ports of entry were overflowing with huddled masses. Immigrants’ names were taken verbally, so there’s no guarantee that our best guesses on spelling match the elusive record. And until 1935, there was no National Archives.
“There were all these years when things could disappear,” Potter says.
While she admires my pursuit and recognizes my disappointment, Potter consoles me with an existential parting shot about who we are as Americans.
“Everyone’s ancestor was somewhere on July 4, 1776,” she says. “Whether signing the Declaration of Independence or somewhere in Syria, they were there.”
___
Every quest, particularly when it comes to your own history, eventually arrives at a crossroads with some version of the same question: What is the point?
Why struggle to pin down my grandfather’s details, to separate truth from tall tales? Surely it’s not to feel more American. The day my family moved from becoming to belonging has long since passed.
Does my faltering attempt to retrace his journey make any difference? After all, he made it. He became one of the United States‘ first imams, opened the nation’s first free-standing mosque and started a newspaper, the American-Arab Message, for a community that would become one of the largest outside the Middle East.
Hussien Karoub had seven children, five of whom survived into adulthood. He died at 79 in 1973. I was only 4 then, but I remember a warm, gentle man. My strongest memory is looking up to see him smile at me as I tore through his house with joyful abandon. Yet his legacy lives on through his descendants, including doctors, musicians, teachers, business owners as well as a lawyer, lawmaker and a journalist. And veterans of foreign wars.
We are Muslim, Christian, and other — a fitting multireligious legacy for a man who was both praised and criticized for embracing other faiths and not seeing his own as monolithic.
A century on, we are Arab-Americans, though we have become less Arab and more American. Yet there’s a pull to learn a little more about the front end of the hyphen. Maybe the urge is strongest when you feel fully connected, when reaching to the past runs no risk of giving up the present. But as the generations pass, the yesterdays become more remote. The trail fades.
It doesn’t surprise Elias that my family’s lore includes a Titanic tale. She once interviewed a man whose grandfather asserted that as many as 15 people from her Syrian village perished when the great ship went down. No record supports that fact, but Elias later learned where the story came from.
“If someone left a village, let’s say in March 1912, to go to ‘Amreeka’ and they were never heard from again,” Elias says, “it was just assumed they were on the Titanic.”
Speaking to so many descendants of Titanic survivors and victims, Elias realized the value of trying to know her own story: “Do you know how many said, ‘I wish I had asked more questions’?”
I can’t ask Jiddo any more questions about his path to America. The Titanic tale? It probably wasn’t true, but no matter. I can continue chipping away at the myths, the facts and the blanks, knowing that his trip was the catalyst for my family’s larger one — our evolution from being a “them” to an “us.”
In fact, as I look back at his journey through the prism of my place in this country, I spot something new, something I didn’t quite expect: The immigrant Hussien Karoub, it seems, was about as “us” as you can be.
___
Follow Jeff Karoub on Twitter: http://twitter.com/jeffkaroub
Source: Fox US News
Watch Nights mark Emancipation Proclamation 150th
As New Year’s Day approached 150 years ago, all eyes were on President Abraham Lincoln. The nation was expecting what he warned would be coming just 100 days earlier: a final proclamation declaring all slaves to be free in Southern states rebelling against the Union.
The tradition of holding Watch Night services began Dec. 31, 1862, as many black church congregations awaited word that the Emancipation Proclamation had taken effect amid the ongoing Civil War.
This year, that tradition follows the document to its home at the National Archives, with a special midnight display planned with readings, songs and bell ringing among the nation’s founding documents.
The official proclamation bearing Lincoln’s signature and the United States seal will make a rare appearance beginning Sunday.
Source: Fox US News
Thatcher worried about Gibraltar during the Falklands war
By hnn
Margaret Thatcher repeatedly agonised over Gibraltar‘s vulnerability to attack from the Spain during the 1982 Falkland’s conflict, newly released cabinet papers reveal. “I understand that the prime minister has expressed concern about the implications of the Falklands Islands crisis for Gibraltar,” one of her private secretaries recorded in papers released to the National Archives under the 20 year rule, adding: “particularly in the light of reports of the jubilant reaction in the Spanish press.” A British military review of Gibraltar‘s position gave “a rather more reassuring picture”, he remarked, adding: “We have no reason to believe that there is an increased military threat to Gibraltar from the Spanish government.
Source:
Guardian
Source URL:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/dec/28/margaret-thatcher-gibraltar-falklands-war
Date:
12-28-12
USSR spies used civilian airlines
By hnn
The Soviet Union used civil airliners to conduct secret Cold War spying missions over Britain, according to newly published Government files.
Some aircraft would switch off their transponders, alerting air traffic controllers to their position before veering off their approved flight paths to carry out aerial intelligence-gathering missions over sensitive targets, papers released by the National Archives under the 30-year rule show.
In a memorandum marked Secret for UK US Eyes Only, Defence Secretary John Nott informed prime minister Margaret Thatcher in December 1981 that the RAF was monitoring the hundreds of monthly flights through UK airspace by Warsaw Pact airliners.
Source:
Daily Mail
Source URL:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2254052/Archived-files-Soviet-Union-used-civil-airliners-conduct-secret-Cold-War-spying-missions-Britain.html#ixzz2GMu74CuO
Date:
12-28-12
Thatcher papers: 'worst moment' of her life
She called it, simply, the worst moment of her life.
It came in March 1982 during the days before the Falklands War, after Argentina established an unauthorized presence on Britain’s South Georgia island amid talk of a possible invasion of the Falklands, long held by Britain.
Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher realized there was little that Britain could do immediately to establish firm control of the contested islands, and feared Britain would be seen as a paper tiger that could no longer defend even its diminished empire. She was told that Britain might not be able to take the islands back, even if she took the risky decision to send a substantial armada to the frigid South Atlantic.
“You can imagine that turned a knife in my heart,” Thatcher told an inquiry board in postwar testimony that has been kept secret until its release by the National Archives on Friday, 30 years after the events it chronicles.
“No one could tell me whether we could re-take the Falklands — no one,” she told the inquiry board. “We did not know — we did not know.”
The assessment is more downbeat than the view offered in Thatcher’s memoir, “The Downing Street Years.”
Thatcher’s handling of the Falklands crisis is remembered as one of the key tests of her leadership. The former prime minister, now 87, has been hospitalized since having a growth removed from her gall bladder shortly before Christmas. She has stayed out of the public eye in recent years because of worsening health problems.
Argentina did invade on April 2, and Thatcher launched a naval task force to take back the islands three days later, after the United Nations condemned the invasion. Britain succeeded by mid-June. The war claimed the lives of 649 Argentines and 255 British soldiers, along with three elderly islanders.
Thatcher testified she had been terrified that by sending the seaborne force which would take weeks to reach the Falklands (known as Las Malvinas in Spanish) she would provoke even more aggressive action by the Argentines while the vessels were in transit. She feared this might make the military operation even more hazardous when they arrived.
She persisted in the bold mission despite the risk of an Argentine troop buildup that might force her to turn the armada back, a result that she said “would have been the greatest humiliation for Britain.”
She doesn’t state the obvious political cost: The mission’s failure would have cut short the career of Britain’s first female prime minister with her almost inevitable ouster as party leader.
The vivid picture of Thatcher’s feelings of helplessness and rage — and eventual resolve — are portrayed in thousands of pages of formerly Secret documents released by the National Archives.
Historian Chris Collins of the Thatcher Foundation — which plans to make the documents available online — said Thatcher’s testimony before the inquiry chaired by Oliver Franks was “very carefully prepared” because she felt politically vulnerable.
“She was concerned at the damage the report might do her, because there was much potential for embarrassment at the government‘s pre-war policy of trying to negotiate a settlement with Argentina ceding sovereignty while leasing back the islands for a period, plus suggestions that Argentine intentions could have been predicted and invasion prevented,” he said.
She concedes to the committee that her political analysis was incorrect because she believed Argentina‘s junta would not invade, as it was making progress at the United Nations in its effort to build diplomatic support for its claim to the disputed islands. She said she thought the junta wouldn’t risk this support with unilateral military action.
“I never, never expected the Argentines to invade the Falklands head-on,” she told the inquiry board, which was investigating, among other things, whether the government should have been better prepared. “It was such a stupid thing to do, as events happened, such a stupid thing even to contemplate doing. They were doing well.”
The papers detail how Thatcher urgently sought U.S. President Ronald Reagan‘s support when Argentina‘s intentions became clear, and reveal Thatcher’s exasperation with Reagan when he suggested that Britain negotiate rather than demand total Argentinian withdrawal.
The documents describe an unusual late night phone call from Reagan to Thatcher on May 31, 1982 — while British forces were beginning the battle for control of the Falklands capital — in which the president pressed the prime minister to consider putting the islands in the hands of international peacekeepers rather than press for a total Argentinian surrender.
Reagan’s considerable personal charm failed on this occasion. Thatcher, in full “Iron Lady” mode, told the president she was sure he would take the same dim view of international mediation if Alaska had been taken by a foe.
“The Prime Minister stressed that Britain had not lost precious lives in battle and sent an enormous Task Force to hand over the Queen’s Islands (the Falklands) immediately to a contact group,” says the memo produced the next morning by Thatcher’s private secretary. She told the president there was “no alternative” to surrender and re-establishment of full British control.
The newly public documents also reveal an extraordinary draft telegram written several days later by Thatcher to Argentinian leader Gen. Leopoldo Galtieri in which she describes in very personal terms the death and destruction both leaders would grapple with in the coming days unless Argentina backed down.
She tells her counterpart that the decisive battle is about to begin, imploring him to begin a full withdrawal to avoid more bloodshed.
“With your military experience you must be in no doubt as to the outcome. In a few days the British flag will once again be flying over Port Stanley. In a few days also your eyes and mine will be reading the casualty lists. On my side, grief will be tempered by the knowledge that these men died for freedom, justice, and the rule of law. And on your side? Only you can answer the question.”
The telegram was never sent, and Galtieri resigned in disgrace several days after Britain reclaimed the islands.
___
Online:
National Archives: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/
Margaret Thatcher Foundation: http://www.margaretthatcher.org/
Source: Fox World News
Did CIA tip lead to Nelson Mandela's 1962 arrest?
On a gently sloping road leading out of the town of Howick, South Africa, a Ford V-8 full of police waved over a car carrying a tall black man wearing a white chauffeur’s jacket. The sight wasn’t so unusual during the country’s apartheid era, except the would-be chauffeur was in the passenger’s seat.
That day, Aug. 5, 1962, Nelson Mandela‘s life as an underground revolutionary came to an end.
He would spend 27 years as a venerated political prisoner. Somehow, the police had known in advance that one of the nation’s most wanted men would be posing that day as a driver delivering his employer to Johannesburg. The question that lingers is, who tipped them off? Some South Africans remain convinced that it was the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency.
Just outside of Howick, there is now a massive steel sculpture of South Africa‘s first black president. It marks the 50th anniversary of the apartheid regime’s most important arrest—and a turning point for the country’s people. “This is where you could say South Africa‘s history changed,” says Brendan Grealy, manager of the Mandela Capture Site and its newly opened museum. “Here he went to jail. When he came out of jail, we became a democracy.”
The fading health of Mandela—recently hospitalized for a recurring lung infection—has spurred a rush to better understand his 94-year life. Google has been digitizing his papers and photographs in partnership with the Nelson Mandela Center of Memory, part of the ex-president’s foundation. But there is still no definitive answer to how the police knew to wait for Mandela.
The person actually driving the car, Cecil Williams, was posing as a wealthy white businessman. Only his skin color was authentic. He was really a well-known theater director and South African Communist. Mandela had recently returned from military training elsewhere in Africa and had sneaked back into the country to lead a band of saboteurs targeting public utilities.
Frustration with the limits of peaceful protests had led the African National Congress, banned by the apartheid regime in 1960, to create a military wing.
As they drove to Johannesburg from the city of Durban that afternoon, Mandela and Williams were scouting for sites to strike. When the police car swerved in front of them and stopped the car, Mandela initially stuck to his alias—David Motsamayi, chauffeur—according to his autobiography, “Long Walk to Freedom.” But the unshaven police sergeant didn’t buy it and delivered his arrest warrant.
A judge sentenced Mandela to five years in prison—three for inciting people to strike and two for leaving the country without a passport. That was extended after a 1964 trial, in which he and seven others were given life sentences for sabotage and other acts.
Who gave him up?
Denis Goldberg, a fellow activist who was also found guilty in the 1964 trial, believes a CIA agent got wind that Mandela was in Durban and shopped the tip to South African security in order to extract an informant from jail. The intelligence community was cozy in those days, he says: “They all knew each other; they all drank together.”
Those who believe a CIA informant betrayed Mandela point to media reports, decades later, about a junior U.S. diplomat at the Durban consulate who allegedly boasted at a party of steering the police to Mandela. South African and British newspapers identified the diplomat as Donald Rickard.
Rickard now lives in Colorado and, when reached by phone, said “that story has been floating around for a while.” He added: “It’s untrue. There’s no substance to it.” Rickard declined to discuss his posting in South Africa, calling it a “private affair.”
A request for information from the National Archives and Records Administration and the CIA yielded no information on Rickard, nor a possible link between the CIA and Mandela’s arrest. The CIA declined to comment. South African police didn’t immediately respond to queries about the arrest.
The U.S. government was no fan of South Africa‘s apartheid state. A confidential 1964 State Department memo—obtained from the National Security Archive, a nonprofit that publishes declassified information—expressed alarm at the number of arrests targeting those who stood up to apartheid. The memo noted with concern that Mandela and others in the 1964 trial might be sentenced to death. “Their deaths would probably mean increased resort to violence and radical measures,” it read.
Mandela himself attributed his arrest to a clumsy job of disguising his movements. “I cannot lay my capture at [the CIA‘s] door,” he says in his autobiography. “It was a wonder, in fact, that I wasn’t captured sooner.
Source: Fox World News
New-found tale of a lonely candle could be early work of Hans Christian Andersen, experts say
COPENHAGEN, Denmark — For years, the somber fairy tale about a lonely candle that wanted to be lit dwelt in oblivion at the bottom of a box in Denmark’s National Archives. Its recent discovery has sent ripples through the literary world because it is believed to be one of the first tales ever written by Hans Christian Andersen.
The famed Dane wrote nearly 160 fairy tales in his life, including classics such as “The Ugly Duckling” and “The Little Mermaid.” The tale of the candle may have been written when he was still a teen, experts say.
Retired historian Esben Brage said Thursday that he found the six-page text on Oct. 4 while searching through archive boxes that had belonged to wealthy families from Andersen’s hometown of Odense in central Denmark….
Source:
WaPo
Source URL:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/danish-historian-says-he-found-copy-of-previously-unknown-fairy-tale-by-hc-andersen/2012/12/13/d771aeea-450d-11e2-8c8f-fbebf7ccab4e_story.html
Date:
12-13-12
Big Find: Hans Christian Andersen's 'First Work'
A Danish historian has found what he believes is an early Hans Christian Anderson manuscript buried at the bottom of a box in the National Archives of Funen. “I was ecstatic,” the historian says. “I had never imagined this.” The handwritten story, titled “Tallow Candle,” tells the story of a…
Source: Newser – Home
Danish historian says he has found an unknown Hans Christian Andersen fairy tale
A Danish historian says he has discovered a copy of what is believed to be a previously unknown fairy tale written by Hans Christian Andersen.
Esben Brage says he found the six-page text in early October while searching in the National Archives through boxes that had belonged to wealthy families from Andersen’s home-town of Odense in central Denmark.
The handwritten tale entitled “Tallow Candle,” and dedicated to a widow who had lived across from Andersen, had been left seemingly untouched at the bottom of one of the boxes.
Andersen expert Ejnar Stig Askgaard said Thursday this is likely one of Andersen’s earliest works, written seven years before his official debut.
Born in 1805, Andersen wrote nearly 160 fairy tales including “The Ugly Duckling” and “The Little Mermaid.”
Source: Fox World News