Tag Archives: Morgan Stanley

The Right Way to Think About Citigroup

By John Grgurich, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

It wasn’t all that long ago that I was positively bearish on Citigroup , lumping it in with Bank of America as a financial leviathan still deeply damaged from the banking crisis, still far from turning the corner back into operational normalcy, and therefore not a safe, profitable place for investors to put their money.

Citi is still a leviathan, but it is turning that corner more quickly than I’d previously thought possible — quickly enough to convince me to buy a few shares as a sort of test run. Here’s a quick overview of how I think the bank is still currently viewed by investors and how I think it should be.

A glass half empty
Of the big four banks, B of A was unarguably damaged the worst in the financial crisis, but Citi wasn’t far behind. Both banks overindulged in the housing boom, and ended up with massive amounts of toxic mortgage debt on their books.

Citigroup put its bad assets into a “bad bank” called Citi Holdings, which moved the toxic debt off the main balance sheet but didn’t absolve the superbank — or its investors — of the responsibility to deal with it. In the most recent quarter, Citi Holdings cost Citigroup $1.1 billion in losses. In the first half of 2012, the losses totaled $2.02 billion.

Also, since the financial crisis, I think the leadership at Citigroup has mainly been at a loss as well. Vikram Pandit, the bank’s former CEO who came on in 2007, needs to be given credit for stabilizing the bank at what was undoubtedly its moment of extreme crisis (and repaying $45 billion in federal bailout money ), but also needs to take the blame for not maximizing the superbank’s significant assets.

One example of this is the sale of the remainder of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney back to Morgan Stanley last fall. It’s generally thought that Citi botched the deal, coming around too easily to Morgan Stanley‘s lowball valuation of the joint enterprise. The superbank ended up losing $2.9 billion on MSSB.  

A glass half full
The good news regarding Citi Holdings is that the bad bank’s balance sheet and losses are both on the decrease.

In the fourth quarter of 2011, Citi Holdings‘ net loss was $1.3 billion, but was just $1.1 billion a year later. And total assets in the bad bank were $156 billion for Q4 2012, 31% lower than for Q4 2011. Finally, the continuing resurgent housing market means poorly performing assets might get even more of a boost in the right direction moving forward.

As for leadership, it’s no secret that Pandit is now gone — replaced in a coup engineered by Citigroup chair Michael E. O’Neill last October — but exactly how his successor would behave is no longer a secret.

Michael Corbat was O’Neill’s handpicked replacement for Pandit and is a well-regarded 30-year veteran of Citi who took over the bank’s global wealth-management …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Does Obama Hate Bank of America?

By Matt Koppenheffer, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

In the final stretch of the 2012 election, President Obama was heckled by some of his opponents for taking out a $15 million loan from Bank of America .

What did the loan represent? Depending on who you ask and which side of the political aisle they sit on, there are plenty of answers. I’d argue that the reality was probably neutral: The campaign needed a short-term loan, and the money from B of A was there and at a reasonable price.

What the loan almost certainly didn’t represent was any sort of presidential soft spot for the “too big to fail” bank. Asked by ABC’s George Stephanopoulos back in 2011 about whether Bank of America’s highly controversial debit-card fee could be stopped, the president responded:

Well, you can stop it because if you say to the banks, “You don’t have some inherent right just to, you know, get a certain amount of profit if your customers are being mistreated. That you have to treat them fairly and transparently.”

Which is wrong for a variety reasons. But that’s a discussion for another time.

Looking back at it though, I got curious: What is Bank of America to the president? A useful lending institution, or a handy political punching bag?

Banking institutions in general weren’t the president’s biggest allies during the most recent campaign. None of his top contributors came from the world of finance. Meanwhile, Mitt Romney‘s top five (hat tip to OpenSecrets.org) looked like this:

  • Goldman Sachs : $1 million
  • Bank of America: $1 million
  • Morgan Stanley : $911,055
  • JPMorgan Chase : $833,096
  • Wells Fargo : $674,076

President Obama did pocket some campaign cash from B of A, but that $257,397 was a fraction of what went to Romney.

And while the president tapped B of A for a campaign loan, his personal finances lie elsewhere. According to his 2011 financial disclosure (again, courtesy of OpenSecrets.org), he has multiple accounts — including a private client account — with JPMorgan. He has another checking account and a 30-year mortgage with Northern Trust . And he has retirement and education savings in Vanguard, Calvert, and PIMCO.

When we put it all together, we can say the following: President Obama doesn’t bank personally with Bank of America, but he is willing to give them business. He received some campaign support, but not nearly as much as his opponent received. And he doesn’t have a whole lot to say specifically about the bank, but he’s ready to jump on it when politically expedient. 

Which, if we shoved that through a word-crunching sausage maker, probably yields a very un-shocking conclusion. That is, that the president doesn’t have much of a tightly held opinion on B of A except to the extent that it helps his ends. What are his ends? When it comes to B of A, I’d say it boils down to helping the economy get back on track, and making the banking sector appear to be adhering to and benefiting from the industry changes that have come about during his administration. 

Sure, you …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Morgan Stanley Asia-Pacific Fund, Inc. Announces Results of Measurement Period Under Discount Manage

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Morgan Stanley Asia-Pacific Fund, Inc. Announces Results of Measurement Period Under Discount Management Program

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Morgan Stanley Asia-Pacific Fund, Inc. (NYS: APF) (the “Fund”) announced the results of its measurement period under its previously announced discount management program (the “Program”). Pursuant to the Program, which commenced in July 2011 for a two-year period, the Fund’s Board of Directors approved up to four consecutive semi-annual tender offers, each to purchase up to 5 percent of the Fund’s outstanding shares of common stock for cash at a price equal to 98 percent of its net asset value (“NAV“) per share if the Fund’s shares trade at an average discount of at least 10 percent over a 12-week period. For the 12-week measurement period ended March 28, 2013, shares of the Fund traded at an average daily discount to NAV of 10.85 percent. The Fund will therefore conduct a tender offer in accordance with the terms of the Program.

The Fund’s tender offer will commence on or about May 13, 2013. Additional terms and conditions of the Fund’s tender offer will be set forth in its offering materials, which will be distributed to its stockholders. If more than 5 percent of the Fund’s outstanding shares are tendered, the Fund will purchase its shares from tendering stockholders on a pro rata basis at a price of 98 percent of the Fund’s NAV per share.

Investing involves risk and it is possible to lose money on any investment in the Fund.

Morgan Stanley Investment Management, together with its investment advisory affiliates, has over 560 investment professionals around the world and $338 billion in assets under management or supervision as of December 31, 2012. MSIM strives to provide outstanding long-term investment performance, service and a comprehensive suite of investment management solutions to a diverse client base, which includes governments, institutions, corporations and individuals worldwide.

Morgan Stanley is a leading global financial services firm providing a wide range of investment banking, securities, investment management and wealth management services. The Firm’s employees serve clients worldwide including corporations, governments, institutions and individuals from more than 1,200 offices in 43 countries. For further information about Morgan Stanley, please visit www.morganstanley.com.

This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of the securities in any state in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful under the securities laws of …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Cousins Properties Announces Offering of 14.0 Million Shares of Common Stock

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Cousins Properties Announces Offering of 14.0 Million Shares of Common Stock

ATLANTA–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Cousins Properties Incorporated (the “Company”) (NYS: CUZ) today announced that it has commenced an underwritten public offering of 14.0 million shares of its common stock. The underwriters are expected to be granted a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 2.1 million shares.

The Company intends to use a significant portion of the net proceeds of the offering to acquire 816 Congress Avenue, a Class-A office building in Austin, Texas. The property is currently under contract, and the acquisition is expected to close mid-April 2013. In addition, the Company intends to use a portion of the net proceeds to redeem in full its outstanding 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.

BofA Merrill Lynch, J.P. Morgan, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo Securities are acting as joint book-running managers for the offering.

This offering will be made pursuant to a prospectus supplement to the Company’s prospectus dated March 29, 2013, filed as part of the Company’s effective shelf registration statement relating to these securities. This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy the shares described herein or any other securities, nor shall there be any sale of these shares in any state or other jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of such state or other jurisdiction. The offering may be made only by means of a prospectus supplement and the related prospectus.

A copy of the preliminary prospectus supplement, final prospectus supplement (when available) and the base prospectus relating to the shares can be obtained by contacting the underwriters as follows: BofA Merrill Lynch, 222 Broadway, New York, NY 10038, Attn: Prospectus Department or email at dq.prospectus_requests@baml.com; or J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Attention: Broadridge Financial Solutions, 1155 Long Island Avenue, Edgewood, NY 11717, or by calling 1-866-803-9204.

About Cousins Properties Incorporated

The Company is a leading diversified real estate company with extensive experience in development, acquisition, financing, management and leasing. Based in Atlanta, the Company actively invests in office and retail projects. The Company is a fully integrated equity real estate investment trust (REIT) and trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol CUZ.

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Bank of America Stock May Be on a Slow Climb Today

By Amanda Alix, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

I’ve been watching Bank of America‘s stock all morning, and I couldn’t help but notice that, despite lots of trading activity, the bank hasn’t really budged much since the opening bell. The share price may move slightly up or down, but it is staying relatively stable, and in today’s market — that’s saying something.

Of course, it’s not unusual for B of A to be a volume leader on any given day, but the lack of downward motion gives me hope that the stock will find itself on an upward climb as the day progresses. I say this for a couple of reasons: There was no truly bad news regarding Bank of America released over the weekend, and the rest of the financials are looking much more lethargic than B of A.

Taking a look at its peers makes Bank of America look downright perky. Both Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase are down so far, perhaps because of apprehension concerning their first-quarter earnings reports due this Friday. Citigroup is looking pallid, too. Why all the long faces?

Capital concerns, again
One thing that could be nagging at the big banks’ stocks has to do with capital reserves. Just after the biggest banks strutted their healthy capital cushions — especially B of A and Citi — for the Fed’s stress tests, some lawmakers have seen fit to lift their voices in favor of requiring even more in the way of stepped-up reserves. Not only is this a bipartisan effort, which means it may actually fly, but it affects banks with assets over $400 billion.

This means that all of the above banks would be affected, as well as Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs . Taking a peek at their stock prices shows that they’re suffering today, as well — which makes me think this bit of discouraging news is indeed at the heart of the lackadaisical showing among the big banks today.

And that brings us back to Bank of America, which is hanging in there, giving up much less than its peers, despite heavy trading. Has the word gotten out regarding its pumped-up customer focus? Perhaps. If so, expect some sweet gains over the course of the trading day.

As the big banks face what could be a discouraging day, keep in mind that it is the overall performance of a stock that really counts. As Foolish, long-term investors, we recognize the fact that one-day changes in share price don’t make or break an investment. Even stocks have good days and bad days, so it’s important to realize that sometimes the moves aren’t portents of dire news, but merely squiggles that we can safely ignore. 

Bank of America’s stock doubled in 2012. Is there more yet to come? With significant challenges still ahead, it’s critical to have a solid understanding of this megabank before adding it to your portfolio. In The Motley Fool’s premium …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Iron Ore About to Get Mauled by Bear Market

By Rich Duprey, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Could the timing be any worse? Just as Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton are shedding assets to focus more intently on their iron ore business, analysts at Morgan Stanley say the whole industry is about to get dusted from a supply glut. It anticipates that inventories will widen next year and expand through 2018, causing prices to tumble by more than a third just this year alone.

Hitting the brakes on the Orient Express
Of course, the miners aren’t helping themselves, as each is bringing new mines online in Australia, along with top iron ore miner Vale opening one up in Brazil. Even though China‘s steel mills still have a voracious appetite when it comes to the ore, analysts expect that industry output will grow by only 2.6% this year, so it won’t be enough to offset rising surpluses. Even China‘s own development and economic planning agency says the country will experience a surplus of 20 million tons, as it will import only about 4% more than it did last year.

China‘s economic growth has been slowing, and even though economists predict that GDP will expand beyond 8% this year, that’s still a good deal below the better than 10% annual growth it’s enjoyed for the past decade.

Anticipating the weak marketCliffs Natural Resources announced last month that it will idle its Wabush Pointe Noire pellet plant in Sept-Iles, Quebec, by the end of the second quarter of 2013. One analyst frets that it will also need to sell its Australian iron ore assets to help pay down some of the $3 billion worth of debt it carries on its balance sheet.

The end is nigh
Morgan Stanley says 2013 will actually experience a supply deficit of around 81 million tonnes of iron ore, but next year it will grow to a 3.3 million tonne surplus and continue widening until it is 291 million tonnes in 2018. 

Factors that might mitigate when, or even if, the glut materializes include the length of time it takes to bring new mines online, but perhaps more crucial will be India‘s turning from a net exporter of iron ore into a net importer. The Wall Street Journal reports that mining interests in the subcontinent worry that they won’t be able to export anything because the country’s Supreme Court keeps rolling out export bans during a probe into illegal mining.

Despite all the doom and gloom, iron ore prices at $139 a ton have held up remarkably well, but Bloomberg believes that based on consensus analyst estimates, it could hit $90 a ton by year’s end.

Iron Ore Spot Price (Any Origin) data by YCharts.

Down a mine shaft
Shares of miners have not fared as well, with BHP down 15% from its 52-week high, Rio off 22%, and Vale losing a quarter of its value. Cliffs has performed the worst of the bunch, with its stock down more than 72%. 

If the industry holds even …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Netflix Confirms Date for "Arrested Development" Release

By Evan Niu, CFA, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Online video streamer Netflix (NAS: NFLX) has now confirmed the official date for the return of cult favorite “Arrested Development.” The company is releasing all 15 episodes of the fourth season simultaneously on May 26. The show will be available in the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Ireland, Latin America, Brazil, and the Nordics.

Netflix said in 2011 that it would bring “Arrested Development” back as an exclusive series. The company has seen successful with original programming, particularly its “House of Cards” series that was released in February. At a Morgan Stanley tech conference in February, CEO Reed Hastings said it was unlikely that additional seasons would be possible.

In a statement, series creator Mitch Hurwitz added, “Finally my simple wish for the show is coming true: that it be broadcast every second around the clock to every television, computer or mobile device in existence.” Welcome back, Bluths.


 
 

The article Netflix Confirms Date for “Arrested Development” Release originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Evan Niu, CFA, has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Netflix. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = document.createElement('script');
ga.type = 'text/javascript';
ga.async = true;
ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';

var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();

Read | <a target=_blank href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/04/news-netflix-announces-arrested-development-date/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Hewlett-Packard Still Has Room to Run

By Adam Levine-Weinberg, The Motley Fool

tesla model s driving

Filed under:

On Tuesday morning, Goldman Sachs analyst Bill Shope downgraded Hewlett-Packard from hold to sell, with a price target of $16, based on a $3.26 EPS estimate for FY 2013. Shope primarily harped upon weakness in the PC industry, which may depress not only unit shipments, but also prices and margins. That said, he believes that HP‘s other major divisions could face trouble as well, calling out enterprise hardware, services, and printing. Combined, these factors could mean that earnings will continue to decline for HP even after 2013.

However, Mr. Market already recognizes the challenges faced by HP in the various businesses Shope mentioned in his report. That’s why HP shares still trade for less than seven times Shope’s very conservative EPS target, despite having doubled since late November.

Hewlett-Packard Price Chart (Nov. 20, 2012 to present). Data by YCharts.

Unlike Shope, I am confident that CEO Meg Whitman will turn around HP‘s performance over the next few years. Indeed, the business has started to show signs of improvement. While PCs will remain an area of weakness, the PC business now represents less than 10% of HP‘s profit (whereas it still generates 25%-30% of rival Dell‘s profit). The printing business is already seeing improved profitability, and while the enterprise hardware and services businesses remain works in progress, they are likely to bottom this year.

Printing margins are growing
HP is the dominant player in printing globally, and will remain so for the foreseeable future. However, the printing business has stagnated in the past few years, as the growth of mobile devices has led people to print fewer documents and photos. Furthermore, the “razor and razor blades” printer pricing model has broken down, as savvy consumers have turned to generic ink to save money. This has crimped margins, as many printers are sold at a loss in the hope of generating a steady stream of profitable ink sales in the future. Lastly, the strong yen has raised the cost of printer components sourced from Japan, particularly the print engines for HP LaserJets, which are built by Canon.

Most of these headwinds have dissipated in recent quarters, which Shope seems to have discounted. The yen has declined by roughly 20% against the dollar since October, which (as I have argued on numerous occasions) will provide a significant tailwind to printing margins this year as component prices drop. Others have finally begun to take notice of this trend: Morgan Stanley analyst Katy Huberty cited better printing margins as one major reason for her recent upgrade of HP.

Furthermore, HP is taking a variety of actions to bolster sales and profitability in the printer business. The “Ink Advantage” program is lowering ink prices in developing countries while boosting printer hardware prices. HP‘s management has reported very good results from this initiative so far. In developed markets, an “Ink in the Office” campaign is moving many small businesses from laser to ink technology, which is cheaper …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

12 Nonprofits to Receive Pro Bono Advice from Morgan Stanley's Strategy Challenge

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

12 Nonprofits to Receive Pro Bono Advice from Morgan Stanley’s Strategy Challenge


The Strategy Challenge, Morgan Stanley’s signature pro bono volunteer program, pairs teams of employees with leading nonprofits to provide strategic consulting

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Morgan Stanley (NYS: MS) announced today that the following 12 nonprofit organizations will participate in the fifth annual Strategy Challenge, the Firm’s signature skills-based volunteer program providing nonprofits with pro bono strategic consulting.

  • Bring Me a Book
  • Futures and Options
  • HealthCorps
  • Hot Bread Kitchen
  • Hollaback!
  • Jacob A. Riis Neighborhood Settlement House
  • Let’s Get Ready
  • Mentoring Partnership of New York
  • The Boys’ Club of New York
  • The HOPE Program
  • The W Connection
  • Westside Family YMCA

The Strategy Challenge pairs each of these nonprofit organizations with a team of Morgan Stanley employees for eight weeks. The employee volunteers use their professional expertise and skill sets to develop strategies that help the nonprofits fulfill their missions in more effective and efficient ways.

The 12 nonprofits work on causes ranging from children’s health to education to economic empowerment and are based in New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco.

“Nonprofits are a critical part of the fabric of every community. But with limited resources and staff, it can be difficult for charities to navigate issues like program scalability, geographic expansion and organizational optimization,” said Joan Steinberg, Head of Morgan Stanley Community Affairs and President of the Morgan Stanley Foundation. “By providing expertise on these issues, we hope to significantly increase the impact our nonprofit partners can have for their constituents.”

Since establishing the Strategy Challenge in 2009, Morgan Stanley has delivered 22,500 hours of pro bono services to 49 nonprofits, worth approximately $3.4 million, …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Ares Capital Corporation Prices Public Offering

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Ares Capital Corporation Prices Public Offering

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Ares Capital Corporation (NAS: ARCC) announced that it has priced its public offering of 16,650,000 shares of its common stock. Ares Capital has granted the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 2,497,500 shares of common stock. The offering is subject to customary closing conditions and is expected to close on April 8, 2013. The offering of the shares is being made under Ares Capital‘s shelf registration statement (as amended), which was filed with, and declared effective by, the Securities and Exchange Commission. On April 2, 2013, the official close price of Ares Capital‘s common stock on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “ARCC” was $18.02 per share.

Ares Capital expects to use the net proceeds of this offering to repay certain outstanding indebtedness under its debt facilities and, to the extent not used for such purpose, for general corporate purposes, which may include investing in portfolio companies in accordance with its investment objective.

Investors are advised to carefully consider the investment objective, risks, charges and expenses of Ares Capital before investing. The preliminary prospectus supplement dated April 2, 2013 and the accompanying prospectus dated August 16, 2012, which have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, contain this and other information about Ares Capital and should be read carefully before investing.

BofA Merrill Lynch, J.P. Morgan, Morgan Stanley and UBS Investment Bank are acting as joint book-running managers for this offering. The underwriters may offer the shares of common stock from time to time for sale in one or more transactions on The NASDAQ Global Select Market, in the over-the-counter market, through negotiated transactions or otherwise at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to prevailing market prices or at negotiated prices.

The information in the preliminary prospectus supplement, the accompanying prospectus and this press release is not complete and may be changed. The preliminary prospectus supplement, the accompanying prospectus and this press release are not offers to sell any securities of Ares Capital and are not soliciting an offer to buy such securities in any state where such offer and sale is not permitted.

The offering may be made only by means of a preliminary prospectus supplement and an accompanying prospectus, copies of which may be obtained from BofA Merrill Lynch, 222 …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

NuStar to Participate in Morgan Stanley 2013 Eagle Ford Shale Summit

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

NuStar to Participate in Morgan Stanley 2013 Eagle Ford Shale Summit

SAN ANTONIO–(BUSINESS WIRE)– NuStar Energy L.P. (NYS: NS) and NuStar GP Holdings, LLC (NYS: NSH) announced today that Danny Oliver, Senior Vice President Business & Corporate Development of NuStar Energy L.P. and NuStar GP Holdings, LLC, will make a presentation at the Morgan Stanley 2013 Eagle Ford Shale Summit in San Antonio on Thursday, April 4, 2013.

A copy of the presentation will be available on each company’s web site at 9:00 a.m. Eastern time on Thursday, April 4, 2013.

NuStar Energy L.P., a publicly traded master limited partnership based in San Antonio, is one of the largest independent liquids terminal and pipeline operators in the nation. NuStar currently has 8,634 miles of pipeline; 87 terminal and storage facilities that store and distribute crude oil, refined products and specialty liquids; and 50% ownership in a joint venture that owns a terminal and an asphalt refinery with a throughput capacity of 74,000 barrels per day. The partnership’s combined system has approximately 96 million barrels of storage capacity, and NuStar has operations in the United States, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, including St. Eustatius in the Caribbean, the United Kingdom and Turkey. For more information, visit NuStar Energy L.P.’s Web site at www.nustarenergy.com.

NuStar GP Holdings, LLC is a publicly traded limited liability company that owns the two percent general partner interest, a 13.0 percent limited partner interest and the incentive distribution rights in NuStar Energy L.P., one of the largest independent liquids terminal and pipeline operators in the nation. NuStar has operations in the United States, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, including St. Eustatius in the Caribbean, the United Kingdom and Turkey. For more information, visit NuStar GP Holdings, LLC‘s Web site at www.nustargpholdings.com.

NuStar Energy, L.P., San Antonio
Investors, Chris Russell, Treasurer and Vice President Investor Relations
Investor Relations: 210-918-3507
or
Media, Mary Rose Brown, Executive Vice President,
Corporate Communications: 210-918-2314
Web site: http://www.nustarenergy.com

KEYWORDS:   United States  North America  Texas

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS:

The article NuStar to Participate in Morgan Stanley 2013 Eagle Ford Shale Summit originally appeared on Fool.com.

Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Is the Manufacturing Sector Ready to Collapse?

By Rich Duprey, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

The economy is still expanding, according to the Institute for Supply Management’s manufacturing index, which came in at 51.3 for March, the fourth consecutive month of growth it’s recorded. But it was well below expectations of 54.0, and with new orders tumbling to just 51.4 from 57.8 — a better than 6% decline — it’s suggestive of a U.S. ready to slip back into recession.

An index above 50 is considered an expanding manufacturing economy, and, naturally, below that level is contraction. The index was driven higher last month based on the strength of the auto and housing industries, aligning with what’s been seen in those markets. General Motors , for example, recorded a better than 6% jump in new-vehicle sales in March, while Ford was up just less than 6%. Chrysler came in third at 5%.

Not just muscle cars
Their sales of full-size pickup trucks were also robust, and analysts said that would coincide with the strength of the housing markets in recent periods. According to just-released Commerce Department data, private residential construction climbed 2.2% to $303.4 billion, its highest level in more than four years.

When Hovnanian Enterprises reported its quarterly results last month, the homebuilder showed a narrower loss than the year-ago figure based on higher sales and new orders. With analysts at Morgan Stanley forecasting pricing strength in the market this year — anywhere from 2% to 10% growth is seen in 2013 — the sector could be a bright spot, and builders could be ones to watch.

Rise of the machines?
What investors really need to keep an eye on is that falloff in new orders, as machinery was one of just three sectors seeing contraction (petroleum and coal and chemical products were the other two). We did see the global PMI just come out a bit stronger than February, and that was helped along by China, which was stronger than anticipated.  

The warning shot again, however, is Europe, where output declined and unemployment of 12% across the eurozone is at record high levels. The dire financial situation unfolding in Cyrpus is waiting for a match to ignite it across the continent.

Offsetting some of that negativity is the rise of manufacturing jobs here at home, which grew 1.6% in March, but with industrial suppliers MSC Industrial Direct and Fastenal having previously warned of industry weakness, and with both due to report earnings next week, we’ll know whether the softness they experienced last quarter plays out. These companies rise and fall with the PMI indexes, domestic and global, and the mixed signals we’ve gotten suggests that their earnings won’t provide much clarity.

If the eurozone financial contagion spreads, it’s an all-bets-are-off scenario, but I’m already pessimistic we’ll be soon heading back down the rabbit hole.

A long, strange trip
If you’re concerned that Ford’s turnaround has run its course, relax — there’s good reason to think that the Blue Oval still has big …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Ares Capital to Float New Stock Issue

By Eric Volkman, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Ares Capital is making a new attempt to expand its capital base. The company will float a 16.65 million share common stock issue in an underwritten public offering. The firm also plans to offer its underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 2.4975 million common shares collectively.

Ares Capital said it intends to use the proceeds of the issue to pay down debt and for “general corporate purposes, which may include investing in portfolio companies in accordance with its investment objective.”

The joint book-running managers of the issue are Bank of America‘s Merrill Lynch, JPMorgan Chase unit J.P. Morgan, UBS, and Morgan Stanley. Ares Capital did not specify the time frame for the offering.

The article Ares Capital to Float New Stock Issue originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Eric Volkman owns shares of Ares Capital. The Motley Fool owns shares of Bank of America. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = document.createElement('script');
ga.type = 'text/javascript';
ga.async = true;
ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';

var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Ares Capital Corporation Announces Public Offering

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Ares Capital Corporation Announces Public Offering

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Ares Capital Corporation (NAS: ARCC) announced that it plans to make a public offering of 16,650,000 shares of its common stock. Ares Capital also plans to grant the underwriters an option to purchase up to an additional 2,497,500 shares of common stock. The offering of the shares will be made under Ares Capital‘s shelf registration statement (as amended), which was filed with, and declared effective by, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Ares Capital expects to use the net proceeds of this offering to repay certain outstanding indebtedness under its debt facilities and, to the extent not used for such purpose, for general corporate purposes, which may include investing in portfolio companies in accordance with its investment objective.

Investors are advised to carefully consider the investment objective, risks, charges and expenses of Ares Capital before investing. The preliminary prospectus supplement dated April 2, 2013 and the accompanying prospectus dated August 16, 2012, which have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, contain this and other information about Ares Capital and should be read carefully before investing.

BofA Merrill Lynch, J.P. Morgan, Morgan Stanley and UBS Investment Bank are acting as joint book-running managers for this offering.

The information in the preliminary prospectus supplement, the accompanying prospectus and this press release is not complete and may be changed. The preliminary prospectus supplement, the accompanying prospectus and this press release are not offers to sell any securities of Ares Capital and are not soliciting an offer to buy such securities in any state where such offer and sale is not permitted.

The offering may be made only by means of a preliminary prospectus supplement and an accompanying prospectus, copies of which may be obtained from BofA Merrill Lynch, 222 Broadway, New York, NY 10038, Attn: Prospectus Department, or e-mail dg.prospectus_requests@baml.com ; J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, c/o Broadridge Financial Solutions, 1155 Long Island Avenue, Edgewood, NY 11717, Attention: Prospectus Department, 866-803-9204; Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, 180 Varick Street, 2nd Floor, New York, NY, 10014, Attn: Prospectus Department, tel.: (866) 718-1649 or e-mail prospectus@morganstanley.com ; or UBS Investment Bank, Attn: Prospectus Department, 299 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10171, tel.: (888) 827-7275.

ABOUT ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Nordic American Tankers to Float New Stock Issue

By Eric Volkman, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Nordic American Tankers has announced that it will issue $87 million in new stock, in the form of common shares in an underwritten public flotation. The ocean transport company’s underwriters have been granted a 30-day purchase option for up to an additional $13.05 million worth of stock. CEO Herbjorn Hansson is expected to purchase roughly $1.5 million in shares.

NAT said it plans to use the proceeds of the issue for acquisitions, and for “general corporate purposes.”

At the moment, the company’s fleet consists of 20 ships. It has signed a preliminary agreement to purchase a new tanker, which it anticipates will be delivered no later than next month.

Morgan Stanley is the book-running manager of the issue, with three Scandinavian financial firms acting as co-managers.

The article Nordic American Tankers to Float New Stock Issue originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Eric Volkman and The Motley Fool have no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = document.createElement('script');
ga.type = 'text/javascript';
ga.async = true;
ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';

var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | <a target=_blank href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/01/nordic-american-tankers-to-float-new-stock-issue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Reagan Budget Guru Declares: We’ve Been Lied To, Robbed, And Misled…

Then, when the Fed’s fire hoses started spraying an elephant soup of liquidity injections in every direction and its balance sheet grew by $1.3 trillion in just thirteen weeks compared to $850 billion during its first ninety-four years, I became convinced that the Fed was flying by the seat of its pants, making it up as it went along. It was evident that its aim was to stop the hissy fit on Wall Street and that the thread of a Great Depression 2.0 was just a cover story for a panicked spree of money printing that exceeded any other episode in recorded human history.

David StockmanThe Great Deformation

David Stockman, former director of the OMB under President Reagan, former US Representative, and veteran financier is an insider’s insider. Few people understand the ways in which both Washington DC and Wall Street work and intersect better than he does.

In his upcoming book, The Great Deformation: The Corruption of Capitalism in America, Stockman lays out how we have devolved from a free market economy into a managed one that operates for the benefit of a privileged few. And when trouble arises, these few are bailed out at the expense of the public good.

By manipulating the price of money through sustained and historically low interest rates, Greenspan and Bernanke created an era of asset mis-pricing that inevitably would need to correct.  And when market forces attempted to do so in 2008, Paulson et al hoodwinked the world into believing the repercussions would be so calamitous for all that the institutions responsible for the bad actions that instigated the problem needed to be rescued — in full — at all costs. 

Of course, history shows that our markets and economy would have been better off had the system been allowed to correct. Most of the “too big to fail” institutions would have survived or been broken into smaller, more resilient, entities. For those that would have failed, smaller, more responsible banks would have stepped up to replace them – as happens as part of the natural course of a free market system:

Essentially there was a cleansing run on the wholesale funding market in the canyons of Wall Street going on. It would have worked its will, just like JP Morgan allowed it to happen in 1907 when we did not have the Fed getting in the way. Because they stopped it in its tracks after the AIG bailout and then all the alphabet soup of different lines that the Fed threw out, and then the enactment of TARP, the last two investment banks standing were rescued, Goldman and Morgan [Stanley], and they should not have been. As a result of being rescued and having the cleansing liquidation of rotten balance sheets stopped, within a few weeks and certainly months they were back to the same old games, such that Goldman Sachs got $10 billion dollars for the fiscal year that started three months later after that check went out, which was October 2008. For the fiscal 2009 year, Goldman Sachs generated what I call a $29 billion surplus – $13 billion of net income after tax, and on top of that $16 billion of salaries and bonuses, 95% of it which was bonuses.

Therefore, the idea that they were on death’s door does not stack up. Even if they had been, it would not make any difference to the health of the financial system. These firms are supposed to come and go, and if people make really bad bets, if they have a trillion dollar balance sheet with six, seven, eight hundred billion dollars worth of hot-money short-term funding, then they ought to take their just reward, because it would create lessons, it would create discipline. So all the new firms that would have been formed out of the remnants of Goldman Sachs where everybody lost their stock values – which for most of these partners is tens of millions, hundreds of millions – when they formed a new firm, I doubt whether they would have gone back to the old game. What happened was the Fed stopped everything in its tracks, kept Goldman Sachs intact, the reckless Goldman Sachs and the reckless Morgan Stanley, everyone quickly recovered their stock value and the game continues. This is one of the evils that comes from this kind of deep intervention in the capital and money markets.

Stockman’s anger at the unnecessary and unfair capital transfer from taxpayer to TBTF bank is matched only by his concern that, even with those bailouts, the banking system is still unacceptably vulnerable to a repeat of the same crime:

The banks quickly worked out their solvency issues because the Fed basically took it out of the hides of Main Street savers and depositors throughout America. When the Fed panicked, it basically destroyed the free-market interest rate – you cannot have capitalism, you cannot have healthy financial markets without an interest rate, which is the price of money, the price of capital that can freely measure and reflect risk and true economic prospects.

Well, once you basically unplug the pricing mechanism of a capital market and make it entirely an administered rate by the Fed, you are going to cause all kinds of deformationsas I call them, or mal-investments as some of the Austrians used to call them, that basically pollutes and corrupts the system. Look at the deposit rate right now, it is 50 basis points, maybe 40, for six months. As a result of that, probably $400-500 billion a year is being transferred as a fiscal maneuver by the Fed from savers to the banks. They are collecting the spread, they’ve then booked the profits, they’ve rebuilt their book net worth, and they paid back the TARP basically out of what was thieved from the savers of America.

Now they go down and pound the table and whine and pout like JP Morgan and the rest of them,you have to let us do stock buy backs, you have to let us pay out dividends so we can ramp our stock and collect our stock option winnings. It is outrageous that the authorities, after the so-called “near death experience” of 2008 and this massive fiscal safety net and monetary safety net was put out there, is allowing them to pay dividends and to go into the market and buy back their stockThey should be under house arrest in a sense that every dime they are making from this artificial yield group being delivered by the Fed out of the hides of savers should be put on their balance sheet to build up retained earnings, to build up a cushion. I do not care whether it is fifteen or twenty or twenty-five percent common equity and retained earnings-to-assets or not, that is what we should be doing if we are going to protect the system from another raid by these people the next time we get a meltdown, which can happen at any time.

You can see why I talk about corruption, why crony capitalism is so bad. I mean, the Basel capital standards, they are a joke. We are just allowing the banks to go back into the same old game they were playing before. Everybody said the banks in late 2007 were the greatest thing since sliced bread. The market cap of the ten largest banks in America, including from Bear Stearns all the way to Citibank and JP Morgan and Goldman and so forth, was $1.25 trillion. That was up thirty times from where the predecessors of those institutions had been. Only in 1987, when Greenspan took over and began the era of bubble finance – slowly at first then rapidly, eventually, to have the market cap grow thirty times – and then on the eve of the great meltdown see the $1.25 trillion to market cap disappear, vanish, vaporize in panic in September 2008. Only a few months later, $1 trillion of that market cap disappeared in to the abyss and panic, and Bear Stearns is going down, and all the rest.

This tells you the system is dramatically unstable. In a healthy financial system and a free capital market, if I can put it that way, you are not going to have stuff going from nowhere to @1.2 trillion and then back to a trillion practically at the drop of a hat. That is instability; that is a case of a medicated market that is essentially very dangerous and is one of the many adverse consequences and deformations that result from the central-bank dominated, corrupt monetary system that has slowly built up ever since Nixon closed the gold window, but really as I say in my book, going back to 1933 in April when Roosevelt took all the private gold. So we are in a big dead-end trap, and they are digging deeper every time you get a new maneuver.

Reagan Budget Guru Declares: We've Been Lied To, Robbed, And Misled...

(Second column, 3rd story, link)


…read more
Source: Drudge Report

Which Bottom-5 S&amp;P 500 Stock Has the Best Chance to Bounce Back?

By Sean Williams, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

The market has seen an incredible run off its lows over the past four years. Chances are good that if you’ve owned a diversified portfolio of investments, you’re sitting on a handsome return. However, it wasn’t all sugar and spice for a handful of companies within the broad-based S&P 500 in the first-quarter. The index closed at an all-time high on Thursday, but these five companies were the worst of the worst in the first quarter. The good news is that one has a very good chance at rebounding in the second quarter.

Cliffs Natural Resources (50.5%)
It was a horrendous quarter for Cliffs, a miner of iron ore and metallurgical coal, which lost half of its value. A cornucopia of analyst downgrades shelled the company after it reduced its quarterly dividend by a whopping 76% to $0.15 from $0.625. The most recent downgrade came courtesy of Morgan Stanley, which warned that new iron ore supplies in the U.S. may reduce iron ore pricing. Iron prices are well off their highs of $187 per dry metric ton, but they’ve also crept off their recent lows of just $99 per dry metric ton set last September. 

J.C. Penney (23.3%)
As unbelievable as this might be, struggling retailer J.C. Penney shed only 23% in the first quarter despite reporting what I deemed to be the worst retail quarter ever. Its fourth-quarter report highlighted a 28.4% decline in total sales, a nearly 32% drop in same-store sales, and a 34.4% tumble in direct-to-consumer sales. Penney CEO Ron Johnson has backtracked on the company’s no-sale pricing policy, but it remains to be seen if customers will return or if the damage has already been done. 

Peabody Energy (20.3%)
It definitely wasn’t a kind quarter to coal producers, with Peabody shares shedding 20% after reporting dismal fourth-quarter results in late January. Coal prices have been under serious pressure because of low-cost natural gas, which has persuaded electric utilities to make the long-term switch from coal to natural gas. Reduced stockpiles of coal have helped somewhat stabilize prices, but the prospect of higher costs in its Australian mines and stagnant coal prices didn’t sit well with its shareholders this quarter.

U.S. Steel (18.1%)
Another underperformer, another commodity-based company! This time it’s U.S. Steel, which saw its shares dip by 18% on the quarter as weak steel prices and tempered demand both domestically and overseas weighed on results. For 2012, U.S. Steel’s net loss widened to $124 million from $53 million in the previous year, but that’s primarily attributed to a whopping $353 million loss on the sale of U.S. Steel Serbia.

Garmin (17.9%)
Finally, navigation and GPS device maker Garmin shed nearly 18% during the quarter after its full-year outlook failed to impress investors. Garmin forecast a profit of just $2.30-$2.40 for the year on revenue of $2.5 billion to $2.6 billion as …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Investors Did a Run on These 3 Stocks

By Rich Duprey, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

With the terms it placed on Cyprus, the eurozone has its template for future bailouts in place, and depositors in countries with their own shaky finances will be wary about bearing the brunt of the next crisis.

Some stocks had shaky weeks of their own, even though they’re unrelated to the global financial problems. Don’t to running over the cliff with them like a bunch of lemmings, as this could just be a temporary situation. So let’s first see whether they had good reason to fall, as panic-fueled routs can sometimes lead to excellent buying opportunities.

Falling off a cliff
Shares of iron ore miner Cliffs Natural Resources fell 14% earlier this week to levels it hasn’t seen since the recession, as analysts at Morgan Stanley and Credit Suisse drastically cut their price targets. Following the miner’s just-as-dramatic slashing of its dividend by 76%, the analysts at both investment houses cut the stock by more than 60% from their previous price target. Morgan Stanley dropped Cliffs’ shares to $14 a stub, and Credit Suisse took it down to $10.

On the bright side, Goldman Sachs raised its outlook from “sell” to “neutral,” but that was hardly enough to outweigh the pall hanging over the miner. In general, analysts expect its iron ore business to be cut in half in 2013 and its pricing power to come under tremendous pressure. Earlier this month, Cliffs announced that it was idling its Quebec iron ore pellet plant to meet the market‘s lower demand.

With the global steel industry wobbling despite expectations that Chinese production will increase 4% this year, Cliffs’ largest customer, ArcelorMittal , is melting down as well. The world’s largest steelmaker accounts for 17% of Cliffs’ total revenues and a third of its U.S. business and has seen its stock lose a quarter of its value in 2013.

Last fall, I believed that most of the risk had been priced into Cliffs’ own stock, but shares are down 58% since then and don’t seem to have reached bottom yet. While it amounts to a bit of closing the barn door after the cows have escaped, I’ll be closing out my outperform rating on Motley Fool CAPS.

Big pay day
Easy come, easy go, or so say investors in American Apparel , which saw their stock jump more than 12% the other day on no company-specific news and then give a good portion of it back for pretty much the same reason. There was, however, an article that appeared in the trade rag WWD that the retailer’s chairman and CEO was being richly rewarded this year with a pay increase from $800,000 to $2 million cash. While sales rose 6% in the most recent quarter, company losses narrowed only slightly.

The stock, however, has more than doubled since the start of the year and has nearly tripled from its 52-week low. After the stock wallowed in penny-stock status because of …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Pinnacle Foods Shares Rise on Market Debut

By Eric Volkman, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Pinnacle Foods has had a successful first day of trading on the stock exchange. The company’s shares were up by 11% over their issue price in after-hours trading, changing hands for $22.20 after hitting the market at $20.

Pinnacle, which produces, markets, and distributes a line of frozen food offerings, said it will net roughly $545.2 million from its listing. With those funds, it will retire chunks of its debt.

Barclays, Bank of America subsidiary Merrill Lynch, Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley, and UBS‘ investment bank unit were the joint book-running managers for the issue.

The article Pinnacle Foods Shares Rise on Market Debut originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Eric Volkman has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Bank of America. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = document.createElement('script');
ga.type = 'text/javascript';
ga.async = true;
ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';

var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Has Cliffs Natural Resources Finally Hit Rock Bottom?

By Matthew DiLallo, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

It’s been an ugly year for investors in Cliffs Natural Resources . The free fall in the company’s shares just doesn’t want to end — shares were hammered again following a downgrade by Morgan Stanley. Is this the final nail in the coffin or have Cliffs’ shares finally hit bottom?

For whatever reason, the Morgan Stanley downgrade appears to have come as a surprise to the market, which sent shares down by double digits. Maybe it’s the fact that the price target was cut all the way to $14 a share. Maybe it’s the language citing deteriorating market conditions in the company’s core iron ore market. Whatever the reason, the stock took another big drop.

Cliffs, as some might remember and others want to forget, was at more than $70 stock this time last year. Those holding on to hope that the stock can someday make its way back should take a look at what Morgan Stanley had to say about the company. For starters, it sees the company’s core iron ore business being cut in half in the coming years as new supply begins to come on line. That new supply would affect both volumes and pricing for the beleaguered miner. According to Morgan Stanley is that this would obliterate about 30% of Cliffs’ bottom line.

However, Morgan Stanley isn’t the only big Wall Street bank throwing around its weight when it comes to having an opinion on Cliffs. Goldman Sachs actually upgraded the stock, though it’s mainly a valuation call. According to Goldman, the company shored up its liquidity after cutting the dividend and issuing equity while also idling a high-cost plant. It thinks the company’s risks are already priced into the stock and are basically calling the bottom.

So who are you to believe? When it all comes down to it, the overarching problem is that Cliffs’ cost of production is too high, especially when compared to global giants BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto . These two can remain profitable even if iron ore prices continue to fall. Meanwhile, with its debt load weighing the company down, Cliffs’ investors could be left with a worthless stock.

While I don’t think that’s a likely scenario, I’m not inclined to be a buyer, even at these levels. High cost of production and heavy debt levels typically don’t end well. Further, Cliffs simply doesn’t have the commodity diversity to weather these storms as well as its more diversified global peers. Sure, a pure play is a great investment when a cycle turns up, but its not a great play for someone who wants to sleep at night knowing their investments are safe. 

Personally, the risk-reward balance isn’t enticing enough, especially when there are so many questions surrounding the company’s future profitability. I’d much rather stick with a diversified global miner than take a flier on a company that just might have further to fall. 

There’s a lot more to the story. Cliffs Natural …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance