Tag Archives: Jamie Dimon

Wall Street Is Sizzling And Have A Good Summer

By Nathan Vardi, Forbes Staff

Last summer Jamie Dimon, the nation’s most prominent bank CEO, was going through one of the darkest moments of his career. The chief executive of JPMorgan Chase & Co., was dealing with the fall out of the so-called London whale trading loss that had first emerged in the spring. In the middle of June he was twice dragged before federal lawmakers who grilled him over the trading debacle and in July the bank was discovering information that raised questions about the integrity of valuations used by traders in its chief investment office. But Dimon is having a different kind of summer this year. JPMorgan recently posted a 32% increase in second-quarter profits thanks to a surge of investment banking fees. Shares of the nation’s biggest bank rose by more than 2% on Thursday and hit a new 52-week high. …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

Why JPMorgan Chase Is Unsafe At Any Scale

By Steve Denning

US Supreme Court room SC High court weighs taking up new case on gun rights

Should we cheer the announcement of JPMorgan Chase?s record profits for the first quarter of 2013? Or should we lament JPMorgan Chase?s continuing failure to account for $1.660 trillion worth of its riskiest assets?derivatives?which are kept off its balance sheet and hidden from public view?
Tone change: from brashness to compliance
Let?s start with some good news. What?s encouraging is the docile tone of Mr. Dimon?s letter to JPMorgan?s shareholders. Thus it was only a few months ago in January that Jamie Dimon was at Davos brashly thumbing his nose at regulators, despite the $6 billion loss from the gambling of the London Whale:
?We?re doing the right thing? Many of the bad practices of the recent past were being phased out? Regulators are trying to do too much, too fast?. We are getting an overly bad press? There is huge misinformation out there about what we are doing to get things right? We have twice as much capital as before to pad against losses? We help clients raise money for socially-important projects in schools and hospitals? Businesses can be opaque. They are complex. You don?t know how aircraft engines work either.?
Now in his newsletter, Jamie The Brash has turned into Jamie the Dutiful. The accent is now, gasp, on compliance:
?Our shareholders should understand that the mandate to meet all the new regulatory requirements requires extensive changes in our business practices. These new rules will touch almost every system, every legal entity, every product and every service that we have across the company. To give you one example, we are enhancing systems to manage risk-weighted asset and liquidity requirements all the way down to the specific asset and the specific client.
?It also is possible that we will need to make changes to our legal entity structure and our capital structure to comply with the new rules relative to subsidiaries, orderly resolution and living wills? We are committed to making the necessary investments in our risk, credit, finance, legal, compliance, audit, technology and operations staff to change systems, reporting and practices to meet all the regulatory changes.?

From: http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2013/04/12/why-jpmorgan-chase-is-unsafe-at-any-scale/

Obama Sits Down With the Masters of the Universe

By David Hanson, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Thursday morning, Barack Obama met with Jamie Dimon, Lloyd Blankfein, Brian Moynihan, and other members of the country’s largest financial institutions. Let me pause for a minute to let you digest the sheer number of pinstripes and massive egos that strolled into the White House.

While the full details from the meeting between the President and financial leaders weren’t released to the public, it is encouraging to see there is at least some communication present on Capitol Hill. According to the White House, the group discussed housing, education policy, and clean energy financing. Although not explicitly stated, the bankers probably shared their thoughts on the new regulation, such as the Volcker Rule. Of these topics, bank leaders were surely heavily interested in the housing sector.

After drastic deterioration in the housing sector pushed the country into a deep recession, banks and policymakers both received most of the blame. However, looking ahead, a productive relationship between the largest money centers and housing policy makers is absolutely vital to a continued housing and broader economic recovery. The discussion comes at an interesting time, as the nation’s two largest mortgage lenders, Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase are set to release earnings on Friday morning.

The two banking behemoths controlled roughly 40% of the mortgage origination market in 2012, and both experienced huge year-over-year revenue increases, as customers’ refinancing accounted for roughly three out of four mortgages. The high refinancing volume was predominantly driven by customers with equity in their homes who jumped at the chance to lock in record low interest rates.

However, the refinancing market is expected to slow, and volume is likely to decline. Enter a necessary productive housing policy. As the refinancing volume becomes a smaller piece of the pie, policymakers and lenders are going to need to be increasingly more in sync. While no one wants to a return to an era of shoddy lending, there is certainly a middle ground that allows banks to support the sector and housing policy while maintaining credit standards.

With the election out of the way, Obama and these leaders may actually be able to make some positive contributions.

With so much of the financial industry getting bad press these days, it may be a “greedy when others are fearful” moment. Not surprisingly, some of Warren Buffett‘s biggest investments are in the space. In the Motley Fool‘s free report, The Stocks Only the Smartest Investors Are Buying, you can learn about a small, under-the-radar bank that’s too tiny for Buffett’s billions. Too bad, because it has better operating metrics than his favorites. Just click here to keep reading.

The article Obama Sits Down With the Masters of the Universe originally appeared on Fool.com.


David Hanson has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Wells Fargo. The Motley Fool owns shares of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Wells

From: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/11/obama-sits-down-with-the-masters-of-the-universe/

We're Betting on JPMorgan Chase and Jamie Dimon

By Matt Koppenheffer and David Hanson, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Absent some recent hiccups, JPMorgan Chase has performed well with Jamie Dimon as both CEO and chairman. However, some shareholders are now calling for Dimon to relinquish his title of chairman.

In this video, Motley Fool banking analysts Matt Koppenheffer and David Hanson debate whether or not Dimon will even give this issue the time of day during the company’s quarterly earnings release on Friday. 

With big finance firms still trading at deep discounts to their historic norms, investors everywhere are wondering if this is the new normal, or if finance stocks are a screaming buy today. The answer depends on the company, so to help figure out whether JPMorgan is a buy today, I invite you to read our premium research report on the company. Click here now for instant access!

var FoolAnalyticsData = FoolAnalyticsData || []; FoolAnalyticsData.push({ eventType: “TickerReportPitch”, contentByline: “Matt Koppenheffer and David Hanson“, contentId: “cms.31430”, contentTickers: “NYSE:JPM”, contentTitle: “We’re Betting on JPMorgan Chase and Jamie Dimon “, hasVideo: “True”, pitchId: “68”, pitchTickers: “NYSE:JPM”, pitchTitle: “JPM Ticker Report”

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Why JPMorgan Needs Jamie Dimon in Both Roles

By John Grgurich, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Over the weekend, news got out that JPMorgan Chase‘s board of directors was actively lobbying its largest shareholders to keep Jamie Dimon in his dual roles of chief executive officer and chairman: This in the wake of growing discontent over how Dimon handled last year’s London Whale trading incident, and in response to a shareholder proposal to separate the roles of CEO and COB.

Though I normally argue the opposite, in this situation, the board is absolutely right, and is on the side of investors.

The case against the same person as CEO and COB
The pitch I’m used to making goes something like this: CEOs in any business are the top dogs, essentially dictators. Their word is typically the final word on all things.

Ideally, of course, these dictators are open-minded people whose egos are in enough natural check to not only hire smart people to advise them, but to actually listen to them, as well. This is the “benevolent king” model. But because absolute power can corrupt absolutely, this model doesn’t always work out.

So, corporations have boards of directors, which are headed by chairmen. Because chairmen of the board (COBs) — in concert with the boards — have the power to hire and fire CEOs, they’re in the ideal position to check the absolute power of CEOs who have run amok.

On a less menacing note, an independent chair can also offer CEOs unfiltered and perhaps even uncomfortable advice on running the business they might not get from underlings who fear that speaking their minds may cost them their jobs.

Theoretically, then, separating the roles of CEO and COB should make a business healthier and more profitable.

The case for Jamie Dimon in both roles
It’s an old argument, and possibly a dangerous one, but I’m going to make it anyway: Jamie Dimon is so good at what he does, that the benefits of him simultaneously occupying the positions of CEO and COB outweigh the potential dangers.

Dimon became president and chief operating officer at JPMorgan Chase when the superbank merged with Bank One in 2004, where Dimon had been also been CEO and COB. He became CEO at JPMorgan in 2005, and COB in 2006. It was those middle years of the 2000s — when the most dangerous part of the housing bubble formed — that Dimon proved his mettle as the bank’s leader.

As qualified homebuyers began to run out, banks turned to unqualified applicants — or subprime borrowers — to keep the mortgage-securitization machine humming and big profits rolling in. But Jamie Dimon was (and still is) a risk control freak, and he kept the bank’s subprime shenanigans to a minimum. This kept JPMorgan not only solvent during the financial crisis, but actually strong — strong enough to be able to buy Bear Stearns as it was collapsing under the weight of its own toxic mortgage debt in March of 2008.

And JPMorgan has generally been on a roll ever …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Even Jamie Dimon Pouts (Though He's Still Richer Than Mike Mayo)

By John Maxfield, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Just because Jamie Dimon, the chairman and chief executive officer of JPMorgan Chase , is the most visible and highest regarded leader of a major Wall Street bank doesn’t mean that he’s immune from saying and doing stupid and immature things.

At an investors’ conference at the end of February, he boasted about why he’s so much richer than Mike Mayo, a bank analyst at Credit Suisse. And, no, as Reuters’ James Saft noted, it’s not because Dimon is better than Mayo at picking lottery tickets. The reason, according to Dimon, concerned Mayo’s intimation that Swiss lender UBS is perceived by some affluent customers to be safer than JPMorgan because the former has a higher capital ratio. While I don’t mean to dismiss Dimon’s completely illogical explanation, the reality has more to do with the fact that Dimon’s father landed him a job with Sandy Weill in 1982. But that’s water under the bridge.

What isn’t water under the bridge is the suggestion that Dimon might leave JPMorgan if he’s forced to give up his role as chairman of the board. It was revealed in the middle of last year that the nation’s largest bank by assets would have to take a roughly $6 billion loss tied to the trading of certain credit derivatives by the bank’s chief investment office. Multiple heads rolled, including the chief investment officer’s, Dimon’s annual pay was cut, and now shareholders are threatening to vote in favor of a proposal that separates the positions of chairman and chief executive officer — both Bank of America and Citigroup have done the same thing over the past few years.

But here’s the icing on the cake, according to an analyst quoted today by Bloomberg News: “If the board is forced by a shareholder vote to strip Jamie Dimon of his chairman’s role, then shareholders may find that Jamie Dimon decides to move on, maybe not immediately but within the year.”

Is that a bluff, blackmail, extortion, or an ultimatum? At this point, it seems more like an unsubstantiated rumor. But that being said, it’s a worthwhile reminder of how even Wall Street‘s best and brightest believe they are beyond reproach.

With big finance firms still trading at deep discounts to their historic norms, investors everywhere are wondering if this is the new normal, or whether finance stocks are a screaming buy today. The answer depends on the company, so to help figure out whether JPMorgan is a buy today, I invite you to read our premium research report on the company. Click here now for instant access!

var FoolAnalyticsData = FoolAnalyticsData || []; …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

JPMorgan Chase Board Members Pushing Shareholders To Keep Jamie Dimon As Chairman

By The Huffington Post News Editors

JPMorgan Chase is working behind the scenes to avert a major potential embarrassment.

In anticipation of a crucial vote at next month’s annual meeting, board members are planning to sit down with some of the bank’s biggest shareholders to make their case that JPMorgan’s influential chief executive, Jamie Dimon, should keep his chairman title, according to several people briefed on the plans.

Read More…

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Huffington Post

Better Buy Right Now: Citigroup or JPMorgan Chase?

By Matt Koppenheffer and David Hanson, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

While JPMorgan Chase  has Jamie Dimon, one of the sharpest men in banking, as its CEO, Citigroup‘s performance in the stress tests surprised many, and may put it squarely on the comeback trail. So which of these two monster banks is the better buy today? In this video, Motley Fool financials analysts Matt Koppenheffer and David Hanson give their views on which of these two they would prefer to have in their portfolio. 

Citigroup’s stock looks tantalizingly cheap. Yet the bank’s balance sheet is still in need of more repair, and there’s a considerable amount of uncertainty after a shocking management shakeup. Should investors be treading carefully, or jumping on an opportunity to buy? To help figure out whether Citigroup deserves a spot on your watchlist, I invite you to read our premium research report on the bank today. We’ll fill you in on both reasons to buy and reasons to sell Citigroup, and what areas Citigroup investors need to watch going forward. Click here now for instant access to our best expert’s take on Citigroup.

var FoolAnalyticsData = FoolAnalyticsData || []; FoolAnalyticsData.push({ eventType: “TickerReportPitch”, contentByline: “Matt Koppenheffer and David Hanson“, contentId: “cms.29522”, contentTickers: “NYSE:C, NYSE:JPM”, contentTitle: “Better Buy Right Now: Citigroup or JPMorgan Chase?”, hasVideo: “True”, pitchId: “80”, …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Is JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon the Banker to Bet On

By Matt Koppenheffer and David Hanson, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Since last year’s London Whale trading incident, and during this year’s hearings on Capitol Hill, Jamie Dimon‘s reputation has come under some serious heat. While some are calling for the JPMorgan Chase  CEO to step down, his impressive track record seems to insure his spot at the megabank’s table. 

In this video, Fool banking analysts David Hanson and Matt Koppenheffer give their take on Dimon’s record and how they would grade his performance. 

With big finance firms still trading at deep discounts to their historic norms, investors everywhere are wondering if this is the new normal, or if finance stocks are a screaming buy today. The answer depends on the company, so to help figure out whether JPMorgan is a buy today, I invite you to read our premium research report on the company today. Click here now for instant access!

var FoolAnalyticsData = FoolAnalyticsData || []; FoolAnalyticsData.push({ eventType: “TickerReportPitch”, contentByline: “Matt Koppenheffer and David Hanson“, contentId: “cms.28204”, contentTickers: “NYSE:BAC, NYSE:JPM, NYSE:WFC, NYSE:USB”, contentTitle: “Is JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon the Banker to Bet On”, hasVideo: “True”, pitchId: “68”, pitchTickers: “NYSE:JPM”, …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Should Jamie Dimon Say Goodbye to His Role As Chairman?

By John Grgurich, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

A group of powerful investors is calling for the head of JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon. Well, at least one of his heads. The coalition wants to split the duties of CEO and Chairman, both of which Dimon currently performs.

At this point, it doesn’t look like it’s going to happen, though it’s time to consider the idea.

AFSCME asks again
The coalition includes the AFSCME Employees Pension Plan, the Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds, Hermes Equity Ownership Services, and the NYC Pension Funds. Together these groups hold $820 million in JPMorgan shares.

According to the group’s press release, the filing to name an independent board chairman “reflects mounting investor concerns with the board’s oversight in the wake of the London Whale losses, recent regulatory sanctions, and its failure to fully demonstrate that it can manage the size and complexity of its balance sheet.”

A similar proposal, filed by the AFSCME Employees Pension Plan last year and voted on by shareholders, garnered a 40% approval rating. JPMorgan shareholders will have the chance to vote on this new proposal in May.

Foolish bottom line
This shareholder proposal couldn’t have come at a worse time for Dimon. JPMorgan has had the bad week of bad weeks.

The good news for Dimon is, the board will likely back him in his current dual-role job structures. But this good news for Dimon is also bad news for shareholders, and potentially the taxpaying public at large.

With trillions of dollars in assets, JPMorgan is a beast for any one person to stay reliably on top of, and Jamie Dimon isn’t just any old CEO. In this Fool’s opinion, he’s the best risk manager in the business.

His obsessive fear of risk is exactly what kept JPMorgan away from the worst excesses of the housing boom, and even allowed the superbank to scoop up Bear Stearns as it was failing back in 2008: a boon not just for the bank but also for the country, as a bankrupt Bear might have touched off the financial crash months sooner.

The London Whale incident, while never a threat to the solvency of the bank, nevertheless showed that even the best CEOs can’t keep their eye on everything going on in a giant organization like JPMorgan. A second, critical eye on the bank’s operations could only be a help.

Unfortunately, that doesn’t look like it’s going to happen. But there’s always next year.

Looking for in-depth analysis on JPMorgan? Check out a new Motley Fool report on the superbank, written by Ilan Moscovitz — The Motley Fool‘s senior banking analyst and JPMorgan Chase specialist.

You’ll learn where the key opportunities for the superbank lie, where its core growth will come from, and the potential business risks. You’ll also get an analysis of its leadership team. For immediate access click here now.

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon Paid $18.7 Million In Compensation Last Year

By The Huffington Post News Editors

NEW YORK (AP) — The CEO of JPMorgan Chase, Jamie Dimon, received $18.7 million in compensation last year, according to regulatory documents the country’s largest bank filed Friday.

That’s 19 percent less than Dimon received in 2011, when his $23 million pay package made him the highest paid bank CEO in the country.

JPMorgan & Co. had already said that it would dock Dimon’s pay, largely because the bank took a $6 billion loss from a complex derivatives trade that went bad last year.

Read More…
More on AP

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Huffington Post

Why Bank of America Is Up This Week

By John Grgurich, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

As far as the big banks go, Bank of America is the trend bucker this week, up a solid 1.66% as the trading week comes to an end. Chalk that happy performance up to a continuing afterglow from the Federal Reserve‘s stress tests.

The tale of the tickers
But before we delve into that, here’s a quick overview of the superbank’s peers and the market for the past week:

  • Citigroup is down 1.52%.
  • JPMorgan Chase is down 0.76%.
  • Wells Fargo is down 1.36%.

Running counter to the general big-bank gloom is the market overall, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average up 0.62%, the S&P 500 up 0.67%, and the Nasdaq up 0.93%.

Stress-test heaven?
Last week at this time, bank investors were digesting the results of the Fed’s annual stress tests, or Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review. And for B of A investors, there were some genuinely tasty menu items to swallow.

The bank did well, as good as or better than some of its peers. And good enough for shareholders to be rewarded with $5 billion in share buybacks. Hence, this week’s generally happy feeling that seems to be carrying the stock along in positive territory, even while other big banks are ending the week in the negative.

So why aren’t B of A’s peers also basking in the CCAR afterglow? JPMorgan investors got a bit of shock last week. The country’s biggest bank passed its stress test, but its proposed capital actions were approved on the condition that Jamie Dimon and his team go back to the drawing board to resubmit its plans.

And Citi investors might be reeling from CEO Michael Corbat’s decision not to increase the bank’s dividend or buy back shares, despite the its impressive performance on the CCAR. In my opinion, investors ought to cheer that move. To me, it’s a sign that Corbat is putting the health of the bank first. 

Money in the bank
We all know, of course, that the market can be fickle: up one week and down the next. The most important thing is to focus on the long term. That’s what investing Foolishly is all about. The market will do what the market will do, sometimes for no apparent reason. But as long as the companies you’re invested in have solid fundamentals, your money is in the right place. 

Looking for in-depth analysis on B of A? If so, look no farther than this Motley Fool premium research report. In it, analysts Anand Chokkavelu, CFA and Matt Koppenheffer, Financials bureau chief, lift the veil on the bank’s operations and give you three reasons to buy and three reasons to sell everyone’s favorite superbank.

As an added bonus, you’ll receive a full year of free updates and expert guidance as key news breaks. To claim your copy, simply click here now.

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

JPMorgan's CEO Should Lose One Job

By Alex Dumortier, CFA, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

On the back of yesterday’s stinging losses, stocks opened higher this morning, with the
S&P 500
and the narrower, price-weighted
Dow Jones Industrial Average
up 0.56% each at 10:10 a.m. EDT. With regard to this week’s flash crisis — the Cypriot question — it appears investors are now betting that the Cypriot government and lawmakers will see reason
and make the hard decisions necessary to obtain bailout financing from international lenders. Their options are narrowing, and time is running out.

Dow component JPMorgan Chase is slated to release its proxy materials today for the bank’s annual shareholder meeting, and they are expected to show that the board remains in favor of maintaining Jamie Dimon in his dual role of CEO and chairman.

Last year, a measure to strip Dimon of the latter role received 40% approval from shareholders — that was just after a rare aquatic mammal known as the “London Whale was discovered to be inhabiting JPMorgan’s London office. After the Senate subcommittee for investigations last week released a 300-page report detailing the management breakdowns that facilitated that fiasco, it would not be surprising if the same measure were to receive similar support this year.

Last year the board justified its opposition to splitting the roles on the grounds that this would create “uncertainty, confusion and inefficiency in board and management function and relations.” I don’t see it. They’d need to provide some evidence for that statement, for a start.

Still, they wisely adopted a nondogmatic line on the issue, stating: “The firm’s board of directors has no established policy on whether or not to have a non-executive chairman and believes that it should make that judgment based on circumstances and experience. The board has determined that the most effective leadership model for the firm currently is that Mr Dimon serves as both chairman and chief executive officer.”

According to the Financial Times, the language in this year’s proxy is expected will be similar.

On the issue of splitting the CEO and chairman roles, the natural bias ought to be in favor of having two separate people fill them. Why? Because there are obvious conflicts of interest between the role of chairman, which is to protect shareholders’ interests, and that of CEO, which is to manage the company. Add to that some signs that Jamie Dimon, who is an excellent manager, could use an ego check, and my inclination would be to support splitting the roles at JPMorgan.

With big finance firms still trading at deep discounts to their historic norms, investors everywhere are wondering if this is the new normal or if finance stocks are a screaming buy today. The answer depends on the company, so …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Is This the Perfect Time to Buy JPMorgan?

By John Grgurich, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

There are bad weeks, and then there are bad weeks. JPMorgan Chase is having a bad week.

In the space of just four business days, the country’s biggest bank has had its capital return plan sent back to the drawing board, been burned at the stake by Senate inquisitors, and had a confidential management-team downgrade by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency revealed in the press.

That’s a lot of noise, and none of it is good. As an investor, should you be tuning in or tuning out?

Bad-news recap
Before we dig into how you should be thinking about all this, let’s give each item a quick overview:

Stress-test mess: Last Thursday afternoon, the Federal Reserve released the final results of its annual stress tests. In a nutshell, JPMorgan performed admirably, if not exceptionally.

But while the Fed did approve the superbank’s proposed capital actions — a 26.6% quarterly dividend increase and $6 billion in share buybacks — it made them conditional on the bank coming back with a revised process plan. The upshot is, however, if the Fed doesn’t like the new plan, it could deny the proposed capital actions. 

Senate inquisition: Last Friday, former bank Chief Investment Officer Ina Drew, former Chief Financial Officer Doug Braunstein, and other bank officers faced congressional grilling from Senator Carl Levin and his colleagues over the handling of last year’s London Whale trading debacle. As CEO Jamie Dimon was not present at the hearing, he was grilled in absentia.  

The questioning came in the wake of a 300-page Senate report on the scandal released the day before. Neither the report nor the questioning cast the bank’s handling of the London Whale in a good light, to say the least.

Management-team downgrade: Today, The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency downgraded JPMorgan’s management team — last July — as a result of the then-hotly followed London Whale trading scandal. The bank’s score changed from a 2 to a 3, indicating that management “needs improvement.” 

This too shall pass
Shares of JPMorgan were down by 0.16% yesterday alone, and 2.62% since last Thursday. After reading through the above, it’s probably not hard to figure out why. This is a lot of bad news in a short period of time, and investors are worried.

But I just don’t think there’s any cause for long-term alarm. In fact, this might be the perfect time to buy into the bank if you haven’t already, or to buy more shares if you already own some.

For starters, in due time, the stress-test stress shall pass. Jamie Dimon and his team are some of the smartest cookies on the banking block, and whatever sort of changes the Fed is requesting to the superbank’s proposed capital-return action plans, they will almost surely be made to the central bank’s liking.

Wells Fargo‘s stress-test results weren’t that far off from JPMorgan’s, and its proposed capital …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Jamie Dimon Agrees With Occupy Wall Street: 'Too Much Inequality'

By Eamon Murphy

Jamie Dimon agrees there is financial inequality

Filed under: , , ,

Getty Images

Jamie Dimon has said many notable things over the years, from calling a multibillion dollar trading loss “a complete tempest in a teapot” to answering a critical analyst’s doubts by explaining, “That’s why I’m richer than you.” The JPMorgan Chase (JPM) CEO made news again Tuesday, while delivering the keynote address at the 2013 Annual Greater Louisville Inc. meeting.

According to Chris Otts of The Courier-Journal, Dimon told his audience that the United States has “too much inequality.” This isn’t a novel insight — the Occupy Wall Street protests were predicated on this idea, expressed through the slogan “we are the 99 percent” — but it’s striking to hear it coming from Wall Street‘s most outspoken defender of financial elites.

“It doesn’t mean we blame the successful,” Dimon continued, sounding more characteristic, “but it’s true. You want to have problems in society? Have inequality.” Dimon mentioned “struggling inner-city public schools” in particular, Otts reports.

The statements represent a rhetorical softening for Dimon, who has in the past rejected the anti-banker sentiment that arose after the financial crisis of 2008. “Acting like everyone who’s been successful is bad and because you’re rich you’re bad, I don’t understand it,” he said in late 2011 at an investors’ conference in New York. Since then, a lot has changed for JPMorgan: the bank, seen as the most successful of the financial behemoths during the crisis, was recently the subject of a “scathing” Senate panel report that accused Dimon and other executives of hiding trading losses from investors and regulators.

According to The New York Times, a criminal investigation of this affair — known popularly, after the trader who caused the losses, as “the London Whale” — is “at an advanced stage.”

Over at AlterNet, Lynn Stuart Parramore traces “The Spectacular Rise and Fall of Jamie Dimon, Wall Street’s Golden Boy,” presenting his life story as “a critique of the American Dream.” Dimon, she argues, was singularly concerned with pursuing wealth, although in his early days as JPM CEO he “was widely perceived as a smart and cautious leader, shrewdly avoiding many of the fancy financial engineering tricks that were all the rage on Wall Street.” And a society that has long viewed material flourishing as a sign of God’s favor — perhaps in some secularized form, more recently — embraced the “success” Dimon so often touts, along with his self-professed prudence (embodied by his favorite catchphrase, “fortress balance sheet”), as a sign of goodness. President Barack Obama, for instance, held up JPMorgan and its leader as worthy examples of American finance: “there are a lot of banks that are actually pretty well managed,” the president said in Feb. 2009, explaining why his administration did not seek to replace executives at bailed-out firms, “JPMorgan being a good example. Jamie Dimon, …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Why the Federal Reserve's Announcement Sent Stocks Soaring

By John Maxfield, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

The market‘s recent rally to all-time highs appeared to be in jeopardy at the beginning of the week following the unexpected bailout of Cyprus on Sunday. But if yesterday and today are any indication, the market has since brushed the bad news off. After climbing marginally yesterday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average is up an impressive 78 points, or 0.54%, with roughly an hour left in the trading session.

On its face, the Cyprus bailout seems more like a tempest in a teapot (to steal a phrase from Jamie Dimon) than a serious economic crisis that would roil the international financial system. At $10 billion, the cost to the eurozone and International Monetary Fund hardly registers on the economic Richter scale. But given the media’s obsession with the matter, it’s clearly not the size of the bailout that matters. The devil, as they say, is in the details.

The most contentious aspect of the bailout concerns the country’s proposed manner of meeting its obligations, as it must come up with 5.8 billion euros to unlock the 10 billion euro package offered by the EU and IMF. Over the weekend, the parliament in Cyprus tentatively agreed to fund its portion by a levy on bank deposits. As my colleague Morgan Housel discussed, depositors with less than 100,000 euros in the bank would face a 6.75% haircut, while those with more than that figure would face a 9.9% tax.

While the proposed levy was subsequently amended to exclude depositors with less than 20,000 euros in a bank account, it was formally voted down yesterday by the nation’s politicians. If anything, however, this only makes the situation worse. As an article on our site noted this morning: “Tuesday’s decisive rejection of the plan to take a slice of all deposits above 20,000 euros ($25,888) has left the country’s bailout in question. Without the bailout, the Cypriot banking sector would collapse, devastating the country’s economy and potentially causing it to leave the euro.”

Beyond Cyprus, the most concrete catalyst for the market‘s ascent today was the anticipated — and now released — announcement by the Federal Reserve regarding its economic outlook. While analysts and commentators had been speculating for months that the Fed may back away from its former commitment to keep interest rates low for an extended time period, today’s announcement seems to contradict that narrative.

After noting that the domestic economy appears to have returned “to moderate economic growth following a pause late last year,” the central bank’s monetary-policy committee nevertheless noted that it “continues to see downside risks to the economic outlook [and] also anticipates that inflation over the medium term likely will run at or below its 2 percent objective.” Given this, the Fed will continue its current program of buying “additional agency mortgage-backed securities at a pace of $40 billion per month and longer-term Treasury securities at a pace of $45 billion per month.” In other words, …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

The Dow Pops While These 3 Stocks Fizzle

By Matt Thalman, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

After fears from Europe hurt the markets over the past two days, investors are patiently waiting for Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke’s press conference, and the markets are all moving higher. As of 12:45 p.m. EDT the Dow Jones Industrial Average is up 59 points, or 0.41%. The S&P 500 is up 0.57%, while the NASDAQ has risen 0.58%.

Although the problem in Cyprus still looms, investors are clearly focusing on the home front today, and they would love to hear the same old song from the Fed: more bond-buying and cheap money for all as the economy continues to grow stronger.

Today’s Dow downers
After shares rose 1.5% on Monday and a few points more yesterday, Verizon is lower by 0.6% today. The company recently received an upgrade from analysts at Citigroup and announced that it would like to pay for TV channels based on unique views, rather than the traditional subscriber model. The company defines a “unique view” as an instance when an individual spends more than five minutes on a channel. This proposal will likely be met with resistance from content providers, but it’s one step closer to the a-la-cart TV subscription model most consumers want.

Shares of JPMorgan Chase have been trading sideways since the Federal Reserve released the result of its stress test, and although JPMorgan didn’t perform poorly, it wasn’t a standout, either. Investors have likely been trading out of Jamie Dimon‘s empire and into Bank of America, which has seen its price rise more than 15% since the beginning of March.

While B of A still has its problems, JPMorgan’s “London Whale” scandal and recent Senate hearings on the matter have shaken investors’ confidence in Dimon’s leadership and risk-management abilities. My Fool colleague Alex Dumortier recently dug further into the matter; click here to see what he found.

Shares of Caterpillar are down 1.7% after the company released sales results for the last three months. Worldwide dealer sales fell by 13% during the rolling three-month period that ended in February, compared with a decline of 4% for the three months ending in January. The largest decline occurred in the Asia-Pacific region, which saw sales drop 26%, while North American figures fell 12%.

Caterpillar’s most recent quarterly earnings report showed a 55% drop in profit, and management cited weak demand and oversupply. Last year the company cut production to help lower supply, but as sales figures continue to fall, inventory levels will likely increase.

Caterpillar is the market share leader in an industry in which size matters, and its quality products, extensive service network, and unparalleled brand strength combine to give it solid competitive advantages. Read all about Caterpillar’s strengths and weaknesses in The Motley Fool’s brand-new report. Just click here to access it now.

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance