Tag Archives: Arch Coal

Audley Capital Calls on Walter Energy to Disclose Mine-Level SG&A in Relation to Peers

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Audley Capital Calls on Walter Energy to Disclose Mine-Level SG&A in Relation to Peers

Requests that Company Provide Analysis Detailing SG&A Per Ton of Production Compared to Peer Group Average

Believes Company’s Corporate-Level Disclosure is Misleading and Embellishes Overall SG&A Reductions

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Audley Capital Advisors LLP (including certain related funds and investment vehicles, “Audley Capital“) today called on Walter Energy, Inc. (NYS: WLT) (TSX: WLT) (“Walter Energy” or “the Company”) to provide per ton of production (“mine-level”) SG&A analysis compared to the average of its peer group since the completion of the Western Coal acquisition in April 2011, or for the fourth quarter of 2012. Audley Capital believes that stockholders deserve the transparency of mine-level analysis, which is arguably one of the most important metrics in met coal production.

For the purposes of analysis, Audley Capital uses a comparable group for Walter Energy that includes Alpha Natural Resources, Arch Coal and Peabody Energy. Audley Capital notes that all of the peer companies report mine-level SG&A while Walter Energy chooses to allocate overhead costs from individual mines to corporate-level SG&A, an opaque reporting threshold.

From: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/17/audley-capital-calls-on-walter-energy-to-disclose-/


Stockholders Are Entitled to an Explanation…and Accountability

Amid federal investigation, coal exports at record levels

From the time coal is scooped from the depths of the Spring Creek strip mine in Montana’s wide-open Powder River Basin until it travels more than 6,000 miles across the Pacific Ocean to power plants in South Korea, the price can increase more than fivefold.

Mining companies, however, are only paying government royalties on the price of the coal when it is mined from federal lands, not when it is sold for more overseas, saving them millions of dollars in the process.

As the Interior Department investigates the industry’s export practices and considers a new royalty system, several exporters in the Montana-Wyoming coal region — the nation’s most productive — are planning to increase shipments abroad to energy-hungry Asia.

Whatever the department decides on royalties, a matter currently under internal review, the results have the potential to cut into profits at a time when the industry is looking to foreign markets to offset some of the daunting challenges it faces at home.

Proposed ports on the West Coast have the potential to increase U.S. coal exports by 60 to 100 million tons a year, said Jim Rollyson, an energy analyst with the advisory firm Raymond James.

“The international export market is where long-term growth for the industry might come from,” Rollyson said. “If you’re the government, that’s real money you’re trying to get there.”

Federal officials forecast that 175 coal-burning power plant units will be shuttered in the next five years, equal to 8.5 percent of the total electricity produced by coal, largely because of competition from cheap natural gas and costs of complying with new environmental regulations.

Overseas markets, by contrast, have been booming.

While analysts expect demand to slip temporarily this year, 2012 saw a record 125 million tons of coal exported from the U.S. Some in the industry project that figure could double in just the next five years if new ports and port expansions are built in Washington state, Oregon and the Gulf Coast.

Federal officials declined to say what they’ve uncovered since the royalties investigation was announced in February. But they’ve said the probe will continue under the leadership of recently confirmed Interior Secretary Sally Jewell.

“We take this issue very seriously and remain fully committed to collecting every dollar due,” said Patrick Etchart with Interior’s Office of Natural Resource Revenue.

Among the major coal producers from federal lands in the West, Peabody Energy and Spring Creek owner Cloud Peak Energy have denied any wrongdoing, while Arch Coal, Inc., has declined to comment.

The investigation into the industry follows concerns raised by two prominent U.S. senators — Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and the committee’s ranking minority member, Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska.

They’ve warned taxpayers could lose many millions of dollars annually if royalties are unfairly calculated. “Taxpayers deserve to know if Interior’s oversight and regulations have kept up” with the rise in exports, said Wyden spokesman Keith Chu.

Royalties currently are paid based on the mine price of coal — about $10.55 a ton in the Powder River Basin, kept low by the volume

From: http://feeds.foxnews.com/~r/foxnews/national/~3/XPevvQXZnLg/

Breathe Easy: Natural Gas Is Lowering CO2 Emissions

By Arjun Sreekumar, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

America’s shale gas revolution is already paying off big time. Not only has it been a boon to consumers and companies who use natural gas for heating their homes and offices, it also appears to be benefiting the environment. Let’s take a closer look.

EIA reports lower CO2 emissions
Last week, the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) reported that U.S. energy-related carbon dioxide emissions for 2012 fell to 5.3 billion tons – the lowest level in nearly two decades. What’s more is that since 2007, emissions have declined consecutively each year, with the exception of 2010. The reason?

The EIA attributed the decline in CO2 emissions primarily to the shift away from coal, the most carbon-intensive fossil fuel, and toward natural gas, the least carbon-intensive fuel, for electric power generation. Less demand for transportation fuels and relatively weak demand for winter heating also played a role in driving emissions lower.

Coal-to-gas switching
Over the past few years, the transition toward natural-gas-fired plants and the retirement of older, coal-powered plants has been an unmistakable trend among utility companies.

For the better part of the past couple of decades, coal traded at a substantial discount to natural gas on an energy equivalent basis. In fact, it held up as the least expensive thermal fuel in the U.S. over that time period.

But all that changed in 2011, as natural gas prices slipped below $3 per Mcf that November. The downward trend in prices continued until spring of 2012, when gas hit a decade low of around $1.82 per Mcf on April 20.

Massively discounted gas prices drove utility companies with the flexibility to rebalance their production mix to burn more natural gas and less coal. In the first half of 2012, when natural gas was especially cheap, several utilities announced plans to curtail coal-powered generation in favor of gas-fired plants.

For instance, Southern Company‘s share of coal used for total power generation fell from 70% to 30%, while the share of natural gas rose from 11% to 47%. Not surprisingly, the company ended up burning more natural gas than it did coal for the first time in its century-long history.  

Impact on coal producers
As increasing numbers of utility companies made the switch to natural gas, the price of thermal coal – the varietal used mainly for power generation – plummeted, leading many producers to reduce production drastically and, in many cases, lay off workers.

For instance, in the second quarter of last year, Arch Coal shuttered four thermal coal mines in Appalachia and idled another, as it struggled to cut costs in the face of falling demand for thermal coal. Not long after, in September, Alpha Natural Resources announced that it would idle mines in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Virginia and lay off almost 10% of its employees.  

However, some coal producers, such as Cliffs Natural Resources and Peabody Energy , fared relatively better due to the

From: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/11/breathe-easy-natural-gas-is-lowering-co2-emissions/

What Pulled the Dow Back From the Brink Today

By Dan Caplinger, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

The 170-point opening plunge for the Dow Jones Industrials raised many fears that the long-awaited correction for the U.S. stock market was finally at hand. Coming on the heels of an extremely disappointing jobs report, the Dow’s decline showed that fears of overall economic weakness were finally starting to break the complacent attitude that most investors have maintained, even through the Cypriot banking crisis, and other more remote global economic difficulties. Yet, by the end of the day, that fear had apparently subsided, and the Dow closed with a loss of just 41 points.

A couple of Dow stocks even managed sizable gains on the day. Boeing jumped 1.4% on news of another successful test flight in its attempt to get its 787 Dreamliner back in the air after battery problems grounded the aircraft back in January. According to a press release, today’s flight completed the necessary final certification test for the battery system, and now, the company will gather and analyze data, and work with the FAA in hopes of getting the Dreamliner up and flying again as soon as possible.

JPMorgan Chase also defied the Dow decline, rising nearly 1%. Late in the day, a Bloomberg report cited a draft copy of legislation that would require JPMorgan and other major banks with assets of $400 billion or more to hold higher amounts of capital than standards under the Basel III accord. With some lawmakers citing the competitive advantages that big banks have over their smaller rivals as justifying the higher capital standards, JPMorgan will face substantial political resistance if it tries to extricate itself from the higher standards.

Finally, several energy companies did well today, with oil and gas exploration company Ultra Petroleum soaring more than 7%, and Arch Coal rising more than 5%. Speculation that natural gas prices may have finally bottomed out lifted several smaller nat-gas producers in the space, which have suffered for a long time from a glut of the clean-burning fuel. Meanwhile, Arch Coal and other coal producers have hoped for nat-gas to return to more sustainable levels, because rising gas prices could end the trend among utility customers to switch from coal to gas, and therefore boost demand and prices for coal. Even with prices having risen to nearly $4 from around $1.80 last April, natural gas could have further to run on the upside.

With big banks like JPMorgan still trading at deep discounts to their historic norms, investors everywhere are wondering if this is the new normal, or whether finance stocks are a screaming buy today. The answer is different for each bank, so to help figure out whether JPMorgan is a buy today, I invite you to read our premium research report on the company today. Click here now for instant access!

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Charles Scott Howard, Whistleblowing Miner, Wins Another Round Against Arch Coal

By The Huffington Post News Editors

WASHINGTON — A panel of federal judges ruled Thursday that a Kentucky miner who was fired two years ago after alleging unsafe conditions at his mine deserves to keep his job, delivering yet another legal victory to a highly public coal-industry whistleblower.

Charles Scott Howard lost his job at Cumberland River Coal Company, a subsidiary of energy giant Arch Coal, in May 2011. Managers informed him he was being let go because he was no longer fit to work due to an on-the-job injury. But Howard had lodged a litany of safety complaints against the company in the run-up to his layoff. An administrative law judge ruled last year that letting Howard go amounted to discrimination under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act.

Cumberland River appealed that decision, arguing that putting Howard back on the job would actually endanger him, due to his injury, and undermine safety law. The panel of appellate judges, however, didn’t buy it.

Read More…
More on West Virginia Mine Disaster

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Huffington Post

3 Energy Trends to Watch During Earnings Season

By Travis Hoium, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Earnings season is right around the corner and there are a few big energy trends to watch for. Here are the big trends I’m looking at and the companies that hold the keys.

Will oil and gas drilling pick up?
Oil and gas production has been rising in the U.S. but rig counts haven’t followed at the same rate. Drillers are becoming more efficient at drilling wells and in field designs as well. This has hurt companies providing rigs and services to the oil and gas industry.

I’ll be looking at trends at Halliburton , which saw North American revenue decline 5% sequentially in the fourth quarter due to lower rig counts. Those rig counts are slowly coming back, so investors should watch how that impacts margins and what management has to say about the rest of 2012.  

It’ll also be important to watch Heckmann, which supplies water and environmental service to drillers, and CARBO Ceramics, which makes ceramic proppants, to see where industry demand and pricing are headed. 

Can coal producers survive?
2012 was a terrible year for coal stocks; 2013 will be key to their very survival. It will be important to watch both revenue and net income trends for any sign of health. As you can see below, Arch Coal , Alpha Natural Resources , and Peabody Energy have all been posting huge losses because of the decline of coal.

ACI Revenue TTM data by YCharts

Arch Coal and Alpha Natural Resources will be two to watch closely because of their exposure to high-cost Appalachian coal and smaller exposure to metallurgical coal than competitors. They’ve both been losing a considerable amount of money per quarter, so they’ll have to turn things around eventually or they’ll end up in bankruptcy. Considering the continuing low price of natural gas, I don’t have high hopes for coal in the first quarter.

Will solar continue its torrid growth pace?
Coal is a declining commodity but the sun is where the future of energy lies. Last year, solar installations grew 76% in the U.S. — 2013 should see more strong growth. But how will the industry trends play out?

First Solar has been the market leader for a decade but a lower-efficiency product and Chinese competition have hurt margins and caused a strategic shift for the firm. The company is now focused on building its own systems with its low-cost modules and best-in-class operational efficiency. But in the fourth quarter, new signings didn’t keep up with what the company built, resulting in a lower backlog. This is a warning sign, and with distributed solar in greater demand than large-scale projects, it will be interesting to see what the numbers and comments First Solar releases have to say about the market‘s direction.

Speaking of distributed solar, can SolarCity continue to grow signings and installations? And more importantly, will it make progress toward profitability? This is a disruptive …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

These 3 Energy Stocks Trounced the Market Today

By Dan Dzombak, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Markets and energy prices were on the move today as fear rose over the economy after a weaker-than-expected private-sector jobs report. At 5:00 pm ET on Wednesday, the VIX was up 11.19%, Brent crude was down 3.04% to $107.32, and WTI crude was down 2.71% to $94.53. U.S. natural gas was up 1.61% to $3.90.

Today’s energy-stock leaders
Among U.S. companies with market caps greater than $500 million, today’s energy-stocks leader was Magnum Hunter Resources , up 3.15% to $3.93. Magnum was up more than 10% this morning, after the company announced an asset sale of its Eagle Ford Shale assets to Penn Virginia for $401 million. The assets include 19,000 net acres with 49 producing wells, seven wells drilled, and four currently being drilled. For March, the average daily production was 3,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day. Magnum plans on using the cash from the sale to pay down debt, which as of Sept. 30 stood at $680 million. The company is late in reporting its annual result for the year ended Dec. 31, after it identified material weaknesses in its internal controls. Investors should be wary of investing in a company that’s late in filing.

Second among energy stocks today was Arch Coal up 2.42% to $5.08, while in third was Peabody Energy , up 1.15% to $20.15. Coal stocks been crushed as environmental regulations pushed up the price of running coal plants and cheap natural gas provided an easy and cheaper alternative for power producers. Natural gas has taken significant market share in the U.S. power markets, and coal demand and prices have fallen as a result.

Weaker companies haven’t survived, with Patriot Coal, for one, going into bankruptcy. The company was spun off from Peabody Energy in 2007 and has been weighed down by $1.6 billion in retiree health benefits. As part of the spinoff, Peabody agreed to cover certain health-care costs for former Peabody employees. Patriot is suing Peabody to make sure that Peabody “does not attempt to use Patriot’s bankruptcy to escape Peabody’s own health care obligations to certain retirees.” Peabody argues that if Patriot’s obligations are lessened; then its own obligations are also lessened. Yesterday, Patriot asked the bankruptcy court to cap life insurance benefits and health-care coverage for its retirees. The company has 4,000 employees and 8,100 retirees.

Foolish bottom line
The coal industry in the United States has been in a state of flux since the arrival of a cheaper alternative for energy production: natural gas. Exports are becoming a much bigger part of the domestic coal landscape, and Peabody Energy has deals in place to get its cheaper coal from the Powder River and Illinois basins to India, China, and the EU. For investors looking to capitalize on a rebound in the U.S. coal market, The Motley Fool has authored a special new premium report detailing exactly why Peabody Energy is perhaps …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

2 Miners Dwarf Several States in Coal Production

By Taylor Muckerman and Joel South, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Coal from the Appalachian region has really fallen out of favor in the United States. So much so that Wyoming mines accounted for nine out of the 10 top producing mines in 2012. This should come as no surprise to coal investors since the Powder River Basin is the most economically sensible coal to produce right now as compared to natural gas. CONSOL Energy , which produces coal in Appalachia, is a perfect example of what producers in that region have been forced to do — it has dedicated the bulk of its 2013 capital expenditures to natural gas production.

The two top mines are operated by Peabody Energy and Arch Coal , and together these mines accounted for 20% of total U.S. production. Why is this so important for these coal miners as they struggle to compete with natural gas? Tune in below. 

The coal industry in the United States has been in a state of flux since the arrival of a cheaper alternative for energy production: natural gas. Exports are becoming a much bigger part of the domestic coal landscape, and Peabody Energy has deals in place to get its cheaper coal from the Powder River and Illinois basins to India, China, and the EU. For investors looking to capitalize on a rebound in the U.S. coal market, The Motley Fool has authored a special new premium report detailing exactly why Peabody Energy is perhaps most worthy of your consideration. Don’t miss out on this invaluable resource — simply click here now to claim your copy today.

var FoolAnalyticsData = FoolAnalyticsData || []; FoolAnalyticsData.push({ eventType: “TickerReportPitch”, contentByline: “Taylor Muckerman and Joel South“, contentId: “cms.28778”, contentTickers: “NYSE:CNX, NYSE:BTU, NYSE:ACI”, …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

2 of Yesterday's Big Disappointments

By Rich Duprey, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

The old investing maxim “sell in May and go away” means we’re quickly approaching the time when the incredible run of the Dow Jones Industrial Average over the past three months will be coming to a close. Yesterday’s five-point loss could be the signal that the market is topping here, and with Europe doing all it can to stop the spread of a financial contagion after its bailout of Cyprus, there seems little reason to believe this bull market will continue much longer.

Yesterday’s big loser was Hewlett-Packard, the first quarter’s big winner, though after a 68% gain over the past three months, a small 2% loss is no big deal. But the landscape for computers hasn’t changed, so now comes the point where the turnaround has to gain traction on its own. I’m not so certain it will, though a broad overview of the markets suggests there are still worse places to be standing right now.

Canary in the coal mine
Coal miner Walter Energy took it on the chin (again) yesterday, falling 8% as the ISM manufacturing index posted its biggest miss to expectations in a year, coming in at 51.3 compared with forecasts of 54.0. The bigger worry, however, is new orders falling all the way down to 51.4 from 57.8, which, coupled with a pullback in China‘s economy, diminishes the prospects for renewed industrial demand and, in turn, greater coal demand. Arch CoalPeabody Energy , and Consol Energy all tumbled 3% or more yesterday.

Analysts see a particularly tough year ahead for Walter because of the weak pricing environment. It has significant cash obligations coming due this year, with Wall Street looking askance at the $150 million or so in interest payments and total cash obligations of $365 million, both of which combine to put it between a financial rock and a hard place. 

It faces outside pressure as well from shareholders agitating for change. Hedge-fund operator SAC Capital Partners recently reported a new 5% stake in the miner, while Audley Capital has publicly expressed doubts about management’s capabilities to turn the company around and wants to oust some directors in favor of its own five-man slate.

As coal miners remain under the gun, there appear to be few catalysts in front of Walter to change its downward trajectory.

Wearing the dunce cap
For-profit educators got schooled yesterday as well, with ITT Educational Services falling almost 9%, Grand Canyon Education dropping 5%, and Corinthian Colleges and Career Education both falling about 3% on the day. The one bright spot was Apollo Group , which rose about 1.5% and is up more than 3% since reporting better-than-expected earnings last week.

Yet even in beating Wall Street forecasts, Apollo showed what the problems are facing the sector: falling revenues, higher expenses, and dwindling student enrollments. When ITT reported fourth-quarter earnings in January, it saw all of those same factors, but it didn’t have the luxury of beating expectations. First-quarter results …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

ADA-ES Schedules 2012 Fourth Quarter and Year-End Financial Results News Release and Conference Call

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

ADA-ES Schedules 2012 Fourth Quarter and Year-End Financial Results News Release and Conference Call

HIGHLANDS RANCH, Colo.–(BUSINESS WIRE)– ADA-ES, Inc. (NAS: ADES) (“ADA” or the “Company”) today announced that it will issue its financial results for the fourth quarter and year-ended December 31, 2012 on Thursday, March 14th, 2013 before the stock market opens. Michael Durham, President & CEO, and Mark McKinnies, Senior VP & CFO, will conduct a conference call focusing on the financial results and business activities that morning at 10:00 am ET:

  • (877) 423-9820 (Domestic)
  • (201) 493-6749 (International)

The conference call will also be webcast live via the “Investor Information” section at www.adaes.com.


About ADA

ADA is a leader in clean coal technology and the associated specialty chemicals, serving the coal-fueled power plant industry. Our proprietary environmental technologies and specialty chemicals enable power plants to enhance existing air pollution control equipment, minimize mercury, CO2 and other emissions, maximize capacity, and improve operating efficiencies, to meet the challenges of existing and pending emission control regulations.

With respect to mercury emissions:

  • Through our consolidated subsidiary, Clean Coal Solutions, LLC (“CCS”), we provide our patented Refined Coal (“RC”) CyClean™ technology to enhance combustion of and reduce emissions of NOx and mercury from coals in cyclone boilers and our patent pending M-45™ and M-45-PC™ technologies for Circulating Fluidized Boilers and Pulverized Coal boilers respectively.
  • We supply Activated Carbon Injection (“ACI”) and Dry Sorbent Injection (“DSI”) systems, mercury measurement instrumentation, and related services.
  • Under an exclusive development and licensing agreement with Arch Coal, we are developing and commercializing an enhanced PRB coal with reduced emissions of mercury and other metals.

In addition, we are developing CO2 emissions technologies under projects funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) and industry participants.

This press release contains and the conference call referenced in this press release will include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance