Tag Archives: Powder River Basin

Amid federal investigation, coal exports at record levels

From the time coal is scooped from the depths of the Spring Creek strip mine in Montana’s wide-open Powder River Basin until it travels more than 6,000 miles across the Pacific Ocean to power plants in South Korea, the price can increase more than fivefold.

Mining companies, however, are only paying government royalties on the price of the coal when it is mined from federal lands, not when it is sold for more overseas, saving them millions of dollars in the process.

As the Interior Department investigates the industry’s export practices and considers a new royalty system, several exporters in the Montana-Wyoming coal region — the nation’s most productive — are planning to increase shipments abroad to energy-hungry Asia.

Whatever the department decides on royalties, a matter currently under internal review, the results have the potential to cut into profits at a time when the industry is looking to foreign markets to offset some of the daunting challenges it faces at home.

Proposed ports on the West Coast have the potential to increase U.S. coal exports by 60 to 100 million tons a year, said Jim Rollyson, an energy analyst with the advisory firm Raymond James.

“The international export market is where long-term growth for the industry might come from,” Rollyson said. “If you’re the government, that’s real money you’re trying to get there.”

Federal officials forecast that 175 coal-burning power plant units will be shuttered in the next five years, equal to 8.5 percent of the total electricity produced by coal, largely because of competition from cheap natural gas and costs of complying with new environmental regulations.

Overseas markets, by contrast, have been booming.

While analysts expect demand to slip temporarily this year, 2012 saw a record 125 million tons of coal exported from the U.S. Some in the industry project that figure could double in just the next five years if new ports and port expansions are built in Washington state, Oregon and the Gulf Coast.

Federal officials declined to say what they’ve uncovered since the royalties investigation was announced in February. But they’ve said the probe will continue under the leadership of recently confirmed Interior Secretary Sally Jewell.

“We take this issue very seriously and remain fully committed to collecting every dollar due,” said Patrick Etchart with Interior’s Office of Natural Resource Revenue.

Among the major coal producers from federal lands in the West, Peabody Energy and Spring Creek owner Cloud Peak Energy have denied any wrongdoing, while Arch Coal, Inc., has declined to comment.

The investigation into the industry follows concerns raised by two prominent U.S. senators — Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and the committee’s ranking minority member, Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska.

They’ve warned taxpayers could lose many millions of dollars annually if royalties are unfairly calculated. “Taxpayers deserve to know if Interior’s oversight and regulations have kept up” with the rise in exports, said Wyden spokesman Keith Chu.

Royalties currently are paid based on the mine price of coal — about $10.55 a ton in the Powder River Basin, kept low by the volume

From: http://feeds.foxnews.com/~r/foxnews/national/~3/XPevvQXZnLg/

Vanguard Natural Resources, LLC to Switch Stock Exchange Listing to The NASDAQ Stock Market

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Vanguard Natural Resources, LLC to Switch Stock Exchange Listing to The NASDAQ Stock Market

HOUSTON–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Vanguard Natural Resources, LLC (NYS: VNR) (“Vanguard”) announced today its intention to voluntarily transfer its stock exchange listing from the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) to The NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”), an exchange of The NASDAQ OMX Group Inc. (NAS: NDAQ) . Vanguard currently expects that its Class A common units will commence trading on the NASDAQ on April 23, 2013 and will continue to be listed under the ticker symbol “VNR.” Vanguard’s common units will continue to trade on the NYSE until the transfer has been completed.

Scott W. Smith, President & Chief Executive Officer, commented, “After careful consideration, we believe the NASDAQ will provide our unitholders with access to an advanced trading platform and will be a more cost effective platform for Vanguard currently and even more so in the future as we continue to grow. In addition, NASDAQ offers quantitative and qualitative governance standards more beneficial to listed companies with significant retail unitholders, particularly those related to quorum requirements.”

“We are proud to welcome Vanguard Natural Resources to NASDAQ’s family of premier energy companies,” said Bruce Aust, Executive Vice President, Global Corporate Client Group, NASDAQ OMX. “Vanguard Natural Resources joins more than 130 companies to transfer their listings to The NASDAQ Stock Market in recent years, and we look forward to supporting VNR and its unitholders in the years to come.”

About Vanguard Natural Resources, LLC

Vanguard Natural Resources, LLC is a publicly traded limited liability company focused on the acquisition, production and development of mature, long-lived oil and natural gas properties in the United States. The Company’s assets consist primarily of producing and non-producing oil and natural gas reserves located in the Arkoma Basin in Arkansas and Oklahoma, Permian Basin in West Texas and New Mexico, the Big Horn Basin in Wyoming and Montana, the Piceance Basin in Colorado, South Texas, the Williston Basin in North Dakota and Montana, the Wind River Basin in Wyoming, the Powder River Basin in Wyoming and Mississippi. More information on Vanguard can be found at www.vnrllc.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

We make statements in this news release that are considered forward-looking statements

From: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/11/vanguard-natural-resources-llc-to-switch-stock-exc/

2 Miners Dwarf Several States in Coal Production

By Taylor Muckerman and Joel South, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Coal from the Appalachian region has really fallen out of favor in the United States. So much so that Wyoming mines accounted for nine out of the 10 top producing mines in 2012. This should come as no surprise to coal investors since the Powder River Basin is the most economically sensible coal to produce right now as compared to natural gas. CONSOL Energy , which produces coal in Appalachia, is a perfect example of what producers in that region have been forced to do — it has dedicated the bulk of its 2013 capital expenditures to natural gas production.

The two top mines are operated by Peabody Energy and Arch Coal , and together these mines accounted for 20% of total U.S. production. Why is this so important for these coal miners as they struggle to compete with natural gas? Tune in below. 

The coal industry in the United States has been in a state of flux since the arrival of a cheaper alternative for energy production: natural gas. Exports are becoming a much bigger part of the domestic coal landscape, and Peabody Energy has deals in place to get its cheaper coal from the Powder River and Illinois basins to India, China, and the EU. For investors looking to capitalize on a rebound in the U.S. coal market, The Motley Fool has authored a special new premium report detailing exactly why Peabody Energy is perhaps most worthy of your consideration. Don’t miss out on this invaluable resource — simply click here now to claim your copy today.

var FoolAnalyticsData = FoolAnalyticsData || []; FoolAnalyticsData.push({ eventType: “TickerReportPitch”, contentByline: “Taylor Muckerman and Joel South“, contentId: “cms.28778”, contentTickers: “NYSE:CNX, NYSE:BTU, NYSE:ACI”, …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Westmoreland Extends $25.0 Million Revolver

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Westmoreland Extends $25.0 Million Revolver

ENGLEWOOD, Colo.–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Westmoreland Coal Company (NasdaqGM:WLB) today announced that Westmoreland Mining, LLC (“WML“), its wholly owned subsidiary, has successfully amended its Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated June 26, 2008 (the “Credit Agreement“). The amendment modifies the termination date of the Credit Agreement and extends the $25.0 million revolver through December 31, 2017. All other provisions of the Credit Agreement remain substantially unchanged.

“We have had a strong long-term partnership with PNC Bank, and are gratified by their continued trust in our management team and our WML operations,” said Kevin Paprzycki, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. “This extension represents an important source of committed liquidity and financial flexibility for Westmoreland Coal.”

About Westmoreland Coal Company

Westmoreland Coal Company is the oldest independent coal company in the United States. The Company’s coal operations include sub-bituminous coal mining in the Powder River Basin in Montana and Wyoming, and lignite mining operations in Montana, North Dakota and Texas. Its power operations include ownership of the two-unit ROVA coal-fired power plant in North Carolina. For more information, visit www.westmoreland.com.

Westmoreland Coal Company
Kevin Paprzycki, 855-922-6463

KEYWORDS:   United States  North America  Colorado

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS:

The article Westmoreland Extends $25.0 Million Revolver originally appeared on Fool.com.

Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Adding It All Up: Why BreitBurn Energy's Reserves Matter

By Matt DiLallo, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Reserves are the lifeblood of an energy production company, but they matter even more if you’re an upstream MLP like BreitBurn Energy Partners . Most traditional exploration and production companies reinvest a majority, if not all, of their cash flow to explore for new sources of production in order to offset the natural decline of current production.

Companies like BreitBurn instead send that cash back to investors. That’s why it needs to be smart in buying assets that have a long reserve life that are also not in rapid decline. Let’s take a quick look at BreitBurn’s reserves and see how they stack up.

The big picture
BreitBurn had an estimated 151 million barrels of oil equivalent in reserves at the end of last year. Those reserves are spread across seven states and are estimated to last about 18 years.

Source: BreitBurn Investor Presentation

The company’s production is split evenly between gas and oil. Not all of its assets are of equal importance to the company so let’s take a closer look at segment.

Northern division
The assets lumped into BreitBurn’s northern division includes the Antrim Shale, New Albany Shale, and its Wyoming assets. The company’s Antrim Shale assets in Michigan make up the greatest portion of reserves at about 35% of the total. These primarily low-decline natural gas assets that are fairly predictable. Investors can expect the company’s more than 3,600 wells to produce for an average of 16 years.

These are solid MLP-type assets, which is why it’s no surprise that fellow upstream MLP LINN Energy also owns assets in Michigan. LINN‘s asset base is a much smaller portion of its overall reserves at less than 6%. The key here is that these are low-decline natural gas assets that are a good fit from an upstream MLP.

In addition to Michigan, BreitBurn has just over 250 wells in Indiana and Kentucky that are dedicated to the New Albany Shale. These just have an average reserve life of seven years and make up a very small portion of the company’s asset base. In Wyoming on the other hand, BreitBurn has a very large asset base, second only to its Michigan assets. These assets add an oily component to its production mix. Just last year the company spent $95 million to acquire a 100% oil asset in the Big Horn Basin. When you add in its crude oil producing Powder River Basin assets to the gassier Green River Basin assets you get a nice mix of production. These days the oilier the production you can get the better; however, given how well-hedged upstream MLPs are, it’s not as critical.

Southern division
BreitBurn’s southern division produces out of three states: California, Florida, and Texas. Of the three, its California assets are its largest. California oil assets are among the best assets for an MLP to own because of the low-decline rate. That is one of the main reasons …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance