Tag Archives: Supreme Court

Ghana says it will release Argentine ship

Ghana‘s government says it will comply with a United Nations court order to release an Argentine naval ship that’s been held since October.

Deputy Information Minister Sam Okudzeto-Ablakwa said the government “has decided to fully comply with the decision of the court.” He spoke to radio station Joy FM.

Ghana‘s Attorney General Benjamin Kunbuor said on a radio broadcast Tuesday that the Supreme Court must reverse a lower court ruling to impound the ship before the Argentine vessel could be released.

The U.N. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea on Saturday ordered Ghana to release the ship.

The ARA Libertad training ship was impounded Oct. 2 at Tema port at the behest of private creditors as collateral for unpaid bonds dating from Argentina‘s economic crisis a decade ago.

Source: Fox World News

Bias toward killer's victims led to police failure

Systemic police prejudice against the poor, drug-addicted sex workers who convicted killer Robert Pickton targeted in Vancouver allowed him to spend years hunting his victims unimpeded by authorities, said a report released Monday by a public inquiry into what police have called Canada‘s worst serial killing case.

Commissioner Wally Oppal‘s 1,448-page final report chronicles years of mistakes that allowed Pickton to lure dozens of women to his farm in Port Coquitlam, British Columbia, with little interference from police and even less concern from the public.

Pickton was convicted in 2007 of six counts of second-degree murder in the deaths of sex workers. He slaughtered the women at his suburban pig farm and fed some of the remains to his pigs. Pickton was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for 25 years.

Pickton picked the women up from Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside, several square blocks of squalid hotels, drug dealers and street-level prostitution, luring his victims with promises of money, alcohol and drugs.

There were reports of missing women in Vancouver dating back to the 1980s, and those disappearances increased dramatically in the mid-1990s.

When relatives and friends attempted to report those women missing, officers and staff with the Vancouver police department told them the women were transient drug addicts who weren’t in any trouble or were simply on vacation, Oppal’s report notes, referring back to testimony from those families at the inquiry.

Oppal wrote in his report, “Forsaken,” that police did not take the disappearance of the women seriously because the victims were poor, aboriginal and addicted to drugs.

“The missing and murdered women were forsaken by society at large and then again by police,” said Oppal.

While Pickton was convicted of six counts of second-degree murder, 20 other charges of first-degree murder were stayed.

Commission lawyer Art Vertlieb said DNA from 32 identified missing women and one unknown woman were found at the farm Pickton owned with his siblings in Vancouver’s Port Coquitlam suburb.

The report said the first major investigative blunders began in 1997, when Pickton attacked a sex worker at his farm. It was later revealed DNA from other missing women were on his clothes that day. Pickton was charged with attempted murder, but prosecutors stayed the case in 1998, after which 19 more women later connected to Pickton’s farm vanished.

Oppal said it was “patently unreasonable” that that investigation was not further pursued.

Pickton had been tagged as a prime suspect in 1999 as police investigated reports of missing sex workers and Pickton bragged to police after his February 2002 arrest that he had killed as many as 49 women and intended to kill more.

Oppal, a former judge, concluded police failed to fully investigate Pickton, 63.

“Recurring patterns of error . . . went unchecked and uncorrected,” Oppal said.

Vertlieb told Oppal in his opening statement to the inquiry that Vancouver police officer Kim Rossmo said a serial killer was at work but his assertions were dismissed by police superiors.

In his report, Oppal said the women’s lives were marked by violence, addiction, racism and mental health issues.

He said the relationship between police and sex workers is marked by distrust. He said poor report taking and follow-up of missing women lead to “critical failures” by police. He said leads about Pickton would have been generated had police acted on reports.

He also concluded police “utterly failed” to warn women of dangers to their safety.

Oppal began the inquiry hearings in October 2011 after the Supreme Court of Canada rejected Pickton’s final conviction appeal in 2010.

The report contains 63 recommendations, among them establishing a regional police force for the Vancouver area and that police must be more accountable to their communities.

Diane Rock was among one of the victims in the 20 charges stayed against Pickton by prosecutors.

Her sister, Lilliane Beaudoin, hopes the report will be taken seriously and that people in Pickton’s poverty-stricken hunting ground will be helped.

“I’ll never have closure,” she said. “It’s hard to feel one’s lost a loved one when there’s no burial. There are no remains of my sister. I can’t comprehend that.”

The case was the largest criminal investigation in Canadian history.

A Vancouver Police Department August 2010 report said 11 women may have been spared had city police or the Royal Canadian Mounted Police acted on information available four years before Pickton’s arrest.

Source: Fox World News

In Honduras, political crisis takes a holiday

In Honduras, the political crisis is taking a holiday.

A standoff between the president and congress and the Supreme Court that brought the country to the brink last week will have to wait until Jan. 3 as offices closed the season.

The Supreme Court and attorney general’s offices were closed Monday, and President Porfirio Lobo was silent after calling on Friday for a national dialogue to find a way out of the crisis.

In little more than a week, Lobo had accused businessmen and the Supreme Court of plotting against him. Then congress, with soldiers surrounding the building, voted last week to oust four justices who voted against Lobo’s police reform. Many called the vote illegal. The attorney general’s office promised to investigate.

But for now, the country that endured a coup in 2009 plans to spend the holidays in heavenly peace.

Source: Fox World News

Four Myths About NHTSA’s Proposal for Mandatory Black Boxes


Twenty-four-hour news networks interrupted their coverage of skydiving cats earlier this week to light a fire under NHTSA’s announcement that it planned to mandate event data recorders, or black boxes, be installed in all new cars. Amidst the frenzy, it almost seems as though many reporting on the announcement didn’t actually read the proposed NHTSA rule or anything about what the event data recorders actually do. We’re here to debunk some of the rumors in circulation.
Myth 1: NHTSA’s Announcement Last Week Said Something We Haven’t Heard Before
Nope. NHTSA has been talking about mandating event data recorders since at least 2006, when it first set rules about how voluntarily installed EDRs had to operate. The only thing NHTSA announced recently is that it plans to put this rule into effect beginning in 2014, which was the date floated officially and unofficially during the past year.
Myth 2: The White House “Signed Off” on NHTSA’s Proposal for Event Data Recorders
A number of major news outlets based their reporting of the black box topic on a story published in the Detroit News, which was titled “NHTSA gets White House OK to mandate vehicle ‘black boxes.’” This makes it sound like Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood brought a bottle of brandy to the Oval Office, kissed Barack Obama’s ring, and said, “Mr. President, even though it’s not the day of your daughter’s wedding, we’d like your blessing for our plan to require automakers to install black boxes in every car. Can we go ahead with this?”
In reality, any time an executive agency proposes a new regulation—whether it’s NHTSA or the Forest Service—they have to clear it with the Office of Management and Budget to make sure the new reg doesn’t conflict with what another agency is doing, isn’t creating some new huge burden for the budget, and that the new rule wouldn’t be totally contrary to the president’s stated goals. The OMB is part of the White House organizational structure, so while it’s technically accurate that the White House cleared the black box plan, this routine rubber stamp is meaningless.
Myth 3: Mandating Black Boxes Will Change the Status Quo
Does your car have an event data recorder? Even you, the automotive illuminati who read Car and Driver, would be forgiven for not knowing. It’s not something listed in a database or published on a window sticker. It turns out that well over 90 percent of new cars sold today in the U.S. already have event data recorders, which automakers have been voluntarily installing for several years. The proposed mandate would extend to the remaining holdover vehicles, which includes some high-end sports cars and a number of Volkswagens and Audis.
What we’re talking about, then, is a rule that would change a sliver of the automotive market. Typically, automakers—either directly or through group lobby associations—push back against any additional government regulation; they don’t want control and they don’t want added costs. But when it comes to EDRs,  the counter-campaign against event data recorders has been virtually nonexistent. Toyota’s continuing nightmare surrounding unintended acceleration showed car manufacturers just how helpful EDRs can be in defending themselves. When a company can analyze black boxes and say, “Sorry, driver, but the computer recorded you mashing the gas pedal with no input on the brake,” that’s persuasive evidence.

Instrumented Test: 2013 Lincoln MKZ AWD V6
Instrumented Test: 2013 Porsche Boxster Manual
Instrumented Test: 2013 Fiat 500 Turbo

Myth 4: Privacy is at Risk Because the Gub’mint Is Gonna Track People
Make no mistake: The government—local police, the CIA, the FBI, DEA, Homeland Security, water department—can and does track individual cars. Much of the time it’s done in a squeaky-clean way, with warrants and court approval for monitoring Fat Tony and the Don Bot. Sometimes, it’s a legal gray area, and we wind up with major court battles trying to sort out the rules for law enforcement. (Privacy advocates, like this writer, were pleased by the recent Supreme Court decision saying that law enforcement officers need a warrant to track vehicles using GPS tags.) Event data recorders are an entirely separate matter. They don’t transmit data. The boxes record certain characteristics about the vehicle, like steering input, acceleration, seatbelt status, and brake usage, in a sort of “streaming” format, retaining only the past few seconds of data for any given moment.
There are serious questions about who owns the data, who can use it, and who can access it. Even with plain-language rules from NHTSA, our judges will end up having to hammer out the details. Bear in mind, though, that a huge cache of information already is stored in in-car GPS systems, and that’s all subject to download by the police or an opponent in a lawsuit. The same is true for smart phones, by the way, which contain way more than just GPS coordinates.

Source: Car & Driver

Boy Scouts must surrender abuse files, California court says

A California appellate court has upheld a Santa Barbara judge’s order saying the Boy Scouts of America must surrender decades of confidential files detailing alleged child sex abuse.

A Scouts spokesman told the Los Angeles Times on Thursday that the organization will appeal the decision to the state Supreme Court.

A lawsuit alleges that a local Scouts official tried to keep a boy’s mother from reporting his 2007 abuse by a volunteer leader to police. The youth group denies the allegations.

In January, a Santa Barbara judge ordered all files since 1991 be turned over to the boy’s lawyers, but not the public.

The order involves different files than those made public in October by order of the Oregon Supreme Court. Those files ranged from 1959 to 1985.

Former Florida teacher, Debra LaFave, convicted of having sex with student denied probation request

A former Tampa teacher convicted of having sex with a student was denied by the Florida Supreme court to be taken off probation, MyFoxTampaBay.com reported.

An appellate court in August reversed a trial judge’s decision to end Debra LaFave’s 10-year non-prison sentence four years early. LaFave appealed to the Supreme Court in October and last week asked the justices to let her remain off probation until they rule.

A three-judge panel of the 2nd District Court of Appeal also asked the high court to review its decision as a question of great public importance. The panel acknowledged the state had no right under Florida law to appeal the trial judge’s decision but cited common law to reverse it.
LaFave pleaded guilty in 2005 to having sex with a 14-year old boy.

The Associated Press contributed to this report

Click for more from MyFoxTampaBay.com
Source: Fox US News

Israel's foreign minister charged with breach of trust

Israel‘s powerful foreign minister was charged Thursday with breach of trust, but escaped more serious charges in a fraud and money-laundering case that could jeopardize his political career and upend the Israeli political system just a month before parliamentary elections.

The decision by Israel‘s attorney general capped an investigation into Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman that stretched back more than a decade. Lieberman, a close ally of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is expected to come under heavy pressure to resign.

Netanyahu had no immediate comment, while Lieberman planned an announcement Thursday evening. In a brief statement, Lieberman’s attorneys said they respected the decision and would study it. Lieberman in the past has denied all accusations and alleged they were politically motivated.

The Soviet-born Lieberman is head of Yisrael Beitenu, an ultranationalist party that is especially popular with immigrants from the former Soviet Union. With a tough-talking message that has questioned the loyalty of Israel‘s Arab minority, criticized the Palestinians and confronted Israel‘s foreign critics, he has at times alienated Israel‘s allies while becoming an influential voice in Israeli politics.

Yisrael Beitenu and Netanyahu’s Likud Party recently joined forces and are running together on a joint list in the Jan. 22 parliamentary elections. Opinion polls have predicted the list would be by far the largest bloc in parliament and lead a new coalition government.

While Lieberman was cleared in the most serious allegations against him, Thursday’s decision nonetheless could force him to step down and throw the joint list into disarray.

The decision was a reversal for Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein , who last year had notified Lieberman that he intended to indict him on charges that included fraud and money laundering.

Prosecutors have long suspected that Lieberman illicitly received millions of dollars from businessmen and laundered the cash through straw companies in eastern Europe while he was a lawmaker and Cabinet minister. In his decision Thursday, Weinstein said the case was not strong enough.

“I am convinced that there is no reasonable chance of a conviction in the offenses Lieberman is suspected of and that case should be closed,” Weinstein said in his decision.

Instead, Lieberman was charged with the lesser offense of receiving official material from the investigation against him from the former Israeli ambassador to Belarus.

The envoy had received the documents from the foreign ministry, which sought additional information on Lieberman from Belarus authorities. The ambassador, Zeev Ben-Aryeh, reached a plea bargain in the case earlier this year.

Israeli law is unclear about whether Lieberman must resign. There is a legal precedent for politicians to step down when they face charges that compromise public trust in them. But Lieberman could decide the charges don’t warrant that he resign.

Law professor Emanuel Gross said that because Weinstein did not make a recommendation as to whether Lieberman should step down, the foreign minister’s political future remained unclear. He said Weinstein might be asked for a ruling, and if he refuses, the matter could head to the Supreme Court.

Israel Radio’s chief political commentator, Hanan Kristal, said Lieberman would likely resign before the attorney general is forced to take action, perhaps by ordering Netanyahu to fire his foreign minister. “I assume (Weinstein) doesn’t want to get to that,” he said.

Court rulings in other, more serious criminal cases against Cabinet officials forced them to resign. Facing the prospect of an indictment, former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert announced his decision to step down in 2008 before formal corruption charges were filed against him. Olmert this year was cleared of most charges, but convicted of breach of trust.

The blunt-talking Lieberman, a native of Moldova, has amassed power with support from immigrants from the Soviet Union and other Israelis drawn to his broadsides against Israeli Arabs and dovish groups, as well as the Palestinians and Western Europe.
Source: Fox World News

Aides: Chavez in tough fight, may miss swearing-in

Somber confidants of President Hugo Chavez say he is going through a difficult recovery after cancer surgery in Cuba, and one close ally is warning Venezuelans that their leader may not make it back for his swearing-in next month. Information Minister Ernesto Villegas said Wednesday night that Chavez was in “stable condition” and was with close relatives in Havana. Reading a statement, he said the government invites people to “accompany President Chavez in this new test with their prayers.” Villegas expressed hope about the president returning home for his Jan. 10 swearing-in for a new six-year term, but said in a written message on a government website that if Chavez doesn’t make it, “our people should be prepared to understand it.” Villegas said it would be irresponsible to hide news about the “delicateness of the current moment and the days to come.” He asked Venezuelans to see Chavez’s condition as “when we have a sick father, in a delicate situation after four surgeries in a year and a half.” Moving to prepare the public for the possibility of more bad news, Vice President Nicolas Maduro looked grim when he acknowledged that Chavez faced a “complex and hard” process after his latest surgery. At the same time, officials sought to show a united front amid the growing worries about Chavez’s health and Venezuela‘s future. Key leaders of Chavez’s party and military officers appeared together on television as Maduro gave updates on Chavez’s condition. “We’re more united than ever,” said Maduro, who was flanked by National Assembly President Diosdado Cabello and Oil Minister Rafael Ramirez, both key members of Chavez’s inner circle. “We’re united in loyalty to Chavez.” Analysts say Maduro could eventually face challenges in trying to hold together the president’s diverse “Chavismo” movement, which includes groups from radical leftists to moderates, as well as military factions. Tapped by the 58-year-old president over the weekend as his chosen political heir, Maduro is considered to be a member of radical left wing of Chavez’s movement that is closely aligned with Cuba‘s communist government. Cabello, a former military officer who also wields power within Chavez’s movement, shared the spotlight with Maduro by speaking at a Mass for Chavez’s health at a military base. Just returned from being with Chavez for the operation, Cabello called the president “invincible” but said “that man who is in Havana … is fighting a battle for his life.” After Chavez’s six-hour operation Tuesday, Venezuelan television broadcast religious services where people prayed for Chavez, interspersed with campaign rallies for upcoming gubernatorial elections. On the streets of Caracas, people on both sides of the country’s deep political divide voiced concerns about Chavez’s condition and what might happen if he died. At campaign rallies ahead of Sunday’s gubernatorial elections, Chavez’s candidates urged Venezuelans to vote for pro-government candidates while they also called for the president to get well. “Onward, Commander!” gubernatorial candidate Elias Jaua shouted to a crowd of supporters at a rally Wednesday. Many observers said it was likely Chavez’s candidates could get a boost from their supporters’ outpouring of sympathy for Chavez. Opposition leader Henrique Capriles, who lost to Chavez in the October presidential election and is running against Jaua, complained Wednesday that Chavez’s allies are taking advantage of the president’s health problems to try to rally support. He took issue with Jaua’s statement to supporters that “we have to vote so that the president recovers.” Maduro looked sad as he spoke on television, his voice hoarse and cracked at times after meeting in the pre-dawn hours with Cabello and Ramirez. The pair returned to Venezuela about 3 a.m. after accompanying Chavez to Cuba for his surgery. “It was a complex, difficult, delicate operation,” Maduro said. “The post-operative process is also going to be a complex and hard process.” Without giving details, Maduro reiterated Chavez’s recent remarks that the surgery presented risks and that people should be prepared for any “difficult scenarios.” The constitution says presidents should be sworn in before the National Assembly, and if that’s not possible then before the Supreme Court. Former Supreme Court magistrate Roman Duque Corredor said a president cannot delegate the swearing-in to anyone else and cannot take the oath of office outside Venezuela. A president could still be sworn in even if temporarily incapacitated, but would need to be conscious and in Venezuela, Duque told The Associated Press. If a president-elect is declared incapacitated by lawmakers and is unable to be sworn in, the National Assembly president would temporarily take charge of the government and a new presidential vote must be held within 30 days, Duque said. Chavez said Saturday that if an election had to be held, Maduro should be elected president. The dramatic events of this week, with Chavez suddenly taking a turn for the worse, had some Venezuelans wondering whether they were being told the truth because just a few months ago the president was running for his fourth presidential term and had said he was free of cancer. Lawyer Maria Alicia Altuve, who was out in bustling crowds in a shopping district of downtown Caracas, said it seemed odd how Maduro wept at a political rally while talking about Chavez. “He cries on television to set up a drama, so that people go vote for poor Chavez,” Altuve said. “So we don’t know if this illness is for that, or if it’s that this man is truly sick.” Some Chavez supporters said they found it hard to think about losing the president and worried about the future. His admirers held prayer vigils in Caracas and other cities this week, holding pictures and singing hymns. Chavez has undergone four cancer-related surgeries since June 2011. He has also undergone months of chemotherapy and radiation treatments. Throughout his treatments, Chavez has kept secret some details of his illness, including the exact location and type of the tumors. Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa wished his close ally the best, while also acknowledging the possibility that cancer might end his presidency. “Chavez is very important for Latin America, but if he can’t continue at the head of Venezuela, the processes of change have to continue,” Correa said at a news conference in Quito. ___ Associated Press writer Christopher Toothaker contributed to this report.
Source: Fox World News

Honduras congress OKs referendum on police cleanup

The Honduran congress approved a bill Tuesday to submit President Porfirio Lobo‘s police cleanup program to a popular vote, after the measure was blocked by the courts. Lobo has been locked in a standoff with Supreme Court justices, who he accuses of catering to powerful business interests. He says the same people who ousted then President Manuel Zelaya in a 2009 coup are now plotting against him. The tension was heightened Tuesday when about 50 soldiers and 25 police officers showed up outside the congressional building. Army Maj. Melvin Flores said his troops had been sent there by his commanders to guard the building. But congressional vice president Marvin Ponce said he hadn’t asked for the troops. Ponce said congress might consider firing some Supreme Court magistrates, which could further raise tensions. “We are in a high-level political crisis,” Ponce said. “I wouldn’t rule out the firing of some magistrates, or of the whole court.” Late Tuesday night, the president of congress was meeting with the head of the armed forces to discuss the situation, said lawmaker Waldina Paz. “We were notified that the national congress was being militarized and this worries us a lot,” Paz said. “We have requested that the human rights commission ask military leaders to withdraw the soldiers from congress.” Perla Simmons of the Liberal Party said she didn’t know what was happening. “We are suspicious of events and don’t know what decisions are going to be taken over the course of the night.” Honduras‘ federal judges have long been closely tied with the business elite. In October, the Supreme Court shot down Lobo’s plan to build private cities as a means of attracting investment and economic development, and last week it declared unconstitutional his plan to clean up the notoriously corrupt national police force. Honduras has lived through this kind of dispute before. Zelaya was deposed when he ignored a Supreme Court order to cancel a referendum on his plan to revise the constitution, promising the poor they would get a voice in shaping the future of the country. Drug trafficking and violence have spiked since Zelaya’s ouster in Honduras, where two-thirds of the 8.2 million people live in poverty. With a homicide rate of 91 per 100,000 residents, it is often called the most violent country in the world. The 2009 coup split created a headache for the United States, which cut off aid to Honduras as punishment, but then was criticized for recognizing Lobo’s government after he was elected in a regularly scheduled vote later that year. Lobo took office in January 2010 and is limited to a single term, which ends next year.
Source: Fox World News

Convicted music pirate asks Supreme Court to review case

A woman ordered to pay $222,000 for pirating 24 copyrighted songs has taken her fight against the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) to the Supreme Court.

In a petition filed Monday, lawyers for Minnesota native Jammie Thomas-Rasset urged the nation’s highest court to review both the fairness and the constitutionality of the fine.

The petition contends that the damages awarded against Thomas-Rasset violated her due process rights and was not tied to any actual injury suffered by the recording companies as the result of her piracy. Instead, by securing such a large verdict against her, the RIAA was hoping to send a message to other copyright infringers.

“Thomas-Rasset cannot be punished for the harm inflicted on the recording industry by file sharing in general,” the petition notes. “While that would no doubt help accomplish the industry’s and Congress’s goal of deterring copyright infringement, singling out and punishing an individual in a civil case to a degree entirely out of proportion with her individual offense is not a constitutional means of achieving that goal.”
To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here
Source: PCWorld

Pakistan’s largest city rocked by wave of violence

Bodies are piling up in Pakistan‘s largest city as it suffers one of its most violent years in history, and concern is growing that the chaos is giving greater cover for the Taliban to operate and undermining the country’s economic epicenter. Karachi, a sprawling port city on the Arabian Sea, has long been beset by religious, sectarian and ethnic strife. Here armed wings of political parties battle for control of the city, Sunnis and Shiites die in tit-for-tat sectarian killings, and Taliban gunmen attack banks and kill police officers. With an election due next year, the violence could easily worsen. According to the Citizens’ Police Liaison Committee, a civic organization that works with police to fight crime, the violence has claimed 1,938 lives as of late November, the deadliest year since 1994, when the CPLC began collecting figures. Police tallies put the dead at 1,897 through mid-October. The Taliban seem to be taking advantage of the chaos to expand their presence in the city, a safe distance from areas of Pakistani army operations and U.S. drone strikes. During recent Supreme Court hearings, judges ordered authorities to investigate reports that as many as 8,000 Taliban members were in the city. Security officials say the Taliban raise money in Karachi through bank and ATM robberies, kidnappings and extortion, and are recruiting as well. The head of the city’s Central Investigation Department, Chaudhry Aslam, who is tasked with tracking down militants, said the Taliban have killed at least 24 of his officers this year. Regular citizens are often caught in the middle. Samina Waseem says her son Aatir, 21, went out on May 22 to get his phone fixed. Three days later she found his body in the morgue with a gunshot wound through his head. She’s convinced he was killed because he belonged to the Mohajir community, descended from people who moved from India to newly created Pakistan when the subcontinent was partitioned in 1947. Part of Karachi’s problem is that since 1947 its population has mushroomed from 435,000 to 18 million. The metropolis ranges from the high-end neighborhoods of Clifton where people live behind bougainvillea-covered walls and eat arugula and fig salads at posh restaurants, to concrete block houses on the dusty outskirts. There migrants move in from the rugged northwest where the U.S. is waging its war with the Taliban, and from the flood-prone plains of Sindh. That population growth is marked by spurts of violence. Currently the overarching struggle appears to be between two powerful forces. One is the Muttahida Quami Movement, the city’s dominant force, which represents Urdu-speaking Mohajirs. The other is the Awami National Party. It represents Pashtuns whose numbers are increasing as their ethnic kin flee the northwest. The MQM prides itself on being the protector of middle-class, liberal, secular values in a country where extremism and religious conservatism hold sway. It says the Taliban began moving into Karachi in force, driven south by a military offensive in 2009, and is wreaking havoc while hiding among the Pashtun. “We are trying our level best to keep Karachi alive,” said Engr Nasir Jamal, of the MQM. The ANP and the Pashtuns believe the MQM is nervous that Pashtun population growth will undermine their hold on Karachi, and that it is targeting Pashtuns to intimidate them. The Pashtuns acknowledge that the Taliban are a big problem, including for them, because the terror group has also been killing its members. But they say the MQM exaggerates the problem. The battle lines are visible across the city. MQM flags and posters blanket the Urdu-speaking neighborhoods, and red flags and graffiti mark ANP territory in the poorer, blue-collar neighborhoods. Theirs is hardly the only conflict. The Pakistan Peoples Party, which heads the national government, says 450 of its activists have been killed over the last 4 ½ years. Nationalists from Baluchistan province find refuge in the city, Sunni extremists target Shiites they consider infidels and the Shiites fight back. Add waves of people displaced by floods over the last three years, and the lack of land and resources becomes a toxic brew. “This is a war for controlling Karachi,” said Taj Haider, a leading member of the PPP in Sindh. During pitched battles between armed wings of political parties last year, whole neighborhoods were cut off, children kept away from school and residents shot and killed while shopping for food. This year the violence has been more spread out. The effect on Karachi’s business community is being felt, said Mohammed Atiq Mir, chairman of the All Karachi Trade Association. He estimated that 20,000-25,000 businesses have left, and that the economic loss equals about $10 million dollars a day. Businessmen he talks with have begun hiring private security guards and are getting licenses to carry weapons. The city’s police are often outnumbered and outgunned. There is one police officer for every 600 people, compared with 1 to 150 on average in neighboring India, said Sharfuddin Memon, an adviser to the Sindh provincial government. There is no witness protection program, so people are reluctant to testify. De-weaponization plans have gone nowhere. Meanwhile the deaths multiply, and the death of Samina Waseem‘s son remains one among hundreds that go unexplained and unpunished. “I just want that whoever did it to just tell us, why he did it,” she pleaded. “Just tell a mother why he killed my son.” __ Follow Rebecca Santana on Twitter (at)ruskygal. __ Associated Press writer Adil Jawad in Karachi and Zarar Khan in Islamabad contributed to this report. __ On the Internet:  http://www.usip.org/publications/conflict-dynamics-in-karachi
Source: Fox World News

US military has detained 200 teens in Afghan war, report says

The U.S. military has detained more than 200 Afghan teenagers who were captured in the war for about a year at a time at a military prison next to Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan, the United States has told the United Nations.

The U.S. State Department characterized the detainees held since 2008 as “enemy combatants” in a report sent every four years to the United Nations in Geneva updating U.S. compliance with the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child.

The U.S. military had held them “to prevent a combatant from returning to the battlefield,” the report said.

A few are still confined at the Detention Facility in Parwan, which will be turned over to the Afghan government, it said. “Many of them have been released or transferred to the Afghan government,” said the report, distributed this week.

Most of the juvenile Afghan detainees were about 16 years old, but their age was not usually determined until after capture, the U.S. report said.

If the average age is 16, “This means it is highly likely that some children were as young as 14 or 13 years old when they were detained by U.S. forces,” Jamil Dakwar, director of the American Civil Liberties Union‘s human rights program, said Friday.

“I’ve represented children as young as 11 or 12 who have been at Bagram,” said Tina M. Foster, executive director of the International Justice Network, which represents adult and juvenile Bagram detainees.

“I question the number of 200, because there are thousands of detainees at Parwan,” Foster said Friday. “There are other children whose parents have said these children are under 18 at the time of their capture, and the U.S. doesn’t allow the detainees or their families to contest their age.”

Dakwar also criticized the length of detention, a year on average, according to the U.S. report.

“This is an extraordinarily unacceptably long period of time that exposes children in detention to greater risk of physical and mental abuse, especially if they are denied access to the protections guaranteed to them under international law,” Dakwar said.

The U.S. State Department was called for comment on the criticism, and a representative said they were seeking an officer to reply.

The previous American report four years ago provided a snapshot of the focus of the U.S. military’s effort in the endgame of the Bush presidency after years of warfare and anti-terrorism campaigns. In 2008, the U.S. said it held about 500 juveniles in Iraqi detention centers and then had only about 10 at the Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan. A total of some 2,500 youths had been detained, almost all in Iraq, from 2002 through 2008 under the Bush administration.

Barack Obama campaigned for the presidency in 2008 in part on winding down active U.S. involvement in the Iraq War, and shifting the military focus to Afghanistan. The latest figures on under-18 detainees reflect the redeployment of U.S. efforts to Afghanistan.

Because the teen detainees were not charged with any crime, “a detainee would generally not be provided legal assistance.” They were allowed to attend open hearings and defend themselves, and a personal advocate was assigned to each detainee, the report said.

“These are basically sham proceedings,” Foster said. “The personal representatives don’t do anything different for the child detainees than they do for the adults, which is nothing.”

The report added that “the purpose of detention is not punitive but preventative: to prevent a combatant from returning to the battlefield.”

It cited a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case, Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld, as establishing that “the law of armed conflict permits the United States to detain belligerents until the end of hostilities without charging such individuals with crimes, because they are not being held as criminals facing future criminal trial.”

The U.S. military is fighting irregular forces — al-Qaida, the Taliban, and an array of similar shadowy insurgent or terrorist groups. So it is not clear when “hostilities” would ever formally end, since there is no declaration of war and no enemy government to defeat. Only the United States can decide when it deems a conflict to be over, in those circumstances.

Foster said that the teens seized are not in uniform or even typically taken in combat.

“We’re not talking about battlefield captures, we’re talking about people who are living at home, and four or five brothers might be taken together. It might take them a year or more to figure out that one of them was younger than 18, to determine the identities of these kids,” she said.

In January, the State Department will send a delegation to Geneva to present the report to the U.N.’s Committee on the Rights of the Child, and to answer any further questions the U.N. committee members may have.
Source: Fox World News

Former Nazi guard appeals to immigration board in Virginia

A former Nazi concentration camp guard who has lived quietly in western Pennsylvania for more than 50 years took his fight against deportation to the nation’s highest immigration court Thursday, arguing that he shouldn’t be punished because he served in Hitler’s army against his will.

The Board of Immigration Appeals in Falls Church heard the appeal from 88-year-old Anton Geiser of Sharon, Pa., who acknowledges serving in the Nazi SS as a guard in the Sachsenhausen and Buchenwald concentration camps. A federal judge ordered him deported in 2010.

But his lawyer argued that the court should have considered that Geiser was forced to join the SS against his will as a 17-year-old.

Government lawyers argued to uphold the deportation. They said federal law places former Nazis in a harsher immigration category, and no exceptions should be made because of compulsory service.

Adrian Roe, Geiser’s lawyer, acknowledged that Congress did indeed place Nazis in a separate, harsher category when it comes to determining their rights to immigrate to and live in the U.S. But he said that not everyone conscripted into the Hitler war machine is truly a Nazi.

“The label Nazi itself sort of goes to belief,” Roe said. “If they were a true believer, we don’t want them here. If they were a forced participant, are they really a Nazi?”

Geiser, who was recently hospitalized, did not attend Thursday’s hearing. He came to the U.S. in 1956 and was naturalized in 1962. He lived in Sharon, about 75 miles north of Pittsburgh, where he worked in a steel mill for decades and raised five children.

Justice Department lawyer Susan Siegal questioned whether Geiser’s service as a camp guard was truly involuntary. She said he could have requested a transfer back to the Russian front, where he was initially serving, or that he could have simply walked away from service or defied immoral orders. She said the Nuremberg trials after World War II and military code established the precedent that following immoral orders is not an adequate defense.

“I’m sorry — Mr. Geiser did engage in crimes against humanity,” Siegal said.

Roe took exception to the portrayal of Geiser as a war criminal. Geiser says he was forced to join the SS in 1942, and that he never killed anyone, though tens of thousands are believed to have died at Buchenwald and Sachsenhausen.

Geiser does not dispute that the Nazi camps were horrific, and he previously told prosecutors he was ashamed of his service. “I was not proud where I served and I didn’t like it then and I didn’t like it now,” he said.

Most of the hearing, though, dealt not with Geiser’s actions during the war but on narrow questions of legal precedent. Roe argued that a 2009 Supreme Court decision requires immigration judges to consider whether an alleged perpetrator of persecution was doing so voluntarily. More broadly, he said U.S. law in nearly all aspects takes into account whether a person was forced to act against his will, and he said the same principles should be extended to Geiser’s case.

The three members of the Board that heard the case — two appointed by Republicans, one by a Democrat — are expected to issue their ruling in a few months. While it is the highest immigration court, it is an administrative body and its rulings are subject to review by federal judges and the Supreme Court. It is expected that the board’s ruling will be appealed by the losing side.
Source: Fox US News

Former Florida teacher convicted of having sex with student wants off probation

A former Tampa teacher convicted of having sex with a student wants the Florida Supreme Court to take her off probation.

An appellate court in August reversed a trial judge’s decision to end Debra LaFave’s 10-year non-prison sentence four years early. LaFave appealed to the Supreme Court in October and Thursday she asked the justices to let her remain off probation until they rule.

A three-judge panel of the 2nd District Court of Appeal also asked the high court to review its decision as a question of great public importance. The panel acknowledged the state had no right under Florida law to appeal the trial judge’s decision but cited common law to reverse it.

LaFave pleaded guilty in 2005 to having sex with a 14-year old boy.
Source: Fox US News

Brazilian Indians protest invasion of their lands

Brazilian Indians are demanding the swift demarcation of their tribal lands, which they say are being invaded by loggers and ranchers. Leaders from some 70 Indian tribes, mostly from the western state of Mato Grosso do Sul, delivered a document with their demands to the presidential office, Congress and the Supreme Court on Tuesday. The document was signed by 20,000 people including American linguist Noam Chomsky and Uruguayan author Eduardo Galeano During a ceremony in Congress, Guarani-Kaiowa leader Ladio Veron said many of his tribe fled their lands in Mato Grosso do Sul after an invasion by ranchers. The ranches, in his words, “are destroying our rivers, forests and are poisoning our land.”
Source: Fox World News