Tag Archives: Natural Gas

Cheap Gas, Low-Cost Solar Accelerate Disintermediation Of Electric Utilities

By William Pentland, Contributor

The following is an excerpt from a piece I wrote for the July issue of RMEL’s Electric Energy magazine: If you want to take the temperature of an industry as large as the utility industry, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Committee’s (SEC) online database of shareholder reports is a great place to start. Under federal securities laws, publicly traded companies, including the vast majority of investor-owned utilities, are required to file quarterly and annual shareholder reports with the SEC. The utility industry’s ambivalence about distributed generation (DG) is a case in point. “Distributed generation” is one of many terms commonly used to describe generation facilities located close to the load, including solar photovoltaics, microturbines and so forth. Unlike the typical traditional utility-scale power plants, DG is connected directly to the distribution network—or connected through the customer’s meter. Historically, the term DG—or any of the half-dozen or so similar terms used to describe generation facilities located close to the load—seldom surfaced in SEC filings, other than those filed by companies pursuing niche market applications like backup power for remotely sited cell towers. Indeed, until recently, nearly all investor-owned utilities remained silent on the subject of DG’s potential impact on electric utilities. That silence began to give way to conflicting perspectives on DG’s potential impact on the industry over the past two or three years. In some filings, DG is described as a potential source of future competition that could adversely affect utilities. In other filings, DG is described as an emerging growth opportunity for utilities. While DG will likely create both risks and opportunities, the former possibility is attracting more attention than the latter. And this tendency exists beyond the rarified world of SEC filings. By allowing customers to displace power from the grid with electricity produced on-site, utilities are expressing concerns about declining demand and lost investment opportunity in supply and energy services: The middleman may get cut out. The full story, “Disintermediation: The Good, Bad and Ugly of Natural Gas,” is available here. …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

Natural Gas: Pipeline To Prosperity…Bridge Fuel To Nowhere

By Larry Bell, Contributor

During the June 25 Georgetown “Climate Action Plan” speech announcing his administration’s full-throttle regulatory assault on coal, President Obama acknowledged that America can look to  natural gas  as a cleaner “transition” fuel  leading to a non-carbon energy future. He said: “Now even as we’re producing more domestic oil, we’re also burning more clean-burning natural gas than any country on Earth. And again, sometimes there are disputes about natural gas, but we should strengthen our position as the top natural gas producer because in the medium-term at least, it can provide not only safe cheap power, but it can only help reduce our carbon emissions.” …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

Countries Are Clamoring for U.S. Natural Gas

By Dan Dzombak, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Around the world, countries pay two to five times more for natural gas than we do in the U.S., and they are clamoring for the U.S. to export it. It would be a win-win situation: U.S. producers would get higher prices than they would domestically, then they could turn around and use that money to drill for more natural gas and oil, boosting the U.S. economy.

Data in dollars per MMBtu. Source: FERC, Waterborne Energy

On Monday, Indian Ambassador to the U.S. Nirupama Rao wrote an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal making the case for the U.S. to export natural gas.

In the video below, Motley Fool contributor Dan Dzombak explains his reasoning on how exporting natural gas would be a boon to the U.S.

Only time will tell what will happen with exports in the U.S. natural gas market. Despite that they are integral to the gas and oil industry, it’s easy to forget the necessity of midstream operators that seamlessly transport oil and gas throughout the United States. Kinder Morgan is one of these operators, and one that investors should commit to memory due to its sheer size – it’s the third-largest energy company in the U.S. – not to mention its enormous potential for profits. In The Motley Fool‘s premium research report on Kinder Morgan, we break down the company’s growing opportunity – as well as the risks to watch out for – in order to uncover whether it’s a buy or a sell. To determine whether this dividend giant is right for your portfolio, simply click here now to claim your copy of this invaluable investor’s resource.

var FoolAnalyticsData = FoolAnalyticsData || []; FoolAnalyticsData.push({ eventType: “TickerReportPitch”, contentByline: “Dan Dzombak“, contentId: “cms.31264”, contentTickers: “NYSE:XOM, NYSE:CHK, NYSE:SD, NYSEMKT:LNG, NYSEMKT:CQP”,

From: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/12/countries-are-clamoring-for-us-natural-gas/

Why Penn West Petroleum Will Outperform

By Brian D. Pacampara, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Based on the aggregated intelligence of 180,000-plus investors participating in Motley Fool CAPS, the Fool’s free investing community, petroleum and natural gas company Penn West Petroleum has earned a respected four-star ranking.

With that in mind, let’s take a closer look at Penn West and see what CAPS investors are saying about the stock right now.

Penn West facts

Headquarters (founded)

Calgary, Canada (1979)

Market Cap

$5.0 billion

Industry

Oil and gas exploration and production

Trailing-12-Month Revenue

$2.7 billion

Management

CEO Murray Nuns

CFO Todd Takeyasu

Return on Equity (average, past 3 years)

7.5%

Dividend Yield

9.8%

Competitors

EnCana

Paramount Resources

Suncor Energy

Sources: S&P Capital IQ and Motley Fool CAPS.

On CAPS, 97% of the 1,394 members who have rated Penn West believe the stock will outperform the S&P 500 going forward.

Just yesterday, one of those Fools, Investment16, tapped Penn West as a particularly timely opportunity: “In the next financial release, we will very well see the balance sheet much healthier than it has been in the past few years. Positive news on Natural Gas, and the commitment from the Canadian Government to bring crude to the market will give much improved future cash flows.”

{sfr%}

Want to see how well (or not so well) the stocks in this series are performing? Follow the TrackPoisedTo CAPS account.

The article Why Penn West Petroleum Will Outperform originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Brian Pacampara has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Strong Quarter for Natural Gas

By Joel South and Taylor Muckerman, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Late-season cold weather has helped to reduce the levels of natural gas in storage, and this combined with receding production has brought natural gas prices up by 16% in the past month, which is a huge win for natural gas producers and their investors. In this video, Motley Fool energy analysts Joel South and Taylor Muckerman give investors the names of a few low-cost natural gas producers that are poised to lock in some of the best returns in the industry from these climbing natural gas prices.

There are many different ways to play the energy sector, and The Motley Fool‘s analysts have uncovered an under-the-radar company that’s dominating its industry. This company is a leading provider of equipment and components used in drilling and production operations and poised to profit in a big way from it. To get the name and detailed analysis of this company that will prosper for years to come, check out the special free report: “The Only Energy Stock You’ll Ever Need.” Don’t miss out on this limited-time offer and your opportunity to discover this under-the-radar company before the market does. Click here to access your report — it’s totally free.

The article Strong Quarter for Natural Gas originally appeared on Fool.com.


Joel South and Taylor Muckerman have no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Range Resources. It recommends and owns shares of Ultra Petroleum and has the following options: long Jan. 2014 $30 calls, long Jan. 2014 $40 calls, and long Jan. 2014 $50 calls. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

My Prediction Was Wrong: Why We Didn't Get To $8 Natural Gas

By Richard Finger, Contributor

It was in July past that there was a prognostication issued (We’re Headed To $8 Natural Gas) that natural gas prices would have at least one run-up to $8 during the winter season. Retrospectively, in light of the inescapable fact that $4 gas has only just been touched and the passing into spring, or the shoulder season, officially commences after next Thursday’s final winter storage number is released, it is pretty clear that the dissections contemplated in that analysis were significantly flawed. The madman with the broken compass is me. So what went wrong? I got dozens of comments, some agreeing, but many more questioning the sanity of my thought process. There are thousands of drilled and completed wells…….wells it hibernation, they said, just waiting to be put “on line” with any spike in gas prices. Shale gas is an infinite resource, and supplies will hold down prices for years to come was another constant refrain. While there is some merit to these criticisms, the actual explanations are more variegated. …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

Chevron Introduces Products and Tools to Help Customers Improve Fuel Economy at 2013 Mid-America Tru

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Chevron Introduces Products and Tools to Help Customers Improve Fuel Economy at 2013 Mid-America Trucking Show

SAN RAMON, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Chevron Products Company, a Chevron U.S.A. Inc. division, maker of the Delo® brand of technologically advanced engine oils, lubricants and coolants, today announced it is introducing products and tools to help customers improve their fuel economy at the 2013 Mid-American Trucking Show (MATS) in Louisville, KY (March 21 – 23). Drivers and fleet executives interested in learning more about fuel economy are encouraged to stop by the Delo booth (South Hall # 32495).

“Reducing operating expenses is top-of-mind for all our customers,” said Jim Gambill, Commercial and Industrial Brands Manager, Lubricants Marketing Americas, Chevron Products Company. “Although there are many ways to achieve this goal, improving fuel economy is one area the whole transportation industry is focused on. At MATS, we’ll demonstrate our commitment to helping customers achieve their fuel economy goals.”

Products, Customers, Tools and Education

During MATS, Chevron will introduce a new fuel economy-focused, Delo-branded, heavy-duty motor oil, designed to deliver clear bottom-line improvements in a range of diesel engines.

Chevron will also highlight an online fuel economy calculator that helps fleet operators and drivers determine the potential savings that can be achieved by using Chevron’s lower viscosity Delo-branded, heavy-duty motor oils.

For those interested in converting their truck or fleet to a lower viscosity oil, Chevron will publish a “Key Considerations” guide on the Expert Knowledge section of ChevronDelo.com. The company will also host a number of educational sessions in its MATS booth (South Hall # 32495) discussing fuel economy topics.

For the new fuel economy calculator and information on how to convert from SAE 15W-40 heavy-duty engine oils to lower viscosity options, please go to www.ChevronDelo.com.

Natural Gas and Fuel Economy

As part of the MATS Fleet Form event (March 20), Chevron will participate in a panel on Natural Gas Engine oils, where it will discuss the fuel economy benefits of natural gas and the engine oil requirements of natural gas fueled engines.

Beyond the company’s fuel economy efforts, Chevron will also have Edgar Hansen, Deck Boss and Chief Engineer of the fishing vessel Northwestern in its booth Thursday through Saturday. Edgar, whose boat uses Delo lubricants and is …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Enduro Royalty Trust Announces Monthly Cash Distribution

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Enduro Royalty Trust Announces Monthly Cash Distribution

AUSTIN, Texas–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Enduro Royalty Trust (NYS: NDRO) (the “Trust”) announced today a cash distribution to the holders of its units of beneficial interest of $0.056553 per unit, payable on April 12, 2013, to unitholders of record on March 28, 2013. The distribution primarily represents oil production during the month of December 2012 and natural gas production during November 2012.

The following table displays underlying oil and natural gas sales volumes and average prices attributable to the current month and prior month distributions.

<td class="bwpadl0 bwvertalignt bwalignc …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

  Underlying Sales Volumes   Average Price
Oil

(Bbls)

  Natural Gas

(Mcf)

Oil

(per Bbl)

 

NASA Seeks to Profit from Natural Gas

By Rich Smith, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Hard on the heels of Lockheed Martin‘s surprise announcement that it’s getting into the energy infrastructure business, its partner, NASA — yes, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration — had an even more surprising revelation of its own today yesterday: NASA is looking to make some commercial profits of its own.

And not just by selling telescopes, space-themed toys, and NASA windbreakers at its stores, either. NASA‘s looking to make some serious scratch by retooling its Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans to manufacture liquefied natural gas (LNG) tanks for commercial use on Earth.

At a joint press conference in New Orleans, standing beside Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, and representatives from Lockheed, NASA representatives confirmed that they will be cooperating with Lockheed to use their “unique experience and equipment at Michoud to manufacture the LNG tanks.” (Don’t worry … NASA‘s still making space gas-tanks, too).

Financial terms of the arrangement among Lockheed, NASA, and the Louisiana government have not yet been disclosed, but details should begin filtering out soon. According to Lockheed, the company has already begun receiving orders from customers who would like it to manufacture cryogenic tanks for fueling LNG-powered vessels. Once sales begin finalizing, and orders delivered, the details of how these three entities are divvying up the profits should become clearer.

The article NASA Seeks to Profit from Natural Gas originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Rich Smith has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Lockheed Martin. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Thoughts on the UK Productivity Puzzle

By Karl Smith, Contributor Izabella Kaminska points to an argument that it is all about valuing capital formation: Current estimates of UK GDP are too low because the methodology undervalues private sector investments in a mature economy: Current GDP estimation methods were designed to value underdeveloped economies in which investment in tangible fixed assets is a good indicator of financial value; The private sector in mature economies like that of the UK is instead increasingly investing in other assets which are not valued by current GDP estimates; It will not be possible to improve GDP calculations to accurately reflect the value of the investments of a mature economy.   Ok but the US should have this same problem and yet However, looking through the IFS report – via Simon Wren-Lewis – it seems as if decomposition more or less answers the puzzle. The report does a decomposition and gets this The authors haltingly conclude that not much is gained from decompositional analysis The slowdown of productivity growth within industries since 2008 is important in explaining the aggregate productivity shortfall relative to the trend. The extent to which industries recover to their pre-recession trends in productivity growth will affect aggregate productivity growth going forward. Again, the trend is driven by within-industry effects and not changes in the composition of industries Right, but if you look at the results a two-part de-compossed narrative immediately comes out. First, the standard acceleration of de-industrialization, common to modern recessions: Construction and Manufacturing fell as fractions of the workforce leading to large negative “between” effects. Second, gains-from-trade which usually rescue advanced economies from aggregate productivity slowdowns failed to appear. Why? Because the good and services that the UK specializes in got whacked. Mining, which I assume is North Sea Oil, fell off a cliff. And, Finance through which London serves as banker to much of the world, also fell off a cliff. We would expect to see large “between” positives in those categories as workers shifted towards the industries in which the UK has a comparative advantage. Thus the pattern would be that all of productivity growth is being driven by increasing productivity in a few sectors which are themselves attracted ever more workers (because of the higher real wage.) That didn’t happen. Instead you got big negatives on the very sectors that one would expect to offset deindustrialization. So the total was a big negative fest. The US on the other hand has had an inverse story. Not only did manufacturing rebound, but natural resource extraction exploded. In addition the construction collapse came early. So looking at the chart below we can get the following pattern 2005: Ahh! Construction is going away 2007: Whew! We sold lots of Bulldozers to BRIC 2008: Ah! Detriot is gone. Ah!! Wall Street is gone.  Ah!! BRIC is gone On the bright side, we have a bunch of this Natural Gas stuff if anyone wants it. 2010: Yeah Detriot is coming back  Yeah Wall Street is coming back. 2011: We have more oil than God.
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest