Tag Archives: Mark Geragos

CNN Commentator Embarrassed By Zimmerman Verdict

By Cliff Kincaid

sunny CNN Commentator Embarrassed By Zimmerman Verdict

After the not-guilty verdict was handed down, George Zimmerman attorney Mark O’Mara strongly criticized the media’s role in getting his client charged in the case.  He compared the media to “mad scientists” who had turned Zimmerman into a “monster.” He said the media “took a story that was fed to you and you ran with it and you ran right over him and that was horrid to him.”

But the false story line—that Zimmerman was a racist who shot a black man for no reason—continued during the trial, especially in the reckless and wild CNN commentaries of Asunción “Sunny” Hostin.

Hostin boosted the prosecutors throughout and wanted viewers to believe a guilty verdict was a slam-dunk. “I think that they [the prosecutors] put the pieces of the puzzle together for this jury extremely well,” she told Anderson Cooper on Thursday night, July 11.

What was astonishing about Hostin’s commentary during the trial was her inability to find much of anything wrong in how the prosecutors presented it. She was sometimes in the courtroom and pretending to pay attention to what was going on, with a focus on jury reactions. She claimed to have somehow divined what some of the jurors were thinking.

She said of the prosecution’s closing argument: “It was passionate. It was convincing. The jury was watching everything he was doing. And what was terrific, I think, about this closing argument is that they brought the focus back to Trayvon Martin, the victim here. They brought the commonsense argument to this jury.”

Fortunately, another CNN commentator, criminal defense attorney Mark Geragos, was usually on hand, taking strong issue with what Hostin was saying. “There’s reality and then there’s Sunny-ville,” he said. Mocking her rosy view of the prosecution’s extremely weak case, he said, “So I’m going to start believing what Sunny tells me and I’m going to start ignoring everything that I watch on TV.”

Earlier, he told her, “Sunny, you have been bringing your own stuff to the table in this case and you know it.”

Whatever she was bringing to the table, it was not an objective analysis of what was taking place in front of her own eyes. Yet, she carried the title of “CNN Legal Analyst.”

An attorney, she calls herself a “multi-platform journalist” who serves as both a CNN legal analyst and anchor for ABC News. “Before joining CNN, Sunny could be seen on the Fox News Channel, where she was seen weekly on The O’Reilly Factor’s ‘Is It Legal?’ segment, sparring with Megan [sic] Kelly and Bill O’Reilly on various provocative issues and high-profile cases,” her bio says.

Regarding prosecutor John Guy’s rebuttal to the closing argument of defense attorney O’Mara, Hostin said on CNN, “John Guy hit it out of the park, he did great.”

She added, “If people were calling him ‘McDreamy’ before…they’re calling him ‘McBrilliant’ now. It was one of the best closing rebuttal arguments I have seen. The jury was riveted, they did not take their eyes off of this man. And what was so important …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Jury selection starts in Zumba prostitution case

The process finding a jury untainted by international news coverage of a prostitution scandal got under way in fits and starts Tuesday in the trial of the business partner of a Zumba instructor accused of using her dance studio as a front for prostitution.

More than 140 potential jurors were called into the courtroom Tuesday before being dismissed to fill out questionnaires in the trial of Mark Strong Sr., who faces 59 misdemeanor counts including conspiring with Zumba instructor Alexis Wright.

Defense lawyer Dan Lilley said most of the questioning of potential jurors would be done privately in judge’s chambers.

“This is a long and laborious process, most of which is not public,” he said.

Lawyers said it could take a couple of days to select a jury. A judge previously rejected a defense motion to move the trial because of pre-trial publicity.

Justice Nancy Mills will be hard-pressed to find jurors who know nothing about the case.

Celebrity lawyer Mark Geragos, whose clients have included Chris Brown, Michael Jackson and O.J. Simpson, said cases like this one cause problems for judges.

“These are what I affectionately call ‘supersized trials,’ trials that for whatever reason end up gaining momentum that’s far beyond what the case justified,” Geragos said from Los Angeles.

Both Strong and Wright have pleaded not guilty.

Strong, 57, has said he helped Wright launch her Pura Vida dance-fitness studio in Kennebunk by co-signing for her lease and loaning money that was repaid with interest.

He acknowledged having a physical relationship with Wright but said he never paid her for sex. He denied engaging in any criminal conduct.

Police said Wright videotaped many of her encounters without her clients’ knowledge and kept meticulous records suggesting the sex acts generated $150,000 over 18 months. A lawyer who has seen the client list says it totals more than 150. So far, more than 60 people have been charged or pleaded guilty. Some of them will be called to testify.

Wright, who lives in nearby Wells, will be tried at a later date. She faces 106 counts including prostitution and invasion of privacy for acts allegedly performed in her studio and in a rented office across the street.

In Kennebunk, people became accustomed to news crews and satellite trucks after indictments were handed up in October. At first, locals were baffled and bemused by the news coverage. Eventually, many of them became irate.

Michael Reed takes the view of many Kennebunk residents — that Strong, Wright and the vast majority of accused johns are outsiders whose actions shouldn’t reflect negatively on the community, known for its beaches, captain’s houses and, across the river in Kennebunkport, the Walker’s Point compound of former President George H.W. Bush.

“Maybe it’s blown out of proportion a little bit. My personal opinion is that I don’t care,” said Reed, who suggested many other residents had lost interest in the case.

___

Follow David Sharp on Twitter at http://twitter.com/David_Sharp_AP.

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox US News

Savage killing at heart of Arizona murder trial

The photographs present a chilling portrait of sex and death.

A nude Jodi Arias on Travis Alexander’s bed. A naked Alexander in the shower. Then minutes later, an image of Alexander stabbed and slashed nearly 30 times in the heart, back, hands and torso, shot in the head, his throat slit from ear to ear.

Other evidence has stacked up since the June 2008 attack in Mesa, a suburb of Phoenix. A bloody palm print; wildly conflicting stories; and, finally, a confession.

The evidence — including time-stamped photos from the day police say Alexander died — is being presented at a trial in Phoenix that’s been dominated by the torrid affair, sex, jealousy and a defendant whose only chance at acquittal is to convince a jury she’s the victim.

There’s no question who killed the 30-year-old businessman and motivational speaker. Arias admits she stabbed and shot him, but claims she was defending herself against an abusive lover.

Alexander “lunged at Jodi in anger,” her attorney, Jennifer Willmott, told jurors.

“Jodi’s life was in danger. He knocked her to the ground in the bathroom where there was a struggle,” Willmott said. “If she did not have to defend herself, she would not be here.”

Prosecutors say the 32-year-old came prepared to kill, packing a .25-caliber handgun and knife, neglecting to call police or anyone else and leaving behind a crime scene that investigators described as among the most gruesome they’d ever seen.

“This is not a case of whodunit,” prosecutor Juan Martinez said in his opening statement. “The person who committed this killing sits in court today.”

Arias repeatedly changed her stories about the killing that could land her on death row if convicted. She first denied any involvement, then blamed it on masked intruders before finally confessing.

The case now rests largely on intent. Her attorneys are trying to convince jurors she was an abused woman defending herself from an enraged ex-boyfriend — something experts say will be difficult given the evidence.

“Why did she bring a gun to a love fest for one?” said San Francisco criminal defense lawyer Michael Cardoza. “This is about damage control now. No jury is going to let this lady walk. It’s just about trying saving her life.”

The story began in fall 2007, when Alexander met Arias, an aspiring photographer, at a Las Vegas convention. The two began dating, and the stormy relationship went on for about five months. At the time, Arias was living in Southern California and would visit Alexander at his Mesa home.

Friends of the man say she practically lived there from time to time, and that Alexander became bothered with her possessiveness and jealousy. They say he broke it off and that she stalked him for months, slashing his tires and hacking into his Facebook account.

She claims she ended the relationship after catching him in too many lies. But she says it was at his urging that she moved to Mesa from California for a time after their breakup.

He started dating other women, yet the two continued to have sex up until the day of his death.

They exchanged thousands of emails and text messages. He sent her photos of his genitalia and requested she wear a French maid outfit while cleaning his house. She sent explicit messages; he told her it appeared he was nothing more than a sex toy “with a heartbeat.”

The profile of Alexander is in sharp contrast to what some friends and family knew. Many believed him to be a devout Mormon who was saving sex for marriage. Friends said Arias also converted to Mormonism after they started dating.

“This year will be the best year of my life. … I will earn more, learn more, travel more, serve more, love more, give more and be more than all the other years of my life combined. … And how will I do this? By strict obedience to the commandments of God,” Alexander wrote in a blog post before his death.

Arias’ challenges are formidable. Police say her bloody palm print and hair were found at the crime scene, along with the photographs on a camera inside Alexander’s washing machine. In addition, authorities say Arias’ grandparents reported a .25 caliber gun –the same caliber used in the slaying — stolen from their Northern California home about a week before the killing. Arias was staying with them at the time.

No weapons were found at the crime scene. Arias’ attorneys have yet to explain why she washed Alexander’s bedding and put the camera in the washing machine, why she left his body in the shower without reporting anything to authorities, and why she lied repeatedly to investigators.

All of this, combined with the sheer brutality of the attack, makes it more difficult for a defense attorney to do anything but attempt to spare her the death penalty, experts say.

“Her changing stories, the confession, the forensic evidence, it’s just a very difficult case to defend,” said California criminal defense lawyer Mark Geragos.

Geragos said her only hope is if defense attorneys can convince jurors Alexander was abusive, and that he attacked her on the day he was killed.

“They’re going to need expert witnesses to clean up her mess,” Geragos said. “The biggest problem is, she’s given all these different stories that don’t comport with the facts, and now she’s admitted doing it.”

As she sat in jail just three months after her arrest, Arias was adamant — at this point sticking with her second story about the intruders — that she was innocent of the crime.

In an interview with “Inside Edition,” she was certain jurors would believe her.

“No jury is going to convict me,” she said. “I am innocent and you can mark my words on that.”

Click for more from MyFoxPhoenix.com.

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox US News