Tag Archives: Jennifer Willmott

At Jodi Arias Trial, Psychologist Janeen DeMarte Says Defendant Was Not A Battered Woman

By The Huffington Post News Editors

Jodi Arias’ defense attorney and a clinical psychologist retained by the prosecution went head-to-head again Thursday, as the defense tried to poke holes in the expert’s findings that Arias was not a victim of domestic violence.

Defense attorney Jennifer Willmott repeatedly questioned Janeen DeMarte about her interpretation of the results of several psychological tests Arias was given. The defense maintains the test results indicate Arias is, among other things, a battered woman who suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder.

DeMarte stood firm on her opinion throughout the line of questioning.

Read More…
More on ptsd

From: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/19/jodi-arias-trial-day-50_n_3115685.html

JODI ARIAS LIVE BLOG: Is Jodi Arias The Victim Of Domestic Abuse? (LIVE UPDATES)

By The Huffington Post News Editors

Is Jodi Arias a victim of domestic violence or a jealous ex-girlfriend?

That question comes more into focus as the trial winds down. Testimony is expected to resume Thursday with the defense cross-examining a prosecution psychologist who casts doubt that Arias was abused or suffered from from post-traumatic stress disorder.

Defense attorney Jennifer Willmott began her second day of cross-examination of Dr. Janeen DeMarte on Wednesday. Willmott repeatedly questioned DeMarte about her education and qualifications, in an apparent attempt to show she lacks experience in her field. Willmott also suggested DeMarte was not qualified to offer an opinion on domestic violence.

Read More…
More on Jodi Arias

From: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/18/jodi-arias-trial-live-blog-day-50_n_3108923.html

Arias defense works to restore expert credibility

Jodi Arias’ defense attorney worked Wednesday to undo any damage to the credibility of an expert witness who diagnosed the defendant with post-traumatic stress disorder and amnesia after a withering cross-examination that called into question his techniques and testing procedures.

Psychologist Richard Samuels testified for a fourth day Wednesday after telling jurors he diagnosed Arias with PTSD and dissociative amnesia, which explains why she can’t remember much from the day she killed her lover. Samuels said he met with Arias a dozen times for more than 30 hours over three years while she was jailed.

Prosecutor Juan Martinez previously seized on multiple lies Arias told Samuels throughout the process of his evaluation, at one point getting the psychologist to acknowledge that he should have re-administered at least one test he used to come to his PTSD diagnosis. Martinez questioned how Samuels could have come to any definitive conclusion for a diagnosis based upon Arias’ lies.

Samuels insisted his diagnosis was accurate.

“The process of forming a diagnosis is not a simple process,” Samuels testified Wednesday. “The fact is that it’s necessary to obtain information from as many different sources as you can.”

Arias faces a possible death sentence if convicted of first-degree murder in the June 2008 killing of Travis Alexander in his suburban Phoenix home. Authorities say she planned the attack in a jealous rage. Arias initially told authorities she had nothing to do with it then blamed it on masked intruders. Two years after her arrest, she said it was self-defense.

Defense attorney Jennifer Willmott spent much of Wednesday questioning Samuels about his testing procedures. When Samuels initially began his evaluation of Arias, she was sticking to the intruder story.

Willmott went over each question and Arias’ answers with Samuels.

“Did she think her life was in danger?” Willmott asked.

“Yes,” Samuels replied.

“Did she feel helpless?” Willmott asked.

“Yes,” Samuels said, explaining later that his diagnosis would have remained unchanged whether Arias was responding to the questions still telling the intruder story or claiming self-defense.

“If the answers remained yes before and yes after, would it have changed the score at all?” Willmott asked.

“No,” Samuels said.

He said Arias also answered “no” to a question about whether she was having nightmares.

“This is a score where you could exaggerate if your intent was to skew the score in your favor,” Samuels said.

He said the PTSD test was merely one tool used to come to his diagnosis.

“I based the information primarily on my interviews, the crime scene photographs and descriptions, interviews with family members, police reports, emails, text messages and the psychological tests,” Samuels said.

Martinez had also questioned Samuels’ credibility, accusing him of blurring the line between objective observer and therapist when he bought Arias a self-help book about building self-esteem.

Samuels denied the accusation.

“Is there ever blurring of the lines between evaluator and therapist?” Willmott asked Wednesday.

“There should not be,” Samuels replied, explaining that sending Arias the book is not considered therapy.

Trial adjourned early on Wednesday after a woman in the gallery vomited.

Samuels was set to return to the witness stand Thursday …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox US News

Savage killing at heart of Arizona murder trial

The photographs present a chilling portrait of sex and death.

A nude Jodi Arias on Travis Alexander’s bed. A naked Alexander in the shower. Then minutes later, an image of Alexander stabbed and slashed nearly 30 times in the heart, back, hands and torso, shot in the head, his throat slit from ear to ear.

Other evidence has stacked up since the June 2008 attack in Mesa, a suburb of Phoenix. A bloody palm print; wildly conflicting stories; and, finally, a confession.

The evidence — including time-stamped photos from the day police say Alexander died — is being presented at a trial in Phoenix that’s been dominated by the torrid affair, sex, jealousy and a defendant whose only chance at acquittal is to convince a jury she’s the victim.

There’s no question who killed the 30-year-old businessman and motivational speaker. Arias admits she stabbed and shot him, but claims she was defending herself against an abusive lover.

Alexander “lunged at Jodi in anger,” her attorney, Jennifer Willmott, told jurors.

“Jodi’s life was in danger. He knocked her to the ground in the bathroom where there was a struggle,” Willmott said. “If she did not have to defend herself, she would not be here.”

Prosecutors say the 32-year-old came prepared to kill, packing a .25-caliber handgun and knife, neglecting to call police or anyone else and leaving behind a crime scene that investigators described as among the most gruesome they’d ever seen.

“This is not a case of whodunit,” prosecutor Juan Martinez said in his opening statement. “The person who committed this killing sits in court today.”

Arias repeatedly changed her stories about the killing that could land her on death row if convicted. She first denied any involvement, then blamed it on masked intruders before finally confessing.

The case now rests largely on intent. Her attorneys are trying to convince jurors she was an abused woman defending herself from an enraged ex-boyfriend — something experts say will be difficult given the evidence.

“Why did she bring a gun to a love fest for one?” said San Francisco criminal defense lawyer Michael Cardoza. “This is about damage control now. No jury is going to let this lady walk. It’s just about trying saving her life.”

The story began in fall 2007, when Alexander met Arias, an aspiring photographer, at a Las Vegas convention. The two began dating, and the stormy relationship went on for about five months. At the time, Arias was living in Southern California and would visit Alexander at his Mesa home.

Friends of the man say she practically lived there from time to time, and that Alexander became bothered with her possessiveness and jealousy. They say he broke it off and that she stalked him for months, slashing his tires and hacking into his Facebook account.

She claims she ended the relationship after catching him in too many lies. But she says it was at his urging that she moved to Mesa from California for a time after their breakup.

He started dating other women, yet the two continued to have sex up until the day of his death.

They exchanged thousands of emails and text messages. He sent her photos of his genitalia and requested she wear a French maid outfit while cleaning his house. She sent explicit messages; he told her it appeared he was nothing more than a sex toy “with a heartbeat.”

The profile of Alexander is in sharp contrast to what some friends and family knew. Many believed him to be a devout Mormon who was saving sex for marriage. Friends said Arias also converted to Mormonism after they started dating.

“This year will be the best year of my life. … I will earn more, learn more, travel more, serve more, love more, give more and be more than all the other years of my life combined. … And how will I do this? By strict obedience to the commandments of God,” Alexander wrote in a blog post before his death.

Arias’ challenges are formidable. Police say her bloody palm print and hair were found at the crime scene, along with the photographs on a camera inside Alexander’s washing machine. In addition, authorities say Arias’ grandparents reported a .25 caliber gun –the same caliber used in the slaying — stolen from their Northern California home about a week before the killing. Arias was staying with them at the time.

No weapons were found at the crime scene. Arias’ attorneys have yet to explain why she washed Alexander’s bedding and put the camera in the washing machine, why she left his body in the shower without reporting anything to authorities, and why she lied repeatedly to investigators.

All of this, combined with the sheer brutality of the attack, makes it more difficult for a defense attorney to do anything but attempt to spare her the death penalty, experts say.

“Her changing stories, the confession, the forensic evidence, it’s just a very difficult case to defend,” said California criminal defense lawyer Mark Geragos.

Geragos said her only hope is if defense attorneys can convince jurors Alexander was abusive, and that he attacked her on the day he was killed.

“They’re going to need expert witnesses to clean up her mess,” Geragos said. “The biggest problem is, she’s given all these different stories that don’t comport with the facts, and now she’s admitted doing it.”

As she sat in jail just three months after her arrest, Arias was adamant — at this point sticking with her second story about the intruders — that she was innocent of the crime.

In an interview with “Inside Edition,” she was certain jurors would believe her.

“No jury is going to convict me,” she said. “I am innocent and you can mark my words on that.”

Click for more from MyFoxPhoenix.com.

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox US News