Tag Archives: Freddie Mac

Will Changes in the Mortgage Market Impact REITs?

By David Hanson and Matt Koppenheffer, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Regulators overseeing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac announced yesterday that the two would be consolidating some repetitive “back-office” functions. Could this be the beginning of a total consolidation of the two? And could it lead to a phasing out of these two government sponsored giants of the secondary mortgage market, shifting the risk of mortgage-backed security investments to the private sector?

In this video, Motley Fool financial analysts David Hanson and Matt Koppenheffer discuss what this scenario would look like, and how REIT investors could be affected. 

One of the most interesting REITs out there today is Annaly Capital. There’s no question Annaly Capital‘s double-digit dividend is eye-catching. But can investors count on that payout sticking around? With the Federal Reserve keeping interest rates at historically low levels, Annaly has had to scramble to defend its bottom line. In The Motley Fool‘s premium research report on Annaly, senior analysts Ilan Moscovitz and Matt Koppenheffer uncover the key challenges the company faces and divulge three reasons investors may consider buying it. Simply click here now to claim your copy, and as an added bonus, you’ll receive a FREE year of key updates and expert analysis as news continues to develop.

var FoolAnalyticsData = FoolAnalyticsData || []; FoolAnalyticsData.push({ eventType: “TickerReportPitch”, contentByline: “David Hanson and Matt Koppenheffer“, contentId: “cms.21548”, contentTickers: “NASDAQ:AGNC, NYSE:NLY”, contentTitle: “Will Changes in the Mortgage Market Impact REITs?”, hasVideo: “True”, …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

The Invisible Hole in Bank of America's Balance Sheet

By John Maxfield, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Sometimes the worst wounds are invisible, at least in Bank of America‘s case. Take one look at the megabank’s balance sheet, and you’ll be hard pressed to identify where all of its losses are coming from. The nation’s second largest bank with over $2.2 trillion in assets earned only $4.1 billion last year. And that was despite the fact that it recorded $83.3 billion in interest and fee income. What gives?

The answer is two-fold. First, as I discussed at length in a series on B of A’s legal problems, the bank continues to record tens of billions of dollars in off-balance sheet liability from lawsuits related to the sale of mortgages and mortgage-backed securities prior to the financial crisis. Most recently, it paid Fannie Mae $3.6 billion in cash and repurchased $6.6 billion in toxic mortgages that Countrywide Financial had previously sold to the government-sponsored agency.

And second, what is identifiable on B of A’s balance sheet is only barely so. Wedged between $349 billion in cash and equivalents, $627 billion in derivative and securities, $927 billion in loans and leases, and $302 billion in intangibles and other assets, sits $5.8 billion in otherwise innocuous mortgage servicing rights, or “MSRs” for short. Is it possible that such a minuscule entry could bring this banking behemoth to its knees? If you’ve caught my drift, the answer is obviously “yes.”

When a bank underwrites a mortgage, the loan is rarely retained on the lender’s books. It’s instead sold on the secondary market to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac who then securitize it with other loans for an even later sale to institutional investors. At the time of the original sale, however, the lender that originated the loan typically retains the right to service it for a small fee — usually somewhere between 0.25% and 0.375% of the loan’s principal plus late fees. This is where MSRs come into the picture, as they represent the value of the rights retained.

You’re probably beginning to see at this point how such a small entry on a bank’s balance sheet could exert inordinate pressure on its bottom line. With respect to B of A specifically, at the end of last year, the $5.8 billion in MSRs related to a staggering $1.05 trillion in mortgages, the vast majority of which were originated by Countrywide Financial between 2004 and 2008. This puts B of A second in terms of third-party servicing portfolios, behind only Wells Fargo and “ahead” of both JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup .

Source: Company filings.

Now, don’t get me wrong. MSRs aren’t necessarily bad. Just ask Wells Fargo, which records billions of dollars in servicing income every year as a result of them.

But in B of A’s case, the problem is that wide swaths of the underlying loans have since either gone into default or are well on their way there and, as a result, are increasingly expensive to …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Annaly Capital: 1 Big Risk We Are Facing Right Now

By Amanda Alix, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

This time of year is oodles of fun for investors, when companies’ annual reports and letters to shareholders shed a bit more light on the inner workings of investment favorites.

The “Risk Factors” section is an especially good read and, while often filled with generalized statements about the economy, future legislation, and such, can sometimes give a real clue as to what these companies themselves consider a threat to their bottom lines.

Such is the case with Annaly Capital Management , whose latest 10-K filing I recently perused. One particular risk the company identified caught my eye, as I had been thinking about this issue myself — and it’s a doozy: the winding down of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Fannie, Freddie wind-down will cause upheaval
As Annaly management notes in its 10-K, the idea to unwind Fannie and Freddie was first floated by the Treasury Department in early 2011, in a white paper regarding housing finance reform. As an entity that invests primarily in mortgage-backed securities backed by these government-sponsored entities, any change in the status of these behemoths would have an impact on Annaly and other pure-agency mREITs, such as American Capital Agency and Armour Residential .

Lately, the changes to those GSEs have been accelerated. Just this week, Edward DeMarco, the acting director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency decreed that the two must work together to create a new, joint company that will securitize home loans for a fee. This new entity could end up being either public or private, depending upon which way the political winds blow.

Since the two GSEs currently insure about 90% of all home loans being written, shutting them down, no matter how slowly, will cause issues for mREITs. As Annaly points out, market uncertainty pursuant to this process can easily cause market jitters that could decrease the value of the company’s holdings. Not a good thing, of course, since it is these very securities that Annaly, American Capital Agency, and Armour use to secure financing with which to invest further.

And that’s not the worst of it. Management notes that elimination of Fannie and Freddie — or even substantial changes to those enterprises — just might also eliminate the government guarantee for those coveted agency MBSes, effectively putting the pure-agency players out of business.

A real and abiding concern
While these assessments of risk may sound dire, they are well within the realm of possibility. This seems to be the year of change at the GSEs, and a group of legislators have recently sought to bump the issue of GSE reform into the spotlight. The Wall Street Journal notes that much of the debate concerns the continued availability of 30-year, fixed rate mortgages — the bread and butter of mREITs — which are common products in the U.S. and Denmark, but not in other parts of the world.

Once again, Annaly management is showing forethought in keeping a close eye on these developments. Mortgage …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

NY Gov. Andrew Cuomo- A Wolf In Sheep’s Clothing

By Tim Powers

Andrew Cuomo SC NY Gov. Andrew Cuomo  A Wolf In Sheeps Clothing

Being a resident of New York state all of my life, I have seen my share of corrupt, liberal governors from Rockefeller (who died while in the company of a prostitute) to Elliot Spitzer and his client number nine moment to the abject failure of David Patterson. But, this time around, we now have the smooth and crass Andrew Cuomo.

Cuomo, when asked to run for Governor by the Democrat party, seemed very reluctant to give up his post as New York State attorney general. But in the end, he decided to run against Tea Party candidate Carl Palidino. It was a grueling campaign; and as usual, the Democrats pulled out all of the stops right down to going after Carl’s family. The tide turned on the election when Carl was nearly engaged in a physical altercation with journalist Fred Dicker over his children being exploited. Ultimately, Carl was then framed as a hothead for doing what any father would do to protect his children. Well, we ended up with Cuomo.

Upon Cuomo’s arrival in Albany, he came across as very fiscally conservative (for a liberal, that is), engaging in a fight with the public sector unions in order to reduce their impact on the New York economy. He also pushed for a two percent tax cap on all local budgets. These things made him look more like a moderate, and people were starting to warm up to him. Up until his draconian New York Safe Act gun law, he enjoyed an approval rating of 73 percent. Since that time, he still enjoys a 59 percent approval rating.

Now, he is saying that amendments will be made to the Safe Act. Such as, removing the restrictions on police officers as to magazine sizes and bullet quantities. I believe that while these amendments are done, he may try to sneak a version of AO 3908, the assembly bill requiring that firearms owners purchase 1 million dollars of liability insurance, into law.

Now, a history lesson on Cuomo. Before he was the attorney general for New York, he served as the Housing and Urban Development secretary under Bill Clinton. As HUD secretary, he was responsible for pushing the banks to give mortgages out to low income people, whom they knew could not afford to pay them back. I hold Cuomo partially responsible for not only the banking, but also the housing crises that put America into her downward spiral. Now why would he have done this, you ask? Because Andrew Cuomo has been instrumental in implementing the UN’s Agenda 21, right after Clinton signed the executive order on “sustainable development”. Cuomo is a key player in this.

Agenda 21 is the UN plan to turn ALL private property over to the government sector, thus creating a loss of US sovereignty. What better way to do this than to sell private homes to people who can’t afford them and to have the mortgages guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, 2 government insurers who refuse to be audited? …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Orchid Island Capital Announces the Closing of Its IPO

By MarketNewsVideo Orchid Island Capital (ORC) announced that it closed its previously announced IPO of 2,360,000 shares of common stock at an initial public offering price of $15.00 per share earlier today. All of the shares in the initial public offering were offered by Orchid Island Capital, Inc., and the proceeds of the offering will be used to invest in residential mortgage-backed securities the principal and interest payments of which are guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae . The shares are listed on the NYSE under the symbol “ORC.” …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Markets

US rate on 30-year mortgage rises to 3.56 pct.

The average U.S. rate on the 30-year fixed mortgage rose this week but remained near historic lows. Low mortgage rates have helped support the slowly recovering housing market.

Mortgage buyer Freddie Mac said Thursday that the average rate on the 30-year loan increased to 3.56 percent from 3.53 percent last week. That’s still near the 3.31 percent reached in November, which was the lowest on record dating to 1971.

The average rate on the 15-year fixed mortgage stayed at 2.77 percent for a third straight week. The record low is 2.63 percent.

The cheap mortgages that are encouraging more people to buy or refinance could also help sustain the economy’s recovery this year. Increased sales are helping lift home prices, which tend to make consumers feel wealthier and more likely to spend. And when homeowners refinance, it typically leads to lower loan payments and more spending. Consumer spending drives nearly 70 percent of economic activity.

Sales of previously occupied homes in the U.S. rose in January to the second-highest level in three years, the National Association of Realtors reported Thursday.

Analysts say the pace of purchases would be higher still if more homes were available. The supply of homes for sale dropped to nearly an eight-year low in January. The limited supply has boosted demand for construction, which has made builders more confident.

Still, the housing market has a long way to go to a full recovery. And many people are unable to take advantage of the low rates, either because they can’t qualify for stricter lending rules or they lack the money for larger down payment requirements.

To calculate average mortgage rates, Freddie Mac surveys lenders across the country on Monday through Wednesday each week. The average doesn’t include extra fees, known as points, which most borrowers must pay to get the lowest rates. One point equals 1 percent of the loan amount.

The average fee for 30-year loans was unchanged at 0.8 point. The fee for 15-year loans also remained at 0.8 point.

The average rate on a one-year adjustable-rate mortgage increased to 2.65 percent from 2.61 percent last week. The fee for one-year adjustable-rate loans rose to 0.4 point from 0.3.

The average rate on a five-year …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox US News

Don’t Ban Firearms; BAN Obama And Cuomo!

By Tim Powers

Andrew Cuomo SC Dont Ban Firearms; BAN Obama and Cuomo!

Now that these two left wing liberal/communists have pushed their agendas to take our God given, Constitutional right to bear arms, I am now waiting for them to announce the forced buyback of our firearms.

As far as Obama, he can start with buying back the firearms that he has illegally sold to the Mexican drug cartels under his Fast and Furious gun running operation, as well as the weapons sold to the Muslim Brotherhood, Al Queida, and the terrorist factions that have taken over Libya and Syria. Not that anyone has bothered to check, but one has to wonder if Ambassador Stevens and the three brave Americans that were with him were killed with American-supplied weapons.

For two of the most polarizing people that ever entered the political spectrum, they sure have their fair share of issues when it comes to protecting and defending the United States Constitution.

Let’s start with Obama. Aside from the eligibility issues that have plagued him since 2007, which still to this day have not been investigated, we can add the Fast and Furious scandal, Benghazi, Solyndra, the NDAA, the BP oil spill extortion, offshore drilling bans, excessive executive orders to circumvent Congress, Obamacare, CZARs, and illegal recess appointments (and that is just off the top of my head. I am sure there is more.)

Now let’s look at Cuomo. As the HUD secretary, he was instrumental in pushing banks to lend money for mortgages to clients they KNEW did not have the means to pay the money back, knowing full well that this would lead to the collapse of not only the banking system, but the housing market as well. Cuomo was subsequently instrumental in causing this recession (more like a depression) that America still has not recovered from regardless of what the economists and media may tell us. I believe that this whole scam was set up in order to transfer private property into the government sector as up to 98 percent of the existing mortgages are guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. If you look at any communist regime, you will find that ALL property is government-owned.

Some 238 years ago, our Founding Fathers faced the same kind of tyranny in the 13 Colonies. Did they just roll over and let the king of England dictate to them as we get dictated to today? No, they didn’t. They kissed their mothers, sisters, and daughters good bye, took up their arms, and stood up in one accord and proclaimed to the king “WE WILL NOT COMPLY’! I fear that if we continue on this path of destruction, we will be faced with the same choices as our Forefathers did. Will you stand up for the Constitution? Or will you just roll over and be ruled by dictators? The time is drawing short for you to make your choice. Until you choose, stay safe and always be aware of your surroundings.

Photo credit: Patja (Creative Commons)

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Monetization of US Government Debt, the numbers

By Michael Pollaro, Contributor Introducing to the The Contrarian Take Databank our newly revised US Government Debt Monetization series. We think this new series is a more complete picture of the players involved in the monetization of the debt of the US Treasury and the debt of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the latter now […]
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest