By NewsEditor
On MSNBC, Ezra Klein of the Washington Post says that Democrats now have lost the sequester:
By NewsEditor
On MSNBC, Ezra Klein of the Washington Post says that Democrats now have lost the sequester:
By Rob Quinn
The Boston Marathon bombing has shaken America, but it shouldn’t shake people’s faith in human solidarity, which is at its best at marathons, writes Ezra Klein in the Washington Post . He points to the story of 1967 Boston Marathon runner, Kathrine Switzer, as recounted in The Nation . Women weren’t allowed…
From: http://www.newser.com/story/166289/marathons-should-still-inspire.html
By Matt Cantor President Obama‘s budget proposal is the latest move in his administration’s “systematic” effort to expose flimsy GOP excuses for government inaction, writes Ezra Klein in the Washington Post . Republicans had complained that Obama didn’t extend a hand to them; now, he’s constantly meeting with them. They said he wouldn’t touch…
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Newser – Home
By Morgan Housel, The Motley Fool
Filed under: Investing
“The calamity of the information age is that the toxicity of data increases much faster than its benefits.” — Nassim Taleb.
When asked what I read, I always plug Twitter. It is one of the most effective communication devices ever invented, I usually say, with no exaggeration.
Twitter has become so important to finance that it is taking over the role of the Wall Street analyst. As news broke of the Cyprus bailout last month, Twitter was a mile ahead of Wall Street. Joe Weisenthal of Business Insider wrote:
Twitter is increasingly equaling or surpassing the value of traditional sell-side research from Wall Street analysts … Because the [Cyprus] news was so surprising, and because there’s so little time between when the bailout was announced early Saturday morning, and when trading begins Sunday evening, there’s been an aggressive thirst for information and analysis on what it all means. But the sell-side has been fairly slow, and the Twittersphere has come to the rescue.
He is right. When big financial news is breaking, all the money in the world can’t buy the information streaming from Twitter’s free iPhone app. It is indispensable.
But there is another side of Twitter, as Washington Post columnist Ezra Klein recently wrote:
Toward the end of the election, I pretty much stopped reading Twitter altogether. It improved my life, and the quality of my work. There was so much partisan sniping and gaffe-driven garbage that reading almost anything but Twitter was a huge improvement in the quality of the information I consumed.
Most forms of information are slow-moving, Klein writes. “If I neglect my RSS feed today, the posts will still be there tomorrow,” he says. “The same is true for the books I’m reading, the magazines piled on my nightstand, the tabs open in my browser.” Ditto for conventional journalism. If I check WSJ.com at 4 A.M. or 9 A.M. or noon, I will find the same stories. There is no rush.
But on Twitter, not checking your feed for an hour can mean missing something important. Since there’s no easy way to see what everyone you follow has Tweeted in the last day — to say nothing of the last week — the best way to stay on top of what’s important is to become a Twitter maniac, glued to the screen all day. It’s as if you didn’t know when your favorite TV show will air, and there’s way to record it when it does. Not wanting to miss it, you sit in front of the TV all day, waiting for it come.
But that means having to sit through a lot of soap operas and realty TV shows. Which is exactly how Twitter can feel sometimes. And I feel it’s getting worse.
In decade’s past, top investors wrote their clients once a quarter, maybe even once a year. Top newspaper columnists wrote once or twice a week.
Twitter has sent those expectations through …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance
By The Huffington Post News Editors
Ask Paul Krugman, and he’ll tell you a former senator has a few things in common with one of the biggest con men in history.
The Pulitzer Prize-winning economist wrote in a blog post Thursday that like major Ponzi schemer Bernie Madoff, former Senator Alan Simpson is benefitting from “affinity fraud” — a dynamic where people ignore evidence indicating someone is obviously wrong because they view them as “their kind of guy.” Simpson and former White House Chief of Staff Erskine Bowles make up the deficit fighting duo President Obama tasked in 2010 with coming up with a plan to reduce the nation’s debt and they recently released the latest version of their proposal.
“Simpson is, demonstrably, grossly ignorant on precisely the subjects on which he is treated as a guru, not understanding the finances of Social Security, the truth about life expectancy, and much more,” Krugman wrote. “Yet he remains not only respectable among the Beltway crowd; as Ezra [Klein] says, he’s lionized in a way that looks from the outside like a clear violation of journalistic norms.”
By Kevin Spak Something strange is happening to the GOP. All of the 2016 contenders seem to have reached a conclusion, Ezra Klein observes in a Bloomberg column: “It’s better to build a reputation as one of the party’s adults than as one of its firebrands.” But Republicans are trying to look more… …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Newser – Home
By Karl Smith, Contributor Kevin Drum writes Ezra Klein posted this chart today showing the steady accumulation of corporate cash and reserves over the past 15 years. I’d like to nominate it for chart of the decade or something. “Why corporations are holding so much more cash is an interesting mystery,” says Ezra, but I think it’s the key mystery of the past couple of decades. Total liquid assets held by nonfinancial corporations have increased from 7.7 percent of GDP to 11.3 percent of GDP. Embarrassingly, I did have trouble reproducing Ezra’s chart from my Flow of Funds data. I did think I knew what a liquid asset is, but apparently not. When I total them up I get a slightly different and shallower curve Still its pretty close – starting a 600 and ending a little over 1600. Now, take Non-Financial Corporate profits after tax and multiple by 2. Plot. A first cut hypothesis might be: Non-Financial corporates attempt to keep roughly 2 years worth of profits on hand as cash. Sometimes profits are disappoint to the downside and the cash exceeds. Sometimes profits surprise to the upside and cash falls below. Or looked at another way, cash has gone from 7.7 percent of GDP to 11.3 of GDP because profits (times 2) have risen roughly in line. Now, I assume that someone has looked at this before, but this is roughly consistent with a corporations-hold-cash-as-a-buffer-between-revenues-and-costs model. This does only makes sense if for some reason corporations feared that they might have trouble tapping credit markets precisely when they really needed to most. Recent history, however, offers little to allay such fears.
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest