Tag Archives: Contributor Kevin Drum

China, Destroyer-of-Worlds

By Karl Smith, Contributor Kevin Drum asks what’s really going on with real interest rates. On one level its obvious, A Global Savings Glut Stupid. But, In theory, as [Ryan] Avent says, if the savings level is high, then interest rates will go down until it’s once again attractive to borrow all that money to invest in real-world production of goods and services. But that hasn’t happened, which means the real problem we’re facing is the mirror image of a global savings glut: namely, a global investment drought. For more than a decade now, no matter how low interest rates have gone, the appetite for real-world investment has remained anemic. This is a big question but I want to suggest that the answer might lie over here in this general direction somewhere: China has become the Jeff Bezos of Industrial Production China at some points has had investment rates of in excess of 40% of GDP. For super-geeks this exceeds the Ramsey Rule at a zero discount rate. For non-geeks it means that there is no investment strategy under which this is the profitable thing to do. Its always hard to tell but on balance I think the Chinese government is aware of this, yet is willing to lose money on its capital investments in order to provide jobs for people moving to the city. This is a smart move if you think cities produce agglomeration effects. With apologies to the less wonkish, China is using physical capital as a loss leader in order to grow cities that will produce network effects will in turn foster the human capital that really makes a country rich. In this way China has become like Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, a Destroyer-of-Worlds.1 You can’t win a physical capital accumulation battle against someone whose plan is to overinvest and lose money on the physical capital. And just as you there is no point even trying to fight a determined central bank on interest rate policy; there is no point fighting a determined China on Industrial policy. That leaves a huge swath of investment unavailable. 1] Bezos is properly styled: His Entropic Incessancy, Destroyer-of-Worlds. …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

Challenge Accepted: Kevin Drum on Corporate Cash

By Karl Smith, Contributor Kevin Drum writes Ezra Klein posted this chart today showing the steady accumulation of corporate cash and reserves over the past 15 years. I’d like to nominate it for chart of the decade or something. “Why corporations are holding so much more cash is an interesting mystery,” says Ezra, but I think it’s the key mystery of the past couple of decades. Total liquid assets held by nonfinancial corporations have increased from 7.7 percent of GDP to 11.3 percent of GDP. Embarrassingly, I did have trouble reproducing Ezra’s chart from my Flow of Funds data. I did think I knew what a liquid asset is, but apparently not. When I total them up I get a slightly different and shallower curve Still its pretty close – starting a 600 and ending a little over 1600. Now, take Non-Financial Corporate profits after tax and multiple by 2. Plot. A first cut hypothesis might be: Non-Financial corporates attempt to keep roughly 2 years worth of profits on hand as cash. Sometimes profits are disappoint to the downside and the cash exceeds. Sometimes profits surprise to the upside and cash falls below. Or looked at another way, cash has gone from 7.7 percent of GDP to 11.3 of GDP because profits (times 2) have risen roughly in line. Now, I assume that someone has looked at this before, but this is roughly consistent with a corporations-hold-cash-as-a-buffer-between-revenues-and-costs model. This does only makes sense if for some reason corporations feared that they might have trouble tapping credit markets precisely when they really needed to most. Recent history, however, offers little to allay such fears.
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

The Problem For The Left If Tetraethyl Lead Really Does Cause Crime

By Tim Worstall, Contributor Kevin Drum’s excellent piece on the effects of tetraethyl lead is now being picked up around the world. Here’s George Monbiot for example:

At first it seemed preposterous. The hypothesis was so exotic that I laughed. The rise and fall of violent crime during the second half of the […]

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest