A 16-year-old girl who says she was sexually assaulted by two football players last summer was drunk and didn’t seem to know what was happening, according to the testimony of three teenagers who were granted immunity from prosecution in order to give their accounts of that night.
The three teens spoke Friday of the West Virginia girl’s behavior the night of a party and described her being digitally penetrated in a car and later on a basement floor.
Two football teammates, a 17-year-old and a 16-year-old, are charged with digitally penetrating the girl early Aug. 12, first in a car and then in the basement of a house. The 17-year-old also is charged with illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material. The two maintain their innocence.
One of the witnesses testified that he took a video of the 17-year-old and the girl in the car, then deleted it later that morning. Another witnesses testified he saw the 16-year-old football player’s encounter with the girl in the basement, as did another witness.
Testimony in the rape trial wrapped up late Friday as a judge, who’s hearing the case without a jury, pushed to finish the case, which is continuing through the weekend. The accuser was expected to testify Saturday.
The case has featured disturbing testimony from teens, both in person and in graphic text messages, and has cast an unwelcome light on what students in the community once considered private conversations. The teenagers who testified Friday winced at times as they were forced to read the adult language in the texts.
The case has riveted the small city of Steubenville amid allegations that more students should have been charged and led to questions about the influence of the local football team, a source of a pride in a community that suffered massive job losses with the collapse of the steel industry.
If convicted, the two teens accused could be held in a juvenile jail until they turn 21.
During one of the witness’ testimony, a prosecutor asked him why he deleted the video.
“It was one of those moments when you realize you did something stupid and wrong that night, so I deleted it,” he replied.
The witness testified he saw the 17-year-old unsuccessfully try to have the girl perform oral sex on him later in the basement house. Another witness also testified that the girl was intoxicated and slurring her words.
On cross-examination, defense attorney Walter Madison suggested that the girl was behaving no differently than anyone else the night of the party.
A witness testified he saw the 17-year-old and the girl asleep under a blanket on the couch later in the morning.
“Did anybody behave in a way to make you think that something was wrong?” Madison, Richmond’s attorney, asked.
“No,” he said.
The second witness granted immunity, testified that he saw the 16-year-old teen digitally penetrate the girl in the basement.
“Was she moving?” special prosecutor Marianne Hemmeter asked.
“Not at this time,” he said.
“Was she talking?” Hemmeter asked.
“I didn’t hear anything,” he said.
The witness said the girl appeared to be “pretty drunk” …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox US News