Tag Archives: Israel Radio

Israeli lawmaker urges intervention in Syria

A veteran Israeli lawmaker and former defense minister says Syria‘s chemical weapons are “trickling” to Lebanon‘s militant Hezbollah group.

Binyamin Ben-Eliezer told Israel Radio on Monday that he is shocked by the “world’s silence” and that the West must intervene to stop the high civilian death toll in Syria.

He says he “has no doubt” Syrian President Bashar Assad used chemical weapons and that some of the weapons are “definitely reaching” Israel‘s enemy Hezbollah.

The Israeli government convened its security cabinet to discuss Syria late on Sunday but no details were released.

Both sides in Syria‘s civil war accuse each other of using chemical weapons.

The U.S. has warned such weapons cross a red line and last week said the weapons were probably used, though it still seeks definitive proof.

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox World News

Israeli airlines strike over "Open Skies" plan

Israel‘s three airlines went on strike Sunday over a proposed “Open Skies” deal with the European Union that local workers say jeopardizes their jobs.

EL AL, Arkia and Israir stopped their outbound flights from Israel early Sunday morning. The strike does not affect flights by international carriers.

The agreement would reduce restrictions on European carriers for using Israeli airspace, increasing competition. The Israeli Cabinet was set to vote on the deal later in the day.

Ofer Eini, head of the powerful Histadrut labor union, told Israel Radio that he favors open skies, but Israel‘s small airline fleets and high security costs make it hard to compete with international carriers. He said the deal could cause local airlines to collapse. Eini warned that thousands of jobs are at risk.

He said the debate should be postponed by a month to improve the proposal’s terms and make sure jobs are secure. He indicated that the strike could be broadened if the deal is approved Sunday.

Transport Minister Yisrael Katz told Israel Radio that he expected the proposal to be approved. He said the deal would benefit the economy by increasing tourism and reducing ticket prices.

From: http://feeds.foxnews.com/~r/foxnews/world/~3/5TvUkVH_yFo/

Israel's Netanyahu hits snags in building team

As Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prepares to take office for a third time, his attempts to form a new coalition government have gotten off to a rocky start.

Netanyahu is vowing to form a broad-based government to tackle the country’s challenges in the coming years, but that won’t be easy. Given the dizzying array of potential coalition partners and their deep differences on key issues, Netanyahu will be hard pressed to build a stable government, much less make significant progress on such divisive matters as drafting ultra-Orthodox Jewish seminary students into the military and pursuing peace with the Palestinians.

“There are very serious disputes that will be very hard to resolve,” Reuven Rivlin, a senior member of Netanyahu’s Likud Party, told Israel Radio on Tuesday.

Netanyahu got the nod to form a new government Saturday night, following a Jan. 22 election. He has six weeks to put a team together. The gloves typically come off early in the negotiations but eventually end up with a coalition.

The sniping has already begun.

Newcomer Yair Lapid, whose party came out of nowhere to become the second largest in the parliament, is thought to be an important partner for Netanyahu.

But Lapid was quoted this week by Israeli media as saying that he is ready to become the parliamentary opposition leader and could force new elections that would make him the prime minister within 18 months. Netanyahu’s allies have seized on the reported comments to depict Lapid as arrogant and intransigent.

Netanyahu’s close ally, Avigdor Lieberman, said Tuesday that he was shocked to hear that a political rookie already has his eyes set on the prime minister’s job. “That is a new phenomenon,” he told Israel Radio. “I only hope that this is temporary, and we can return to negotiations about real issues.”

Rivlin, a veteran of decades of backstage political maneuvering, explained why the sometimes ugly negotiations have to work out in the end with the formation of a government — because failure means another election. That has never happened in Israel.

“Never before has Israel needed to have such a wide government, because every problem or dispute could spark the need for new elections,” he said. “I don’t think any of the 120 members, especially the 50 newly elected ones, would want to go to elections again in a few months.”

Netanyahu’s Likud-Yisrael Beitenu bloc won the most seats in last month’s parliamentary election. But with just 31 seats, Netanyahu needs to bring in multiple coalition partners to secure a majority of at least 61.

He can pursue two main choices — either form a narrow coalition with the hard-line and religious parties that have traditionally backed him, or try to build a broader, more moderate coalition.

Each choice has risks.

Netanyahu’s traditional allies hold a total of 61 seats, so this option is mathematically possible. But a narrow coalition would be unpopular with the public following an election in which secular, centrist candidates did surprisingly well.

With the government required to pass a budget in the coming months after posting a larger-than-expected deficit last year, a narrow coalition would leave Netanyahu vulnerable to political extortion by partners threatening to bring down his government.

For now, Netanyahu is pledging to court more centrist partners, believing a larger coalition will be more stable and better capable of addressing the nation’s needs.

“It is inconceivable that the most challenging country in the world should suffer from instability and weak governance,” Netanyahu told a welcoming ceremony for the new parliament on Tuesday. “We need stability to deal with the quality of living for the citizens of Israel, but also to guarantee something far more superior and important.”

In his comments, Netanyahu laid out an ambitious agenda: He vowed to reform the country’s compulsory military draft “in a way that will not tear this nation apart” and to find ways to reduce Israel‘s high cost of living.

He said Israel must face “new and mounting threats,” a reference to Iran‘s suspect nuclear program and the turmoil sweeping the region. Netanyahu also pledged to pursue a “secure, stable and realistic peace” with the Palestinians.

Despite Netanyahu‘s appeals for unity, any one of these issues could rip apart a future coalition. Ending the country’s contentious system of giving out draft exemptions to Jewish seminary students would alienate potential ultra-Orthodox partners. Failing to do so would drive away centrists like Lapid, who made the issue a centerpiece of his campaign.

Negotiations with the Palestinians are just as contentious.

Peace talks remained frozen during Netanyahu’s just-completed four-year term, and he is under heavy international pressure to get negotiations back on track. When President Barack Obama visits in the spring, he can be expected to increase the pressure on Israel to come forward with an initiative.

Restarting peace talks with the Palestinians will likely require new concessions by Netanyahu that would be opposed by his hard-line base of support. Netanyahu’s own party is dominated by lawmakers who reject concessions to the Palestinians. A likely partner, the pro-settler Jewish Home, even advocates annexation of large parts of the West Bank, the heartland of any future Palestinian state.

Yet Lapid, among others, has said he will not participate in a government that is not conducting serious peace negotiations.

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox World News

Israeli lawmaker: domestic issues must be priority

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu‘s top ally is recommending that the next Israeli government sideline the polarizing issue of peacemaking with the Palestinians in favor of domestic issues.

The comments come as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu begins sounding out potential partners for his next government.

Lawmaker Avigdor Lieberman told Israel Radio on Thursday that focusing on domestic issues is the best way to avoid political paralysis.

Lieberman says, “If we want to founder from the outset and embark upon endless internal struggles, then make foreign policy the top priority.”

Tuesday’s election badly weakened Netanyahu, and he is scrambling to find coalition partners among hawkish, centrist and ultra-Orthodox parties that have made it into parliament. His top partner is likely to be a newcomer centrist party with more moderate views on peacemaking.

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox World News

Israel's Labor head poised to be Netanyahu gadfly

Just seven years after quitting her job as a high-profile media commentator, the leader of Israel‘s Labor Party appears to be on track to become head of the country’s second-largest parliamentary faction and the leading voice against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

And if Netanyahu’s coalition somehow falls short of a majority in next week’s election, Shelly Yachimovich would likely wind up with a far more important job: prime minister of Israel.

Yachimovich, 52, took over Labor, the once-storied movement that led Israel to independence, in late 2011 at one of its lowest points. Buoyed by a social protest movement, she revitalized the party by veering away from its traditional dovish platform of promoting peace with the Arabs and focusing almost entirely on the economy, jobs and the country’s various social ills.

Her political ascent, along with the strength of the Israeli right wing, underscores that pursuing peace with the Palestinians is not a winning campaign issue among Israelis, who appear to have lost faith that West Bank lands can be traded for peace.

Skeptical Israelis point to the rising strength of Hamas militants in Gaza Strip, the uncertainty roiling the region as the Arab Spring unfolds, and the wide gaps with moderate Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas that have kept negotiations deadlocked the past four years. Even when Israeli leaders proposed what they considered far-reaching offers, during the 2000-2001 negotiations and again in 2008, no deal was reached.

Netanyahu’s Likud-Beiteinu bloc remains far ahead in the polls before the Jan. 22 vote, and Yachimovich has vowed not to serve in a Netanyahu government. As a result, she looks likely to become the country’s new opposition leader, a forum that could allow the articulate populist to further burnish her credentials for any future race for prime minister.

Yachimovich appears set nearly to double Labor’s presence from eight to as many as 18 seats in the 120-seat parliament. That would leave it well behind Likud-Beitenu but still the second-largest party in parliament.

Although Labor‘s roots were socialist, Yachimovich’s economy-focused approach has alienated some of Labor’s traditional supporters. Critics accuse her of turning Labor — which dominated Israeli politics for the country’s first 30 years and produced prime ministers like David Ben-Gurion, Shimon Peres and Yitzhak Rabin — into a niche party that ignores Israel‘s diplomatic and security challenges and fails to present a viable alternative to the security-obsessed right.

Last week, acclaimed Israeli author Amos Oz attacked Yachimovich for neglecting the Palestinian issue, saying she was worse than former Labor leader Ehud Barak, who serves as Netanyahu’s defense minister. Barak’s defection from the party in 2011 opened the way for Yachimovich to take the helm.

“He (Barak) says there is no solution. She (Yachimovich) says there is no problem,” said Oz, one of the most eloquent voices of Israel‘s left.

Yachimovich has also tiptoed around some of the traditional targets of the left — the huge government outlays on West Bank settlers and ultra-Orthodox Jews — in an effort to appeal to working-class voters who like Netanyahu’s hard line on security but have been hurt by his economic policies.

Israel Radio political analyst Hanan Kristal gave Yachimovich high marks for making the party younger, more dynamic and “changing its DNA.” But he said she was not a strong prime ministerial candidate like Netanyahu, or Barak and Ehud Olmert before him, because of her narrow focus.

“She’s channeled the Labor Party into a one-issue party,” he said. “That’s her ideology, but it’s also her strong suit. She’s not as strong when it comes to diplomacy and security.”

Public opinion polls confirm that most Israelis do not see her as prime ministerial material, and overwhelmingly see Netanyahu as best suited for the job. But if pre-election polls prove dramatically wrong and Netanyahu and his allies don’t win enough support to form the next government, that task could fall to her.

Yachimovich’s one-time mentor-turned-rival, former Defense Minister Amir Peretz, abruptly left Labor last month to team up with former Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni in a new party whose focus is resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Peretz, a former Labor leader, assailed Yachimovich for avoiding the conflict with the Palestinians.

“Labor gave up its historic role as the leader of the peace movement,” he charged.

Yachimovich told the Yediot Ahronot newspaper website recently that Labor “is not a leftist party and never was. … It strived for peace out of pragmatism and not out of some romantic dream of peace.”

“It is much harder to deal with the socio-economic agenda,” she added.

As a journalist, author and radio show host, Yachimovich made her name as a passionate advocate for the downtrodden. She has acknowledged voting in the past for Hadash, a party which has communist leanings. The daughter of Holocaust survivors from Poland, Yachimovich often invokes her working-class roots by mentioning that her father worked in construction. She has two children and lives in Tel Aviv.

In politics, she has been an energetic lawmaker, passing legislation on behalf of the poor and promoting woman’s rights. But it was the mass grassroots protests against Israel‘s high cost of living that erupted in the summer of 2011, drawing hundreds of thousands into the streets, that provided her tail wind.

Taking aim at Netanyahu, she has depicted him as a cold capitalist out of touch with the average Israeli.

While the country has a per capita income approaching Western Europe’s, the gaps between rich and poor are wide, and many people have trouble making ends meet. Few seem to have benefited from the country’s impressive economic growth while many have suffered from the erosion of social welfare safeguards.

Unlike Netanyahu, Yachimovich tends to favor a strong government safety net.

Netanyahu’s campaign has focused on how he has fought Palestinian militants and stood strong against Iran’s suspected nuclear program. But this week’s news that Israel‘s 2012 national deficit ballooned to twice its initial projection, roughly $10.5 billion, played right into Yachimovich’s hands.

“Netanyahu is leading the Israeli economy to total collapse,” she said. “Four more years with him, and the damage will be irreversible.”

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox World News