Tag Archives: Blind Sheikh

Sheikhing Us Blind

By Allan Erickson

Muslim Brotherhood pressuring White House to release Blind Sheikh Sheikhing us Blind

It is true we tried in civilian court a known Islamic terrorist after the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman from Egypt, the”Blind Sheikh,” was convicted of seditious conspiracy, murder, plans to blow up other New York landmarks including the U.N., and a plot to kill Egyptian President Mubarak. Adbel-Rahman is serving a life sentence in a U.S. facility.

Among his other accomplishments:

  • Fiery preaching encouraging Egyptian army officers to assassinate Egyptian President Sadat;
  • Approving followers who killed 60 tourists in Luxor in an attempt to get the sheikh freed;
  • Issuing a fatwa from jail providing bin Laden theological permission to perpetrate 9/11

This has been a very bad guy for a very long time. He has the blood of innocents on his hands, literally thousands of victims.

Roughly six months ago, we learned the Obama Administration was preparing the way to release this maniac into Egyptian custody, now that the Muslim Brotherhood is in charge in Cairo.

We provide Egypt billions of dollars in aid and military hardware annually. We have given support to the current Muslim Brotherhood regime in other ways, despite mayhem and murder in the streets. In return, Egypt, led by Morsi of the Brotherhood, refuses to help us investigate Benghazi, helps Iran transport weapons through the Suez to attack Israel, and insists we release Abdel-Rahman.

No doubt John Kerry will pick up where Hillary Clinton left off and continue licking the boots of the Brotherhood, even as he acknowledges Obama’s Libyan war released tens of thousands of RPGs and other weapons of war to Al Qaeda, which is obviously not decimated as the administration claims.

Speaking of Al Qaeda, the U.S. got its hands on another bin Laden partner recently. But rather than put him on trial via the military at Gitmo, as in the case of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM), Obama and Holder have decided to bring Sulaiman Abu Ghaith (SAG) to New York to stand trial in civilian court, where he will enjoy the right to remain silent, at taxpayer expense of course. SAG is Osama bin Laden’s son-in-law, one ‘suspected’ of being extremely helpful to KSM and bin Laden in killing 2,975 Americans on September 11, 2001.

Held in custody just blocks from Ground Zero, SAG no doubt enjoys reading a Koran untouched by infidels, a prayer mat, and Halal food specially prepared. He entered a plea of not guilty just days ago.

We are told SAG cannot be interrogated now because this is a criminal proceeding and he has rights. We are told he was brought to New York secretly and has attorneys appointed by the court to provide representation. Why do we extend the rights of U.S. citizenship to terrorists?

Many prominent Americans, including the minority leader in the Senate, have said SAG is an enemy combatant just like KSM. Therefore, he should be interrogated, held at Gitmo, and tried. Many others agree, no doubt the majority of New Yorkers and the family members of the victims of 9/11.

Eric Holder and Barack Obama apparently …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Video: The Pieces Of The Puzzle All Fit-Benghazi Is The Key!

By Gabor Zolna

The plan was to kidnap the Ambassador and trade him for the Blind Sheikh; that never happened when Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods refused to obey three stand-down orders.

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

What Difference, At This Point, Does It Make?

By Jim Emerson

Obama Appeaser Enemies SC What difference, at this point, does it make?

“What difference,at this point, does it make?”

In the throes of her faux outrage, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made this phrase famous. She uttered it while being questioned about the lies this administration told after four Americans were killed in Benghazi. She acted like a child who was caught in a lie trying to find a way out of any consequences. Whether she realizes it or not, this will register with the low information voter and thus will become her legacy. If you don’t think of this being her legacy, what is the first thing you think when someone mentions her husband Bill?

Why does it matter?

During the months leading up to the murders at Benghazi, Chris Stevens and the Ambassador in Libya were begging for the increased security that was denied by all levels of the State Department; and no one was held responsible. The White House pressured Twitter to pull the Libyan embassy tweets during the murder spree and forced CNN to surrender the Ambassador’s diary they found at Benghazi murder scene. Hillary’s minions hid the survivors of Benghazi from the public and Congress. They denied the existence of any real-time audio and video feed from the compound.  This White House ordered military commanders to stand down from launching a rescue mission.  The administration blamed a video when the world knew that it had nothing to do with the pre-planned attack. Now she is lying to Congress when she said she always said that it was a terrorist attack. But why should that matter?

Why does it matter?

With no fear of retribution from America, al Qaeda forces raided a natural gas plant in Algeria to capture Westerners and most likely was planning to take them to Libya before the Algerian security forces could react to their presence.  The Algerians did manage to contain and kill the terrorist, but not before the hostages were killed. Why does it matter? Terrorist organizations affiliated with Al Qaeda will continue to target Americans whereever they are. They want something, and this White House knows what it is.

What do they have in common?

The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt made it clear to Barack Obama that they wanted the release of the Blind Sheikh, Omar Abdel-Rahman. Most likely, the attack on Benghazi was part of al Qaeda’s efforts to kidnap Americans as an exchange for the Blind Sheikh. The Algerian kidnapping attempt was most likely a secondary consideration to punishing the French for their involvement in Mali. The Congressional Democrats’ and their lap dog media’s response is “What difference at this point does it make?” We can’t make the President look bad, even when he ignores the obvious.

Photo credit: terrellaftermath

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Video: Did Obama Stage The Algerian Kidnapping To Trade The Blind Sheik?

By Kris Zane

Hillary Clinton was on the Hill this morning, four months after the Benghazi consulate attack; Congress is still trying to find out what happened on September 11, 2011.

Obama vowed to get to the bottom of it; but instead, we got “Pin the tail on the anti-Muslim YouTube video” and a “Benghazi Accountability Report” authored by Islamic apologist Thomas R. Pickering that didn’t actually find anyone accountable.

Congressman Jason Chaffetz, after months of having state department official after state department official testify, asked the innocent question “Where are the survivors?” “I don’t know who they are. I don’t know where they live. I don’t know what state they’re from. I don’t even know how many there are. It doesn’t seem right to me.”

The whole business stinks of a cover-up. And cover-ups give rise to conspiracy theories.

Enter the “conspiracy theory” that the attack on the Benghazi consulate was an Obama-orchestrated “October Surprise” to kidnap ambassador Chris Stevens and trade him to the Muslim Brotherhood for the Blind Sheikh and prop up his dismal 43% approval rating by acting the hero.

Except a retired four-star Admiral says this is exactly what happened:

The Washington Examiner, quoting retired Four-Star Admiral James Lyons, writes: “the attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi…was the result of a bungled abduction attempt…the first stage of an international prisoner exchange…that would have ensured the release of Omar Abdel Rahman, the ‘Blind Sheik’…

Enter the Algerian hostage crisis. Again, the Blind Sheikh enters the picture. Again, the kidnapping operation hits a snag. Again, the militants seem to have inside knowledge of the facility. The militants, headed by the al-Qaeda-linked “holy warrior” Mokhtar Belmokhtar, demand the release of the Blind Sheikh in exchange for the Americans being held. And again, there is a massacre.

Except this time, instead of four Americans dying, everyone dies (hostages and militants, eighty-one at last count), mowed down by a fleet of Algerian military helicopters.

And lo and behold, among the dead bodies, among the militants reportedly heading the mission are several blond-haired, blue-eyed westerners.

America, Obama is in bed with the Muslim Brotherhood. Obama is in bed with terrorists. Obama is in bed with the enemy.

When exactly America will wake up to this fact, however, remains to be seen.

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Video: Muslim Brotherhood, Obama Collude To Release The Blind Sheikh

By Kris Zane

The Muslim Brotherhood’s Mohammed Morsi is “pressuring” Obama to release the Blind Sheikh. Of course the behind-the-scenes is that the corrupt, Marxists/Islamists Barack Hussein Obama would like nothing more than to release the Muslim Brotherhood’s lord and savior Omar Abdel-Rahman, aka the Blind Sheikh.

Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism