Tag Archives: United States District Court

Acacia Subsidiary Enters into Settlement and License Agreement with Other World Computing, Inc.

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Acacia Subsidiary Enters into Settlement and License Agreement with Other World Computing, Inc.

NEWPORT BEACH, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Acacia Research Corporation (NAS: ACTG) announced today that its Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC subsidiary has entered into a settlement and license agreement with Other World Computing, Inc. This agreement resolves litigation that was pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

ABOUT ACACIA RESEARCH CORPORATION

Acacia Research Corporation‘s subsidiaries partner with inventors and patent owners, license the patents to corporate users, and share the revenue. Acacia Research Corporation‘s subsidiaries control over 250 patent portfolios, covering technologies used in a wide variety of industries.

Information about Acacia Research Corporation and its subsidiaries is available at www.acaciaresearchgroup.com and www.acaciaresearch.com.


Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

This news release may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based upon our current expectations and speak only as of the date hereof. Our actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors and uncertainties, including the economic slowdown affecting technology companies, our ability to successfully develop products, rapid technological change in our markets, changes in demand for our future products, legislative, regulatory and competitive developments and general economic conditions. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, recent and forthcoming Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, recent Current Reports on Forms 8-K and 8-K/A, and other SEC filings discuss some of the important risk factors that may affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.

Acacia Research Corporation
Rob Stewart, Investor Relations
Tel 949-480-8300
Fax 949-480-8301
or
Media Contact:
SpecOps Communications
Adam Handelsman, President & Founder
212-518-7721
adam@specopscomm.com

KEYWORDS:   United States  North

From: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/18/acacia-subsidiary-enters-into-settlement-and-licen/

Acacia Subsidiary Enters Into Settlement and License Agreement With Microserv, Inc.

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Acacia Subsidiary Enters Into Settlement and License Agreement With Microserv, Inc.

NEWPORT BEACH, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Acacia Research Corporation (NAS: ACTG) announced today that its Brandywine Communications Technologies LLC subsidiary has entered into a settlement and license agreement with Microserv, Inc. This agreement resolves litigation that was pending in the United States District Court for the District of Idaho.

ABOUT ACACIA RESEARCH CORPORATION

Acacia Research Corporation‘s subsidiaries partner with inventors and patent owners, license the patents to corporate users, and share the revenue. Acacia Research Corporation‘s subsidiaries control over 250 patent portfolios, covering technologies used in a wide variety of industries.

Information about Acacia Research Corporation and its subsidiaries is available at www.acaciaresearchgroup.com and www.acaciaresearch.com.


Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

This news release may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based upon our current expectations and speak only as of the date hereof. Our actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors and uncertainties, including the economic slowdown affecting technology companies, our ability to successfully develop products, rapid technological change in our markets, changes in demand for our future products, legislative, regulatory and competitive developments and general economic conditions. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, recent and forthcoming Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, recent Current Reports on Forms 8-K and 8-K/A, and other SEC filings discuss some of the important risk factors that may affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.

Acacia Research Corporation
Rob Stewart
Investor Relations
Tel: 949-480-8300
Fax: 949-480-8301
or
Media Contact:
SpecOps Communications
Adam Handelsman
President & Founder
212-518-7721
adam@specopscomm.com

KEYWORDS:   United States  North America  California  Idaho

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS:

The article Acacia Subsidiary Enters

From: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/17/acacia-subsidiary-enters-into-settlement-and-licen/

Acacia Subsidiaries Enter into Settlement Agreement with Toshiba Corporation

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Acacia Subsidiaries Enter into Settlement Agreement with Toshiba Corporation

NEWPORT BEACH, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Acacia Research Corporation (NAS: ACTG) announced today that its Advanced Data Access LLC subsidiary, its Smart Memory Solutions LLC subsidiary and its Smart Foundry Solutions LLC subsidiary have entered into a settlement agreement with Toshiba Corporation. This agreement resolves litigation that was pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California and United States District Court for the Central District of California.

ABOUT ACACIA RESEARCH CORPORATION

Acacia Research Corporation‘s subsidiaries partner with inventors and patent owners, license the patents to corporate users, and share the revenue. Acacia Research Corporation‘s subsidiaries control over 250 patent portfolios, covering technologies used in a wide variety of industries.

Information about Acacia Research Corporation and its subsidiaries is available at www.acaciaresearchgroup.com and www.acaciaresearch.com.


Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

This news release may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based upon our current expectations and speak only as of the date hereof. Our actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors and uncertainties, including the economic slowdown affecting technology companies, our ability to successfully develop products, rapid technological change in our markets, changes in demand for our future products, legislative, regulatory and competitive developments and general economic conditions. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, recent and forthcoming Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, recent Current Reports on Forms 8-K and 8-K/A, and other SEC filings discuss some of the important risk factors that may affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.

Acacia Research

From: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/12/acacia-subsidiaries-enter-into-settlement-agreemen/

SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky Notifies Investors with Losses on Their Investment in Family Dol

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky Notifies Investors with Losses on Their Investment in Family Dollar Stores, Inc. of Class Action Lawsuit and the Deadline of April 22, 2013 to Seek a Lead Plaintiff Position

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Levi & Korsinsky announces that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina on behalf of investors who purchased Family Dollar Stores, Inc. (“Family Dollar” or the “Company”) (NYS: FDO) stock between October 3, 2012 and January 2, 2013.

For more information, click here:http://zlk.9nl.com/family-dollar-fdo/.

The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants issued materially false and misleading statements regarding Family Dollar‘s then-present sales demand, profitability and financial results for the first quarter of 2013 and for December 2012. As a result of defendants’ false statements, Family Dollar‘s stock traded at artificially inflated prices throughout the Class Period, reaching a high of $71.20 per share by November 30, 2012. It is further alleged that during this time Family Dollar‘s senior executives cashed in, selling their own Family Dollar stock at artificially inflated prices; during the Class Period the Company’s Chief Executive Officer sold more than $15.6 million worth of his Family Dollar stock.

On January 3, 2013, Family Dollar issued a press release disclosing that sales in the Company’s first quarter 2013 had significantly underperformed and that the Company was slashing 2013 financial guidance. Upon this news, Family Dollar stock fell $8.30 per share to close at $55.74 on January 3, 2012.

If you suffered a loss in Family Dollar you have until April 22, 2013to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. To obtain additional information, contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. either via email at jlevi@zlk.com or by telephone at (877) 363-5972, or visit http://zlk.9nl.com/family-dollar-fdo/.

Levi & Korsinsky is a national firm with offices in New York, New Jersey, and Washington D.C. The firm has extensive expertise in prosecuting securities litigation involving financial fraud, representing investors throughout the nation in securities and shareholder lawsuits. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

CONTACT:
Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph Levi, Esq.
Eduard Korsinsky, Esq.
30 Broad Street – 24th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Tel: (212) 363-7500
Toll Free: (877) 363-5972
Fax: (866) 367-6510
www.zlk.com

<div

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Law Offices of Todd M. Garber Announces Lead Plaintiff Deadline in the Class Action Lawsuit Against

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Law Offices of Todd M. Garber Announces Lead Plaintiff Deadline in the Class Action Lawsuit Against ITT Educational Services, Inc.

LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)– The Law Offices of Todd M. Garber announces that shareholders of ITT Educational Services, Inc. (“ITT” or the “Company”) (NYS: ESI) have until May 10, 2013 to move for lead plaintiff status in the shareholder lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of a class (the “Class”) comprising all purchasers of ITT common stock between April 22, 2010 and February 25, 2013, inclusive (the “Class Period“).

ITT provides postsecondary degree programs in the United States. The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period the Company and certain of its officers and directors violated federal securities laws by issuing false and misleading statements. On February 22, 2013 ITT announced that the Securities and Exchange Commission was investigating the Company’s involvement in certain private student-loan agreements. According to ITT, the Company had received a subpoena from the SEC on February 8, 2013, along with a letter informing the Company of the investigation. The subpoena issued by the SEC requested documents related to a 2009 loan risk sharing agreement and ITT‘s PEAKS Private Student Loan Program. As a result of this news, ITT stock declined $3.10 per share, or nearly 17%, to close on February 25, 2013 at $15.53 per share on unusually heavy volume.

If you are a member of the above-described Class, you may move the Court no later than May 10, 2013 to serve as lead plaintiff; however, you must meet certain legal requirements. To be a member of the Class you need not take any action at this time. You may retain counsel of your choice or take no action and remain an absent Class member. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this Notice or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Todd M. Garber, Esquire, of the Law Offices of Todd M. Garber, by telephone at 213-700-7262 or by email to info@toddgarberlaw.com.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Law Offices of Todd M. Garber
Todd M. Garber, Attorney at Law
Los Angeles, …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Glancy Binkow &amp; Goldberg LLP Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against Incyte Corporation

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP Announces Class Action Lawsuit Against Incyte Corporation

LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware on behalf of a class (the “Class”) comprising all purchasers of the common stock of Incyte Corporation (“Incyte” or the “Company”) (NAS: INCY) between April 26, 2012 and August 1, 2012 (the “Class Period“). The Complaint alleges that certain statements issued by Incyte during the Class Period were false and misleading regarding the Company’s business and financial prospects.

Incyte, a biopharmaceutical company, focuses on the discovery, development and commercialization of proprietary small molecule drugs for oncology and treatment of inflammation. The Complaint alleges that Incyte issued misleading statements concerning demand for the Company’s myelofibrosis drug, Jakafi.

On August 2, 2012, Incyte announced the Company’s second quarter 2012 financial results and disclosed that the sales growth of Jakafi had been much softer during the second quarter of 2012 than investors and certain stock analysts had been led to expect. In response to these disclosures, the price of Incyte stock declined 22% from its August 1, 2012 close of $24.92 per share, to close at $19.57 per share on August 2, 2012 on heavy trading volume.

No class has yet been certified in this action. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. If you purchased Incyte shares during the Class Period, you have certain rights and have until May 6, 2013 to move for lead plaintiff status. To be a member of the class you need not take any action at this time, and you may retain counsel of your choice. If you wish to learn more or have any questions concerning your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Michael Goldberg, Esquire, of Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP, 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100, Los Angeles, California 90067, by telephone at (310) 201-9150, Toll Free at (888) 773-9224, by e-mail to shareholders@glancylaw.com, or visit our website at http://www.glancylaw.com.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP, Los Angeles, CA
Michael Goldberg, 310-201-9150 or 888-773-9224
shareholders@glancylaw.com
www.glancylaw.com

KEYWORDS: …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Law Offices of Howard G. Smith Announces Lead Plaintiff Deadline in the Class Action Lawsuit Against

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Law Offices of Howard G. Smith Announces Lead Plaintiff Deadline in the Class Action Lawsuit Against Harvest Natural Resources Inc.

BENSALEM, Pa.–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Law Offices of Howard G. Smith announces that investors of Harvest Natural Resources, Inc. (“Harvest” or the “Company”) (NYS: HNR) have until May 21, 2013 to move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff in the securities fraud class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas on behalf of a class (the “Class”) comprising all purchasers of Harvest securities between May 7, 2010 and March 18, 2013, inclusive (the “Class Period“). Harvest, an independent energy company, engages in the acquisition, exploration, development, production and disposition of oil and natural gas properties.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period defendants made false and/or misleading statements or failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s financial performance and prospects. Specifically, defendants misrepresented or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company incorrectly capitalized certain lease maintenance costs and certain internal selling, general and administrative costs; (2) the Company improperly presented certain cash flow items and caused certain long-lived assets to be impaired; (3) the Company was unable to sell its interests in Petrodelta S.A. to PT Pertamina (Persero); (4) the Company lacked adequate internal and financial controls; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, the Company’s statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

If you are a member of the Class described above, you have certain rights and have until May 21, 2013 to move for lead plaintiff status. To be a member of the class you need not take any action at this time, or may retain counsel of your choice. If you wish to discuss this action or learn more concerning your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Howard G. Smith, Esquire, of Law Offices of Howard G. Smith, 3070 Bristol Pike, Suite 112, Bensalem, Pennsylvania 19020 by telephone at (215) 638-4847, Toll Free at (888) 638-4847, or by email to howardsmith@howardsmithlaw.com, or visit our website at http://www.howardsmithlaw.com.

Law Offices of Howard G. Smith
Howard G. Smith, Esquire
215-638-4847
888-638-4847
howardsmith@howardsmithlaw.com
www.howardsmithlaw.com

KEYWORDS:   United States  North America  Pennsylvania

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS:

The article Law Offices of Howard G. Smith Announces Lead Plaintiff Deadline in the Class Action Lawsuit Against Harvest Natural Resources Inc. originally appeared on Fool.com.

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Levi &amp; Korsinsky Notifies Investors with Losses on Their Investment in Atlantic P

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky Notifies Investors with Losses on Their Investment in Atlantic Power of Class Action Lawsuit and the Deadline of May 7, 2013 to Seek a Lead Plaintiff Position

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Levi & Korsinsky announces that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on behalf of investors who purchased Atlantic Power Corporation (“Atlantic Power” or the “Company”) (TSX:ATP) (NYS: AT) stock between July 23, 2010 through March 4, 2013.

For more information, click here:http://zlk.9nl.com/atlantic-power-at/.

The complaint alleges that during the class period, defendants issued materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business practices and financial results. Specifically, the complaint alleges that: (a) cash flows the Company was using to pay a dividend payout were being funded by revenues derived from companies Atlantic Power was spending millions of dollars to acquire; (b) Atlantic Power‘s losses from operations were mounting, jeopardizing the Company’s ability to maintain the outsized dividend payment; and (c) defendants knew that many of the Company’s project contracts were scheduled to expire over the course of 2013, meaning cash flows from those projects would be substantially lower after those contracts ended, and unbeknownst to investors, Atlantic Power was not replacing those contracts-further jeopardizing its ability to maintain the outsized dividend payment that was supporting its stock price. As a result of defendants’ materially false and misleading statements, Atlantic Power common stock traded at artificially inflated prices throughout the class period.

If you suffered a loss in Atlantic Power you have until May 7, 2013to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. To obtain additional information, contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. either via email at jlevi@zlk.com or by telephone at (877) 363-5972, or visit http://zlk.9nl.com/atlantic-power-at/.

Levi & Korsinsky is a national firm with offices in New York, New Jersey, and Washington D.C. The firm has extensive expertise in prosecuting securities litigation involving financial fraud, representing investors throughout the nation in securities and shareholder lawsuits. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph Levi, Esq.
Eduard Korsinsky, Esq.
Tel: 212-363-7500
Toll Free: 877-363-5972
Fax: 866-367-6510
www.zlk.com

KEYWORDS:   United States  North America  New York

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS:

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

DEADLINE ALERT: Rigrodsky &amp; Long, P.A. Reminds Shareholders of Family Dollar Stores, Inc. of Upcomin

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

DEADLINE ALERT: Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. Reminds Shareholders of Family Dollar Stores, Inc. of Upcoming Deadline

WILMINGTON, Del.–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Rigrodsky & Long, P.A.:

  • Do you, or did you, own shares in Family Dollar Stores, Inc. (NYSE: FDO )?
  • Did you purchase your shares prior to October 3, 2012, or between October 3, 2012 and January 2, 2013?
  • Did you lose money in your investment in Family Dollar Stores, Inc.?
  • Do you want to discuss your rights?

Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. reminders shareholders of Family Dollar Stores, Inc. (NYSE: FDO) (“Family Dollar” or the “Company”) of an upcoming deadline involving a securities fraud class action lawsuit commenced against the Company.

A complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina on behalf of all persons or entities that purchased the common stock of Family Dollar between October 3, 2012 and January 2, 2013 (the “Class Period“), alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against the Company and certain of its officers (the “Complaint”). If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 22, 2013.

If you purchased shares of Family Dollar during the Class Period, or purchased shares prior to the Class Period and still hold Family Dollar, and wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact Timothy J. MacFall, Esquire or Peter Allocco of Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., 825 East Gate Boulevard, Suite 300, Garden City, NY at (888) 969-4242, by e-mail to info@rigrodskylong.com, or at: http://www.rigrodskylong.com/investigations/family-dollar-stores-inc-fdo-2.

A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the Court must determine that the class member’s claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that the …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman &amp; Herz LLP Commences Class Action Lawsuit on Behalf of Harvest Natura

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP Commences Class Action Lawsuit on Behalf of Harvest Natural Resources, Inc. Investors

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, on behalf of all persons who purchased the common stock of Harvest Natural Resources, Inc. (“HNR” or the “Company”) [NYSE: HNR] between May 7, 2010 and March 19, 2013, inclusive (the “Class Period“), against the Company and certain of the Company’s officers, alleging securities fraud pursuant to Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) and 78t(a)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the SEC [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5] (the “Class”).

The case name is styled Kim v. Harvest Natural Resources, et al. A copy of the complaint filed in this action is available from the Court, or can be viewed on the Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP website at www.whafh.com.

During the Class Period, HNR issued materially false and misleading statements and omitted to state material facts that rendered their affirmative statements misleading as they related to the Company’s financial performance, business prospects, and financial condition. As a result of these materially false and misleading statements, the price of the Company’s securities was artificially inflated during the Class Period. As the truth of the Company’s materially false and misleading statements entered the market, the Company’s stock plummeted.

The Complaint alleges that statements made by defendants are false and misleading because defendants failed to disclose that: (1) the Company incorrectly capitalized certain lease maintenance costs and certain internal selling, general and administrative costs; (2) the Company improperly presented certain cash flow items and caused certain long-lived assets to be impaired; (3) the Company was unable to sell its interests in Petrodelta S.A. to PT Pertamina (Persero); (4) the Company lacked adequate internal and financial controls; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, the Company’s statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

As a result of the market‘s assimilation of the news disclosed in the Company’s March 19, 2013 press release, the Company’s shares declined $1.79 per share or more than 32%, to close at $3.70 per share.

In ignorance of the false and misleading nature of the statements described in the Complaint, and the deceptive and manipulative devices and contrivances employed by said defendants, plaintiff and the other members of the Class relied, to their …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Cognex Sues Microscan for Patent Infringement

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Cognex Sues Microscan for Patent Infringement

NATICK, Mass.–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Cognex Corporation (NAS: CGNX) announced today that it has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Microscan Systems, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Cognex alleges that Microscan’s Mobile Hawk, a handheld product used to read Direct Part Mark (DPM) codes, infringes a patent held by Cognex. The lawsuit seeks to prohibit Microscan from using Cognex’s patented technology in its products, and to recover damages resulting from the infringement.

“Cognex has invested substantial time and resources to develop highly innovative ID code-reading technologies, and thousands of customers around the world purchase our products precisely because of our innovations. While we welcome legitimate competition, we will not stand idly by when competitors use our proprietary technology against us in the marketplace. We have a responsibility to all of our stakeholders, particularly to our engineers who devote significant effort to create new technologies, to take meaningful action whenever a competitor infringes any of our patents,” said Robert J. Willett, Chief Executive Officer of Cognex.

About Cognex Corporation

Cognex Corporation designs, develops, manufactures and markets a range of products that incorporate sophisticated machine vision technology that gives them the ability to “see.” Cognex products include barcode readers, machine vision sensors and machine vision systems that are used in factories, warehouses and distribution centers around the world to guide, gauge, inspect, identify and assure the quality of items during the manufacturing and distribution process. Cognex is the world’s leader in the machine vision industry, having shipped more than 850,000 vision-based products, representing over $3 billion in cumulative revenue, since the company’s founding in 1981. Headquartered in Natick, Massachusetts, USA, Cognex has regional offices and distributors located throughout North America, Japan, Europe, Asia and Latin America. For details visit Cognex online at http://www.cognex.com.

Cognex Corporation
Susan Conway, 508-650-3353
Director of Investor Relations
susan.conway@cognex.com

KEYWORDS:   United States  North America  Massachusetts

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS:

The article Cognex Sues Microscan for Patent Infringement originally appeared on Fool.com.

Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Milberg LLP Announces Pendency of Class Action Lawsuits Against Maxwell Technologies, Inc. – www.max

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Milberg LLP Announces Pendency of Class Action Lawsuits Against Maxwell Technologies, Inc. – www.maxwelltechnologieslawsuit.com

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Milberg LLP announces that class action lawsuits have been filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California on behalf of purchasers of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. (“Maxwell”) (NAS: MXWL) common stock between April 28, 2011 and March 7, 2013, inclusive (the “Class Period“).

Milberg LLP has created a website (www.maxwelltechnologieslawsuit.com) that seeks to answer questions about shareholder class actions.

The lawsuit alleges Maxwell and certain of its officers and directors violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The complaint claims Maxwell issued materially false and misleading statements which led to an inflated stock price during the Class Period.

On March 7, 2013, Maxwell issued a press release disclosing that it will need to restate previously issued financial statements for 2011 and most of 2012 due to errors related to the timing of recognition of revenue from sales to certain distributors.

On this news, Maxwell’s share price fell more than 11% to close at $8.10 per share on March 8, 2013.

On March 20, 2013, shares of Maxwell fell another 20.56% after announcing a delay in filing its 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

If you purchased Maxwell shares during the Class Period you may, no later than May 13, 2013, request that the Court appoint you lead plaintiff. A lead plaintiff is a class member that directs the litigation. Your share in any recovery will not be affected by serving as a lead plaintiff. You do not need to be a lead plaintiff to recover. You may retain Milberg LLP, or other attorneys, for this action, but do not need to retain counsel to recover. If this action is certified as a class action, class members will be automatically represented by Court-appointed counsel. The complaints in this action were not filed by Milberg.

If you wish to discuss this matter with us, please contact the following attorney:

Acacia Subsidiary Enters into Settlement and License Agreement with Ventyx USA, Inc.

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Acacia Subsidiary Enters into Settlement and License Agreement with Ventyx USA, Inc.

NEWPORT BEACH, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Acacia Research Corporation (NAS: ACTG) announced today that its Automated Facilities Management Corporation subsidiary has entered into a settlement and license agreement with Ventyx USA, Inc. This agreement resolves patent litigation that was pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

ABOUT ACACIA RESEARCH CORPORATION

Acacia Research Corporation‘s subsidiaries partner with inventors and patent owners, license the patents to corporate users, and share the revenue. Acacia Research Corporation‘s subsidiaries control over 250 patent portfolios, covering technologies used in a wide variety of industries.

Information about Acacia Research Corporation and its subsidiaries is available at www.acaciaresearchgroup.com and www.acaciaresearch.com.


Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

This news release may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based upon our current expectations and speak only as of the date hereof. Our actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors and uncertainties, including the economic slowdown affecting technology companies, our ability to successfully develop products, rapid technological change in our markets, changes in demand for our future products, legislative, regulatory and competitive developments and general economic conditions. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, recent and forthcoming Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, recent Current Reports on Forms 8-K and 8-K/A, and other SEC filings discuss some of the important risk factors that may affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.

Acacia Research Corporation
Rob Stewart
Investor Relations
Tel: 949-480-8300
Fax: 949-480-8301
or
Media Contact:
SpecOps Communications
Adam Handelsman
President & Founder
212-518-7721
adam@specopscomm.com

KEYWORDS:   United States  North America  California

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS:

The article Acacia …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Kirby McInerney LLP Announces It Has Been Retained by an Investor for a Class Action Lawsuit on Beha

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Kirby McInerney LLP Announces It Has Been Retained by an Investor for a Class Action Lawsuit on Behalf of Mellanox Technologies, Ltd. Investors

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Kirby McInerney LLP announced today that it has been retained by an investor in Mellanox Technologies, Ltd. (“Mellanox” or the “Company”) (NAS: MLNX) to pursue class action claims under the federal securities laws on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased the common stock of Mellanox between April 19, 2012 and January 2, 2013 (the “Class Period“).

Complaints filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York allege that Mellanox and certain of its current and former executives issued materially false and misleading statements during the Class Period regarding the Company’s future prospects and financial performance. According to the complaint, the defendants knew, but concealed from the investing public during the Class Period, that: (1) Mellanox was experiencing a continuous influx of customer complaints regarding glitches in its InfiniBand product; (2) a competitor’s rapid development of its own InfiniBand adaptor would diminish Mellanox’s product offering and increase competition in the market for InfiniBand, in which Mellanox had maintained a near monopoly; (3) the Company’s large first and second quarter 2012 sales growth could not be maintained and was not the result of the defendants’ business acumen or growth in the market for InfiniBand; (4) Mellanox’s inventory, both at the Company and in the hands of at least one significant customer, was increasing dramatically, and the increase would result in decreased sales and profit margins going forward; and (5) as a result of the above factors, Mellanox’s actual sales growth supported neither its own fourth quarter 2012 guidance nor the inflated share price targets analysts and investors were modeling based on defendants’ optimistic statements and guidance during the Class Period.

The complaints allege that the market learned, through a series of partial disclosures made between September 7, 2012 and January 3, 2013, that the foundation for the Company’s business was not as solid as defendants had portrayed it during the Class Period. On September 7, 2012, at least one analyst downgraded Mellanox shares from Buy to Hold. Then, on October 18, 2012, Mellanox reported its third quarter 2012 financial results and issued fourth quarter 2012 fiscal guidance that was lower than expected. Finally, at the end of the day on January 2, 2013, the defendants finally admitted that Mellanox had missed its fourth quarter 2012 revenue guidance by over 20%. This news, along with the above announcements, made the price of Mellanox shares fall precipitously on unusually high trading volume.

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Acacia Subsidiary Enters into Settlement and License Agreement with 6waves, LLC, 6waves Technologies

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Acacia Subsidiary Enters into Settlement and License Agreement with 6waves, LLC, 6waves Technologies, LLC, 6waves US, Inc, and Six Waves, Inc.

NEWPORT BEACH, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Acacia Research Corporation (NAS: ACTG) announced today that its subsidiary, Gametek LLC, has entered into a settlement and license agreement with 6waves LLC, 6waves Technologies, LLC, 6waves US, Inc., and Six Waves Inc. This agreement resolves patent litigation that was pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.

ABOUT ACACIA RESEARCH CORPORATION

Acacia Research Corporation‘s subsidiaries partner with inventors and patent owners, license the patents to corporate users, and share the revenue. Acacia Research Corporation‘s subsidiaries control over 250 patent portfolios, covering technologies used in a wide variety of industries.

Information about Acacia Research Corporation and its subsidiaries is available at www.acaciaresearchgroup.com and www.acaciaresearch.com.


Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

This news release may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based upon our current expectations and speak only as of the date hereof. Our actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors and uncertainties, including the economic slowdown affecting technology companies, our ability to successfully develop products, rapid technological change in our markets, changes in demand for our future products, legislative, regulatory and competitive developments and general economic conditions. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, recent and forthcoming Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, recent Current Reports on Forms 8-K and 8-K/A, and other SEC filings discuss some of the important risk factors that may affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.

Acacia Research Corporation
Rob Stewart
Investor Relations
Tel (949) 480-8300
Fax (949) 480-8301
or
Media Contact:
SpecOps Communications
Adam Handelsman
President & …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

DEADLINE ALERT: Rigrodsky &amp; Long, P.A. Reminds Shareholders of Mellanox Technologies, Ltd. of Upcomi

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

DEADLINE ALERT: Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. Reminds Shareholders of Mellanox Technologies, Ltd. of Upcoming Deadline

WILMINGTON, Del.–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Rigrodsky & Long, P.A.:

  • Do you, or did you, own shares in Mellanox Technologies, Ltd. (NASDAQ GS: MLNX )?
  • Did you purchase your shares prior to April 19, 2012, or between April 19, 2012 and January 2, 2013, inclusive?
  • Did you lose money in your investment in Mellanox Technologies, Ltd.?
  • Do you want to discuss your rights?

Rigrodsky & Long, P.A. reminds shareholders of Mellanox Technologies, Ltd. (“Mellanox” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ GS: MLNX) of an upcoming deadline involving a securities fraud class action lawsuit commenced against the Company.

A complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of all persons or entities that purchased the common stock of Mellanox between April 19, 2012 and January 2, 2013, inclusive (the “Class Period“), alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against the Company and certain of its officers (the “Complaint”). If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than April 8, 2013.

If you purchased shares of Mellanox during the Class Period, or purchased shares prior to the Class Period and still hold Mellanox, and wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact Timothy J. MacFall, Esquire or Peter Allocco of Rigrodsky & Long, P.A., 825 East Gate Boulevard, Suite 300, Garden City, NY at (888) 969-4242, by e-mail to info@rigrodskylong.com, or at: http://www.rigrodskylong.com/investigations/mellanox-technologies-ltd-mlnx.

A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the Court must determine that the class member’s claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Glancy Binkow &amp; Goldberg LLP Announces Class Action Lawsuit against Harvest Natural Resources Inc.

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP Announces Class Action Lawsuit against Harvest Natural Resources Inc.

LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas on behalf of a class (the “Class”) comprising all purchasers of the securities of Harvest Natural Resources Inc. (“Harvest” or the “Company”) (NYS: HNR) between May 7, 2010 and March 18, 2013.

Harvest, an independent energy company, engages in the acquisition, exploration, development, production and disposition of oil and natural gas properties. The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period defendants made false and/or misleading statements or failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s financial performance and prospects. Specifically, defendants misrepresented or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company incorrectly capitalized certain lease maintenance costs and certain internal selling, general and administrative costs; (2) the Company improperly presented certain cash flow items and caused certain long-lived assets to be impaired; (3) the Company was unable to sell its interests in Petrodelta S.A. to PT Pertamina (Persero); (4) the Company lacked adequate internal and financial controls; and (5) as a result of the foregoing, the Company’s statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

No class has yet been certified in this action. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. If you purchased Harvest securities during the Class Period, you have certain rights, and have until May 21, 2013 to move for lead plaintiff status. To be a member of the class you need not take any action at this time, and you may retain counsel of your choice. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Michael Goldberg, Esquire, of Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP, 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100, Los Angeles, California 90067, by telephone at (310) 201-9150, Toll Free at (888) 773-9224, by e-mail to shareholders@glancylaw.com, or visit our website at http://www.glancylaw.com.

This press release may be considered Attorney Advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules.

Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP
Michael Goldberg
(310) 201-9150 or (888) 773-9224
shareholders@glancylaw.com
www.glancylaw.com

KEYWORDS:   United States  North America  California

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS:

The article Glancy Binkow & Goldberg …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

UPCOMING DEADLINE: Levi &amp; Korsinsky Notifies Investors with Losses on Their Investment in Cirrus Log

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

UPCOMING DEADLINE: Levi & Korsinsky Notifies Investors with Losses on Their Investment in Cirrus Logic, Inc. of Class Action Lawsuit and the Deadline of April 5, 2013 to Seek a Lead Plaintiff Position

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Levi & Korsinsky announces that a class action lawsuit has commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of investors who acquired Cirrus Logic, Inc. (“Cirrus” or “the Company”) (NAS: CRUS) stock between July 31, 2012 and October 31, 2012.

For more information, click here: http://zlk.9nl.com/cirrus-logic-crus/.

The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants issued materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s financial performance and prospects. In particular, it is alleged that defendants knew but concealed the following during the Class Period: (a) that the Company’s dependence on Apple, Inc. for revenues was increasing rather than diminishing; (b) Cirrus’s sales growth was falling rather than increasing; (c) difficulties in Cirrus’s supply chain and at its vendors were increasing costs and diminishing the Company’s profit margins; (d) the launch of several models of Cirrus’s new LED lighting had been delayed; and (e) as a result of the aforementioned, defendants knew Cirrus’s increased fiscal 2013 guidance was not attainable.

On October 31, 2012, Cirrus issued significantly lower guidance than was expected for fiscal 2013. In response to the Company’s announcement, Cirrus stock fell from a close of $40.78 per share to $36.14 a share on November 1, 2012.

If you suffered a loss in Cirrus you have until April 5, 2013to request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn’t require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. To obtain additional information, contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. either via email at jlevi@zlk.com or by telephone at (877) 363-5972, or visit http://zlk.9nl.com/cirrus-logic-crus/.

Levi & Korsinsky is a national firm with offices in New York, New Jersey, and Washington D.C. The firm has extensive expertise in prosecuting securities litigation involving financial fraud, representing investors throughout the nation in securities and shareholder lawsuits. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph Levi, Esq.
Tel: 212-363-7500
Toll Free: 877-363-5972
Fax: 866-367-6510
www.zlk.com

KEYWORDS:   United States  North America  New York

INDUSTRY KEYWORDS:

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

CORRECTING and REPLACING Abraham, Fruchter &amp; Twersky, LLP Announces That a Class Action Lawsuit Has

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

CORRECTING and REPLACING Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky, LLP Announces That a Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed against Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Fourth graph, first sentence of release should read: If you purchased the common stock of Spectrum from August 8, 2012 through March 12, 2013 (the “Class”) and you wish to serve as lead plaintiff in this action, you must move the Court no later than May 13, 2013. (sted May 16, 2013).

The corrected release reads:

ABRAHAM, FRUCHTER & TWERSKY, LLP ANNOUNCES THAT A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT HAS BEEN FILED AGAINST SPECTRUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky, LLP announces that a securities class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased the common stock of Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Spectrum” or the “Company”) (NAS: SPPI) from August 8, 2012 through March 12, 2013, inclusive (the “Class Period“). The complaint alleges violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5, promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain of its officers and directors.

The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements to the investing public by dismissing concerns that sales of FUSILEV® (an oncology drug manufactured by Spectrum) would be adversely affected by increased supplies of leucovorin (a generic and competing drug of FUSILEV) and concealing the impact that the increased availability of leucovorin would have on FUSILEV sales. The complaint alleges that the defendants knew that when the availability of leucovorin increased, Spectrum would not be able to sustain its business outlook and revenue projections.

After the market closed on March 12, 2013, Spectrum surprised the market by reporting in a press release that sales of FUSILEV would be dropping significantly due to “a change in ordering patterns of FUSILEV.” The Company also decreased their full-year 2013 revenues forecast to a range of $160 to $180 million, significantly lower than analysts’ revenue expectations of $297.33 million. In a reaction to this news, shares of Spectrum common stock fell $4.64 per share, or 37%, on extremely high trading volume of 22.5 million shares.

If you purchased the common stock of Spectrum from August 8, 2012 through March 12, 2013 (the “Class”) and you wish to serve as lead plaintiff in this action, you must move the Court no later than …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Abraham, Fruchter &amp; Twersky, LLP Announces That a Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed against Spectr

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky, LLP Announces That a Class Action Lawsuit Has Been Filed against Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky, LLP announces that a securities class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada on behalf of all persons or entities who purchased the common stock of Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Spectrum” or the “Company”) (NAS: SPPI) from August 8, 2012 through March 12, 2013, inclusive (the “Class Period“). The complaint alleges violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5, promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain of its officers and directors.

The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements to the investing public by dismissing concerns that sales of FUSILEV® (an oncology drug manufactured by Spectrum) would be adversely affected by increased supplies of leucovorin (a generic and competing drug of FUSILEV) and concealing the impact that the increased availability of leucovorin would have on FUSILEV sales. The complaint alleges that the defendants knew that when the availability of leucovorin increased, Spectrum would not be able to sustain its business outlook and revenue projections.

After the market closed on March 12, 2013, Spectrum surprised the market by reporting in a press release that sales of FUSILEV would be dropping significantly due to “a change in ordering patterns of FUSILEV.” The Company also decreased their full-year 2013 revenues forecast to a range of $160 to $180 million, significantly lower than analysts’ revenue expectations of $297.33 million. In a reaction to this news, shares of Spectrum common stock fell $4.64 per share, or 37%, on extremely high trading volume of 22.5 million shares.

If you purchased the common stock of Spectrum from August 8, 2012 through March 12, 2013 (the “Class”) and you wish to serve as lead plaintiff in this action, you must move the Court no later than May 16, 2013. Any member of the proposed class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain a member of the proposed class.

If you would like to discuss this action or if you have any questions concerning this notice or your rights as a potential class member or lead plaintiff, you may contact: Arthur J. Chen of Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky, LLP toll free at (800) 440-8986, or via e-mail at info@aftlaw.com or achen@aftlaw.com.

Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky, LLP has extensive experience in securities class action cases, and …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance