Tag Archives: Tufts University

Tufts’ ‘YOLO’ Essay Question Asks College Applicants To Explain Phrase’s Personal Significance

By The Huffington Post News Editors

YOLO [YO-low]: An acronym meaning “You only live once.” Meant to elicit a carefree attitude, willing to take chances.

Also, the subject of an essay question to get into one of the best universities in the country.

Tufts University in Medford, Mass., is asking applicants to answer three essay questions. The first two deal with why prospective students are applying to Tufts and how their background defines them. Then they give applicants a choice of five essay prompts, one of which involves “YOLO”:

Read More…
More on Education

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Huffington Post

Causeway Capital Management Names Foster Corwith and Alessandro Valentini Portfolio Managers

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Causeway Capital Management Names Foster Corwith and Alessandro Valentini Portfolio Managers

LOS ANGELES–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Causeway Capital Management LLC (“Causeway”), an asset management firm specializing in global equity investing, today announced the appointment of Foster Corwith and Alessandro Valentini as portfolio managers, effective April 1.

Corwith and Valentini will join Causeway’s six current fundamental portfolio managers–Sarah Ketterer, Harry Hartford, James Doyle, Jonathan Eng, Kevin Durkin, and Conor Muldoon–in managing client portfolios on a team basis.

“Foster and Alessandro have made many meaningful contributions to Causeway over the years, and we’re delighted to promote them to the portfolio management team,” said Sarah Ketterer, chief executive officer of Causeway. “We have an exceptionally talented investment team—analysts as well as portfolio managers—collaborating to achieve our clients’ long-term investment objectives.”

Foster Corwith joined Causeway in 2006 and is a director and fundamental portfolio manager responsible for investment research in the global industrials and consumer sectors. Prior to joining Causeway, Mr. Corwith was a research associate at Deutsche Asset Management, where he was responsible for researching consumer staples companies. From 2003 to 2004, Mr. Corwith was a project manager in the Corporate Services group of The Bank of New York. From 2001- 2003, Mr. Corwith was an analyst in Credit Suisse First Boston’s prime brokerage unit. Mr. Corwith has an MBA from the University of Chicago, a BA, cum laude, from Tufts University, and is a CFA charterholder.

Alessandro Valentini joined Causeway in 2006 and is a director and fundamental portfolio manager responsible for investment research in the global health care and financials sectors. Before coming to Causeway, Mr. Valentini worked as a research analyst at Thornburg Investment Management. From 2000 to 2004, Mr. Valentini worked as a financial analyst at Goldman Sachs in the European Equities Research-Sales division in New York. Mr. Valentini has an MBA from Columbia Business School, with honors, an MA in Economics from Georgetown University and a BS, magna cum laude, from Georgetown University. He is also a CFA charterholder.

About Causeway

Established in 2001, Los Angeles-based Causeway provides investment management services to corporations, pension plans, public retirement plans, Taft-Hartley pension plans, endowments and foundations, mutual funds, charities, private trusts, wrap fee programs, and other institutions. Causeway’s international and global value equity strategies use team-based, value-driven investment disciplines that combine in-depth research and analysis, active portfolio construction, and proprietary risk management. Causeway also manages a quantitative emerging markets equity strategy and a global absolute return strategy. The firm, wholly-owned by …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Maximus Thaler, Tufts University Student, Wants To Open Cafe That Serves Discarded Food For Free

By The Huffington Post News Editors

Turkey meatballs, organic Greek yogurt, fair trade coffee. It sounds like the makings of a persnickety shopper’s grocery list. But it’s just one batch of fresh food that Maximus Thaler retrieved from a dumpster outside of a Massachusetts supermarket.

According to the National Resources Defense Council, supermarkets throw away on average, $2,300 worth of out-of-date, but still consumable, food every night. It’s a wasteful practice Thaler hopes to put an end to by raising $1,500 to open a café that gives away discarded grub.

“We believe food is a fundamental right, and should be shared freely with all,” the Tufts University student wrote on his Kickstarter page.

Read More…
More on Millennial Impact

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Huffington Post

Golf, BBQ Lobbyists Responsible For Daylight Savings Time

By The Huffington Post News Editors

Europeans will lose an hour of sleep this Sunday, something most Americans did three weeks ago. And in the fall they’ll get it back a week before their US counterparts.

So why this trans-Atlantic divide?

Look no further than the US golf and barbecue industries.

For years, the United States changed its clocks in late April and late October, but that changed in 1986 when lawmakers heard from lobbyists that more daylight means more money, explained writer Michael Downing.

According to Downing — author of “Spring Forward, The Annual Madness of Daylight Saving Time” — the industry claimed “one more month of daylight savings meant $200 million more in selling of barbecues and charcoal.”

“For the golf industry, one more month of daylight savings meant $400 million more in green fees and equipment sales,” he said, adding “and that was the industry estimate 25 years ago.”

The spring change was moved to early April, which, for many years, put the US in line with its European counterparts.

But in 2005, the time change was bumped up a second time: springing forward to the second Sunday in March and falling back the first Sunday in November.

This added three weeks of daylight savings in the spring, and an extra week in the fall.

Chambers of commerce and big supermarket chains helped pressure Congress into making the change, hoping an additional hour of light at the end of the day would encourage Americans to stop by stores on the way home after work.

The confectionery industry meanwhile can take credit for that additional week in the autumn, explained Downing, who teaches creative writing at Tufts University in Boston.

“The candy-makers have long wanted to have Halloween’s trick-or-treat covered by daylight savings, for the children to be able to collect more candy,” he said.

However, at least one US industry objected to the most recent change: the airlines.

“They had to reschedule the flights take off and landing times for international flights that had been fixed for years around. It cost the industry $200 to $400 million,” Downing explained.

The United States used a two-year implementation delay in a bid to convince other countries to follow suit in an attempt to smooth things over. The cajoling didn’t work.

Complicating the daylight saving dilemma further is that every US state can decide for itself whether to follow along.

Those shunning the system are Hawaii — which enjoys sunshine all year round — and Arizona, known for its sizzling summers.

Read More…

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Huffington Post

Illumina Found to Infringe on Syntrix Patents

By Rich Duprey, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

A federal jury in Tacoma, Wash. found the BeadChip array product manufactured by Illumina infringed a patent of Syntrix Biosystems, and the life sciences tools maker was ordered to pay approximately $96 million in damages. However, charges that the infringement was willful, and that Illumina misappropriated trade secrets, were dismissed.

Strongly disagreeing with the jury’s findings, Illumina said it will ignore the decision as it intends to file motions asking the court to vacate the jury’s finding and rule as a matter of law that the BeadChip does not infringe Syntrix’s patent. 

Illumina’s president and CEO Jay Flatley said, “We will continue to sell the products that are the subject of this suit and no damages will be payable to Syntrix until all appropriate appeals have been taken, which may take a number of years.”

The gene sequencing equipment maker contends its technology is based on technology licensed from Tufts University when Illumina was founded in 1998. “We continue to feel very strongly about our position that Syntrix’s allegations are without merit,” the executive continued, “and that, ultimately, our position will be vindicated.”

Illumina develops, manufactures, and markets life science tools and integrated systems for the analysis of genetic variation and function, and derives product revenues from the sale of microarrays and DNA sequencing products.

The article Illumina Found to Infringe on Syntrix Patents originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Rich Duprey has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Illumina. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, "load", function(){new FoolVisualSciences();})
addEvent(window, "load", function(){new PickAd();})

var themeName = 'dailyfinance.com';
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-24928199-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);

(function () {

var ga = document.createElement('script');
ga.type = 'text/javascript';
…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Illumina Announces Outcome of Its Patent Litigation Against Syntrix Biosystems, Inc.

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Illumina Announces Outcome of Its Patent Litigation Against Syntrix Biosystems, Inc.

SAN DIEGO–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Illumina, Inc. (NAS: ILMN) today announced that a federal jury in Tacoma, Washington found that Illumina’s BeadChip array product infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,951, 682, asserted by Syntrix Biosystems, Inc. The federal jury ordered Illumina to pay approximately $96 million in damages to Syntrix based on a royalty rate of six percent for BeadChip products sold by Illumina from 2005 through May 2012. United States District Court Judge Benjamin H. Settle, however, dismissed from the case claims that Illumina’s alleged infringement was willful and that Illumina misappropriated Syntrix’s trade secrets. The Syntrix patent expires on September 17, 2019.

Illumina continues to believe that Syntrix’s claims are without merit. Illumina intends to file post-trial motions asking the court to vacate the jury’s finding and to rule as a matter of law that the BeadChip does not infringe Syntrix’s patent.

Jay Flatley, Illumina’s President and CEO, stated, “We strongly disagree with this verdict and plan to appeal the present finding of infringement. In the meantime, we will continue to sell the products that are the subject of this suit and no damages will be payable to Syntrix until all appropriate appeals have been taken, which may take a number of years.” Mr. Flatley continued, “Our BeadChip products are based on Dr. David Walt‘s technology that was licensed from Tufts University when Illumina was founded in 1998. Like many other companies, we respect the valid and enforceable intellectual property rights of others. Consistent with our policy, we believe we acted properly with respect to the Syntrix ‘682 patent. We continue to feel very strongly about our position that Syntrix’s allegations are without merit and that, ultimately, our position will be vindicated.”

About Illumina

Illumina (www.illumina.com) is a leading developer, manufacturer, and marketer of life science tools and integrated systems for the analysis of genetic variation and function. We provide innovative sequencing and array-based solutions for genotyping, copy number variation analysis, methylation studies, gene expression profiling, and low-multiplex analysis of DNA, RNA, and protein. We also provide tools and services that are fueling advances in consumer genomics and diagnostics. Our technology and products accelerate genetic analysis research and its application, paving the way for molecular medicine and ultimately transforming healthcare.

Forward-Looking Statements

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Tadpole Eyes Grafted Onto Blind Animals’ Tails Able To See, Brain Plasticity Research Shows

By The Huffington Post News Editors

By: Charles Choi, LiveScience Contributor
Published: 02/27/2013 06:06 PM EST on LiveScience

Eyes hooked up to the tail can help blinded tadpoles see, researchers say.

These findings could help guide therapies involving natural or artificial implants, scientists added.

A major roadblock when it comes to treating blindness and other sensory disorders is how much remains unknown about the nervous system and its ability to adapt to change. To learn more about the relationship between the body and the brain, researchers wanted to see how capable the brain was of interpreting sensory data from abnormal “ectopic” locations from which it normally does not receive  signals.

Eye on the tail

Scientists experimented with 134 tadpoles of the African clawed frog Xenopus laevis, a common lab animal. They painstakingly grafted new eyes onto places such as their torsos and tails and then surgically removed their original eyes. [See Images of the Odd-Eyed Tadpoles]

“We do a lot of work to understand regenerative biology, and that entails experiments that change the body,” researcher Michael Levin, a developmental biologist at Tufts University, told LiveScience. “We have four-headed worms, six-legged frogs, and many other unusual creatures here as part of our work on bioelectricity and organ regeneration.”

These experimental tadpoles then received a vision test the researchers first refined on normal tadpoles. The tadpoles were placed in a circular arena half illuminated with red light and half with blue light, with software regularly switching what color light the areas received. When tadpoles entered places lit by red light, they received a tiny electric zap. A motion-tracking camera kept tabs on where the tadpoles were.

Remarkably, the scientists found that six tadpoles that had eyes implanted in their tails could apparently see, choosing to remain in the safer blue-light areas.

“The brain is not wired to find an eye on the tail, since it’s never happened before and thus is not something the brain has evolved specifically to deal with, and yet it can recognize this patch of tissue as providing valuable visual information,” Levin said.

“These findings suggest that the brain has remarkable plasticity and may actually take a survey of its body configuration to make use of different body arrangements,” Levin added. “If it were not the case, then every time a mutation produced an improvement in body plan — a large significant change in anatomy — the animal would die and the beneficial mutation would be lost.”

Rather, when a mutation makes a change in the body plan of an embryo, the brain-body programs that tell an eye to see and a hand to grasp, for instance, “don’t suddenly become useless,” Levin said. “The brain can map its activity onto a wide range of configurations of the body. This modularity makes it much easier for complex new body features to evolve.”

Augmentation technology

The transplanted eyes came from tadpole donors genetically modified to generate …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Huffington Post

Conn. congressman sees factual flaw in 'Lincoln'

By Jonathan_So

As Rep. Joe Courtney watched the Oscar-nominated “Lincoln” over the weekend, something didn’t seem right to him.

He said Tuesday he was shocked that the Oscar-nominated film, about President Abraham Lincoln‘s political struggle to abolish slavery, includes a scene in which two Connecticut congressmen vote against the 13th amendment to the Constitution, outlawing slavery…

Courtney, who majored in history at Tufts University, asked that the movie, which stars Daniel Day-Lewis as Lincoln, be corrected before its release on DVD

Source:
AP

Source URL:
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_CONN_CONGRESSMAN_LINCOLN?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2013-02-05-19-37-04

Date:
2-5-13

Source: FULL ARTICLE at History News Network – George Mason University