Tag Archives: Senator Rand Paul

Rand Paul Did OK At Howard University

By capblack

Rand Paul 4 SC Rand Paul Did OK At Howard University

There was only one Jack Kemp. God knows we need his all-American appeal to conservative and urban audiences at a time when the GOP is attempting frenzied “minority outreach.”

(I put “minority outreach” in quotes because involvement is more my cup of tea.)

That aside, Senator Rand Paul’s Howard University speech set the outreach march on steadier ground.

Instead of sounding like a Democrat with a removable “R,” he was himself, which is all American blacks (pro and con) should ask of him.

I don’t think I’m alone is saying I don’t need White folks adopting minstrel show phony drawls (see Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden), nor drop obvious applause lines based upon our religious or civil rights experience.

Just talk to us.

From the podium and during Q & A, he addressed his stance on issues like the Civil Rights Act that got him in hot water in the past.

One mistake I think Black folks make is demanding that those far removed from our community magically address us as if they’ve been lifelong insiders.

Rand Paul is obviously a White male libertarian and Republican US senator. Some of his conclusions on the GOP or icons like Ronald Reagan differ from those of the Black liberal mainstream.

That his conclusions differ from those of the Black liberal mainstream doesn’t necessarily make him a villain.

American Blacks of Paul’s generation should focus less on what happened in the past and more on what can be done now to distance ourselves from the limitations of yesteryear.

Rand Paul was born in the South three years ahead of me. We came of age in a region forced to confront its Apartheid by federal troops and legislative leveraging from the White Hosue and Capitol Hill.

A lot of Black liberals will charge that he doesn’t “get” Black folks. I wonder: does “Mt. Negro Dialect” Harry Reid “get” us any better?

I’d argue that Rand Paul’s decriminalization of what he calls “victimless drug crimes” alone has the potential to liberate several generations of Black men who chose drug-dealing as a profession.

That stance resonates far more with the Black liberal (and parts of the conservative) mainstream than with anti-drug hardliners like myself.

I consider crack, heroin, meth, and other chemical angels of slow motion death to be nothing less than satanic in their design and impact.

Drug decriminalization is a big libertarian coalition builder, and within it lies the glue for adding American Blacks who feel that the War on Drugs is racist.

This topic, along with libertarian aversion to intrusive policing and an aptly named “warfare state,” were rightly shared by Paul at Howard University– just like he does elsewhere.

I think he did ok during his Howard University speech, precisely because he remained himself and didn’t deviate from trademark philosophical positions.

I expect White folks to be themselves and not put on patronizing productions designed to pacify us.

Rand Paul did ok at Howard University and thus far is ok by me as someone offering the GOP political viagra if they’re willing to take it.

Donate/Stop Socialist Hate!

http://www.gofundme.com/197xk8

Drone Warfare In America

By Floyd Brown

Republican Democrat SC Divide And Conquer  Fair And Balanced

In early March, Senator Rand Paul had America buzzing about drones. They were the highlight of his 13-hour filibuster against John Brennan, Barack Obama’s nominee to be director of the CIA. Paul’s intention was not to actually stop the nomination of Brennan – he knew the filibuster would fail. Instead, he wished to turn the nation’s attention to the use of drone-fired missiles to kill American citizens and others around the globe.

Paul repeatedly cited the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, part of our cherished Bill of Rights, saying: “The Fifth Amendment… should protect you from a president that might kill you with a drone.”

“You can’t be judge, jury and executioner all in one,” Paul warned.

Well, John Brennan tried to play that role when executing Americans at the behest of Barack Obama’s War on Terror strategy. Even George W. Bush put terrorists in Guantanamo Bay before bringing them to trial. Obama just dispensed with the trials and moved right to summary execution.

Sadly, Brennan was confirmed, and the missile-mounted drones continue to fly.

“Are you going to just drop a Hellfire missile on Jane Fonda?”

So are drones (or unmanned aircraft systems–UASs–as they are called by the military) useful? Sure – in war zones. They are good for spying on the enemy and targeting enemy forces and supplies.

But even in these situations, drones have scary consequences. By some accounts in the foreign press, secret drone attacks have killed an estimated 4,700 people – nearly one quarter have been civilians, and as many as 200 are reportedly children.

And worse yet, the Obama administration admitted to targeting Americans and foreign nationals (albeit those in terror groups).

They also claim the legal authority to kill U.S. citizens without a trial (even here in America) as long as the target is linked to a terrorist organization.

Look, I am not alone in being very suspicious of these powers. As government agencies increase the use of drone technology, opportunities for abuse grow exponentially, especially when the Obama administration reserves the right to kill Americans without due process.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder recently defended using lethal force against Americans in America, saying it would be considered legal and justified in an “extraordinary circumstance.”

“The President could conceivably have no choice but to authorize the military to use such force if necessary to protect the homeland,” Holder concluded.

10,000 New Drones By 2020

If the Obama administration’s life-extinguishing policy wasn’t enough, get this: A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) report anticipates 10,000 new civilian drones will be flying the skies of America by the year 2020.

Sound outlandish? It’s not. Since 2007, the FAA has issued 1,428 licenses to police, universities, and federal agencies to fly drones domestically.

This sounds like a perfect storm of threats to privacy and security. Imagine these drones spying on your business or even your teenage daughter as she sunbathes next to the backyard pool.

Sounding the Alarm Bells

In December 2011, The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) issued a report entitled “Protecting Privacy from Aerial Surveillance” that warned of the potential “mission …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Obama Addresses Drone Filibuster

A Kind Word For Senator Rand Paul From A Typically Unkind Critic

By Rick Ungar, Contributor

I don’t much care for Senator Rand Paul—something I have made abundantly clear in the pages of this column from the day Mr. Paul first announced his candidacy for the United States Senate. What’s more, since arriving in Washington, there is little in the Senator’s record that would create any expectation that my  low opinion of Mr. Paul’s politics and perspectives would be subject to much in the way of change. …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

Video: ACLU Lawyer Calls Obama “Judge, Jury, Executioner” Over Drone Attacks

By Bobby Powell

A recently leaked Department of Justice “White Paper” gives the President of the United States and those he designates – “high government officials” – the authority to take the life of any American citizen, even if there is no proof that the citizen in question is involved in nefarious activities.

John Brennan, the Obama administration’s pick to replace Leon Panetta as the next CIA Director, has found his nomination put on hold by Senator Rand Paul after refusing to answer Paul’s question in front of the Senate sub-committee regarding the use of drones to attack American citizens domestically, again without ever having been charged with a crime in a court of law. Senator Paul calls the idea “appalling.”

In this episode of “The Truth Is Viral”, Nate Wessler, a lawyer with the ACLU’s National Security Project, echoes Senator Paul’s sentiments in this exclusive interview in which he calls Obama and the members of his administration “Judge, jury, and executioner.” That is a strong statement of condemnation coming from the historically ultra-liberal ACLU.

****CALL TO ACTION INFO****
WBKB PHONE: (989) 356-3434
FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/WBKBTV
TWITTER: @WBKB11
YOUTUBE: http://www.youtube.com/user/wbkbtv
(Please remember to call only once as they are logging all numbers with CallerID)

****READ DEATH/RAPE THREATS  BELOW****

TTiV Forum thread: Twitter Followers Of Rapper “The Game” Threaten TTiV Host And His Wife With Murder And Rape

SOURCE: Bob Powell/The Truth Is Viral

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Video: Rand Paul Calls For Spiritual Awakening In U.S

By Daniel Noe

Senator Rand Paul appeared on Glenn Beck’s program and talked about what he now takes away from people telling him they are praying for him.

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Video: Rand Paul Believes Gun-Running Took Place In Benghazi

By Daniel Noe

Rand Paul weighs in on the Benghazi terrorist attack on FOX News…

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Video: Senate Kills Amendment To Ban US Sending Weapons To Egypt

By Daniel Noe

Here, Senator Rand Paul sounds off…

Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Video: Rand Paul Doubles Down: Benghazi May Have Been Cover-up

By Daniel Noe

Wednesday afternoon, Senator Rand Paul blasted Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for her ineptness during the Benghazi massacre. Paul said he would have fired her for not reading her emails from the Benghazi Ambassador before he was slaughtered by Islamists.

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Video: Senator: I’m Afraid Obama Has A King Complex

By Daniel Noe

Sen. Rand Paul unveils plan to stop assault on 2nd Amendment on Fox News’ Hannity…

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Video: Senator On Gun Control Executive Order: Obama Is Not ‘King’

By Daniel Noe

“I’m against having a king,” Senator Rand Paul said. “I think having a monarch is what we fought the American Revolution over and someone who wants to bypass the Constitution, bypass Congress — that’s someone who wants to act like a king or a monarch.”

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism