Linuxaria: SATA is the most common bus interface on desktops and on many servers
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Linux Today
Linuxaria: SATA is the most common bus interface on desktops and on many servers
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Linux Today
By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool
Filed under: Investing
SATA-IO to Host Serial ATA Plugfest and Interoperability Workshop in Taipei, Taiwan
TAIPEI, Taiwan–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Serial ATA International Organization (SATA-IO)
WHAT: The Serial ATA International Organization (SATA-IO), the consortium dedicated to sustaining the quality, integrity and dissemination of Serial ATA (SATA™) technology, will host a Plugfest, Interoperability Workshop and Training Session May 20-23, 2013 in Taipei, Taiwan.
WHERE: The Westin Taipei Hotel: 133 Nanjing East Road, Section 3 Taipei, 104 Taiwan
Renesas Electronics today announced the availability of its new SuperSpeed Universal Serial Bus (USB 3.0) to Serial ATA (SATA) Revision 3 [Note] bridge SoC (system on chip, part number µPD720231) that enables the reduction of the total BOM significantly. The uPD720231 enables effective multi-gigabit per second (Gbps) data transfer between a USB 3.0 host system and a SATA device used in widely adopted external USB hard drives and solid state drives (SSD). …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Phys.org
While some companies spend a lot of time and effort adding fringe features that few users will ever need, or gussying up the interface and calling it a major upgrade, R-Tools Technology spends its time making sure its programs are fast and work correctly. Case in point: R-Drive Image 4.7. While the GUI is simple (but easy to learn and use), the feature-list is not: full, incremental, and differential backups; compression; disk cloning; encryption; and support for Windows Dynamic Disks (a bugaboo with some imaging programs) and BSD slices (Linux partitions); split files; optical media support; file system conversion.
Every feature worked fine in my testing. The program is fast, and I particularly liked the way R-Drive Image mounts a backup image. With R-Drive Image, you use the program itself to mount the image as a read-only virtual drive with its own drive letter. This eliminates a background process when you don’t need it, and renders the backup complete searchable using standard Windows methods. I can’t begin to tell you how much time I’ve wasted restoring True Image backups simply so I could search them for a vital file a customer had to have right away.
The Linux-based, bootable CD (or floppies if you wish) that R-Drive Image creates hearkens back to the 80’s and early 90’s with a character-based interface. It looks quaint, but it has the latest drivers for USB and SATA, as well as mouse support. Also, because it doesn’t have to deal with graphics drivers or a bitmapped GUI, R-Drive image boots very quickly.
Networking support is this program’s weak point. Using the boot disc to back up over the network involves configuring your Ethernet adapter, entering server IP addresses as well as the share name of the location you’re imaging to, plus any applicable passwords. There’s no network browsing, even after configuring the adapter so you must have this info on hand. Also, the help file is curiously lacking, well… help on the topic. Hence, if you don’t understand what I just wrote, don’t buy this program for imaging across a network.
To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here
…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at PCWorld
Intel is looking to capture and more of the SSD market with the release of its 525 Series mSATA drives. These tiny storage devices deliver respectable performance at good prices. The new 525 Series is based on Intel’s 25nm NAND memory and LSI Logic’s SandForce SF-2281 controller. They measure approximately 3.7mm thick by 51mm long by 30mm wide (full-size mSATA) and come in 30GB, 60GB, 90GB, 120GB, 180GB, and 240GB capacities.
If you’re not familiar with this standard, mSATA is an acronym for Mini-Serial Advanced Technology Attachment. Its edge connector is similar in appearance to that of a PCIe Mini Card and is electrically compatible, but its data signals are sent to the computer’s SATA controller instead of its PCIe controller. The standard is designed for small SSDs that fit in tight spaces where their 2.5-inch and even 1.8-inch siblings can’t.
Retail pricing for the Intel 525 series is $54 for the 30GB ($1.80 per GB), $104 for the 60GB ($1.73 per GB), $129 for the 90GB ($1.43 per GB), $149 for the 120GB ($1.24 per GB), $214 for the 180GB (1.18 per GB), and $279 for the 240GB model ($1.16 per GB). That’s more expensive per GB than larger drives, but it’s very competitive with other mSATA products.
Each model in the 525 Series is a SATA 6-GBps drive, but real-world speed scales with size. This is true of most SSDs: More memory means more pathways across which to distribute read/write operations. Our testing with the 120GB, 180GB, and 240GB flavors bore this out. While read speeds increased only mildly, write speeds rose significantly with each jump in capacity. See the numbers in the table below:
To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here
…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at PCWorld
Intel’s new Solid-State Drive 525 packs performance identical to a standard 2.5-inch SSD into a device one eighth of the size, according to the company.
The SSD 525 Series comes in 30GB, 60GB, 90GB, 120GB, 180GB, and 240GB sizes, and uses the same 25nm memory architecture as Intel’s larger solid-state options. The drives use mini-SATA connectors, which allow them to be plugged into smaller PCIe slots common to notebooks while still providing a full SATA 6GB/s data rate.
The 120GB and 180GB models are already shipping, and Intel has promised that the rest of the drive sizes will be available within the quarter.
The diminutive new line could help raise Intel’s profile in the mobile marketplace—despite its desktop and laptop dominance, the company has not seen its processors widely used in smartphones and tablets, and could benefit from an improved reputation among mobile OEMs.
To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here
Source: FULL ARTICLE at PCWorld
The 512GB Crucial M4 is one of the highest-capacity solid-state drives we've tested; it also proved to be one of the faster readers. Using a Marvell 9174 controller, 25nm MLC (multi-level cell) NAND flash memory, and the latest SATA 6Gbps interface, the M4 read our 10GB collection of small files and folders at 416.7 megabytes per second (MBps). The drive was also quick when reading a single large file–it accessed our 10GB test file at 472.8 MBps.
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Computerworld Latest
The 512GB Crucial M4 is one of the highest-capacity solid-state drives we’ve tested; it also proved to be one of the faster readers. Using a Marvell 9174 controller, 25nm MLC (multi-level cell) NAND flash memory, and the latest SATA 6Gbps interface, the M4 read our 10GB collection of small files and folders at 416.7 megabytes per second (MBps). The drive was also quick when reading a single large file—it accessed our 10GB test file at 472.8 MBps.
The M4 proved to be much slower at writing files, however; it wrote our 10GB file/folder combo at a poky 265.1 MBps, and it wrote our single 10GB file at a leisurely 326.8 MBps. Because SSDs have a limited write lifetime, most people will tend to use an SSD to store the computer’s operating system and application software than to store rapidly changing data (documents, photos, music, and other types of files). So it could be argued that the M4’s excellent read performance renders this SSD a strong value all on its own.
This is a large capacity drive, however, and while flash memory has dropped in price considerably over the past year, it’ll still cost you. Crucial lists the M4 at $425 for a bare drive. (A package that includes a mounting bracket and a SATA cable adds $5 to the price tag, while a kit with adata-transfer software adds $12, so make sure you know which one you’re buying.) We found the kit that includes the data-transfer software (but no SATA cable) selling online for $400 (as of January 22, 2013). That’s a chunk of change, but when you break it down to cost per gigabyte, you end up with a very reasonable—for an SSD, anyway—78 cents per gigabyte. A smaller-capacity high-performance drive, such as the 256GB Samsung 840 Pro (with a $239 street price), costs closer to 94 cents per gigabyte. Samsung’s 512GB 840 Pro, meanwhile, fetches a street price closer to $490.
So the M4 scores big wins in two categories—price and read speed. Knowing that an SSD will inevitably wear out, however, buyers should also take the manufacturer’s warranty into account. Corsair offers a three-year warranty where some other manufacturers—including Samsung—provide five years of coverage. Overall, Crucial’s 512GB M4 is a good deal.
To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here
Source: FULL ARTICLE at PCWorld
Today marks the beginning of the end of me having an Ubuntu machine at home, and I have mixed feelings about that. By the weekend the last machine that I do have, my network file server and general dogsbody machine, will have been replaced and its replacement will not be running Ubuntu.
The primary purpose of the machine is to be a point of backup for my laptop and other devices, as well as a host for the large and valuable content collections such as my photos, music, purchased TV shows, movies, etc.
Since this collection is multiple terabytes in size there just isn’t a viable cloud storage solution. Firstly getting content to the cloud would be a long and difficult process, secondly the actual costs of that much storage are still reasonably prohibitive compared to home solutions and thirdly since a lot of this content is in the form of high quality media, while my home Internet connection can stream it, the download bandwidth costs of cloud storage providers are equally cost prohibitive.
So I still need some form of fast and reliable file storage at home, at least for the foreseeable future. And this is where Ubuntu comes up short.
For the last few years I’ve done what anyone would have done, I purchased a small form-factor machine, loaded it with SATA drives and installed Ubuntu 10.04 LTS using Software RAID to deal with the reliability factor.
This has all worked fine, the box even survived a transatlantic voyage; what it hasn’t survived is the upgrade to Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. At some point after the upgrade the box did not come back up after a reboot; after searching for a monitor to plug into it to find out what was going on, I was dismayed to see a message about the RAID being in degraded mode and the boot not continuing.
My first reaction, naturally, was that one of the disks had finally given out; so, knowing that the Ubuntu initramfs is too limited to debug, I booted a USB image and grabbed the various SMART utilities to figure out which disk had been thrown and needed replacing.
Mysteriously they all checked out. I rebooted back into Ubuntu, and it came up just fine. Weird. And a subsequent reboot works fine too.
At this point my disk utilization is well over 90% and I’m already starting to consider my options for expanding it, I’m still thinking dodgy disk and so begin accelerating that process. The most obvious option is just to buy larger disks; the next option would be to buy more smaller disks, but this would require additional SATA capacity in the machine; the final option would be to buy a proper RAID array or even a NAS of some description.
I’m wary of NAS, the last one I bought, while admittedly a relatively budget option, ie. under $1,000, just didn’t perform. It didn’t have the power to actually get data from its disks and out of the network port in anything like a timely manner, certainly not enough for 1080p 7.1 streaming, for example.
And then the server throws a disk again, but at least this time a monitor is plugged into it so I can see the messages I missed last time. And this time I stay in the initramfs and do a little bit of poking around.
I realize there’s nothing wrong with the disks at all.
The problem is Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.
I do what anyone else would do with a problem, and hit Google, Stack Overflow and Launchpad to find a workaround. And what I find saddens me; huge numbers of people reporting that their RAIDs frequently boot in degraded mode. Bugs are marked “Invalid”, “Won’t Fix” or “Unassigned”.
Now I know this used to work, because I wrote unreasonable amounts of the code that did it. So I quickly dived in to see if there was an obvious bug fix to find that all the code I’d written had been ripped out, not replaced with anything better, just gone. All that remained was the “upstream” code that had existed before I started, or at least an updated version of it.
I dug through the history to figure out if I was missing something, expecting that things were no longer required and that new ways of doing things had been put in place, but that wasn’t the case either. The history clearly showed a different story: faced with the pressure of updating to a newer upstream release of various utilities, for no reason other than to keep roughly in step with Debian, all of the bug fixes, patches and changes to make things work had been dropped because they were “hard to merge”.
Now I don’t want to come across as bitter at this point that my work had been dropped, because that’s not my feeling at all. I entirely understand and appreciate the decision that must have happened here.
Canonical has limited resources of its own, and a small hobbyist developer community around it. Those resources have to be spent wisely and not squandered. The Ubuntu focus right now is on the desktop, and on Unity; the Server focus is a lesser one, and entirely aimed at cloud hosting and guests — though given that the Canonical VP of Cloud couldn’t even be bothered to turn up for his scheduled panel at the most recent CloudOpen conference, it’s hard to fathom how much of a focus even that is for them anymore.
So if they have a low server focus, and what they do have is for cloud, then it’s no surprising that support for things like Software RAID aren’t a priority worth spending resource on. Cloud guests and hosts access storage over a network using protocols like NFS or (ugh) iSCSI.
Simply put, the home server is a uninteresting and dying product, and I’m a weird outlier for still having one at all.
This wasn’t quite the end though, I still had disks to replace and storage to sort out. If Ubuntu couldn’t do Software RAID reliably anymore, it could still at least do Hardware RAID. I looked around for Hardware RAID boxes, especially single enclosure ones that could just plug into the box and go.
This seemed like a good plan except that high performance Hardware RAID devices come in two fundamental flavors: Thunderbolt, which Ubuntu does not support; and Ethernet, which means the Ubuntu machine is superfluous to requirements.
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Planet Ubuntu
The new SATA Express specification will define new device connectors and motherboard connectors that will support both PCIe drives and existing SATA devices, offering a low-cost solution to fully utilize the performance of SSDs and hybrid drives
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Computerworld Latest