Tag Archives: Transocean Ltd

Ex-BP executive testifies at Gulf oil spill trial

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — The first phase of a trial over the deadly Deepwater Horizon disaster neared an end Wednesday with testimony by a former BP executive who helped supervise the company’s Gulf of Mexico drilling operations.

Patrick O’Bryan, BP‘s vice president of drilling and completions in the Gulf of Mexico at the time of the company’s April 2010 well blowout, said he never heard any concerns that the rig crew felt pressure to cut corners to finish a project that was behind schedule and over budget. O’Bryan said everybody who worked on the project cared about safety.

“They took pride in what they did. They wanted to deliver a good well, but they wanted to deliver a safe well,” O’Bryan said. He testified on the 29th day of a federal trial designed to identify causes of the blowout and assign fault to the companies involved in the nation’s worst offshore oil spill.

O’Bryan was one of BP‘s last witnesses as the first phase of the trial neared its conclusion, possibly as soon as Wednesday. The trial began Feb. 25 and has included testimony by more than three dozen witnesses for the federal government, a team of private plaintiffs’ attorneys, London-based BP PLC, rig owner Transocean Ltd. and cement contractor Halliburton.

U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier is hearing the case without a jury. Barring a settlement, he could decide how much more money the companies owe for their roles in the disaster.

Robert Bea, an expert witness for plaintiffs’ attorneys, testified earlier in the trial that the drilling team was under enormous financial pressure to finish the Macondo well project.

O’Bryan acknowledged the project was “costing more than we thought” but said he never heard any concerns that safety was sacrificed to speed up the process.

“It’s not uncommon to have cost overruns,” said O’Bryan, who left BP in 2011 to take a job at a smaller company.

O’Bryan was visiting the Deepwater Horizon when the blowout triggered an explosion that killed 11 rig workers. He described a harrowing race to evacuate the burning rig after the blast.

O’Bryan was on the bridge when the rig started to violently shake. He saw drilling mud showering a supply boat near the rig and heard a hissing noise before the explosion.

From: http://feeds.foxnews.com/~r/foxnews/national/~3/PvcibhN1Eg4/

Brazil authorizes Chevron to resume production

Brazil‘s National Petroleum Agency says it has authorized Chevron Corp to resume production on six offshore wells off the coast of Rio de Janeiro after more than 100,000 gallons of crude seeped into the ocean there.

The agency says Friday’s authorization will last one year. In an emailed statement, the Rio-based agency said a security team would be monitoring the U.S.-based company’s operations.

An estimated 110,000 gallons (416,300 liters) of crude seeped into the ocean near the Chevron well in November, 2011. The leaks resumed several months later, and the company’s production in the Frade field was suspended. The field had been producing around 62,000 barrels a day.

Criminal charges against Chevron and driller Transocean Ltd. were dropped but both still face two civil lawsuits seeking $20 billion in damages.

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox World News

Transocean CEO: Rig workers should have done more

Transocean employees should have done more to detect signs of trouble before the company’s drilling rig exploded in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010, killing 11 workers and triggering the nation’s worst offshore oil spill, the company’s chief executive testified Tuesday.

Transocean Ltd. president and CEO Steven Newman said the Swiss-based drilling company agreed in January to plead guilty to a criminal charge of violating the Clean Water Act because its employees on the Deepwater Horizon played a role in botching a crucial safety test before the blowout of BP‘s Macondo well.

“Do you blame the crew that night?” Transocean attorney Brad Brian asked Newman on the 14th day of a trial designed to determine the causes of BP‘s well blowout and to assign fault to the companies involved.

“Do I blame the crew? Do I wish the crew would have done more? Absolutely. I am not sure that that’s the same emotional content as blame,” Newman said.

Newman, however, said BP ultimately was responsible for deciding how to perform the safety test and for determining whether it was successful.

“The responsibility that our crew has in a situation like that is to line the test up, to make sure that the lines and the valves and the gauges are the way they’re supposed to be,” Newman said.

Two BP rig supervisors, Robert Kaluza and Donald Vidrine, are charged with manslaughter in the 11 rig workers’ deaths and await a separate trial. An indictment last year accused Kaluza and Vidrine of disregarding abnormally high pressure readings during the safety test.

No Transocean employees have been charged with crimes, but the company pleaded guilty to the misdemeanor charge in February and agreed to pay $1.4 billion in criminal and civil penalties as part of a settlement with the Justice Department.

Newman was in Geneva, Switzerland, when the rig exploded April 20, 2010. When another company executive called to tell him the rig was on fire and was being evacuated, Newman could tell from the man’s voice that “something was terribly wrong.”

“I kept telling myself that the first phone call associated with an incident is always as full of misinformation as it is of information, and so I just kept telling myself it couldn’t be that bad,” he recalled.

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox US News

Defense starts for companies in Gulf spill trial

The owner of the drilling rig that exploded in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 has started to present its defense at a trial designed to determine the causes of the deadly disaster and assign fault to the companies involved.

Transocean Ltd. called its first witness Monday on the 13th day of the trial.

A federal judge already has heard testimony by more than a dozen witnesses called by the Justice Department and attorneys for Gulf Coast businesses and residents who claim the spill cost them money.

The plaintiffs’ lawyers still expect to call another witness to the stand this week, an employee of cement contractor Halliburton.

Halliburton and Macondo well owner BP PLC also will call their own witnesses after Transocean finishes presenting its case.

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox US News

Worker: Rig was bustling before BP well blowout

A worker who survived the deadly explosion on the Deepwater Horizon testified Wednesday that a flurry of activity on the drilling rig hindered his ability to monitor BP‘s well for signs of trouble before the April 2010 blowout.

Joseph Keith, the second rig worker to testify in person at a federal trial over the disaster, said he never saw any indications that a blowout was brewing before drilling mud started raining down on the rig floor just before the blast. The blowout triggered an explosion that killed 11 men and led to the nation’s worst offshore oil spill.

Keith, a mud logger employed by a unit of Halliburton Co., said rig workers were performing several other tasks — including operating a crane — that made it more difficult for him to monitor the well for signs of a “kick,” or unexpected flow of fluids into the wellbore. He said the rig typically ceased other activities while workers were engaged in the delicate task of displacing drilling mud with seawater.

Keith, however, testified during cross-examination by a lawyer for rig owner Transocean Ltd. that he was still able to perform his job “fully and capably.” He also said he would have alerted supervisors if he saw or heard anything unsafe happening on the rig.

It was Keith’s job to monitor well conditions and report any red flags to a BP rig supervisor and drillers employed by Transocean Ltd. He described himself as a “second pair of eyes” on data that could have showed them that BP PLC’s Macondo well was unstable.

“You missed this kick, did you not?” plaintiffs’ attorney John de Gravelles asked.

“A lot of people missed the kick, sir,” Keith responded.

He said later than he has more than 20 years of experience and caught roughly a dozen such “kicks” before the Deepwater Horizon disaster, without ever missing one.

Keith said BP ultimately was in charge of orchestrating the operations and could have stopped other activities during the displacement process.

Choking back tears, Keith said he doesn’t have any regrets about his actions on the rig on the night of the explosion.

“I’m sorry it happened,” he said. “I wish it would have never happened.”

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox US News

BP executive defends report on Gulf oil spill

The BP executive who led the company’s probe of the Deepwater Horizon rig explosion defended the contents of his team’s report on the disaster in his testimony Monday for a trial over the 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

A lawyer for rig owner Transocean Ltd. asked the BP executive, Mark Bly, why the report doesn’t mention a call from BP rig supervisor Donald Vidrine to an onshore engineer, Mark Hafle, less than an hour before the blast killed 11 workers and triggered the nation’s worst offshore oil spill.

Notes from interviews by BP investigators show they knew about a telephone call in which Hafle and Vidrine discussed the results of a crucial safety test that Vidrine allegedly misinterpreted. Hafle told the BP investigators he had warned Vidrine that the results indicated the test may not have been properly lined up.

But BP‘s September 2010 report says its investigators found no evidence that the Transocean rig crew or BP rig supervisors consulted anyone “outside their team” about the test results.

Transocean attorney Brad Brian pressed Bly to explain that apparent discrepancy. Bly described the call as an “after-the-fact conversation” and said the details of their discussion weren’t completely clear. Bly also insisted his team’s report covered the test results “pretty comprehensively.”

Brian asked Bly why none of his handwritten notes include any mention of his team’s interviews with Hafle.

“Did you just decide not to write it down, sir?” Brian asked.

“I don’t recall,” said Bly, whose testimony started last Wednesday.

Vidrine and fellow BP well site leader Robert Kaluza were indicted last year on manslaughter charges stemming from the workers’ deaths and await a separate trial. Their indictment accuses them of disregarding abnormally high pressure readings that should have been glaring indications of trouble just before the April 20, 2010, blowout of BP‘s Macondo well.

The so-called “Bly report” focused on equipment failures and mistakes that rig workers made. Brian, noting that the Macondo drilling project was over budget and behind schedule, asked Bly why his investigation didn’t explore whether the blowout resulted from any decisions that BP made on shore that were designed to save time and money.

“Did you think it was relevant to your …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox US News

Trial set to open in Gulf oil spill civil litigation

Nearly three years after a deadly rig explosion in the Gulf of Mexico triggered the nation’s worst offshore oil spill, a federal judge in New Orleans is set to preside over a high-stakes trial for the raft of litigation spawned by the disaster.

Barring an 11th-hour settlement, U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier will hear several hours of opening statements Monday by lawyers for the companies involved in the 2010 spill and the plaintiffs who sued them. And the judge, not a jury, ultimately could decide how much more money BP PLC and its partners on the ill-fated drilling project owe for their roles in the environmental catastrophe.

BP has said it already has racked up more than $24 billion in spill-related expenses and has estimated it will pay a total of $42 billion to fully resolve its liability for the disaster that killed 11 workers and spewed millions of gallons of oil.

But the trial attorneys for the federal government and Gulf states and private plaintiffs hope to convince the judge that the company is liable for much more.

With billions of dollars on the line, the companies and their courtroom adversaries have spared no expense in preparing for a trial that could last several months. Hundreds of attorneys have worked on the case, generating roughly 90 million pages of documents, logging nearly 9,000 docket entries and taking more than 300 depositions of witnesses who could testify at trial.

“In terms of sheer dollar amounts and public attention, this is one of the most complex and massive disputes ever faced by the courts,” said Fordham University law professor Howard Erichson, an expert in complex litigation.

Barbier has promised he won’t let the case drag on for years as has the litigation over the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill, which still hasn’t been completely resolved. He encouraged settlement talks that already have resolved billions of dollars in spill-related claims.

Judge Barbier has managed the case actively and moved it along toward trial pretty quickly,” Erichson said.

In December, Barbier gave final approval to a settlement between BP and Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee lawyers representing Gulf Coast businesses and residents who claim the spill cost them money. BP estimates it will pay roughly $7.8 billion to resolve tens of thousands of these claims, but the deal doesn’t have a cap.

BP resolved a Justice Department criminal probe by agreeing to plead guilty to manslaughter and other charges and pay $4 billion in criminal penalties. Deepwater Horizon rig owner Transocean Ltd. reached a separate settlement with the federal government, pleading guilty to a misdemeanor charge and agreeing to pay $1.4 billion in criminal and civil penalties.

But there’s plenty left for the lawyers to argue about at trial, given that the federal government and Gulf states haven’t resolved civil claims against the company that could be worth more than $20 billion.

The Justice Department and private plaintiffs’ attorneys have said they would prove BP acted with gross negligence before the blowout of its Macondo well on April 20, 2010.

BP‘s civil penalties would soar if Barbier agrees …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox US News

Criminal charges dropped against Chevron in Brazil

A Brazilian federal court has dismissed criminal charges filed last year against Chevron Corp., driller Transocean Ltd. and several of their executives in connection with a 2011 oil spill off the coast of Rio de Janeiro.

The two companies and 17 of their executives had been charged with “crimes against the environment” and faced up to 31 years in prison if convicted.

Judge Marcelo Luzio sent the charges back to prosecutors, who have five days to appeal his ruling, a court official said Thursday. The official did not provide further details. She spoke on condition of anonymity because she was not authorized to speak to the news media.

The prosecutor’s office said it would not have any immediate comment.

Chevron said in a statement that it was pleased by the court’s decision and that it remained “committed to its policy of full transparency and close cooperation with Brazilian authorities.”

Transocean said it welcomed the ruling, which it said showed that “Transocean’s crew members did exactly what they were trained to do, acting responsibly, appropriately and quickly while always maintaining safety as their top priority.”

The companies still face two civil lawsuits seeking $20 billion in damages for the spill, in which about 155,000 gallons of crude oil leaked from the seabed near a Chevron well off the coast in November 2011.

“Both sides are seeking an agreement regarding the amount to be paid,” said Marcelo Del Negri, a spokesman at the federal prosecutor’s office. “All I can tell you is that they have offered to pay far less than what we want — about $160 million.”

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox World News

Chevron, Transocean say Brazil drops criminal oil spill charges

Gas prices are displayed at a Chevron gas station in Los Angeles, California

RIO DE JANEIRO (Reuters) – A Brazilian judge dropped criminal charges against Chevron Corp , Transocean Ltd and 17 of their employees related to a November 2011 offshore oil spill, the companies said on Wednesday. The criminal case, and a civil suit seeking as much as 40 billion reais ($20.4 billion) in damages, have cast a chill over Brazil's oil industry. The criminal suit carried penalties of up to 31 years. The civil case still open is Brazil's largest-ever environmental lawsuit. …

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Yahoo Business

Judge approves Transocean's $1B spill settlement

A federal judge has approved Transocean Ltd.’s agreement with the Justice Department to pay $1 billion in civil penalties for its role in the massive 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier said in his ruling Tuesday that he found “no just reason for delay” in approving the civil settlement.

Last week, a different judge approved Transocean’s criminal settlement with the federal government. The company pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge and will pay an additional $400 million in criminal penalties.

Transocean owned the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, which exploded and sank over BP’s Macondo well in April 2010. The accident killed 11 rig workers and spawned the nation’s worst offshore oil spill.

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox US News