Tag Archives: Robert Shiller

How Almost Always Being Wrong Has Changed the Wall Street Analyst

By Morgan Housel, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

In hindsight, everyone saw the financial crisis coming. The crazy lending, the high leverage, the soaring home prices. It all made so much sense.

In reality, few did. Some saw troubles, or imbalances. But very, very few truly foresaw the magnitude of what would occur in 2008.

And the surprise of 2008 wasn’t … a surprise. Wall Street analysts and economists have missed nearly every significant market turning point for as long as anyone can remember. In an interview two years ago, Yale economist Robert Shiller told me:

In particular, if you look at the Great Depression of the 1930s, nobody forecasted that. Zero. Nobody. Now there were, of course, some guys who were saying the stock market is overpriced and it would come down, but if you look at what they said, did that mean a depression is coming? A decade-long depression? That was never said.

I have asked economic historians, give me a name of someone who predicted the depression, and it comes up zero.

The proof of how bad we are can be just sad. Economists Ron Alquist and Lutz Kilian once looked at all the fancy math models and forecasts analysts use to predict the price of oil one month, one quarter, and one year out. They found that simply assuming that whatever the price of oil is today is what it will be in the future is one of the best predictive strategies. Is it a good strategy? No. But it was better than most forecasting techniques highly paid analysts and consultants use.

In another study, Dresdner Kleinwort looked at Wall Street‘s predictions of interest rates over a 15-year period and compared them with what interest rates actually did in, with the advantage of hindsight. It found an almost perfect lag. If interest rates fell, Wall Street would wait six months and then predict that interest rates were about to fall. When interest rates rose, Wall Street would wait six months and then declare that interest rates were about to rise.

“Analysts are terribly good at telling us what has just happened but of little use in telling us what is going to happen in the future,” the report concluded.

From 2003 to 2007, Standard & Poor’s predicted that 0.12% of a certain type of mortgage bond would default. In reality, 28% did.

In 2008, analysts predicted the S&P 500 would earn $94 per share. In reality, it earned $15 per share.

In 2008, oil giant Gazprom’s CEO predicted that oil would soon hit $250 a barrel. Instead, it soon hit $33.

For more fails, see here and here and here and here.

We live in a world engulfed by predictions and forecasts. Yet very few ever stop to ask the pertinent question, “What is the evidence that we’re any good at it?”

Those who have looked at it invariably come to the same answer: There is none. But we still lap predictions up, putting our faith in them to

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

16 Big Bubbles That Are Getting Ready to Pop

By Business Insider

Filed under: , , , ,

Alamy

With stocks hovering around all-time highs, many are wondering if equities are the next great bubble getting ready to burst. But stocks aren’t the only things that look frothy: There are a lot of other asset classes that sure look like bubbles.

We’ve compiled a list of the assets that analysts now believe are flashing the warning signs of over-inflation.

If you think we reached the peak of bubble-calls last spring when Robert Shiller diagnosed a “bubble on bubbles,” think again.

%Gallery-184509%

More from Business Insider:

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

On Humility, and What Forecasters You Should Pay Attention to

By Morgan Housel, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Yale economist Robert Shiller has been more right than most of his peers.

In 2000, his book Irrational Exuberance showed in clean detail how the stock market was overvalued. In 2004, the second edition of the book described how and why the housing market was an accident waiting to happen.

Shiller’s background makes him worth listening to. He has the credibility to make forecasts on the economy and financial markets — a distinction the great majorities of economists lack.

Yet when you listen to him talk, he is perhaps the most hesitant economist in the world. When I interviewed him a year ago, nearly every question was answered with some version of “I don’t know,” “It’s hard to say,” “It’s just too uncertain,” or “That’s impossible to tell.”

It may seem counterintuitive, but Shiller’s hesitancy to forecast is part of what has made him a good forecaster in the past. He is only willing to lay down a firm opinion during periods of wild extremes, when the stars align and the odds of making a good forecast are at their highest. Otherwise, he shrugs his shoulders. That respect for uncertainty sets him, and his record for being right, apart.

Last month, I sat down with Hoover Institute economist Russ Roberts. I asked him how to make sense of forecasts and opinions in a world where smart people are so bad at forecasting — a world with too few Shillers. Here’s what Roberts had to say:

The article On Humility, and What Forecasters You Should Pay Attention to originally appeared on Fool.com.

Morgan Housel doesn’t own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

(function(c,a){window.mixpanel=a;var b,d,h,e;b=c.createElement(“script”);
b.type=”text/javascript”;b.async=!0;b.src=(“https:”===c.location.protocol?”https:”:”http:”)+
‘//cdn.mxpnl.com/libs/mixpanel-2.2.min.js’;d=c.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0];
d.parentNode.insertBefore(b,d);a._i=[];a.init=function(b,c,f){function d(a,b){
var c=b.split(“.”);2==c.length&&(a=a[c[0]],b=c[1]);a[b]=function(){a.push([b].concat(
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments,0)))}}var g=a;”undefined”!==typeof f?g=a[f]=[]:
f=”mixpanel”;g.people=g.people||[];h=[‘disable’,’track’,’track_pageview’,’track_links’,
‘track_forms’,’register’,’register_once’,’unregister’,’identify’,’alias’,’name_tag’,
‘set_config’,’people.set’,’people.increment’];for(e=0;e<h.length;e++)d(g,h[e]);
a._i.push([b,c,f])};a.__SV=1.2;})(document,window.mixpanel||[]);
mixpanel.init("9659875b92ba8fa639ba476aedbb73b9");

function addEvent(obj, evType, fn, useCapture){
if (obj.addEventListener){
obj.addEventListener(evType, fn, useCapture);
return true;
} else if (obj.attachEvent){
var r = obj.attachEvent("on"+evType, fn);
return r;
}
}

addEvent(window, …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance