Tag Archives: Joseph Farah

China’s Central Bank Holding Americans Hostage

By Floyd Brown

Red China flag SC Chinas Central Bank Holding Americans Hostage

I travel around the world to uncover stories that impact Capitol Hill. Often, the most important stories need an outsider’s perspective to understand them. This week, I spoke at conference called FreedomFest 2013. This conference included some of the greatest strategic thinkers in the world, and several had chilling comments about China.

Jim Rogers, Steve Forbes, Alex Green, Mark Skousen, Joseph Farah, and Bert Dohmen are just a few of the thinkers who shared their insights about investments and governance in a world of increasing risk. I deeply value the opinions of the unique minds attending FreedomFest. And this year, an important trend has emerged. This trend is influencing events that will impact your life and your investments…

The collected voices share a great fear about what lies directly ahead for China. China’s central bank responded aggressively to the financial crisis of 2008. It responded with liquidity and easy money. And this flood of easy money has helped produce an incredible array of malinvestment. (Austrian School economists developed the concept of malinvestment to explain the consequences of a central bank providing too much monetary stimulus.)

As applied to China, the story goes something like this…

Big Trouble in… Big China

Governments and firms were required to keep the economy growing at all costs, which led them to poorly allocate the excess funds. This flood of artificially cheap money paid for projects that require huge debt service payments, but provide little economic value.

For example, highways and bridges to nowhere were built. High rise apartment buildings remain vacant, and entire cities are ghost towns waiting for businesses and inhabitants to show up. One of the most colorful descriptions I heard was of the Guangzhou South Train Station. This colossus of a station is eerily vacant. Imagine going into Grand Central Station, and not a soul is in sight…

What’s more, China’s Vice Finance Minister, Zhu Guangyao, admitted this month that local government debt levels are unknown. Official figures haven’t been released since 2010 and are likely much greater than the forecast 10.7 trillion yuan ($1.7 trillion).

Estimates of China’s local government debts range from Standard Chartered Bank’s 15% of GDP at the end of 2012, to Credit Suisse Bank’s 36%. The debt rating agency Fitch forecasts that the figure is 25% of GDP, so it downgraded China’s sovereign debt rating in April.

Collapse on the Horizon

Now that the stimulus of 2008 has worn off, the economy is in worse shape than before. China is currently dealing with an overhang of excess debt, along with too much factory inventory and housing capacity. These excess supplies have become dead weight. Therefore, China is again scrambling to stir up growth, and officials will be forced to order more stimulus. The big concern now is that the excess debt will cause a full-scale economic collapse.

The clearest sign of distress in China can be seen via the inverted yield curve. An inverted yield curve happens when short-term interest rates become higher than long-term interest rates. This means that there’s a structural problem …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

Video: Hawaii Gov. Used Search Warrant To Find Obama Birth Certificate

By Daniel Noe

Of course, it was a failed attempt!

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism

What Difference Does It Make…?

By Tom Ballantyne Jr.

Author’s Note – I began my most recent post with the following:

“I never imagined that I’d find myself quoting Bill’s one-time heart throb (okay, eons of time ago), but using her just happens to suit my purpose. (Guess Bill and I aren’t so different after all….)”


Due to an inadvertent title change (the title was to have been the same as this one’s), readers were no doubt puzzled by this. Hopefully, this will clear things up.


Anyone who registers even the faintest EKG response realizes that the “Mainstream Media” isn’t mainstream. So if you felt your not insignificant intelligence was being insulted…and therefore didn’t dive headlong into the piece, I’d ask you to reconsider, as I believe our perception of the establishment media (which almost no one in this audience either reads or watches) is at the very root of all that ails us…and I mean that with absolute sincerity!


Note that I did not say that the endangered media is the problem, but that our perception of it is. Hear me out….


Every national Conservative pundit I know, with the exception of Rush Limbaugh (who has famously – and accurately – dubbed them the “Drive-by” or “Endangered Media”), Michael Savage, and Joseph Farah (who both refer to them as the “so-called ‘mainstream’ media”), mindlessly refers to them as the “mainstream” or “MSM” – freely bestowing upon them the highest of both compliments and credibility!


Would we have called the Communists’ Pravda (far more conservative today than our own state-controlled press!) the Soviet Union’s “mainstream” media? Of course not! It was nothing more than a state-owned organ of propaganda…and while George Soros may not own the New York Times outright (or even in part), it is clear that he, his allies, and his pawns are in lockstep with its entire agenda. (Obviously everything I have said about the networks applies to the so-called “Newspaper of Record,” as well as to its counterparts from coast to coast – whose viewership and coffers are also universally, and happily, “on the brink.”)


To put this in perspective I will recount an experience I had last spring, when AZ State Representative Carl Seel took me by to introduce me to then Speaker of the House, Andy Tobin. It was a Friday afternoon, perhaps 2:00 or 3:00, and the Speaker had gone for the week, as it turned out. His secretary dutifully wrote down my name and phone number, however, promising to have him call me…which, of course, he never did. I knew little about the Speaker at that time, but have since learned all I need to know: he’s a “Republican” – not a Conservative, and a “politician” – not a Statesman, as best I can tell. (It’s difficult, of course, to know any of our “representatives” well when they refuse to respond to their constituents!


As I left his office that day, and passed through the deserted anteroom, there on a …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism