Tag Archives: Jeff Gundlach

The Most Inevitable Headline of All Time

By Morgan Housel, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

After the Dow Jones hit a new record high this week, more than double off its 2009 lows, the Wall Street Journal published one of the most inevitable headlines of all time.

“Market Rewarded Those Who Stuck It Out,” it read.

You don’t say.

The only thing worse than suffering through a period like the last five years is suffering through and not learning anything from it. To me, there are three imperative investment lessons from the last five years. That “markets reward those who stick it out” is one of them.

For those who stuck out for the last five years, the 2008 crash — literally one of the sharpest wealth destroyers in history — is now a set of painful memories at worst, and a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity at best. If you did nothing, your portfolio is likely larger today than it was in 2007. If you bought steadily over the last five years, it’s probably much larger. Only if you sold near the bottom and hid somewhere else have you lost money.

History is clear on this: Hold stocks for a long time, and your odds of making money are very high. Since 1871, there have only been four periods when an investor purchasing stocks didn’t make money in real (inflation-adjusted) terms over a 10-year period: 1908, 1929, the late 1960s, and the late 1990s:

Source: Robert Shiller, author’s calculations. 

If you purchased stocks once a month, every month, since 1871, 87.8% of your purchases would be profitable 10 years out, even adjusted for inflation. The four brief periods that left you in the red after a decade were invariably followed by above-average returns. That period includes the aftermath of a civil war, two world wars, a flu pandemic, terrorist attacks, droughts, presidential assassinations, depressions, recessions, crippling debts, bank runs, high inflation, deflation, oil embargoes and a dozen bubbles. Through it all, the market rewarded those who stuck it out. It is the same story time and time again. It was no different this time around, and it will likely be no different next time around.

What else did we learn of the last five years? One of my favorite quotes from investor Jeff Gundlach is, “In risk assets, you make 80% of your money 20% of the time.”

During the 21,000 or so trading days between 1928 and today, the Dow Jones went from 240 to 14,000, or an average annual return of 5% (not including dividends). If you missed just 20 of the best days during that period, annual returns fall to 2.6% — which is to say, half of the compounded gains took place on 0.09% of days. That’s the numerical version of Gundlach’s wisdom.

Sure, if you missed the 20 worst trading days, you would have done much better. But most of the 20 best trading days and the 20 worst trading days happen during the same periods, often during the same months. No one can time the market so …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

This Apple Bear Was Absolutely Right

By Evan Niu, CFA, The Motley Fool

AAPL Chart

Filed under:

OK, Jeff Gundlach. You were right. Absolutely right.

The bond guru has maintained bearish sentiment on Apple for the better part of a year. Last May at the Ira Sohn Conference in New York, Gundlach went as far as to recommend shorting Apple while going long natural gas, a trade that he said had “monster legs.” Let’s look at the price of United States Natural Gas Fund compared to the Mac maker to see how “monster” this trade turned out.

AAPL data by YCharts.

Over the next four months, Apple would continue rallying and top out at $705, nearly 30% higher than when Gundlach recommended shorting it, while natural gas was up less than 10%. Following Apple‘s peak, shares have cratered and are now down 22% from his initial call, although natural gas has given up most of its gains as well and is now only up 2.6%. Not so sure I would call that “monster,” even though his prediction that Apple would eventually fall has come to fruition.

In November, Gundlach appeared on CNBC at a time when Apple was trading near $550. The fund manager then expressed his belief that Apple has lost its main product innovator and that it would soon try to pass off “tooty-fruity” iPad colors as innovative. His crystal ball told him that Apple would soon hit $425, which was $125 below prices at the time and represented a market cap loss of nearly $120 billion. I panned Gundlach at the time, saying his price target was absurd since it would put Apple’s P/E firmly into single-digit territory of 9.6 (or 6.7 excluding cash), and that Apple’s cash would comprise 30% of its value.

Right after the new year kicked off, Gundlach went back on CNBC to reiterate the same $425 prediction. He said that his call wasn’t about being a bond guru or a equity specialist, but merely because he’s a “market guy” and that $425 was about the price that Apple went vertical and that the “bubble” would soon have to pop and shares would return from whence they came. I wondered if he would ever be right.

By mid-morning today, Apple shares tapped a fresh 52-week low of $422.90. Gundlach was right. Investors are looking at a pullback that has now officially reached 40% since late September — less than six months ago. It took a while for Gundlach’s call to pan out, but pan out it did.

Not so absurd anymore
As far as those “absurd” valuation figures I calculated from his first $425 prediction, they’re even cheaper now since Apple has posted an earnings release since, which also happened to spark a plunge.

Since Apple’s earnings per share last quarter were effectively flat from a year prior (down $0.06), the previously estimated P/E is still right on target at 9.6. However, Apple did add an additional $15.9 billion in cash to its coffers during the fourth …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Are Apple Shares Rotten?

By Alex Dumortier, CFA, The Motley Fool

AAPL Chart

Filed under:

After spending most of the day in negative territory, stocks pulled out a win in the last part of the session,  with the
S&P 500
and the narrower, price-weighted
Dow Jones Industrial Average
ultimately gaining 0.5% and 0.3%, respectively.

The VIX Index , Wall Street‘s fear gauge, responded well,  falling 9% to close a hair above 14. (The VIX is calculated from S&P 500 option prices and reflects investor expectations for stock market volatility over the coming 30 days.)

What’s going on with Apple?
It used to be that investors couldn’t get enough of Apple . Now, the stock appears friendless. Today, for example, the shares lost 2.5% while the broad market advanced 0.5%. That decline produced a new 52-week low and put the company’s market capitalization below $400 billion.

According to the folks at Business Insider, star bond fund manager Jeff Gundlach predicted last year that the stock would hit $425, so they went looking for a follow-up comment (the shares closed at $420.05 this afternoon). Here’s how he responded:

AAPL over the last six months offers a textbook case study in market behavior and effectively debunks efficient market theories. The weakness is all the more remarkable because it has occurred within the context of a strong overall US stock market.  SPX up 5% since September 19, 2012 and AAPL down 40%. [Note: SPX refers to the S&P 500.]

Is Apple a counterexample to the efficient market hypothesis, according to which stocks are always fairly priced because they reflect all relevant information at any given time? I’m not sure, but I think it certainly points to herd behavior among investors that produces stock price momentum (positive or negative). Take a look at Apple’s performance relative to the S&P 500 since the second quarter of 2012:

Source: AAPL data by YCharts.

You can clearly see two periods of divergence between the two: The first as Apple shares shot ahead of the market, peaking above $700 on Sep. 19 and the second one, which is ongoing, during which the shares are underperforming. As far as herding goes, according to Goldman Sachs, the investment bank, Apple was the most heavily owned stock among hedge funds at the end of 2010 and 2011. That was not the case at the end of last year, as the stock fell to third place in Goldman’s ranking behind AIG And Google. In other words, pile in as a group and leave together as well.

Momentum is a reality, but ask yourself: If you’re a value-oriented investor, when are you most interested in looking at Apple shares: when they are above $700 and everyone is clamoring to own them or when they are no longer the flavor of the month and the price …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Links 23 Feb: Google's Streaming Music, Google's Crime Fighting

By Tim Worstall, Contributor Several interesting little stories around concerning Google. For example, Google has now been used to track down an art thief or two: Is Google becoming a key arm of the law-enforcement complex? It certainly seems to be so with respect to art thefts. I first came across this idea back in November, when Bloomberg Markets profiled Jeff Gundlach, who was hit by art thieves in September: …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

The Most Interesting Chart from Jeff Gundlach's Recent Presentation

By Marc Prosser, Contributor Recently bond guru and DoubleLine Capital Co-Founder Jeff Gundlach gave his market outlook presentation for 2013.  As always the presentation was information packed, but the below chart really stood out to me. (don’t know who Jeff Gundlach is?  Go here.)
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest