Tag Archives: ICI

Savvy Ways to Manage Your IRA Savings

By The Associated Press

Filed under: , , , ,

Alamy

By MARK JEWELL

BOSTON — When it comes to retirement planning, most of the focus is placed on 401(k)s. The reality is that individual retirement accounts represent the largest share of America’s savings.

At the end of last year, IRAs had $5.4 trillion in assets compared with $5.1 trillion in 401(k)s and other defined contribution plans. Some 40 percent of U.S. households own at least one type of IRA, which offer tax incentives to save for retirement.

Many of these IRA holders are left to their own devices to manage their accounts. Of course, some investors are take-charge types with the ability to maximize savings without taking on too much risk. But in many other instances, portfolio management is hit-or-miss, with little attention to selecting an appropriate mix of mutual funds or other investments.

“Many individuals are still missing out on the long-term savings benefits of IRAs, simply because they don’t understand what they are and how they work,” says Dan Keady, director of financial planning for TIAA-CREF, a financial services company. In a recent telephone survey of 1,008 adults, his company found that nearly half of the respondents lacked a basic knowledge.

IRAs provide individuals not covered by workplace retirement plans with an opportunity to save on a tax-advantaged basis on their own. The money put into a traditional IRA can be deducted from the accountholder’s taxable income for that year, and the money isn’t taxed until it’s withdrawn at retirement. Also, workers who are leaving jobs can use IRAs to preserve the tax benefits that employer-sponsored plans offer.

Haphazard Management

With so many IRA holders managing accounts on their own, approaches vary widely, often to the detriment of long-term savings.

For example, surveys by the fund industry’s trade organization, the Investment Company Institute, found that low-yielding money-market mutual funds make up a far larger proportion of IRA portfolios than is typically considered appropriate. For example, the ICI found that IRA holders in their 60s had invested nearly 25 percent of their portfolios in low-yielding money funds. That’s four times larger than the average allocation to money funds in 401(k) accounts owned by people in their 60s.

Perhaps even more surprising, IRAs held by people in their 20s had an average 22 percent in money funds.

Sponsored Linksadsonar_placementId=1505951;adsonar_pid=1990767;adsonar_ps=-1;adsonar_zw=242;adsonar_zh=252;adsonar_jv=’ads.tw.adsonar.com’;

Among the reasons cited for the unusually high weighting: Money funds are often a default investment for small rollovers into IRAs from other investment accounts, and IRA holders may be more likely than other investors to keep invested savings readily available for conversion to cash.

Most investors use money funds as parking places for cash that’s temporarily kept out of higher-yielding investments. But it’s no way to build retirement savings because money funds have offered returns barely above

From: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/20/managing-ira-savings/

Does Apple's New Headquarters Spell Doom For Apple?

By Tim Worstall, Contributor According to the standard rules of thumb used by the British financial press the problems that Apple is having over its new headquarters building should spell trouble, possibly even doom, for the firm. There are many different formulations of the basic principle but this story from Businessweek would make many commenters reach for their version of it: He had that right. Since 2011, the budget for Apple’s Campus 2 has ballooned from less than $3 billion to nearly $5 billion, according to five people close to the project who were not authorized to speak on the record. If their consensus estimate is accurate, Apple’s expansion would eclipse the $3.9 billion being spent on the new World Trade Center complex in New York, and the new office space would run more than $1,500 per square foot—three times the cost of many top-of-the-line downtown corporate towers. Compared to Apple’s profits or cash reserves of course this number is very small. But it is indeed standard in the UK financial press to make comments about firms that move into new buildings. For example, Don Sull at the London Bsiness School has always used the presence of fountains in reception as a signal to sell. If they’re spending money on that then where else are they wasting cash? Other formulations of much the same idea include, back in the dotcom boom days, if the receptionist had a flat screen monitor rather than a CRT. John Harvey Jones, ex-head of ICI, has long used a very similar judgement call. Christopher Fildes, perhaps the doyen of English financial journalism, used to make much the same point as Don Sull. Indeed, it’s difficult now to work out which one of them was quoting the other. …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Latest

The Men Who Run Bunzl

By Tony Reading, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

LONDON — Management can make all the difference to a company’s success and thus its share price.

The best companies are those run by talented and experienced leaders with strong vested interests in the success of the business, held in check by a board with sound financial and business acumen. Some of the worst investments to hold are those run by executives collecting fat rewards as the underlying business goes to pot.

In this series, I’m assessing the boardrooms of companies within the FTSE 100. I hope to separate the management teams that are worth following from those that are not. Today I am looking at Bunzl , the “one-stop shop” distributor of low-value products from coffee cups to cleaning fluid.

Here are the key directors:

Director

Position

Philip Rogerson

(non-exec) Chairman

Michael Roney

Chief Executive

Brian May

Finance Director

Pat Larmon

CEO, North America

Philip Rogerson has been chairman since March 2010. Although he gave up one chairmanship and another non-executive position to clear his diary for the role, he remains chairman of another FTSE 100 company, Aggreko, and of FTSE 250 member Carillon.

His executive career was spent at ICI, and then British Gas where he served as finance director and as a divisional director, before overseeing the demerger of Centrica as deputy chairman.

Growth by acquisition
Michael Roney became CEO in 2005, shortly after Filtrona was spun off from the company leaving Bunzl as the distribution group it is today. He had been a non-executive since 2003, and as he stepped into the CEO role the former CEO, who had overseen Bunzl’s divestment of a swathe of businesses over a 14 year period, moved up to chairman. That would be frowned upon in today’s corporate governance climate, but makes for continuity.

An American, Roney worked for Goodyear in various roles before joining Bunzl, including being CEO of the Asian and European divisions. With Bunzl already focused on distribution, Rooney has led its growth by acquisition, rolling out specific market niches globally, with over 60 acquisitions completed. Revenues, operating profit and EPS have grown in each year under his leadership, and the shares have increased by 150%.

Company men
Brian May has been finance director for most of Roney’s tenure, taking up that role in 2006. A chartered accountant, he joined Bunzl from KPMG in 1993 and rose through the finance ranks. North American CEO Pat Larmon has also been with the company for a long period. He joined in 1990 when Bunzl took over a company he owned, and rose through the group to his current position in 2004.

Bunzl has six non-execs, with two new directors joining this year. They have credible and relevant experience with a bias toward distribution and retailing CVs. The company has a policy requiring executives holding shares worth at least their annual base salary.

I analyze management teams from five different angles to help work out a verdict. Here’s my assessment:

1. Reputation. Management CVs and track record.

Good.

Score 3/5

2. Performance. Success at the company.

Excellent.

Score 5/5

3. …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Is IMI the Ultimate Retirement Share?

By Roland Head, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

LONDON — The last five years have been tough for those in retirement. Portfolio valuations have been hammered, and annuity rates have plunged. There’s no sign of things improving anytime soon, either, as the eurozone and the U.K. economy look set to muddle through at best for some years to come.

A great way of protecting yourself from the downturn, however, is by building your retirement fund with shares of large, well-run companies that should grow their earnings steadily over the coming decades. Over time, such investments ought to result in rising dividends and inflation-beating capital growth.

In this series, I’m tracking down the U.K. large-caps that have the potential to beat the FTSE 100 over the long term and support a lower-risk income-generating retirement fund (you can see the companies I’ve covered so far on this page).

Today, I’m going to take a look at engineering group IMI , one of the smaller companies in the FTSE 100.

IMI vs. FTSE 100
Let’s start with a look at how IMI has performed against the FTSE 100 over the last 10 years:

Total Returns 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 10-Yr. Trailing Avg.
IMI -25.7% 98.4% 86.5% -16.6% 48.4% 20.2%
FTSE 100 -28.3% 27.3% 12.6% -2.2% 10% 10%

Source: Morningstar. (Total return includes both changes to the share price and reinvested dividends. These two ingredients combined are what make it possible for equity portfolios to regularly outperform cash and bonds over the long term.)

IMI‘s meteoric growth over the last decade earned it promotion into the FTSE 100 in 2010 and means that shareholders have enjoyed an average annual return of twice the FTSE 100 average over the last 10 years — not bad for a company that specializes in “the precise control and movement of fluids”! So does IMI have the makings of a great retirement share?

What’s the score?
To help me pinpoint suitable investments, I like to score companies on key financial metrics that highlight the characteristics I look for in a retirement share. Let’s see how IMI shapes up:

Item Value
Year founded 1862*
Market cap 4.3 billion pounds
Net debt 117 million pounds
Dividend Yield 2.4%
5-Year Average Financials
Operating margin 13.5%
Interest cover 14.0x
EPS growth 15.6%
Dividend growth 10%
Dividend cover 2.1x

*The company that became IMI was founded in 1862, but from 1927-1966, it was part of ICI, which it helped found.

Here’s how I’ve scored IMI on each of these criteria:

Criteria Comment Score
Longevity A long and respectable heritage. 5/5
Performance vs. FTSE Outstanding. 5/5
Financial strength Low debt, strong cash generation, but a big pension deficit. 3/5
EPS growth Strong earnings growth is expected to continue. 4/5
Dividend growth Decent growth with no cuts in more than 20 years. 4/5
Total: 21/25

Unlike many British engineering businesses, IMI has survived and prospered for more than 150 years. Although the nature of its business has changed several times over the years — until the 1990s, its main area of expertise was metals — this isn’t unusual for successful engineering businesses, which tend to be driven by a combination of scientific discovery and economic necessity.

Although analysts’ forecasts suggest IMI‘s earnings growth will …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance