Tag Archives: General Re

3 Reasons to Buy Berkshire Hathaway

By Steve Symington, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

If we were to ask the world to name the most successful financial holding company in history, it’s a pretty safe bet Berkshire Hathaway  would take the cake.

Why? As Warren Buffett pointed out on the very first page of his 2012 letter to Berkshire shareholders, the company’s per-share book value has grown by an astounding average of 19.7% each year since 1965, good for an overall gain of 586,817% — and, might I add, absolutely destroying the S&P 500’s perfectly respectable 7,433% return over the same period, including dividends.

To put that in perspective, if you had taken $5,000 in 1965 and achieved with it the same annual rate of return as Berkshire, today it would be worth a whopping $29.3 million.

OK, so it’s easy to look back and see how much money you could have made investing with Berkshire over the past 48 years, but does that mean the Omaha-based conglomerate won’t continue to outperform the broader market indexes going forward? Hardly.

In fact, here are three reasons you can feel great about buying shares of Berkshire Hathaway today.

1. Look who’s driving this thing

Source: AP.

While Buffett’s leadership has undoubtedly left its mark on Berkshire over the years, much of the company’s success has stemmed from (in Buffett’s recent words) its “cadre of terrific operating managers,” on whom he relies to run Berkshire’s underlying businesses with very little oversight.

That’s also part of the reason it’s so darned difficult to figure out exactly who Buffett’s eventual successor will be; the possible list of candidates includes a wide range of names from former hedge-fund manager Todd Combs to insurance head Ajit Jain, MidAmerican Energy’s Gregory Abel, Geico’s Tony Nicely, and Tad Montross of General Re.

In any case, Buffett made it clear in his 2011 shareholder letter that Berkshire has already chosen not only his successor, but also “two superb back-up candidates as well.”

In the same paragraph, Buffett then reminded us that more than 98% of his net worth is in Berkshire stock. He elaborated:

Being so heavily concentrated in one stock defies conventional wisdom. But I’m fine with this arrangement, knowing both the quality and diversity of the businesses we own and the caliber of the people who manage them. With these assets, my successor will enjoy a running start.

Which brings me to the next reason you might consider buying shares of Berkshire.

2. Taking over the world, one business at a time
Of course, great leadership certainly can’t hurt. Buffett himself often says he likes to find businesses capable of performing well even in spite of the occasional bad manager, even half-joking once that Coca-Cola could be run by a ham sandwich.

Luckily for Berkshire shareholders, Buffett hasn’t had to test that principle, thanks largely to its massive, stable insurance segment, which includes industry behemoths Geico and General Re. As I noted recently, however, Berkshire also made nearly $9.7 billion last year from its stakes in chemical maker Lubrizol, industrial …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Exclusive Interview with Former AIG CEO Hank Greenberg: How AIG Went Off Track

By Morgan Housel, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

I sat down with former AIG chairman and CEO Hank Greenberg this week. We talked about everything from AIG‘s early days, its growth, to its downfall and bailout in 2008.

Below is one of the most interesting clips from the talk. I asked Mr. Greenberg a simple question: When did AIG go off track?

Here’s what he had to say (transcript follows):

Morgan Housel: When did AIG go off track, from being a first-class global organization to where it found itself in 2008?

Hank Greenberg: I don’t think AIG went off track. We had an Attorney General in New York, now a disgraced Attorney General

Morgan Housel: There’s actually a quote in your book. I’m going to quote it here. It says, “Eliot Spitzer, an elected public prosecutor in New York, sparked the process that would drive AIG to near destruction.”

Hank Greenberg: That’s correct.

Morgan Housel: When people think about AIG‘s downfall, they think of derivatives and leverage and liquidity. They often don’t think about Eliot Spitzer. What was his role?

Hank Greenberg: Very simple. I was on a conference call with analysts, and one of them asked me, “What’s the regulatory environment like today?” This is after Enron and Sarbanes-Oxley.

There was a change in the atmosphere. Boards of directors became less supportive of companies and their management. They were more concerned about their own liability after Enron. When I was asked this question, I said, “A foot fault is like a murder charge today,” which was a way of trying to dramatize the change that had taken place.

If you read the book, you’ll see there’s an affidavit by a man called Vacco, who had been the prior Attorney General of New York, and he happened to be in Spitzer’s office when one of Spitzer’s deputies came in and said, “Did you hear what Greenberg just said on an analyst call?”

He said no. He repeated that I said a foot fault is like a murder charge. Spitzer then said, in front of this prior Attorney General, “I’m going to take Greenberg down.” He used some other language which was just a disgrace for him to be saying that. It’s in the book.

He used that. He was running for governor. He wanted to take down big names, and he went on a campaign to do that.

He focused on a transaction we did with Warren Buffett‘s company, General Re, which was our largest reinsurance partner. It was five years old, it had no effect on shareholders’ equity or earnings per share — nothing to do with that. It was a peanut transaction, and he tried to make that into a murder charge, and was successful. The board just gave up supporting the CEO.

Now, I was going to step down as the CEO in May. This was in March of 2005. I was going to step down as CEO, stay as chairman to make sure the transition to a new leadership team would go …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance