Tag Archives: David Edelman

The Wireless Giants May Have More Than Unlocked Phones to Worry About

By Dan Radovsky, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

More than 114,000 people signed the We the People petition asking the White House to decriminalize the unlocking of cell phones. That cry was heard, answered, and clearly agreed with by the administration.

“Neither criminal law nor technological locks should prevent consumers from switching carriers when they are no longer bound by a service agreement or other obligation,” wrote R. David Edelman, the White House senior advisor for Internet, innovation, and privacy.

But will this support from the highest levels of government finally get jailbreaking cell-phone owners out of darkened alleyways?

Not if the major wireless carriers can stop it, and they have every business reason to try to do so.

First, carriers spend billions of dollars on building their network infrastructures and keeping those networks up to date. Then they must obtain the most desirable handsets from the phone manufacturers and subsidize the high cost of those phones to attract consumers to sign long-term contracts.

CTIA-The Wireless Association, which represents the larger carriers, such as Verizon, AT&T, Sprint, and T-Mobile, in its comments to the U.S. Copyright Office of the Library of Congress last month, characterized locked cell phones as common and important to its members’ business: “According to a recent survey, 36% of wireless customers received a free phone from their carrier, and many more received heavily subsidized handsets.” That practice of subsidizing phones, CTIA wrote, was a “key component to keeping wireless service accessible and affordable.”

That played off Librarian of Congress James Billington’s notice in October that locked phones played “an essential part of the wireless industry’s dominant business model.”

But once a cell phone is unlocked, the carriers still have ways to make changing carriers with that phone a pain in the neck, if not just plain impossible.

In the U.S., much of that pain is produced because of two incompatible wireless protocols used that the different carriers use: the GSM standard at AT&T and T-Mobile USA, and the CDMA standard at Verizon and Sprint Nextel .

The 4G LTE technology that most carriers have been moving to was supposed to remove the protocol mismatch by allowing subscribers to take their handsets with them to different carriers just by changing their subscriber identity modules, or SIM cards. But Verizon and AT&T rutted up that road by requiring phone makers to provide handsets that work only on each of those networks’ wireless frequencies.

A game-changer?
However, there are market forces coming into play that may pose an even bigger threat to the wireless status quo than just unlocked phones. With the growth of the “connected car” concept, vehicles with built-in wireless technology will need the capability of changing carriers as they are driven from one network coverage area to another. A “wirelessly locked” car is not practical, nor is having to physically change SIM cards when driving along.

That brings up the concept of the virtual SIM (also referred to as an embedded SIM, a soft SIM, or a white SIM), …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

The White House and FCC's Genachowski Say Owners Should Decide on Unlocked Cell Phones

By Dan Radovsky, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Wireless carriers such as Verizon and AT&T probably won’t be too crazy about FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski’s remarks regarding the recent ban on unlocking cell phones.

At a recent TechCrunch CrunchGov event last week, Genachowski said it “raises competition concerns; it raises innovation concerns.”

The ban makes it illegal for cell-phone owners to unlock their phones to be used on a wireless network different from which it was originally used. Since carriers need to keep subscriber churn to a minimum, making it difficult (or more expensive) to change providers would be to their advantage.

The carrier-friendly ban became effective on Jan. 26, when the Librarian of Congress removed the unlocked-cell-phone exemption from the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or DMCA. The legislation, enacted by Congress in 1998, was meant to make illegal any technology designed to bypass copyright protections. However, since the language of the DMCA was so broad, Congress gave the Librarian of Congress the discretion to issue exemptions to the law.

Obviously, this ban on modifying one’s own cell phone to use it on a different carrier’s network has led to some consumer outrage, enough so that a We the People petition was started that has gone over the signature threshold of 100,000 and now warrants an official administration response.

And the White House did respond with this from R. David Edelman, senior advisor for Internet, innovation, and privacy:

“The White House agrees with the 114,000+ of you who believe that consumers should be able to unlock their cell phones without risking criminal or other penalties. … It’s common sense, crucial for protecting consumer choice, and important for ensuring we continue to have the vibrant, competitive wireless market that delivers innovative products and solid service to meet consumers’ needs.”

In addition, the FCC released a statement from Genachowski, which included this statement:

“From a communications policy perspective, this raises serious competition and innovation concerns, and for wireless consumers, it doesn’t pass the common sense test. The FCC is examining this issue, looking into whether the agency, wireless providers, or others should take action to preserve consumers’ ability to unlock their mobile phones. I also encourage Congress to take a close look and consider a legislative solution.”
 
There will probably soon come a WeTheLobbyists petition pushing the wireless industry’s view. So, we will probably be hearing more on the unlocking question before it’s settled.

The Motley Fool’s chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report: “The Motley Fool’s Top Stock for 2013.” Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

The article The White House and FCC’s Genachowski Say Owners Should Decide on Unlocked Cell Phones originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Dan Radovsky owns shares of AT&T. The Motley Fool has no position in any …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

White House Responds to Cell Phone Unlocking Petition

Just days after FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski aired his concerns about the implications of the mobile phone unlocking ban, the White House has issued an official response to the petition launched on its We The People site. The response, penned by the White House‘s Director of International Cyber Security R. David Edelman, touched upon the Digital Millennium Copyright Act‘s inadequacy to keep up with rapidly evolving mobile technology in a highly competitive consumer marketplace and briefly mentioned what the Obama administration will do to address these concerns.

Continue reading…

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at IGN Tech