Tag Archives: Andrei Lankov

Pivotal NKorea question: What is Kim thinking?

Don’t worry, one popular argument goes, we’ve seen this before. Just ignore Pyongyang’s unlikely threats of nuclear holocaust as you would, say, a child throwing a tantrum.

Others, equally well credentialed, say the prospect of another Korean War has never been higher, with a massive, proud North Korean army incensed by propaganda specialists pumping up an already supercharged atmosphere with increasingly violent threats.

Who’s right? That depends on how you read the country’s young leader, Kim Jong Un. In his 16 months on the job, Kim’s government has raised fears with unusually aggressive threats against Seoul and Washington, and it’s not clear whether he will pull back, a feat perfected by his late father, considered a master at brinkmanship.

The mystery surrounding Kim Jong Un‘s intentions has some outsiders predicting nightmare scenarios.

“What makes this different from past ‘normal crises’ is our lack of insight into … Kim’s mind,” David Shlapak, a U.S.-Asia security analyst at RAND Corp., said last week in a transcript of comments released by the think tank.

The threats have continued, even amid U.S. and South Korean offers of dialogue. On Tuesday, the North’s military Supreme Command warned that unspecified retaliatory actions would happen at any time.

Figure out Kim, analysts say, and you may determine what’s happening in North Korea.

If he follows the playbook of his father, Kim Jong Il, he will tighten the screws just enough, in an attempt to push his adversaries to negotiations meant to win aid. Grandfather Kim Il Sung, on the other hand, gambled everything early in his leadership on a surprise attack on South Korea that resulted in three years of carnage that had U.S. officials dropping hints about the use nuclear weapons to force a resolution.

Some see the North’s sustained outburst as part of a long-established pattern meant to solidify loyalty at home, while also pushing Seoul and Washington to adopt more Pyongyang-friendly policies. Since the Korean War ended in 1953, they say, the rivals have experienced many cycles of hostility, often punctuated by bloodshed, without things spiraling out of control.

“There are no good reasons to think that Kim Jong Un, North Korea‘s young dictator, would want to commit suicide,” Andrei Lankov, a professor at Kookmin University in Seoul, wrote last week in a New York Times op-ed

From: http://feeds.foxnews.com/~r/foxnews/world/~3/Xrtxfvbh19E/

Experts say North Korea nuclear test an 'important step towards weaponization'

Experts say North Korea‘s successful detonation of a miniaturized nuclear device is concerning because it indicates the country may be getting closer to the ability to put a nuclear device on a missile.

North Korea drew worldwide condemnation Tuesday after it announced it had successfully conducted its third nuclear test, in direct defiance to U.N. Security Council orders to shut down its atomic activity or face more sanctions and international isolation.

North Korea expert Andrei Lankov tells Fox News that possession of such a “miniaturized” device would be necessary to create a nuclear warhead.

“It shows they are advancing their nuclear technology,” Lankov said.

He also noted the significance of the timing of the test, which came just months after North Korea‘s successful intercontinental ballistic missile test.

“It seems they are very close to being able to put a device on a missile,” Lankov said.

Peter Beck, an expert for Asia Society, tells Fox News the blast appears to be “significantly greater” than North Korea‘s past nuclear tests. He, too, said the test “…shows a greater commitment by North Korea to marry the missile and nuclear programs.”

President Obama was one of many world leaders to speak out against the test early Tuesday, calling it a “highly provocative act” and warning that the international community would act in response.

“These provocations do not make North Korea more secure,” the president said in a statement. “Far from achieving its stated goal of becoming a strong and prosperous nation, North Korea has instead increasingly isolated and impoverished its people through its ill-advised pursuit of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery.”

North Korea‘s official state media said the test was conducted in a safe manner and is aimed at coping with “outrageous” U.S. hostility that “violently” undermines the North’s peaceful, sovereign right to launch satellites. North Korea faced sanctions after a December launch of a rocket that the U.N. and Washington called a cover for a banned missile test. Pyongyang said it was a peaceful satellite launch.

Earlier Tuesday, South Korean, U.S. and Japanese seismic monitoring agencies said they detected an earthquake in North Korea with a magnitude between 4.9 and 5.2.

Annika Thunborg, who works for the Vienna-based UN nuclear monitoring agency the CTBTO, confirms to Fox News the blast was larger than past tests, measuring 4.9 seismically on the Richter scale. The country’s 2006 test, which was widely seen as a failure, measured 4.1 and the 2009 test measured 4.5.

Thunborg also says they are trying to find out if enriched uranium was used in this test. This would be significant as the first two tests used North Korea‘s plutonium stocks which are being depleted. Uranium could be derived from a new nuclear method and those supplies could be renewed.

The North said it used a “lighter, miniaturized atomic bomb” that still has more explosive force than past tests. North Korea is estimated to have enough weaponized plutonium for four to eight bombs, according to American nuclear scientist Siegfried Hecker. However, it is not known whether North Korean scientists …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox World News