Tag Archives: New York Federal Reserve

Why Apple and Bank of America Are Defying the Downbeat Market

By John Maxfield, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

We all knew it couldn’t last forever. Following 10 consecutive days in which the market closed higher — the longest streak since the 1990s — the Dow Jones Industrial Average appears positioned to finish lower for the first time this month. With roughly an hour left in the trading session, the blue-chip index is down 51 points, or 0.35%.

There was a slew of economic releases on the macroeconomic front today. First, consumer confidence came in worse than expected. The closely watched Thompson Reuters/University of Michigan index of consumer sentiment fell to 71.8, down from 77.6 in February. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg had expected a reading of 78. According to a market strategist quoted by The Wall Street Journal: “The drop in March is certainly out of step with some of the other things that we’ve been seeing. But [Thursday’s] jobless claims number was still low and everything else is doing OK, so I’m not freaking out just yet.”

On a slightly more upbeat note, a report by the New York Federal Reserve estimated that growth in the eponymous region’s manufacturing sector stayed positive for a second month in a row. Its Empire State manufacturing index came in at 9.2 for the month of March. This was slightly worse than the preceding month, but, as an economist told MarketWatch.com, the reading suggests that the level of manufacturing activity “does seem to be getting better” — though he went on to note that “it still hasn’t got to a point where we would call it strong, firm, or even normal.”

Finally, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released its estimate of inflation for the month of February. The data showed that consumer prices rose by 0.7% last month, equating to the fastest increase since 2009. The primary impetus was energy prices, which climbed by 9% over a one-month time period. On a year-over-year basis, meanwhile, overall inflation came in at 2%. For those worried that this news will encourage the Federal Reserve to ease off the monetary gas pedal, any such concerns are premature, as the central bank has promised to keep interest rates low until annualized inflation exceeds 2.5% or the unemployment rate falls below 6.5%.

In terms of individual stocks, the worst-performing component on the Dow today is far and away JPMorgan Chase , the nation’s largest bank by assets. After the market closed yesterday, the Federal Reserve released the results of the 2013 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review, or CCAR, the purpose of which is to determine which of the nation’s biggest banks will be allowed to increase the amount of capital they can return to shareholders this year.

While JPMorgan’s proposed dividend increase was not denied, the Fed is nevertheless requiring the bank, along with Goldman Sachs, to resubmit an updated version at the end of the third quarter in order to “address weaknesses in their capital planning processes.” CEO Jamie Dimon responded by …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Exclusive Interview: Why Former AIG CEO Hank Greenberg Sued the Government for $25 Billion

By Morgan Housel, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Hank Greenberg, former chairman and CEO of AIG , sued the government last year for $25 billion, related to the 2008 bailout of the company he founded and built. 

The common response when hearing that AIG‘s old boss is suing the government that saved his company is something between utter disgust and anger. It feels like the ultimate “thanks for nothing” move.

I sat down with Mr. Greenberg last week and asked him to explain the motive for the lawsuit. Here’s what he had to say (transcript follows):

Morgan Housel: You’ve recently been involved in a $25 billion lawsuit against the government, specifically the New York Federal Reserve.

Hank Greenberg: Not involved. We have commenced a lawsuit against the U.S. government.

Morgan Housel: Some people, when they hear about the lawsuit after the AIG bailout, they respond with a sense of shock. What was the purpose of that lawsuit?

Hank Greenberg: Several things. First of all, we have a Constitution in the United States, and there’s a provision against unlawful taking by the government. You can take anything you want, but you have to pay for it.

If you go back into the book and you see it started with Spitzer, it led to management changes and those management changes led to the company becoming deeper and deeper into the need for liquidity, so they sought liquidity from the New York Fed, from the window. They were turned down.

They tried to get a broker-dealer license, which would give them access to the window. They were turned down.

At the very last moment, Hank Paulson, then Secretary of the Treasury, calls Willumstad, who was then the Chairman of AIG and CEO. He says, “There’s only one deal we’re going to give you.” That was $85 billion at 14.5% interest. At the window, if they were borrowing, it would have been 1.5%.

As an aside, they opened the window to the Arab Bank, which was then 26% owned by Libya when Gaddafi was running it, so Libya could get access to the window, but AIG couldn’t.

So “14.5%, $85 billion, and we’re taking 79.5% of the equity of the company,” and incidentally he tells Willumstad, “You’re fired.” Here’s the Secretary of the Treasury, calling a public company CEO and firing him. Is this America? Does the government fire CEOs? I hadn’t heard that before.

He then says to Willumstad, “Sign that agreement” that I just related to you.

He says, “Just fire me. I’m not signing the agreement,” so Paulson sends in his replacement, a guy called Ed Liddy who’s on the Board of Goldman Sachs. He signs the agreement, still as the director of Goldman Sachs and resigns from Goldman Sachs three days later, retroactively. Very unusual, to say the least.

Of the $85 billion that they lent AIGAIG had about $800 billion of assets. They had plenty of collateral. They didn’t have to take 79.5% of the equity at the time.

Now you’ve got the $85 billion; …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance