Tag Archives: Doug Lamborn

Surprise! North Korea Might Have Nuclear Ballistic Missiles After All!

By Breaking News

Remember how Vice President Joe Biden, grinning and rolling his eyes like a madman, assured America during the 2012 vice-presidential debate that there was no reason to worry about Iranian nukes, because the intelligence community would know the very instant they were ready to deploy one? Within a couple of days, Biden was hiding under his desk and claiming that very same intelligence community fabricated the phony “spontaneous video protest” narrative of the Benghazi terror attack, making fools of the entire Administration by giving them false talking points.

And now it turns out that all those assurances we’ve heard about how North Korea can’t put a nuclear warhead into a long-range missile might have become suddenly… inoperative, at the very moment tensions on the Korean peninsula hit a post-war high.

Eli Lake at the Daily Beast – one of the best reporters covering the Benghazi saga, which the rest of the media ignored almost as hard as they’ve pretended not to notice the Kermit Gosnell abortion-horror trial – writes that new Pentagon report “says North Korea likely has nuclear warheads.”

According to the report, “DIA assesses with moderate confidence the North currently has nuclear weapons capable of delivery by ballistic missiles however the reliability will be low.” That line was read aloud by Rep. Doug Lamborn, a Republican from Colorado, on Thursday during a House Armed Services Committee hearing.

Read more at Human Events . By John Hayward.

From: http://www.westernjournalism.com/surprise-north-korea-might-have-nuclear-ballistic-missiles-after-all/

Pentagon: NKorea could launch nuclear missile

A U.S. intelligence report concludes that North Korea has advanced its nuclear knowhow to the point that it could arm a ballistic missile with a nuclear warhead, a jarring revelation in the midst of bellicose threats from the unpredictable communist regime.

President Barack Obama urged calm, calling on Pyongyang to end its saber-rattling while sternly warning that he would “take all necessary steps” to protect American citizens.

The new American intelligence analysis, disclosed Thursday at a hearing on Capitol Hill, says the Pentagon’s intelligence wing has “moderate confidence” that North Korea has nuclear weapons capable of delivery by ballistic missiles but that the weapon was unreliable.

Rep. Doug Lamborn, R-Colo., read aloud what he said was an unclassified paragraph from a secret Defense Intelligence Agency report that was supplied to some members of Congress. The reading seemed to take Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, by surprise, who said he hadn’t seen the report and declined to answer questions about it.

The DIA conclusion was confirmed by a senior congressional aide who spoke on condition of anonymity because the Pentagon had not officially released the contents. The aide said the report was produced in March.

Since the beginning of March, the Navy has moved two missile defense ships closer to the coast of the Korean peninsula, in part to protect against a potential missile launch aimed at Guam, a U.S. territory in the Pacific. The Pentagon also has announced it will place a more advanced land-based missile defense on Guam, and Hagel said in March that he approved installing 14 additional missile interceptors in Alaska to bolster a portion of the missile defense network that is designed to protect all of U.S. territory.

On Thursday, the Pentagon said it had moved a sea-based X-band radar — designed to track warheads in flight — into position in the Pacific.

Notably absent from that unclassified segment of the report was any reference to what the DIA believes is the range of a missile North Korea could arm with a nuclear warhead. Much of its missile arsenal is capable of reaching South Korea and Japan, but Kim has threatened to attack the United States as well.

At the House Armed Services Committee hearing in which he revealed the DIA assessment, Lamborn asked Dempsey, whether he agreed with it. Dempsey said he had

From: http://feeds.foxnews.com/~r/foxnews/national/~3/z4yuooghpWc/

Fuel industry envisions American energy independence as domestic production rises

By Jim Angle

The U.S. has discovered so much more energy than it thought it had that some now talk about the possibility for North American energy independence.

The reason? Advances in technology such as fracking, horizontal drilling and other improvements, which have increased natural gas production by 27 percent in just four years, have made the U.S. number one in gas — with oil on its way.

“We could make OPEC ‘NOPEC’ if we really put our minds to it,” says Charles Drevna of the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers. “We’re talking decades, if not into the 100s of years, of supply in North America.”

Rep. Doug Lamborn, R-Colo., of the House Natural Resources Committee says, “It’s amazing the amount of energy in North America. When you include our Canadian and Mexican neighbors, we have so many resources that it’s mind boggling.”

And Rep. Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., of House Energy and Commerce Committee adds, “We have the unique opportunity at this particular time in our nation’s history to really be energy independent.”

Jack Gerard, president of oil industry’s American Petroleum Institute says, “It’s very realistic that we could be energy secure as a nation. … It’s been estimated by the Energy Information Agency that we could be the No. 1 oil producer in the world by 2020, surpassing Saudi Arabia. So this is a big deal. It’s a game-changing opportunity, and it’s of historic proportions.”

Even those who share the administration’s desire to reduce the reliance on petrochemicals acknowledge government projections that the U.S. will produce one third more of its own oil by 2020.

One analyst, however, says self reliance must include alternatives, such as wind, solar and more.

“We can reduce our dependence on foreign oil by shifting to electric vehicles and investing in public transportation, as well as having much more efficient cars, which are already under way,” Daniel Weiss of the Center for American Progress said.

Either way, analysts say, being more energy sufficient could bring manufacturers back to the U.S., because they’d have a cheap and reliable source of energy.

“The primary driver right now the manufacturing industry is energy costs,” Gerard said. “When you look at those potential opportunities to build new chemical plants, to expand steel capacity, bring home a lot of those jobs that left over the past decade, the primary driver is the cost of energy.”

The price of natural gas has dropped from $13 to $3, giving the U.S. a huge competitive advantage.

In fact, the U.S. is producing so much natural gas, there’s talk of actually exporting it, meaning hundreds of billions usually sent overseas to buy energy would instead stay here at home to create jobs and boost the American economy.

…read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Fox US News