Tag Archives: Direxion Nasdaq

Profit From These Double-Digit Growers

By Selena Maranjian, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Exchange-traded funds offer a convenient way to invest in sectors or niches that interest you. If you’d like to add some big, technology-heavy stocks to your portfolio, the Direxion Nasdaq-100 Equal Weight Index ETF could save you a lot of trouble. Instead of trying to figure out which companies will perform best, you can use this ETF to invest in lots of them simultaneously.

The basics
ETFs often sport lower expense ratios than their mutual fund cousins. The Nasdaq-100 ETF‘s expense ratio — its annual fee — is a relatively low 0.35%. The fund is very small, too, so if you’re thinking of buying, beware of possibly large spreads between its bid and ask prices. Consider using a limit order if you want to buy in.

This ETF is too new to have a sufficient track record to assess. As with most investments, of course, we can’t expect outstanding performances in every quarter or year. Investors with conviction need to wait for their holdings to deliver.

Why Nasdaq-100 and equal-weighting?
Nasdaq-100 stocks offer the benefits of large-cap status, which can provide a bit more stability than small caps, and they’re often in rapidly changing and growing industries, as well. Equal weighting is a sensible way to structure an index, as it doesn’t let the biggest companies overly influence the index’s returns, when the smaller ones, which might be able to grow faster, are left less powerful.

More than a handful of big, technology-heavy companies had strong performances over the past year. Seagate Technology surged 52%. Despite that, with a P/E ratio recently below 5, it’s still a seemingly cheap stock. It’s been whacked by the decline of the PC, but there’s still hope as cloud computing takes off and requires storage, and if solid-state drives grow in demand. Some don’t like the prospects for Seagate’s main drive business, though, and think Seagate is cheap, but not that attractive.

Vertex Pharmaceuticals jumped 48%, as it looks to expand the application of its promising cystic fibrosis drug, Kalydeco. Vertex recently entered into a deal with Bristol-Myers Squibb to pursue a treatment for Hepatitis C. 

Micron Technology gained 41%, with bulls seeing growth in tablets and smartphones driving demand for memory chips. The stock soared to a 52-week high recently, when Micron posted its second-quarter earnings. Bulls liked the report, seeing lower costs and rising margins hinting at a return to profitability soon. Micron’s purchase of Japanese manufacturer Elpida seems promising, boosting its capacity and its relationship with Apple. Bears worry about Micron losing market share, though.

Other companies didn’t do as well last year, but could see their fortunes change in the coming years. Nuance Communications , a speech-recognition software specialist, slid 10%. Many had expected the health-care field to offer great new opportunity for the company, but now, some worry about competitors

From: http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/04/11/profit-from-these-double-digit-growers/

The Lure of Apple-Light ETFs

By Dan Caplinger, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

The terrible performance of Apple over the past six months hasn’t just hurt its shareholders. Just about anyone who invests in any sort of index fund has felt the pain of Apple’s 40% correction, given the tech giant’s status as the biggest company in the U.S. stock market.

When one stock can have such a huge impact on what’s supposed to be a diversified investment vehicle, it’s tempting to conclude that there’s something flawed about that investment’s methodology. Apple’s losses are a big part of the reason that investors are taking a close look at equal-weight ETFs to see if they can deliver better returns with less risk.

Hitting the big ETFs
It’s not hard to find proof of just how damaging Apple’s plunge has been. The popular PowerShares QQQ , which tracks the Nasdaq 100 index, has fallen 1.3% in the past six months since Apple hit its all-time high above $700 per share. That compares to an 8% gain for the S&P 500 — despite Apple’s sizable weighting in that index — and a similar gain of 7% for the Apple-free Dow Jones Industrials excluding dividends.

You can see another sign of the massive hit that Apple has had on the index by looking at the Direxion Nasdaq-100 Equal-Weight ETF, which has gained more than 9% since last September. In that ETF, Apple has only a 1% weighting rather than the 13% weight that the tech giant has in the PowerShares ETF.

Proponents of equal-weight funds argue that this proves the validity of their strategy. Rather than taking market capitalization into account in buying more of some stocks than others, equal-weight funds simply buy equal amounts of every stock in an index. The result is a truly diversified portfolio that gets rebalanced regularly to incorporate changes in share price.

Over the long haul, the equal-weight strategy has worked very well. Given the relative outperformance of smaller, more volatile stocks compared to their larger counterparts, equal-weight funds have benefited from having greater weight on smaller stocks and less exposure to lagging blue chips. Although ETFs using the strategy have relatively short histories, similar equal-weight traditional mutual funds have histories going back 10 to 15 years, and they’ve tended to outperform the market-cap-weighted S&P 500 by 2 to 3 percentage points annually — a huge amount to see year in and year out.

A better alternative?
Interestingly, because equal-weight S&P 500 funds take away the vast majority of the weighting from the component stocks with the largest market caps, they tend to perform in line with mid-cap funds that only include stocks of similar size to the smallest stocks in the S&P 500. In fact, if you look at the returns for the S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF over the same 10- to 15-year time frame, you’ll find that it outperforms the S&P 500 by an even larger margin than equal-weight funds. Yet as a …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance