Tag Archives: BLM

California Dreaming of an Oil- and Gas-Free Future

By Rich Duprey, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Oil and gas exploration has the power to unleash a powerful job-creating force. California, with the worst unemployment rates in the country at 9.6% (tied with Mississippi and Nevada), could join in the jobs boom that would have it rival best-in-the-nation North Dakota, which boasts a 3.3% unemployment rate. But unfortunately for those looking for work in the state, a recent court victory shows the state has no chance of participating in that job-creating machine anytime soon.

Turning a blind eye
A federal judge ruled that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management ignored its responsibility in assessing the environmental impact hydraulic fracturing would cause when the agency doled out leases in California’s Monterey Shale Formation, which is estimated to hold some 15 billion barrels of oil. That’s akin to 64% of all the estimated shale oil reserves in the U.S. and is double the combined reserves of North Dakota‘s Bakken Shale and Texas’ Eagle Ford Shale.

Occidental Petroleum was one of the biggest winners of leases when they were handed out, but analysts at Raymond James have identified privately held Venoco and Plains Exploration & Production as among those also highly exposed to the Monterey formation.

Rockin’ the Bakken
It was of course the Bakken boom that ignited North Dakota‘s economy and sent its unemployment rate to the lowest level of any state (Texas is 17th on the list at 6.4% unemployment). It also happens to be one of the few states with a budget surplus. An oil and gas boom in California would go a long way to shoring up its chronic fiscal problems and pension woes, let alone leading the U.S. in surpassing Saudi Arabia as the top oil producer in the world.

The court decision, however, effectively bars any drilling on the contested 2,500 acres leased for oil and gas development until the fracking question is resolved.

A fractured future
In the fracking process, water, chemicals, and fluids are pumped into wells under high pressure to fracture rock formations. Proppants are injected to prop open the fissures and allow the oil and gas to flow more freely. Environmentalists charge that the process opens up the entire ecosystem to contamination, and in the past it has been blamed for everything from groundwater contamination to earthquakes. Considering California‘s history with quakes, its nervousness is perhaps understandable.

Heckmann is a leading player in the fluids-management area, and with its recent acquisition of Power Fuels — centered almost solely in the Bakken oil play — it seeks to become a one-stop shop for environmental services. It noted declining levels of activity in the Bakken last quarter, though a lot of that has to do with greater efficiencies realized. That suggests California might have been able to capitalize on the opportunity if a slowdown did manifest itself.

California dreamin’
There are still more lawsuits in the pipeline on other acreage because leases were granted by BLM under the same “flawed analysis,” according to one

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

California Fracking Lawsuit: Judge Slams Obama Administration

By The Huffington Post News Editors

SAN FRANCISCO -– A federal judge struck a major blow against fracking in California this week, ruling that the government was wrong to allow energy companies to drill for oil on 2,700 acres of public land without first considering environmental impacts.

The Bureau of Land Management‘s assessment of the land “did not adequately consider the development impact of hydraulic fracturing techniques,” wrote U.S. Magistrate Judge Paul Grewal in a decision made public on Monday that sided with environmental groups that sued the BLM.

The land in question sits atop the Monterey Shale, a formation of sedimentary rock stretching beneath much of Central California, which the U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates contains more than 15 billion barrels of oil. But the oil can only be reached through hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, an invasive process that injects vast amounts of water, sand and chemicals to create cracks in the rock and force the oil to the surface.

Read More…
More on Fracking

…read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at Huffington Post

Midway Completes Gold Rock Plan of Operations, White Pine County, Nevada

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Midway Completes Gold Rock Plan of Operations, White Pine County, Nevada

DENVER–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Midway Gold Corp. (“Midway”) announces completion and filing of a Plan of Operations (PoO) for the Company’s second project, Gold Rock. The PoO for Gold Rock, submitted to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) on March 21st, 2013, has been accepted as complete, and officially begins the project’s Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process. Gold Rock is scheduled to be the Company’s second operating gold mine and is currently targeted for production in 2016.

Ken Brunk, Midway’s President & CEO, stated, “We are moving forward at Midway. We are building a mining company. Initiating the permit process at Gold Rock is part of our strategy of developing a pipeline of projects leading to future production. We want to leverage the experience gained from permitting the Pan project along with the relationship we’ve developed with the Ely BLM office. Our first priority remains getting our Pan project into production near term. We are positioning Gold Rock to be our next mine after Pan.”

Gold Rock Project – Nevada

Gold Rock, 8 km southeast of Midway’s Pan project, appears to contain similar host rocks and styles of gold mineralization. The Gold Rock project is a Carlin-style gold deposit and the resource is open in all directions. Drill results from 2012-13 drilling will be incorporated into a new resource update later this year. There is considerable expansion potential with numerous exploration targets along a 12 km, favorably mineralized trend.

The Company expects the Gold Rock Mine will be similar to the planned operations at Pan. The Pan project is currently in an advanced stage of permitting and a Record of Decision from the BLM is expected in the fourth quarter of 2013. Pan will be a shallow open pit, heap leach mine in White Pine County, Nevada. Once in operation, Pan is projected to employ about 150 workers. The Pan project, scheduled to be the Company’s first operating mine, is targeted for production in mid-2014. Pan’s draft EIS was published by the BLM on March 22nd is currently in a 45-day public comment period.

Stock Options Granted – On March 11th, 2013, the board granted non-qualified and incentive stock options on a total of 2,545,000 shares of Midway’s common stock to directors, employees and consultants pursuant to Midway’s shareholder-approved combined incentive and non-qualified stock option plan. The options are exercisable for up to five years at a price of …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Midway Receives a Key Permit for Pan Gold Project, White Pine County, Nevada

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Midway Receives a Key Permit for Pan Gold Project, White Pine County, Nevada

DENVER–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Midway Gold Corp. (“Midway”) announces receipt of a key permit required for production at its Pan Gold Project in Nevada. A Water Pollution Control Permit has been received from the State of Nevada. This announcement closely follows publication of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). The Pan project is on track to start construction in late 2013 with production targeted for mid-2014.

“We are delighted to reach two major permitting milestones in the last week,” said Ken Brunk, Midway’s President & CEO. “This is a credit to a great team of people and our cooperative, professional relationship with the agencies involved. It is outstanding that we are starting our EIS comment period for Pan with one of our most important permits in hand.”

Midway received the Water Pollution Control Permit, which authorizes the construction, operation and closure of approved mining facilities in White Pine County. The Nevada Division of Environmental Protection determined that the proposed operation will not degrade the waters of the state and that public safety and health will be protected. There are no surface waters in the project area and the proposed pit does not reach the groundwater table.

The other major milestone was the completion and publication of the Draft EIS by the BLM. It is now available for public review. A comment period, required under the National Environmental Policy act (NEPA), will be open until May 6th. More information on this process and how to comment can be found in Midway’s press release dated, March 22nd, 2013.

Pan Gold Project, Nevada – The Pan Project represents nearly a US$100 million capital investment in a part of Nevada that welcomes new investment and associated economic opportunities (see Feasibility Study dated December 19, 2011). Once in operation, the Pan mine is projected to provide 150 workers with stable, high-paying jobs. In addition to direct employment, Midway expects the mine will have a multiplier effect by creating support jobs in surrounding communities.

Geologically, the Pan project is an oxidized, Carlin-style gold deposit mineable by shallow open pit methods and treatable by heap leaching. A Feasibility Study was completed in November 2011. It shows the NPV5% of the project is robust at a range of gold prices, ranging from $123 million at $1,200/oz gold to $344M at $1,900/oz gold. The IRR grows from 32% to 79% using the same gold price range. Both are after-tax figures (see press …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Get Rid Of Cows On Public Land, Start A Food Riot

By Fred Weinberg

Sacred Cow Taxes US Economy SC Get Rid Of Cows On Public Land, Start A Food Riot

The yuppies who think they know something about “public” lands are at it again.

They want to raise the grazing fees on the 87% of the land in Nevada that happens to be owned by the Federal Government.

Astonishingly, this time, the BLM is on the side of the people; and by that, I mean us. You and me.

Here’s a question for you.

If it costs a rancher more to graze cattle on “our” land, what do you think is going to happen to the price of beef? Do you think it might go up?

Yet Katie Fite, who is the “biodiversity director” (whatever the hell that is) of the Western Watersheds Project (whatever the hell that is) says that we ought to raise that fee because it is unrealistically low.

Let’s see.

The Government, which shouldn’t own the land in the first place, should charge more to use the land so we can produce food so our cost of food should go up.

Why, that’s the same thing as saying that we should tax oil at a higher level so . . . never mind.

Fortunately, even the Obama Administration understands that actually raising the cost of food could trigger a whole lot of unpleasant consequences up to and including food riots that the President doesn’t want to deal with while all of his other chickens are coming home to roost.

Who are these people?

Well, like most “conservationists” or “environmentalists”, they seem to believe that man simply isn’t part of the ecology.  That we shouldn’t be able to eat, have modern conveniences, and motorized transportation because while we may be God’s most advanced creature, our opposing thumbs don’t give us the privilege of using the land on which we live.

In short, these people are luddites. (If you are under 40 and went to a public school, google it.)

Meanwhile, they have forgotten something.  That land doesn’t belong to them.  They’re not the stewards of our future.  Their concept of ranching being “damaging” to the land is ludicrous.

They are as dumb as the global warming people.

Think about it.  If global warming is such a terrible thing, then Al Gore and his ilk must long for a return to having a glacier at the corner of Tropicana and the Strip. (Although I might point out with my tongue firmly planted in my cheek that it would be very difficult to have a car to car shootout on a glacier.)  They could rename the MGM Grand the Ice Palace.

By the same logic, the Western Watersheds Project would also like a return of the 30-foot meat-eating Allosaurus to our territory.  It became extinct about 65-million years ago, but we’re guessing that’s something the Western Watersheds Project cannot blame on today’s ranchers.

I’ve read much of the mumbo jumbo on their web site, and I have yet to figure out what these people are actually for; but it is easy to figure out what they are against. …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Western Journalism