Tag Archives: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

3 Reasons Investors Are Scared of Biotech Stocks

By Brian Orelli, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Biotechs offer the possibility of monster returns. Overnight doubles aren’t out of the question. Triples and quadruples as a drug successfully progresses through the clinical trial process are the norm.

And yet many investors shy away from the industry. Let’s take a look at why.

Down on bad news
Biotechs face many succeed-or-fail binary events over the course of drug development. Clinical trials, Food and Drug Administration advisory committee meetings, and FDA approval decisions all offer an opportunity for a monster pop or a monster drop.

As drugs succeed, they’re given a larger value, but that means if a drug subsequently fails, it has a larger effect on the stock price. Phase 1 failures tend to have very little effect on stock prices. Phase 2 hurts a little more, especially for companies with limited pipelines. Drugs that fail in phase 3 are quite costly.

For example, shares of ZIOPHARM Oncology were cut by two-thirds this week after its cancer drug palifosfamide failed a phase 3 trial in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. The smaller phase 2 trial suggested the drug was working, which built up the value of the company. The drug did delay tumor progression by a month, but the increase wasn’t statistically significant.

Down on good news
These days, it doesn’t take bad news to send shares down. Good-but-expected news is often enough to do it. After the excitement of the binary event is over, investors flee. It’s “sell the news” without the “buy the rumor.”

For example, Navidea Biopharmaceuticals  dropped 12% following the approval of its lymph node diagnostic Lymphoseek this month. The approval was widely expected after an earlier FDA rejection for issues at a third-party manufacturer.

In December, ARIAD Pharmaceuticals experienced the same issue with a double-digit drop after its leukemia drug Iclusig was approved by the FDA. Strong data and a fast-track designation got the drug approved quickly.

Down on unexpected news
The worst risk is the kind that can’t be foreseen.

At least with binary events, investors can see it coming. Data from a clinical trial will be released. The FDA will make a decision about whether the drug is approvable. The exact date might not be known, but at least it can be pinpointed to a month or two, with many events coming in a smaller window than that.

But sometimes events come out of left field. And they’re almost never the good kind.

Shares of Affymax , for instance, are down more than 90% year to date after the company had to recall all of its red blood cell stimulating drug, Omontys, that treats patients on dialysis with chronic kidney disease. The drug caused allergic reaction in some patients, which was occasionally fatal.

Didn’t you say something about monster returns?
I did.

While there’s a lot of risk investing in the biotech industry, there’s also the potential for insane increases in share prices. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals , for instance is up 550% over the last …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Is Johnson & Johnson a Cash King?

By Jim Royal, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

As an investor, it pays to follow the cash. If you figure out how a company moves its money, you might eventually find some of that cash flowing into your pockets.

In this series, we’ll highlight four companies in an industry, and compare their “cash king margins” over time, trying to determine which has the greatest likelihood of putting cash back in your pocket. After all, a company can pay dividends and buy back stock only after it’s actually received cash — not just when it books those accounting figments known as “profits.”

Today, let’s look at Johnson & Johnson and three of its peers.

The cash king margin
Looking at a company’s cash flow statement can help you determine whether its free cash flow actually backs up its reported profit. Companies that can create 10% or more free cash flow from their revenue can be powerful compounding machines for your portfolio. A sustained high cash king margin can be a good predictor of long-term stock returns.

To find the cash king margin, divide the free cash flow from the cash flow statement by sales:

Cash king margin = Free cash flow / sales

Let’s take McDonald’s as an example. In the four quarters ending in December, the restaurateur generated $6.97 billion in operating cash flow. It invested about $3.05 billion in property, plant, and equipment. To calculate free cash flow, subtract McDonald’s investment from its operating cash flow. That leaves us with $3.92 billion in free cash flow, which the company can save for future expenditures or distribute to shareholders.

Taking McDonald’s sales of $25.5 billion over the same period, we can figure that the company has a cash king margin of about 14% — a nice high number. In other words, for every dollar of sales, McDonald’s produces $0.14 in free cash.

Ideally, we’d like to see the cash king margin top 10%. The best blue chips can notch numbers greater than 20%, making them true cash dynamos. But some businesses, including many types of retailing, just can’t sustain such margins.

We’re also looking for companies that can consistently increase their margins over time, which indicates that their competitive position is improving. Erratic swings in margins could signal a deteriorating business, or perhaps some financial skullduggery; you’ll have to dig deeper to discover the reason.

Four companies
Here are the cash king margins for four industry peers over a few periods.

<td …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Company

Cash King Margin (TTM)

1 Year Ago

3 Years Ago

5 Years Ago

Johnson & Johnson

18.5%

17.5%

23%

19.8%

Abbott Laboratories

18.9%

19.2%

20.1%

13.6%

Eli Lilly 

19.5%

27%

16.4%

21.9%

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

Is This the Next Investing Bubble?

By Brian Orelli and Max Macaluso, Ph.D., The Motley Fool

Filed under:

With the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index hitting record highs, Motley Fool health care analyst Max Macaluso and Fool contributor Brian Orelli sat down to chat about whether we’re in a biotech bubble. Their conversation follows:

Max Macaluso: So, Brian, generalist investors love looking at indexes — like the Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500, or Nasdaq Composite — to feel the pulse of the broader market. It’s important to stay in tune with how the overall market is performing, but we both focus on the biotech sector. How can biotech investors get a quick snapshot of how stocks in this industry are performing?

Brian Orelli: There are a couple of biotech indexes: the AMEX Biotech index (^BTK) and the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index (^NBI). And then there are some ETFs that track those funds or another basket of companies they’ve created, the SPDR S&P Biotech ETF (XBI), iShares NASDAQ Biotechnology Fund (IBB), and First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology Index Fund (FBT) for example.

I think most people follow the NBI or the iShares ETF that tracks it.

Macaluso: The Dow Jones Industrial Average is hovering near an all-time high. Is the NBI also hitting record highs?

Orelli: It just hit a record high, but we have to go further back than 2007 — the last time the Dow was at an all-time high. The NBI was at this level back in 2000. Like the dot-com bubble, the biotech bubble burst, and it’s taken us this long to recover.

Macaluso: You’re drawing an eerie parallel here… do you think we’re in another biotech bubble right now?

Orelli: I don’t think we’re in a bubble. I was still in grad school during the last one, so I wasn’t covering the sector as closely as I do now, but I remember the euphoria for biotech. In contrast, I don’t think valuations are over the top today.

Keep in mind that overall value should go up over time. Companies are pumping billions of dollars into R&D. That should be creating more valuable companies. If it isn’t, we have a problem.

Macaluso: So if valuations across the industry aren’t inflated at the moment, what’s behind the biotech industry’s incredible run lately?

Orelli: The index has run up in large part because of a couple of key components that make up a large portion of the index. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals for instance is over 8% of the index. Its macular degeneration drug, Eylea, has been selling better than investors — and the company for that matter — had expected. Shares are up over 50% over the last year. Gilead Sciences has almost doubled over the last year as investors have high hopes for its hepatitis C franchise.

That’s the thing about indexes. There are 119 companies in the NBI. Euphoria for all the little guys can move the index, but so can monster moves by a few of the big companies. Those might be overvalued now — it depends on whether Regeneron can develop more drugs and, for Gilead, whether …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Investors Must Wait to See if Merck Can Improve-It

By Brian Orelli, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

One of the most risky issues facing Merck just got pushed back for more than a year. The pharma giant announced that the Data Safety Monitoring Board for its Improve-It trial took an interim peek at the data and recommending continuing the trial.

The Improve-It trial pits cholesterol lowering drug Vytorin — a combination of Zocor and Zetia — against Zocor alone, which is available as a generic. Back in 2008, Vytorin failed to decrease the amount of plaque in patients’ arteries compared to Zocor. But the Improve-It trial is an outcomes study — measuring heart attacks, strokes, and other heart issues — which is more definitive than measuring plaque in arteries.

Shares are up around 3% today. That isn’t so much because continuing the trial means it’s more likely that the trial will come out positive. Instead I think investors are breathing a sigh of relief because Vytorin isn’t worse than Zocor. If it was, the committee would have ended the trial.

Of course, continuing the trial also means that Vytorin isn’t decreasing heart attacks and strokes by a wide margin over Zocor. If it was, the committee would have stopped the trial because it isn’t ethical to continue giving just Zocor to patients if we know it’s inferior.

So the most likely outcome when the trial finishes in September 2014 is something in the middle. Either Vytorin improves outcomes a little. Or it doesn’t really do anything, but doesn’t hurt patients, either. That’s what happened with Merck’s Cordaptive. The drug looked great on paper (laboratory tests), lowering bad cholesterol and increasing the good kind, but when added to a statin like Zocor, Cordaptive didn’t lower the occurrence of heart complications than a statin alone.

It makes you wonder how many more times the FDA will approve cholesterol drugs based on laboratory tests. Amarin recently submitted Vascepa using laboratory tests as a surrogate endpoint. The FDA made the biotech wait until its outcomes study was “substantially enrolled” before it could apply, so the agency clearly doesn’t want to wait too long to see the outcomes data.

If it hasn’t already decided to require a pre-approval outcomes study for drugs in the works, you have to think that Improve-It failing to improve outcomes would push the agency over the edge. A multi-year trial would substantially delay companies developing drugs next-generation cholesterol drugs targeting PCSK9: Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals‘ REGN727 and Amgen‘s AMG 145 are in the lead. In addition to the delay and the added cost, it also makes them more risky because there are clearly no guarantees that positive laboratory tests will translate into better outcomes.

Can Merck beat the patent cliff?
This titan of the pharmaceutical industry stumbled into 2013 and continues to battle patent expirations and pipeline problems. Is Merck still a solid dividend play, or should investors be looking elsewhere? In a new premium research report on Merck, The Fool tackles all …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

IJH, REGN, HFC, EQIX: Large Outflows Detected at ETF

By ETFChannel.com

Looking today at week-over-week shares outstanding changes among the universe of ETFs covered at ETF Channel, one standout is the iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (AMEX: IJH) where we have detected an approximate $1.2 billion dollar outflow — that’s a 7.8% decrease week over week (from 141,650,000 to 130,650,000). Among the largest underlying components of IJH, in trading today Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASD: REGN) is off about 0.8%, HollyFrontier Corp. (NYSE: HFC) is down about 2%, and Equinix Inc (NASD: EQIX) is up by about 0.1%. For a complete list of holdings, visit the IJH Holdings page » …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Markets

IJH, REGN, HFC, EQIX: ETF Inflow Alert

By ETFChannel.com

Looking today at week-over-week shares outstanding changes among the universe of ETFs covered at ETF Channel, one standout is the iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (AMEX: IJH) where we have detected an approximate $132.2 million dollar inflow — that’s a 0.9% increase week over week in outstanding units (from 140,450,000 to 141,650,000). Among the largest underlying components of IJH, in trading today Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASD: REGN) is up about 0.6%, HollyFrontier Corp. (NYSE: HFC) is up about 0.6%, and Equinix Inc (NASD: EQIX) is lower by about 0.6%. For a complete list of holdings, visit the IJH Holdings page » …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at Forbes Markets