Tag Archives: Daniel Miller

Why GM's New Pickups Should Worry Ford

By John Rosevear, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Are General Motors‘ new Chevy Silverado and GMC Sierra losers?

A lot of Internet trash talk has been aimed at both full-size pickups since GM unveiled the just-redesigned new models in January. Even my Foolish colleague Daniel Miller has been skeptical, saying that the Silverado “looks to disappoint” when the all-new models hit dealers later this spring.

But I think it’s unlikely that the trucks will “disappoint.” In fact, I think there’s a good chance they’ll turn out to be great trucks once folks get a chance to drive them.

Here’s why.

More improvements than meet the eye
Most observers are keying off the new trucks’ looks — they bear a strong family resemblance to the outgoing versions they’re replacing. (The silver truck is a 2013 Silverado LTZ, and the red one is the all-new 2014 version.)

Image sources: General Motors.

But there appear to be a whole lot of subtle improvements baked into the new truck. GM certainly hasn’t been shy about saying so: The company called a press conference last week to tout its new haulers, pointing out, among other things, that a Silverado with GM‘s new 5.3 liter V8 got slightly better EPA mileage ratings than Ford‘s much-advertised “EcoBoost” V6 truck.

That sounds like a trivial thing, but a lot of full-size pickup buyers would rather have the V8, all things being equal — even if it’s a V8 that runs on just four cylinders much of the time to save gas, as GM‘s new engine will.

GM has been touting a slew of other upgrades, from the new truck’s impressive towing capacity to an upgraded interior. But all automakers do that when they launch new models. Why should we take GM‘s word for it?

Here’s why: Because after years of up and down quality, the company’s latest models have been very good.

Why a Cadillac bodes well for GM’s pickups
In any given month, GM might sell 50,000 pickups or more here in the United States. The combination of high volume and big margins mean that pickups are Ford’s most important single line of business — and they just might be GM‘s, too.

In contrast, GM sold just 15,751 Cadillacs in the U.S. in March — but in its own way, GM‘s ongoing effort to revive Cadillac is nearly as important to GM’s long-range profit goals as its bread-and-butter pickup trucks are.

Why am I bringing up Cadillac? Because GM‘s latest Cadillacs have been home runs. The ATS, a compact sedan launched last year, has turned out to be a genuine, legit competitor to the BMW 3-Series, one of the best-regarded cars in the world.

The ATS, simply put, is really good, proof that GM is doing great vehicles nowadays. Its big brother, the CTS, was just unveiled in New York, and it looks like another home run, a car that will challenge BMW‘s 5-Series and Mercedes-Benz’s E-Class head-on.

GM …read more

Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Why GM Won't Win the China Luxury Wars

By John Rosevear, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

The market for luxury cars in China is one of the fastest-growing — and most lucrative — automotive markets in the world. China‘s wealth explosion has led to white-hot demand for Western luxury goods of all kinds, from Rolex watches to top-shelf champagne. Luxury cars are no exception.

With its long-established position as the top-selling automaker in China, General Motors might seem to be in a great position to take a lead in this immensely profitable market. My Foolish colleague Daniel Miller recently made just that argument.

But I don’t think so. As I see it, GM is going to have to make a massive effort if it wants to gain significant ground in China. That effort will cost billions of dollars, and take (at least) several years to bear fruit.

And even then, it might be hopeless, because the competition is already well-established.

Sure, GM can beat Toyota and Ford, but…
Daniel (rightly I think) dismissed potential challenges to GM from the likes of Toyota and Ford . While Toyota’s Lexus brand is a well-established and credible luxury competitor in other parts of the world, lingering anti-Japanese sentiment from last year’s China-Japan territorial clash continues to hurt Toyota’s China efforts across the board.

In some ways, Ford is a more serious threat. While the Blue Oval, which got a very late start in China compared to its biggest global rivals, has nothing like GM‘s presence in the Middle Kingdom, it does have some top-notch products going for it — and those products are proving to play well with Chinese consumers. Already, the Ford Focus is one of China‘s top sellers, and the Escape SUV — called the Kuga in China – has been climbing the charts since its introduction a few months ago.

Ford is doing well in China by positioning its well-equipped mainstream models as premium offerings. But, true luxury cars are something else. While Ford is making a big effort to resuscitate its laggard luxury brand, Lincoln, that effort could take years to gather steam. Even then, it seems pitched more at the Japanese luxury brands rather than at the real global luxury heavyweights that dominate the market in China.

It’s those heavyweights — the big three German luxury carmakers — that stand between GM and success in China‘s luxury-car market. And they represent a huge obstacle: All three are formidable competitors and, to put it simply, GM isn’t yet in a position to confront them directly.

The German luxury leaders are another matter
Why will it be a challenge for GM to confront the Germans in China? For one thing, they already pretty much own the market: In 2012, BMW had a 23.6 percent share of China‘s luxury car market, Daimler’s Mercedes-Benz brand had a 20.6 percent share, and Volkswagen’s Audi brand had a whopping 29.6 percent share.

That’s almost three-quarters of the market right there. As for GM‘s luxury brand, Cadillac? It’s barely on the charts, selling just a …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance