Tag Archives: Value Line

Google Doesn't Know When to Say "No"

By Tim Brugger, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

In addition to its outstanding financials, part of what makes Google such an attractive investment alternative is its unending drive to innovate. From space age glasses to playing with the notion of a self-driving car, Google has quickly differentiated itself from every company out there — and that’s good. But its latest initiative — bringing home delivery of food and other goodies to Silicon Valley via its Shopping Express experiment — is just plain wrong.

The latest foray
In addition to the challenge of taking on established industry leaders Amazon and eBay , Google’s Shopping Express seems more like cockiness than a genuine, long-term revenue opportunity. At this point, shopping express is in a test phase, according to Tom Fellows, Google’s product management director. For the next six months, consumers in the San Francisco area will enjoy free, same-day delivery of products from the likes of Target, Wal-Mart, and several Bay Area food and specialty shops, among others.

You don’t have to be a CFO to recognize that margins in the home-delivery business are razor-thin, which raises the question: What’s the point of Shopping Express? Some have speculated that Google wants to drive more traffic to its site, generating additional advertising revenue. As it stands, shoppers can access Amazon.com or eBay either directly or using any search engine they choose. Users of Google’s Shopping Express, so the line of reasoning goes, would boost its site activity and, ostensibly, the amount of ad revenue.

Amazon’s Prime delivery service is viable primarily because of its widespread — and growing — distribution system. eBay’s model doesn’t allow for distribution centers, but it’s not trying to generate revenue with fast, home delivery. That’s simply a carrot eBay dangles to drive more sales.

Google hasn’t said what the service might eventually cost, only that “We’re still working out our long-term pricing plan but early testers will get six months of free, unlimited same-day delivery. The pilot will expand as we work out the kinks, so please stay tuned.”

Perhaps Google plans to work out some kind of deal with the retailers associated with Shopping Express, taking a bit off the top for each item sold. Or perhaps, when the testing phase is over, Google thinks consumers will be so enamored with the idea of sitting at home, waiting on their groceries, that they’ll fork over enough to cover costs and possibly even produce a slight profit.

The future of shopping express
The history of failed home-delivery efforts is replete with such names as Kozmo, Urbanfetch, and Webvan. They all died a mercifully fast and unprofitable death, after sucking venture capital firms dry. Retail’s a tough industry, as Target, Wal-Mart, and others like them will attest. Acting as a third-party delivery service by piggybacking on other retailers, as Google Shopping Express does, just adds another layer of expense on top of margins that are already too thin. According to Value Line data compiled by New York University, retail …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Value Line, Inc. Announces Third Quarter Earnings

By Business Wirevia The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Value Line, Inc. Announces Third Quarter Earnings

NEW YORK–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Value Line, Inc., (NASDAQ: VALU) reported results for the third fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2013. The Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q has been filed with the SEC and is available on the Company’s website @www.valueline.com/About/corporate_filings.aspx.

During the nine months ended January 31, 2013, the Company’s net income of $5,095,000, or $0.52 per share compares to net income of $5,835,000, or $0.59 per share, for the nine months ended January 31, 2012. Net income for the third quarter of fiscal 2013 of $1,747,000, or $0.18 per share compares to net income of $1,844,000, or $0.19 per share, for the third quarter of fiscal 2012. Income before income taxes, which is inclusive of the non-voting revenues and non-voting profits interests from EULAV Asset Management (“EAM”), was $8,080,000 for the nine months ended January 31, 2013, as compared to $9,384,000 for the nine months ended January 31, 2012. Shareholders’ equity of $32,857,000 at January 31, 2013 compared favorably to shareholders’ equity of $32,699,000 at January 31, 2012. As of January 31, 2013, retained earnings were $32,272,000 and cash and short term liquid assets were $13,895,000, respectively.

Value Line, Inc. is a leading New York based provider of investment research. The Value Line Investment Survey is one of the most widely used sources of independent equity investment research. Value Line also publishes a range of proprietary investment research in both print and digital formats including research in the areas of Mutual Funds, Options and Convertible securities. Value Line‘s acclaimed research also enables the Company to provide specialized products such as Value Line Select, Value Line Special Situations, and copyright data, distributed under copyright agreements for fees, including certain proprietary ranking system information and other proprietary information used in third party products. Investment Management services are provided through its substantial non-controlling and non-voting interests in EULAV Asset Management, the investment adviser to The Value Line Family of Mutual Funds. Value Line‘s products are available to individual investors by mail, at www.valueline.com or through 1-800-VALUELINE, while institutional-level services for professional investors, advisers, corporate, academic, municipal and legal libraries are offered at www.ValueLinePro.com and at 1-800-531-1425 or 1-800-634-3583.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This report contains statements that are predictive in nature, depend upon or refer to future events or conditions (including certain projections and business trends) accompanied by such phrases as “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “will”, “intend” and other similar or negative expressions, …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance