Tag Archives: Bristol Meyers

Johnson & Johnson Invokana PDUFA Preview

By Maxx Chatsko, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

It’s almost here! Johnson & Johnson is eagerly awaiting a decision on its type 2 diabetes drug Invokana (canagliflozin) by the end of the month. The novel small molecule inhibits the SGLT2 protein, which is responsible glucose retention in the kidney, thus allowing diabetes patients to maintain healthy glucose levels. Invokana has blockbuster potential as the first SGLT2 diabetes drug to (potentially) hit the market. Here’s what investors need to know. 

Pass or fail?
It looks like Invokana should have no problem gaining approval. The only thing that could put a lid on investor enthusiasm is the cautious outlook on the new class of drugs by the FDA. Bristol Meyers Squibb and AstraZeneca failed to get their SGLT2 inhibitor Forxiga (dapagliflozin) approved in November of last year, although the drug did gain approval in Europe.

What was the holdup? Forxiga showed a possible link to increased cancer risk. Invokana data has steered clear of a similar link thus far, but that didn’t stop a panel from voting 8-to-7 over long-term cardiovascular safety concerns. Johnson & Johnson is conducting a trial evaluating the long-term effects of Invokana, which is expected to wrap up in 2015. That should appease the FDA panel for the upcoming PDUFA and lead to a thumbs-up for the new drug.

Market competition: SGLT2 inhibitors
There are big advantages for a first-in-class drug such as Invokana. Pfizer’s ertugliflozin and Eli Lilly’s empagliflozin are the next SGLT2 inhibitors that will be thrust upon the market. Both drugs are in phase 3 trials at the moment, which pegs approval to late 2014 or 2015 and gives Johnson & Johnson a sizable window to get comfy with doctors and patients.

The FDA is also expected to reconsider Forxiga later this year after reviewing additional safety data. Should it gain approval in its second attempt, will doctors be able to overlook previous safety concerns and prescribe it over Invokana? 

Market competition: The field
Being first in class doesn’t automatically make a drug king, but being first to market sure helps. Merck’s Januvia was the first DPP-4 inhibitor approved for type 2 diabetes and is now the most well-established therapy. The franchise recorded $5.75 billion in worldwide sales in 2012. And despite Forxiga’s woes, the alliance between Bristol Meyers and AstraZeneca isn’t exactly out of the race, either. The Byetta franchise, acquired from Amylin Pharmaceuticals last August, brought in $227 million in 2012.

Usually, doctors hesitate to prescribe new drugs as first-line therapies in light of a smaller body of safety data. That would seem to bode well for Januvia and Byetta, except for a recent study that found patients taking either drug were twice as likely to develop pancreatitis, a potentially lethal condition. The study puts a smudge on Januvia’s squeaky-clean safety and side-effect profile and creates an interesting opportunity for Invokana.

Invokana’s blockbuster potential
Will doctors prescribe Invokana over well-established therapies with new safety data in hand? I think it’s …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Is Bristol-Myers Squibb One of the Best Companies in America?

By Brian Orelli, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Missed it by this much. That’s how it goes some times.

The Motley Fool recently published its list of The 25 Best Companies in America and while Bristol-Myers Squibb  made the initial cut down from 1,700 public companies to about 40, it failed to make the final cut.

For having such a long name and a history that dates back to 1858, Bristol-Myers Squibb is surprisingly smaller than most of its pharmaceutical peers. Quite a few younger big biotechs — Celgene, Gilead Sciences, and Amgen — have market caps larger than Bristol-Myers.

While bigger is often better because it helps with profit margins, I like the smaller, more-focused Bristol-Myers.

A few years ago, Bristol-Myers decided to slim down and focus exclusively on drug development. The company spun off its baby formula business, Mead Johnson Nutrition , and sold off quite a few other auxiliary businesses while expanding its drug development through acquisitions to fill its pipeline.

That forward-thinking attitude has earned it a nomination for the Fool’s top 25 best-run companies.

The case for Bristol-Myers Squibb
Drug development is risky business, but Bristol-Myers has protected investors by sharing that risk with other drugmakers. Its mega blockbuster Plavix was developed with Sanofi . Bristol-Myers’ next potential blockbuster, Eliquis, was developed with Pfizer . The company has also established a diabetes partnership with AstraZeneca , which led to the companies jointly purchasing Amylin Pharmaceuticals.

Developing drugs with a partner cuts into the potential profits, but it also shields the company from major hits if the drug fails. When Bristol-Myers has gone it alone, it hasn’t been pretty. The company purchased Inhibitex for $2.5 billion only to see the lead hepatitis C drug it got in the deal fail in the clinic.

Beyond shareholders, Bristol-Meyers treats the rest of the stakeholders with equal respect.

Like most drugmakers, Bristol-Myers has a patient assistance program to help patients pay for their medication. In 2011, the company provided 250,000 patients with free medications valued at more than $450 million.

More generally, Bristol-Myers takes its corporate responsibility seriously. In 2010, it set a series of goals to be completed by 2015, including reducing total energy use and greenhouse gas emissions by 15% and to reduce water use by 10%.

According to reviews on Glassdoor, only 68% of employees would recommend working at Bristol-Myers to a friend, although interestingly 91% approve of CEO Lamberto Andreotti. Many of the reviews complain that it’s difficult to advance in the company. Apparently everyone wants to eventually have Andreotti’s job, but doesn’t feel like that’s possible. Something for the company to work on, for sure.

The case against 
The marketing of drugs is supposed to be straightforward. The Food and Drug Administration approves a drug for a specific indication. While doctors are allowed to prescribe drugs off label, drugmakers are expected to limit their promotion to just the FDA-approved use.

In the past, Bristol-Myers seems to have blurred that line. In 2007, Bristol-Myers agreed to pay more than $515 million to resolve …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance