Tag Archives: Brian Lee

Is Molycorp Finally a Buy?

By Doug Ehrman, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

On a day that the Dow Jones Industrial Average set another new record high, shares of Molycorp hit a new 52-week low, closing just $0.12 above its lowest point in the last year. The company has suffered from falling rare-earth prices and the inevitable problem of operating in a market that is 90% controlled by China. Prices for the substances that form the company’s stock and trade have seen falling demand as the initial hype over those products has waned in the weak economy.

While there are no obvious catalysts on the horizon, the question for Molycorp has become one of whether the stock is cheap enough to warrant a long-term play. Trying to call a bottom is risky business and not really the Foolish way. With that in mind, I believe shares of Molycorp look attractive between $4 and $5 per share. Essentially then, despite the new low, the stock has room to fall further before it is time to establish a position.

How did we get here?
In the middle of March, Molycorp had two significant events that affected the stock in opposite ways. On the positive side, the company announced a five-year exclusive agreement between Molycorp Advanced Water Technologies and a subsidiary of Univar. Although the specific financial details of the transaction weren’t disclosed, the arrangement involves having Univar act as a distributor of SorbX-100, a cerium-based product used in water treatment; the product is sold to North American industrial and municipal wastewater treatment facilities.

The announcement led Brian Lee, an analyst at Goldman Sachs, to comment that the deal “should help quell some investor concerns around excess cerium capacity.” He believes the relationship will allow Molycorp to sell the entirety of its phase 1 cerium production by 2015. The announcement led to a 4% pop in the stock.

Unfortunately for shareholders, the news wasn’t sufficient to keep the stock headed higher. A disappointing earnings report, made worse by the fact that the company requested additional time before it was ready to report, has weighed on shares. In January, the company told the market that it was significantly lowering its revenue and cash flow projections for the first half of the year; additional stock and bonds would be sold to meet the expected $250 million deficiency in the company’s cash needs.

When earnings were finally released, the company reported a net loss of $359.6 million, or $2.91 per share, compared with $0.26 EPS, or $26.6 million, a year earlier. For the most recent quarter, analysts had predicted a loss, after excluding writedowns and one-time items, of $264.3 million, or $0.30 per share. Excluding the charges, actual results were a loss of $0.45 per share.

Looking ahead
One of the factors that led Molycorp to lower its revenue projections was inventories, both internally and with end users; depressed prices have not only created a glut in several key rare-earth materials, but the lack of sales has also hampered price …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Here's Why Shares of Universal Display Rose Today

By Steve Symington, The Motley Fool

Filed under:

Even as the wider market pulled back, shares of OLED specialist Universal Display  rose more than 7% during Friday’s trading, though they gave up some of those gains as the day went on.

So why the optimism?
As fellow Fool Eric Bleeker noted on Wednesday, Samsung was all set to release its latest flagship smartphone, the Galaxy S4, yesterday evening. Given Samsung‘s incorporation of OLED tech in its past Galaxy phones — and considering the fact the Korean conglomerate is currently responsible for the vast majority of Universal Display‘s total sales — anxious investors have remained on the edges of their seats to confirm to what extent (if at all) the Galaxy S4 would utilize Universal’s OLED materials in its screens.

The Galaxy S4 will go on sale next month and boasts a massive 5-inch AMOLED screen — up from 4.8 inches in the Galaxy S III — with an impressive pixel density at 441 pixels per inch. As a basis for comparison, note Apple‘s iPhone 5 has a pixel density of just 326 pixels per inch.

Of course, that doesn’t necessarily mean Apple fans will be swayed, especially when we remember CEO Tim Cook’s recent assertion that OLED screens’ color saturation is “awful,” while at the same time noting Apple’s own retina displays are nearly twice as bright. Even so, those comments seemed especially interesting after I noticed that, just a few days earlier, Apple may have quietly hired an OLED expert away from Korean electronics giant LG Display , fueling further speculation of Cupertino’s interest in the versatile technology.

In addition, just this morning analyst Brian Lee of Goldman Sachs added fuel to the fire by suggesting that, based on his channel checks, Universal Display remains “well positioned to benefit from [Samsung’s] upcoming Galaxy S4 ramp given its leverage to both red and green phosphorescent (e.g. emitter and host) materials” in the design of its display.

What’s more, Lee estimated Universal Display could end up collecting between three and four times as much revenue from each Galaxy S4 device as it did from every S III smartphone, “given its expansion in materials supplied from one to three types.” 

Of course, Lee’s perspective should come as little surprise considering the fact he has long remained a proponent for Universal Display‘s business and currently holds a $41 price target for its shares.

The bear case
On the other end of the analyst spectrum, let’s not forget Piper Jaffray analyst Jagadish Iyer who, just a few weeks ago, lowered his firm’s price target for shares of Universal Display from $18 to $16 after voicing concern that Samsung may also be using green host materials from Japanese OLED supplier Nippon Steel.

While Iyer’s comments helped shares of Universal Display fall by as much as 13% that day, his concerns appeared to be considerably overblown after the company skyrocketed 16% just a few days later following its solid fourth-quarter earnings results.

Now tell me how you really feel
While Samsung currently remains …read more
Source: FULL ARTICLE at DailyFinance

Life sentences in deaths of 2 Detroit-area women

The judge has ordered life sentences for three people convicted in the deaths of two Detroit-area women who were abducted, killed and buried in a park.

Wayne County Judge Vonda Evans called one man a “merciless mercenary” and another an “architect of death.” Reginald Brown, cousin Jeremy Brown and Brandon Cain face mandatory life in prison without parole.

Brian Lee proclaimed his innocence before he was sentenced Friday to at least 45 years in prison for second-degree murder.

Hamtramck residents Abreeya Brown and Ashley Conaway were stuffed in a car trunk at gunpoint before they were killed in February. Police believe they were targeted for informing authorities about an earlier shooting.

A fifth defendant was sentenced last week to at least 20 years in prison.

Source: Fox US News